MEMOIRS AND LETTERS
OF
CARDINAL DE BERNIS
VOLUME I.
<£our to JFtante Istrttton
LIMITED TO TWELVE HUNDRED AND
FIFTY NUMBERED SETS, OF WHICH THIS is
NO 969
A. F. Collet.
MEMOIRS AND LETTERS
OF
CARDINAL DE BERNIS
WITH AN INTRODUCTION
BY
C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE
CTranslatcU bg
KATHARINE PRESCOTT WORMELEY.
ILLUSTRATED WITH PORTRAITS FROM THE ORIGINAL.
IN TWO VOLUMES,
VOL. I.
BOSTON:
HARDY, PRATT & COMPANY.
1902.
/3S
1702.
v/,/
Copyright, 1901,
BY HARDY, PRATT & COMPANY.
All rights reserved.
Hntfcersttg -Press:
JOHN WILSON AND SON, CAMBRIDGE, U. S. A.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
INTRODUCTION BY C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE ON THE ABBE" AND
CARDINAL DE BERNIS, MADAME DE POMPADOUR, AND
THE STATE OF FRANCE UNDER LOUIS XV 1
TRANSLATOR'S NOTE 79
MEMOIRS : LETTER OF CARDINAL DE BERNIS TO HIS NIECE,
THE MARQUISE DE PUY-MONTBRUN 81
Part JFirst
CHAPTER I. — 1715-1735.
My Birth. — Childhood. — Education. — My coining to Paris. — En-
trance at the Seminary. — My Journey to Languedoc. — Return to
Paris in 1735 85
CHAPTER H. — 1735-1744.
Manners and Morals of the Age. — Cardinal de Fleury. — Cardinal de
Polignac. — My Journey to Auvergne and Languedoc in 1739. —
Return to Paris in 1741. — The Bishop of Mirepoix. — My Entrance
to the French Academy in 1744. — Men of Letters. — Women. —
The Great Seigneurs 112
CHAPTER HI. — 1745-1751.
The year 1745. — The Campaign of Fontenoy. — A few important
Events. — The year 1748. — The state of Affairs from the Peace of
Aix-la-Chapelle to 1751. — The Ministers in office till 1751. — My
situation in 1751. — A Conversation with Monsieur de Puysieux . 150
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER IV. — 1752-1755.
PAGE
That which preceded my Departure for Venice. — My De'but there. —
The foreign Ministers resident in Venice. — Affairs which I nego-
tiated during my Embassy. — Some interesting Particulars. — Jour-
ney to Parma early in 1755. — Return to Paris in June, 1755. —
State of the Court and Country in 1755 .......... 172
CHAPTER V. — 1755.
The Situation of Madame de Pompadour in 1755. — Capture of the
Vessels, "Alcide" and "Lys." — My Appointment to the Spanish
Embassy. — Secret Proposals of the Court of Vienna, September,
1755. — My first Conference with the Austrian Ambassador. — Ac-
count rendered by me to the King of the Memorial of Vienna. —
Continuation of the Negotiations. — First Secret Committee on the
Vienna affair. — Affairs of Vienna, Berlin, and Dresden. — My
own position ... ................ 195
CHAPTER VI. — 1755-1756.
The Affair of the Requisition, and that of Minorca. — Continuation of
Negotiations with Vienna. — The Treaty of Versailles. — Publica-
tion of the Treaty in July, 1756. — Further Negotiations with the
Court of Vienna. — The King of Prussia assembles his Forces, and
threatens an Invasion of Saxony and Bohemia ....... 220
CHAPTER VII. — 1732-1758.
Affairs of Parliament and what related thereto during my Ministry . 246
CHAPTER VHI. — 1757.
That which happened a few Days after my Entrance into the Council
of State. — The Crime of Damiens. — The Dismissal of Messieurs
d'Argenson and de Machault. — The Conclusion of definite Arrange-
ments with the Court of Vienna ...... . , .271
CONTENTS. vii
CHAPTER IX.— 1757.
PAGE
The Comte de Stainville and the Embassy to Vienna. — My Appoint-
ment to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. — Intrigues to remove
Mare'chal d'Estrees from the Command of the Army. — Negotia-
tions of the Duke of Cumberland with Marechal de Richelieu. —
That of the King of Prussia with the same. — That of the
Margravine of Bayreuth with me 296
APPENDIXES.
I. EXPEDITION TO MINORCA 317
II. TREATY OF VERSAILLES 321
Til . SPEECH or Louis XV. TO PARLIAMENT 325
INDEX , 327
LIST OP
PHOTOGRAVURE ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGE
CARDINAL DE BERNIS Frontispiece
By Callet (Antoine-Fran9ois). In possession of the family.
INTRODUCTION.
MME. DE POMPADOUR 26
By La Tour (Maurice Quentin de) ; Versailles.
CHAPTER
II. CARDINAL DE POLIGNAC 126
By Rigaud; Louvre.
III. MAURICE DE SAXE, COMTE AND MARECHAL 155
By Liotard (Jean-fitienne) ; Dresden.
V. MARIA THERESA, EMPRESS-QUEEN 204
From a print from a portrait at Versailles.
VI. JOSEPH PARIS, CALLED PARIS-DU VERNE Y 221
By Van Loo (Carl); Portraits Nationaux.
VIII. CARDINAL DE BERNIS (PROFILE) 284
In the Cabinet des Estampes, Paris.
INTRODUCTION.
BY C.-A. SAINTE-BEUVE.
IN the last century when young Frenchmen went to Eome,
where Cardinal de Bernis resided as ambassador of France
from 1769, and where he died in 1794, one of their chief de-
sires was to be presented to him ; and the first thing they
usually found to say was to thank him for the pleasure his
pretty verses had afforded them ; on which they were much
surprised that the prelate did not answer their compliments as
they expected, and that he kept all his amiability and charm
for other topics of conversation. I shall not imitate those
young Frenchmen of 1780, and shall carefully avoid the
mistake into which they fell. There are very distinct periods
to be observed when we speak of Bernis ; he was not cardinal
until he was forty-three years old, and he did not really
take Orders until he was forty. Up to that time he was an
abb6 as many men were in those days, having the title and a
few benefices ; but he was not bound to the profession ; he
was not a priest in any degree ; and in 1755, at the age of
forty, we shall see him hesitate much before taking the step
of which he felt the danger, and from which his delicacy as
an honest man had hitherto deterred him. " I have bound
myself to my profession," he writes to Paris-Duverney
(April 19, 1755), " and I have taken the step after so much
reflection that I hope I shall never repent it."
As for his gay little verses, they belong to his youth ; he
had ceased to make them before he was thirty-five years old.
VOL. I. — 1
2 INTRODUCTION.
" I have totally abandoned poetry for the last eleven years,"
he writes to Voltaire in 1761. " I knew that my little talent
injured me in my profession and at Court ; I ceased to prac-
tise it without regret, because I did not think much of it, and
I have never liked whatever was mediocre. I write no more
verses and I read few, unless they are, like yours, full of soul,
strength, and harmony ; I prefer history." It is necessary,
therefore, in speaking of Bernis to mark his epochs distinctly,
if we desire to be just towards one of the most graceful and
most polished minds of the last century, towards a man of
real capacity more extensive than people think, a man who
knew how to redeem his literary weaknesses and his political
pliancy by a decent and useful middle-age and by an honour-
able end. Documents recently issuing from the archives of
the Vatican cast light upon the second half of his career,
while he was ambassador of France in Eome. To these I
shall presently refer ; but first I desire to speak of the more
frivolous Abbd de Bernis, from whom we shall see the serious
man insensibly emerging.
He was born at Saint-Marcel d'Ardeche in Vivarais, May
22, 1715, of an ancient race of high nobility. As a younger
son he was destined for the Church. He came to Paris
for his first studies at the Jesuit college (Louis-le-Grand),
and he did his philosophy and his theology at the sem-
inary of Saint-Sulpice and the Sorbonne. "We find him
successively canon and Comte de Brioude, canon and Comte
de Lyon, that is to say, a member of chapters for which he
was required to give proofs of very ancient nobility ; these
positions were for him merely honorary. While awaiting
benefices which did not come (having only a very insignifi-
cant one at Boulogne-sur-mer) the Abbe*-Comte de Bernis
entered society, for which he was made, especially that portion
of it which is called the great world, but in it he lived as
INTRODUCTION. 3
poor as the poorest of new-comers. Diderot speaks somewhere
of dinners he more than once ate with him at six sous
a head. For years Bernis supported gaily and with indiffer-
ence this cramped condition, this contrast between his tastes
and his situation, between all that he saw and did not
have. But his soul " was brave and gentle," and youth,
that ready and easy consoler, stood him in place of all ; no
man was ever made to enjoy more than he ; all contempo-
raries tell us of the advantages of his person and the charms
of his face. " I always remember your grace, your fine coun-
tenance, and your mind," wrote Voltaire many years later.
Duclos, his friend, one of those who have spoken best of him,
and whose habitual harshness softens to depict him, says :
" From birth an amiable face, a candid countenance, much
intelligence, charm, a sound judgment, and a trusty character
made all societies seek him ; he lived pleasantly with them
all." Marmontel also, less agreeable in this than Duclos, and
with less variety of tone, tells us that " the Abbd de Ber-
nis, escaping from the seminary of Saint-Sulpice, where he
succeeded ill, was a gallant poet, very plump, very rosy, very
dainty, who, together with Gentil-Bernard, amused the joyous
suppers of Paris with his pretty verses." That rotund and
ample figure, that handsome rounded face and triple chin
which strike us in the portraits of Bernis as an old man,
came to him rather early in life; but at first something
childlike and delicate mingled with them, and always, even
to the last, his profile kept its distinction and elegance ; the
forehead and eyes were very fine.
He began by making verses to his " Dieux Penates "
(1736), as Gresset did upon his " Chartreuse." These verses
of Bernis, done at twenty-one years of age, have all Gresset's
defects ; they have also his facility and his flow of language.
Already we see the Cupids and Zephyrs which pervade
Bernis, and made d'Alembert say that "if you cut their
wings you cut their vitals."
" Mais qu'une Sagesse sterile
N'occupe jamais mes loisirs ;
Que toujours ma muse fertile
Imite, en variant son style,
Le vol inconstant des Zephyrs."
Bernis in his best moments has a certain harmonious
languor, but the tender note is soon lost, drowned in a
dainty but insipid warbling. We can scarcely find any of
his lines to quote in the midst of this abundant and monot-
onous superfluity ; for if he has an occasional turn to revery
and sentiment in his poems, he is wholly wanting in ideas
and invention. In a few of his " Epistles " there are some
rather pretty passages on Ambition, or on Laziness, which
picture him.
" Qui sait, au printemps de son a"ge,
Souffrir les niaux avec courage
A bien des droits sur les plaisirs.
Pourquoi cbercher si loin la gloire ?
Le plaisir est si pres de nous ! "
The tone is always and everywhere the same. In this very
" Epistle on Laziness," the only one which La Harpe singled
out, we see Bernis graceful, natural, but without force, without
any loftiness of purpose, without ideal. In his opening poem,
" To my Penates," he had spoken rather severely of Voltaire,
apostrophizing him as a brilliant mind then in its decadence ;
he soon abandoned this youthful judgment ; they grew at-
tached, and Voltaire, while applauding and caressing him,
gave him one of those nicknames he excelled in finding, —
nicknames which comprise a whole judgment. Bernis had
made a string of descriptive verses called " The Four Parts of
a Day," following it with another string (I dare not say of
INTRODUCTION. 5
poems) called " The Four Seasons." These verses obtained
in society an immense success, which, later, evaporated com-
pletely. Bernis had put into them even more than his wont
of flowers, garlands, posies ; whereupon Voltaire called him,
speaking to Bernis himself, " la belle Babet," and speaking
to others, " the big Babet," — Babet being a flower-girl then
in vogue, a vender of what is called " The Four Seasons."
Let us not be unjust nor too rigorous to Bernis ; he
judged himself as a man of taste, a man of sense, and as if
there were nothing of the poet in him. Voltaire, who gave
him the pretty and malicious nickname, was the first, years
after, to flatter him about his verses and to play the role of
tempter. In 1763, Bernis, after his ministry, being in exile
and in political disgrace, some enemy hoping to injure him,
or some greedy publisher, reprinted his " Four Seasons " with
the title " By M. le C. de B." « I do not know," writes
Voltaire, liking to harp upon the topic, " who wrote those
'Four Seasons;' the titlepage says, 'By M. le C. de B.'
Apparently that is Cardinal de Bembo; they say that car-
dinal is the most agreeable man in the world ; he has loved
literature all his life ; it increases his pleasures, also people's
respect for him, and it softens his griefs — if he has any."
At other times he returns to his recollections of Babet, " fill-
ing her beautiful basket with that profusion of flowers ; " he
jokes, teases, and turns criticism into praise. Bernis is
grateful for the intention, but does not allow himself to be
taken in by it.
" As for Babet's ' Seasons ' " he replies, " I hear they are
dreadfully mangled ; I have not seen them these twenty
years. After my death, some charitable soul will purify
those amusements of my youth, which have been cruelly
ill-used, and mixed up with all sorts of platitudes. As for
me, I laugh at the trouble people give themselves uselessly
6 INTRODUCTION.
to set traps for me. They think to ruin me by proving that
I wrote verses till I was thirty-two [elsewhere he says
thirty-five] ; they do me only honour ; I wish with all my
heart I had the talent as I still have the taste for poesy ;
but I like better to read yours than I did to make mine. If
you want me to tell you my secret wholly, it is that I
renounced making verses when I saw that I could not be
superior in an art which excludes mediocrity."
It would be ungracious, after such a judgment, so full of
sense and candour, to give ourselves the easy pleasure of
laughing at Bernis for his poetry.
In those days, and in spite of compliments, all sorts of
criticism were made "to him. " I am asked," he writes in
1741, "how it is possible that a man bom to live in the great
world should amuse himself in writing, and in becoming
an author." To these critics, great seigneurs and men of
rank, he answers that " if it is not shameful to know how
to think it certainly is not so to know how to write ; and it
is not the making of books that dishonours' a man, but the
melancholy habit of making bad ones." "With regard espe-
cially to writing poetry, Bernis thus reflects : " It is difficult
to be young and live in Paris without having a desire to
make verses," and he thinks, as to such as are made with
more or less talent, that it does not follow that such talent
brings with it all the extravagances that render certain
versifiers ridiculous. "Happy they," he cries with feeling
and truth, " happy they who have received a talent which
follows them everywhere, which, in silence and solitude,
brings before their eyes all that absence had made them
lose; which lends a body and colours to all that breathes,
which gives to the world inhabitants whom the vulgar
mind ignores."
This pronounced literary taste, which was, as it were, the
INTRODUCTION. 7
advertisement of a careless and worldly life, did Bernis much
harm in his career. Cardinal de Fleury, a friend of his fam-
ily, sent for him and told him that if he continued in that
course he must expect nothing so long as he, Cardinal de
Fleury lived. On which Bernis bowed humbly and made
his well-known speech: " Monseigneur, I will wait." In
quoting it, some persons have supposed that it was said in
after years to Boyer, Bishop of Mirepoix, minister of bene-
fices ; this is an error, which takes from the saying its point
and its vengeance. It can only have its true value when
addressed by a very young man to a very old prime-minister
who forgot his age at the moment.
Bernis, man of society, of agreeable conversation, and of safe
and brilliant intercourse, to which his ambition seemed lim-
ited, was early known to Mme. de Pompadour ; he was in
favour with her as well as with the king, but he had never
as yet obtained anything towards making his fortune. It
was the French Academy that opened his way to it. He
was elected a member at the close of 1744, that is to say,
when he was twenty-nine years of age. He succeeded the
Abbe* Ge*doyn, and was received on the same day as the
Abbe* Girard, the grammarian. In his speech of thanks he
refers modestly to his youth, which, " far from doing him an
injury, had spoken in his favour." He says a few words on
the usefulness of relations between men of the world and
men of letters ; on the advantages the language had gained
from such relations since the days of the La Eochefoucaulds,
the Saint-fivremonds, and the Bussys; adding that it was
on the footing of their successor that he himself was now
entering the Company. Cre'billon, the tragic writer, who
received him, merely gave him this vague eulogy : " Your
genius has so far seemed to turn chiefly to poesy." In the
years that followed his reception, Bernis figures more than
8 INTRODUCTION.
once at the head of the Academy on the solemn occasions
when it was required to appear at Versailles. The Society
chose him as a face and subject agreeable to the king.
His friends say that at this period he aspired only to
obtaining, by means of a few petty benefices, the modest
sum of six thousand francs a year, which he thought would
make him happy for life. But Boyer, Bishop of Mirepoix,
who was minister of benefices after Cardinal de Fleury's
death, resisted the entreaties of all Bernis' friends, even the
most powerful : he made a condition (which to us, in these
days, seems quite reasonable) that Bernis should bind him-
self seriously to his profession, should cease to be an abbd in
name only, and become a priest. Bernis, from conscience
and a sense of his want of strength, recoiled and delayed ;
his habits and morals were of his age and of his time ; his
heart and mind had nothing irreligious in them; but the
prospect of a bishopric, which he was allowed to look
for at the cost of external sacrifices was more calculated
to frighten than to tempt him.
" No, you know too well my honour :
Culpable, perhaps, through frailty,
But an enemy to imposture.
I will not add impiety
To the weaknesses of nature."
That is what he said to his friend the Due de Nivernais, in
an " Epistle on Ambition."
More than that : Bernis, before this period, and as far
back as 1737, had undertaken, by advice of Cardinal de
Polignac (with whom he had more than one tie of nature,
frailty, and genius), a serious poem, finished in later years and
sumptuously printed after his death (Parma, 1795), entitled
" Eeligion Avenged." In this poem, which in truth is not a
poem at all, and is destitute of invention like all Bernis'
INTRODUCTION. 9
work, are some very good philosophical verses, a clear expo-
sition and a judicious and rather vigorous- refutation of the
systems of Lucretius, Pyrrho, and Spinoza. I have all my
life remembered the following lines, which are not the only
ones that might be quoted : —
"God, universal Father, watches o'er every species;
The universe is subject to the laws of his wisdom ;
From man it descends to the vilest gnat ;
It needed God himself to create a worm."
But in spite of these attempts at sincere conversion and
this confession of principles, Bernis had the honesty not to
take advantage of them, but to confess his weakness, even to
Boyer ; consequently, his fortunes did not advance. It was
then that Louis XV., tired of the struggle, gave him a pen-
sion of fifteen hundred francs a year and a lodging under the
eaves of the Tuileries ; up to this time, Bernis had lived in
the house of one of his relatives, the Baron de Montmorency.
One day when Bernis was coming from Mme. de Pompadour's
apartment carrying under his arm a roll of chintz which she
had given him to furnish his new apartment, he met the
king on the staircase; his Majesty insisted on knowing
what he was carrying ; he was forced to show the chintz and
explain its purpose. " Very well," said Louis XV., putting a
roll of louis into his hand, " she has given you the drapery,
here 's for the nails."
Nevertheless, impatience came to Bernis at last, and,
according to the witty remark of Duclos, seeing that he had
so much trouble in making a small fortune, he resolved on
attempting to make a large one : it proved much easier to
do. V, He began by being sent as ambassador to Venice
in 1752. Many things, more or less romantic, were written
and printed in which Bernis' name was mixed up at the
date of this embassy; we will confine ourselves to those
10 INTRODUCTION.
which are open to honourable men. We have his corre-
spondence with Paris-Duverney during those years; it is
wholly to his honour, and it begins to make him known to
us on his political and serious side. Paris-Duverney, a
superior man with administrative capacity of the first order
and a singular talent for matters of war, was already in
semi-retirement ; he was then almost exclusively employed
in realizing his last patriotic thought, — that of the establish-
ment of the ficole Militaire. We know that he was one
of the great protectors of Beaumarchais in his opening
career; we now find him tenderly allied with Bernis, in
whom he recognizes talent and a future. In their corre-
spondence the latter enters into the details of his life as
an ambassador : " My house is decent, well-furnished, and
nothing shows the younger son of Gascony. I try at the
same time to keep it orderly." Like all Frenchmen absent
from Paris he feels a void ; he complains of his languishing
life and regrets society : " However, if one is ever happy
having nothing to do and living with people who have
nothing to do, I am. Nothing is lacking to my peace and,
I dare to say it, to the consideration that is shown to me ;
but I need a little more food for my mind." Above all,
he regrets his Saturdays, the day of the week which he was
wont to spend in Paris with Duverney. " If my Saturdays
were only preserved to me," he writes, " I should applaud
myself for having taken a course which will daily become
more and more advantageous for me, but will never be of
any use to the king so long as I stay in a place where
there is nothing to do."
This inaction, which he felt from the first, was to grow
more and more into a burden upon him ; and it was thus
that ennui ended, little by little, by inoculating him with
ambition. Meanwhile, he talks with his friend, speaks of
INTRODUCTION. 11
that which interests the latter most, his dear foundation,
that Scole Militaire about which Duverney encountered
such obstacles at its outset. The worthy founder replies
with beautiful and noble words on this subject, which reveal,
even under the reign of Louis XV., the heart of a citizen.
I wish to quote a few of them ; be it only to bring morality
into my topic, the beginnings of which have been a little
enervating : —
" What you tell me, monsieur," writes Duverney to Bernis,
" of the opinion of foreigners on this establishment is little
fitted to moderate my impatience ; I still have much eager-
ness in these matters, which contribute to the glory of our
master and the good of the nation. . . . Objections have
never repulsed me. It is usual for great enterprises to be
thwarted. Experience has also taught me that the value
of great things is never better known than to those who
have not seen them born. We praise, we admire to-day
what was blamed formerly. Under M. de Louvois the
friends of M. Colbert said that the Hotel Koyal des In-
valides was only a humiliating hospital for soldiers ; to-day,
lieutenant-colonels do not blush to retire there. Under
Mme. de Maintenon it was asserted that the proofs of pov-
erty required for admission to Saint Cyr would alienate the
nobles ; to-day, nobles in easy circumstances are not ashamed
to say that they are poor hi order to gain admission for
their daughters, who, beneath that brown woollen gown
which formerly seemed so repulsive, are showing more van-
ity and pride than is desirable. Time removes objects
from passions that obscure them ; and, when they are good
in themselves, we come at last to seeing only that good."
Bernis is worthy of this generous intercourse to which
friendship invites him; he encourages his friend, he com-
forts him with affectionate warmth: "I would fain gather
12 INTRODUCTION.
all good hearts to give them to you." He desires to be in
a position to defend him against the injustices and the dis-
likes that begin to overwhelm him : " Would to God that
I were within reach of bearing testimony to the truth I with
what pleasure should I render an account of the sorrows
of the friend and citizen of which I have been the witness
and the repository ! " Here Bernis rises to ideas which are
by no means foreign to him, although we are not accustomed
to associate them with his name ; he speaks in accents that
come from his soul : —
" If men were not ungrateful," he says ; " I would forgive
the folly, inconsistency, ill-temper, and all the other imper-
fections that certainly degrade humanity ; but it is hard not
to gather the fruits of our benefactions ! it is the sower sow-
ing his seed on stony ground. However, in spite of that
ingratitude, there are superior souls who desire to make the
happiness of men without expecting other reward than that
of being satisfied with themselves."
In another place he says : —
" If you were reasonable only you would not be so great a
citizen ; zeal must face obstacles which reason tells us to
avoid. As for me, I think that what brings ruin on States
is the so-called wisdom attributed to those who dare not run
the risks that always attend the effort to procure the greatest
possible good. We are too anxious to make our fortune in
these days, and too fearful of losing it when made : this is
the universal evil which is now afflicting Europe ; for, thank
God, whatever may be said, we are not the only ones who
deserve blame. You see, monsieur, that, in spite of myself,
moral ideas are getting possession of me ; that is the malady
of those who are nearly always in solitude."
These letters of Bernis and Duverney, which have nothing
very interesting in their topics, and which were printed in
INTRODUCTION. 13
1790 with the most ridiculous and impertinent notes that
can be imagined, are curious when read, as I have read
them, from the point of view of biography and a knowl-
edge of the two characters. While we feel in Duvemey a
grandeur of soul accompanied by kindness and even bon-
homie, the temperate, noble, human, and fairly elevated
character of Bernis comes forth naturally; his mind gives
glimpses of shades and perceptions of delicacy. Thus,
speaking of one of their mutual friends who, under critical
circumstances, had written to Duverney a letter couched in
a semblance of philosophy and of a nature to cause delusion,
he says: "The philosophical spirit that is now spreading
over the surface of the world makes it difficult to distin-
guish at first sight fools from wise men, or honest men from
rascals. Every one seems rich because every one has silver
or false coin ; but a few days suffice to distinguish the one
from the other." This shrewd remark of Bernis on the
varnish of the philosophical spirit which was everywhere at
that time, applies to-day to many another varnish, equally
wide-spreading, — varnish of talent, varnish of mind, varnish
of judgment. Each man takes his varnish every morning on
reading his newspaper; the journalist has taken his the
night before ; the dye of the one colours the other ; in
twelve hours every one repeats himself. Where is the real
spirit, the new and original judgment? And how much
time and how many occasions are required to test and dis-
tinguish them. A few days do not suffice, as Bernis may
then have thought.
Bernis never became a great directing minister. Could
he have been one ? I do not know. Fate did not give him
time to repair his mistakes or correct his hazardous under-
takings; but Bernis was always an excellent ambassador;
he had insinuation, conciliation, courtesy; he represented
14 INTRODUCTION.
his position with taste and magnificence ; he will always be
the model of a French ambassador in Eome, such as he was
for twenty years. It was in Venice that he served his
apprenticeship, at any rate for externals, public affairs being
almost nothing there. " As this embassy," he remarks, " is
more for show than for necessity, it is sometimes thought
that any one is fitted for it ; in which they are hugely mis-
taken ; " and he defines admirably the qualities that are es-
sential in the representative of the king if he desires to be
respected in a post of this kind. Let him speak for himself,
for we cannot say the thing as well as he : —
"When we have business to negotiate with a foreign
Court, it is the manner in which it is conducted that fixes
the attention and decides the esteem in which we are held.
But when there is nothing to negotiate or disentangle with
a Court, we are judged by our personality ; thus it requires
great attention to avoid the censure of a crowd of inquisitive
and penetrating observers, who are seeking to unravel your
character and your principles, while you yourself are wholly
unable to divert their attention. If the king desires to
make his crown and his nation respected in Venice, he must
always send here a man of common-sense ; that will suffice,
provided he is a man with a lofty soul and decent manners
for it is impossible to awe a very libertine nation, I might
even say a debauched one, except by the opposite morals."
Such words are noteworthy on Bernis' lips. Did he
justify them in all respects ? At any rate he could not
better show the value which he placed on esteem, and
from that period he knew how to obtain it, no matter what
the secret chronicles may say.
Nevertheless the two years and a half that Bernis spent
in Venice seemed to him extremely long. He felt that his
Versailles friends would not leave him there eternally ; he had
INTRODUCTION. 15
the vague but certain hope of a future return : " My greatest
pain is that of aspiring to be useful, to open modestly a way
to it, yet to be ever driven back into inaction and uselessness ;
so much for my moral condition." Physically his health
suffered for want of exercise ; his size increased and gout at-
tacked his knees. It was then that ambition came to him ;
from the moment that he ceased to be a private individual,
enjoying as he pleased the charms and pleasures of society,
he could only be a busy and useful public man ; he sums up
this alternative in admirable terms : " To be free and master of
one's leisure, or to fill one's time with labours of which the
State shall reap the fruits — these are the two positions an
honest man should desire ; a medium career is nothingness."
Certain ministers at Versailles, who feared his return, set
traps for him ; they employed all kinds of manoeuvres to keep
him fixed in this lagune. " I see plainly," he says, " that by
their tricks they will find a way to make me stay with my
arms folded in this cul-de-sac." Duverney counsels and
calms him under these attacks of impatience, which are always
tempered in Bernis with philosophy, and never go so far as
irritation. " All things here below depend on circumstances,"
writes Duverney, " and circumstances have such frequent
revolutions that the wisest thing to do is to prepare ourselves
to take advantage of them the moment they turn our way.
It is almost always dangerous to try to force them ; nothing
is gained but torments, which increase as our hopes retreat ;
and we pass our lives without a moment of real satisfaction.
We should always be ready to act, but force nothing ..."
Money was a great torment to Bernis ; he had nothing but
his salary, and the first year of his embassy he spent twenty-
three thousand francs beyond it. German princes and
princesses and personages of mark were ceaselessly passing
through Venice on their way to Italy, and had to be entertained.
16 INTRODUCTION.
In November, 1754, the Due de Penthievre arrived at the em-
bassy with his suite and lodged there thirteen days. " I got
through with this embarrassment very well," says Bernis
gallantly, " after many expenses, incurred in profusion, but
without extravagance ; and there remains to me the friendship
of a prince honest man, and the satisfaction of having con-
tented all the ranks of his household." Duverney takes
upon himself to further Bernis' interests at Court ; the only
urgent thing is pecuniary help. If some good abbey should
fall vacant it would be a great point to obtain it. As for
better political places, it is agreed between the two friends
that it would be wiser to press nothing ; the agreement is :
" In regard to places, one should know how to raise the siege
when they defend themselves too long." On this point
Bernis has firm tactics, a gentle and insinuating method,
namely : " Never to take places by assault, and never to re-
fuse those that surrender of themselves." Finally, the end of
his apprenticeship arrives, and Bernis, recalled to Paris, sets
out for France at the close of April, 1755.
Duclos, Bernis' friend and confidant, has very well de-
scribed to us the employment of his life during these years
that are now to be so busy. This was the moment when the
alliance was closely formed between France and Austria, and
the Treaty of Versailles was conceived and discussed secretly.
Bernis, though not yet minister, was the principal agent, the
confidential plenipotentiary ; he debated and settled the arti-
cles with the Imperial Ambassador, M. de Staremberg.
Persons have done Bernis the honour to attribute to him the
first idea of this treaty which upset the policy of Kichelieu
and changed the system of continental alliances in Europe.
They have done more, they have gone so far as to say that
in thus taking sides with Austria against Prussia it was the
poet, the rhymester within him that sought revenge. Fred-
INTRODUCTION. 17
erick the Great at the end of an " Epistle " to Comte Gotter,
in which he describes the infinite details of human industry
and labour had said : —
" I have not described all ; for the matter 's immense,
And I leave to Comte Bernis his barren abundance."
It has been supposed that Bernis knew of this " Epistle " and
that those lines were the motive that made him counsel the
powers at Versailles to abandon the King of Prussia and ally
themselves with the Empress. Turgot, in certain anonymous
verses which went the rounds of Paris and vividly exposed
the withering disasters with which the Seven Years' War
was afflicting France, exclaimed : —
" Bernis, have you victims enough ?
And a king's contempt for your little rhymes —
Is it duly avenged ? "
But in this explanation, since so constantly repeated, nothing
is correct; the grave Turgot imagined a gratuitous cause,
and if petty motives did indeed contribute to produce those
great calamities, Bernis at least had no cause to blush for so
mean and miserable a motive as that of which he is accused.
Bernis had no rancour of that kind against the Great Frederick,
and his heart of an honest man was far higher placed than
that. Algarotti, who had known him when ambassador in
Venice, wrote to the King of Prussia (January 11, 1754):
" I see quite often the French ambassador, who is well-fitted
to represent the most agreeable nation upon earth. He flatters
himself, Sire, that the course he has now taken up may lead
him to again pay his court to your Majesty. He has many
titles by which to admire you, Sire : as minister, as one of
the Forty, as a man of wit. I should see him oftener than I
do if his cook were not so good." When Madame de
Pompadour confided to Bernis for the first time this idea of
VOL. I. — 2
18 INTRODUCTION.
the alliance with Austria, so contrary to established policy,
he began by objections ; Duclos, on Bernis' behalf, says so
expressly. Frederick, an equitable adversary, confirms it in
his History ; he blames Bernis only for lending himself to
views the imprudence of which he felt up to a certain
point, and which he, later, strove to moderate, but in
vain.
" So long as it was a question of establishing his fortune,"
writes the historian-king, " all ways were the same to him
to reach his object; but as soon as he found himself es-
tablished he sought to maintain himself in office by principles
less fickle and more conformable to the permanent interests
of the State. His views turned wholly towards peace, to
end, on the one hand, a war of which he foresaw only its
disadvantages, and on the other, to withdraw his nation from
an enforced and adverse alliance, of which France was bear-
ing the burden and from which the house of Austria would
alone reap the fruits and the advantages. He addressed
himself to England by silent and secret means ; he opened
negotiations there for peace; but the Marquise de Pompa-
dour being of a contrary opinion, he at once found himself
stopped short in his measures. His imprudent actions had
raised him, his wise views ruined him; he was dismissed
for having talked of peace."
At the very moment when Bernis was actually dismissed
Frederick spoke of him to Lord Marshall in the same
manner : " People exaggerated Bernis' merits while he was
in favour ; and now they blame him too much — he deserves
neither."
This important point in the history of the eighteenth
century will never be completely cleared up until a con-
scientious historian is allowed to go to work on the State
papers and has made continuous extracts from them. Still,
INTRODUCTION. 19
the general meaning of the conclusion may be foreseen and
judged in advance. As to the aspect of Bernis himself and
the movements of his mind amid this torrent, we may gain
some idea from the letters and notes which he continues
to address to Duverney. During that busy year (1756-
1757), when he puts his hand to great affairs before he
enters upon his ministry, he is no longer the infirm and
languishing man of Venice, who has gout in his knees,
and whose life drags on from one inflammation of the chest
to another ; he is prodigal of himself in society, spends half
his nights at cards and pretends that he likes it, the better
to hide his other game; for as yet he is not a minister;
the secret negotiation he is conducting is carried on outside
of the cabinet, and those who are in office watch him. In
the midst of all these cares he was never in better health.
His nature, apparently so epicurean and lazy, has found its
element. "We are in^the throes of a great decision," he
writes to Duverney (October 13, 1756) ; " my health is good
in spite of the labour, which increases and will increase day
by day."
His only complaint is not to have all to do, not to have
the whole burden upon himself: "The final orders have
arrived (Fontainebleau, November 5, 1756) ; I am now
employed in the greatest work that ever was done. They
will not see that everything depends on the execution, and
that it is unbearable to be charged with a plan without
having the right to watch over its execution and conduct
it." That will be his continual complaint throughout the
whole period of his favour; for even after he entered the
ministry he was constantly thwarted by those, or to speak
more truly, by her, who used him only as an instrument:
"They made me dance upon a great stage with fetters on
my feet and hands. I consider myself very lucky to have
20 INTRODUCTION.
come out of it and saved my reputation." He did not save
it as intact as he flattered himself.
Bernis, entering the Council as minister of State in Janu-
ary, 1757,1 appointed secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
in June of the same year, promoted to the dignity of car-
dinal in October, 1758, was suddenly superseded by Choiseul
in November, and almost immediately sent into exile at his
abbey of Saint-Me'dard of Soissons. The first emotion over,
he told himself, with the good sense and reflection devoid of
bitterness with which he was provided and which formed
the basis of his character: "I have no longer my fortune
to make; I have only to honestly fulfil the career of my
profession and acquire the consideration which ought to
accompany a great dignity: for that, retirement is admi-
rably well fitted."
It is under this last form, no longer political nor yet
social, and not absolutely ecclesiastical, but agreeably diver-
sified and mingled, — it is in this retirement, soon to be
followed and crowned by a great embassy, that we must
study him henceforth in his quality as cardinal, finding
pleasure in recognizing him more and more as an eminent
personage, of gentle mind, rare culture, and infinite social
art.
I shall here make a short digression and profit by an
unexpected document, the knowledge of which I owe to the
kindness of M. le Due Pasquier, former chancellor of France.
This document, which appears to have come originally from
Cardinal Lome'nie de Brienne, consists of a manuscript col-
lection of the private letters of Bernis written by him
during his ministry to M. de Choiseul, then our ambassador
at Vienna, and subsequently his successor in the ministry
of Foreign Affairs, and to the Marquise de Pompadour and
1 Two weeks before the death of the Marquis d'Argenson. — TR.
INTRODUCTION. 21
the king, written at the close of his ministry and during
the first days of his dismissal. They explain the causes
of his retirement and fall, more clearly than our previous
knowledge of them. They allow us to judge with precision
of his degree of incompetency at the head of public affairs,
and also of the excuses that belong to his defence. In what
I have now to say, I shall take Bernis less as minister than
as witness and reporter of the deplorable situation he con-
tributed to create, and in which he took part without having
either the strength or the influence to produce a remedy.
The sight, which I shall merely glance at after Bernis
without enlarging upon it, is distressing ; but it holds within
it certain stern lessons which history has already drawn ; it
makes us penetrate into the causes of the ruin of the old
monarchy; it makes us feel to what a point the noblest
nations (our own in particular) depend, for the spirit that
animates them and for their inward vigour, on the govern-
ments that rule them and on the men who are at their head.
The condition of public opinion in France at the begin-
ning of the Seven Years' War, so lightly undertaken, was
not what it became a year later ; the new alliance with
Austria, conceived in defiance of ancient maxims, filled all
minds and flattered all hopes. The Empress Maria Theresa,
in her brave and passionate struggle against the aggrandize-
ment of Prussia, had employed a special blandishment in
her effort to win France; she had not disdained to make
herself the " friend " of Madame de Pompadour, and sides
were taken with Austria at Versailles precisely as we declare
for private friends against all others in the social cabal of a
clique. Bernis, just returned from Venice, and who was, as
it were, in the hollow of Madame de Pompadour's hand, was
charged with drawing up the plan and negotiating the treaty
of alliance. In spite of his first objections as a man of sense,
22 INTRODUCTION.
he did not long resist the general impulse which carried
away every one about him ; he was dazzled, and believed he
was contributing to the greatest political operation attempted
since the days of Eichelieu.
At first, all things appeared to go well ; the new alliance
so extolled by the Court was very well taken by the public
until the news came of the first disasters. We had begun
by successes; the taking of Port-Mahon, the victory of
Hastenbeck, the first advantages of the Due de Kichelieu
seemed to promise an easy triumph to this novelty in diplo-
matic combination. Bernis, minister of Foreign Affairs
since June, 1757, kept all his hopes alive until the moment
when the Due de Eichelieu concluded with the Duke of
Cumberland the convention of Kloster-Zeven (September 8,
1757), which allowed the enemy's army to exist, and was
never to be ratified. It is here that Bernis' correspondence
with Choiseul (then Comte de Stainville) gives to us the
connected train of his thoughts and his anxieties. " M.
de Eichelieu, my dear count," he writes (September 20,
1757), "has rather forced the affair of the convention. No
act was ever less pondered, or concluded with less formalities.
The Duke of Mecklenburg and the Swedes will not be
pleased, and I fear much that annoyances may arise which
will counterbalance the advantages. It is true that this
event is glorious in appearance, and gives M. de Eichelieu
the facility to put himself forward ; but beware the conse-
quences ! " From this moment the chances of war turn and
become unfavourable. Two letters from Bernis, written on
the news of the defeat at Eosbach, are such that we cannot
extract them ; it is not the defeat, but certain details of the
defeat which should be buried. Will it be believed that on
learning of this disaster nothing was thought of at Versailles
but the " poor general," who allowed himself to be beaten ?
INTRODUCTION. 23
" They saw nothing at Court in the lost battle but M. de
Soubise, nothing of the State. Our friend [notre amie ;
Madame de Pompadour is always mentioned thus between
Bernis and Choiseul], our friend gave him the strongest
proofs of friendship, and the king also." What is worse
than this condolence is that they think only of procuring
him a revenge, and Bernis himself, since he must, lends
himself to it. " The king loves M. de Soubise," he writes
the following spring to Duverney; "he wants to give
him the opportunity to revenge himself for Eosbach ; there
is the truth. One must not oppose one's master, but serve
him as he wishes, especially when circumstances render all
other courses impossible, or dangerous."
That which appears most distinctly in Bernis from end to
end of these letters to Choiseul is the character of an honest
man below the situation ; one who is the designated and
responsible author of an alliance now shown to be fatal, who
feels himself involved, and has not the power to either hold
firm or to repair the eviL " One does not die of grief," he
writes to Choiseul (December 13, 175 7), "inasmuch as I am
not dead after September 8 " (period of the heedless conven-
tion of Kloster-Zeven). " The blunders since then have been
heaped up in a manner that cannot be explained except by
bad intentions. I have spoken with the utmost force to God
and his saints. I excite a little rise in the pulse; then
lethargy returns ; great sad eyes are opened, and all is said."
He finds that France has neither king, nor generals, nor
ministers ; and that expression seems to him so true and
just that he consents to be included himself in the category
of those who do not exist. "It seems to me that I am
minister of Foreign Affairs in Limbo. Try, my dear count,
if you cannot excite better than I have done the principle of
life which is dying within us. As for me, I have struck all
24 INTRODUCTION.
my great blows, and I am about, like the others, to have a
paralysis of feeling, but without ceasing to do my duty
as a citizen and an honest man."
At this date there was no direction in France, neither in
the armies nor in the cabinet. The affairs of the ministry
of war were still, through the subalterns, under the in-
fluences of " Les Ormes " [The Elms], that is to say, under
that of Comte d'Argenson now in exile on his estate at Les
Ormes, having quitted the ministry in the early months of
1757.1 Insubordination, and want of discipline are every-
where ; no one is feared or obeyed ; the rivalry and dis-
union of the Due de Kichelieu and the Prince de Soubise
have led to the disasters of the close of the campaign;
demands are made on the Mare*chal de Belleisle and
Duverney for memoranda and plans for the coming cam-
paign which will not be followed. In the midst of these
reverses which affect so profoundly the military honour and
the future of the monarchy, the apathy of Louis XV. is
total. "There is no such example of playing so great a
game with the same indifference as a game of cards." The
sole honour to Bernis, charged with the political side, but
excluded, naturally, from military questions, and having
only a trifle more favour than others, but no more authority
or influence in decisive moments, is that of comprehending
the evil and suffering from it. " Sensitive, and, if I may
dare to say so, sensible as I am, I am dying on the rack, and
my martyrdom is useless to the State." He cries out for a
government at any cost, with nerve, consistency, and • fore-
sight : " Please God to send us a will of some sort, or some
one who would have it for us ! I would be his valet de
chambre if need be, and with all my heart."
1 He was succeeded in it by his nephew the Marquis de Paulmy, son of
his late brother, the Marquis d'Argenson. — TK.
INTRODUCTION. 25
Bernis had nothing in him which awed the king or Madame
de Pompadour. The latter had known him in poverty ; she
had drawn him out of it ; she enjoyed him for the gentleness
of his intercourse and the charm of his society ; but she con-
sidered him at all times as her creation. The minister was
to her still the little abbe*, smiling and flowery, who came to
her lever on Sunday mornings and whom she tapped famil-
iarly on the cheek with a " Good-day, abbe*." It is related
that on one occasion, during the altercations at the close of
their intercourse, she reproached him sharply with having
lifted him out of the dust ; to which he answered with dig-
nity, alluding to his rank : " Madame, a Comte de Lyon is
never lifted out of the dust." However that may be, it is
certain that Bernis never had the slightest ascendency over
the king or over Madame de Pompadour. It was M. de
Choiseul who, without being above him in birth, but adding
to his birth at all times the habits and state of a great
seigneur, was able to win that necessary influence, and jus-
tify it definitively by his capacity.
In any Study of the eighteenth century Madame de Pom-
padour is inevitable. We must not fear to call things and
epochs by their name ; and the name under which the eigh-
teenth century may most justly in many respects be designated,
for the taste, the style universally reigning in the arts of
design, hi the fashions and usages of life, in poesy even, — is
it not that coquettish and decorative name which seems to
be made expressly for the beautiful marquise and to rhyme
so well with amour ? All the arts of that period bear her
seal ; the great painter Watteau, who came before her time
and who created a magic pastoral world, seems to have deco-
rated and embellished it expressly that she might take posses-
sion of it to bloom and reign there. The successors of
Watteau delighted unanimously in recognizing the sceptre
26 INTRODUCTION.
of their natural protectress. In poesy, it is not Bernis alone
who is wholly Pompadour, it is Voltaire in three-fourths of
his lesser verses, it is the whole light poetry of the day;
even in prose we have Marmontel in his " Contes Moraux,"
and Montesquieu himself in his " Temple de Gnide." The
"style Pompadour" unquestionably existed before the ad-
vent of the beautiful marquise, but she sums it up in herself,
she crowns it and personifies it.
Jeanne-Antoinette Poisson, born in Paris, December 29,
1721, issued from that rich bourgeoisie and that world of
finance which pushed itself forward in the last half of Louis
XV.'s reign, and in which it was not rare to find a witty and
sumptuous epicureanism ; to this she added elegance. Every
one agrees in saying that in her youth she had all the talents
and all the graces. Her education had been most careful in
the arts that charm; everything had been taught to her,
except morality. " I found there," writes President Renault
to Mme. du Deffand, referring to some social occasion, " one of
the prettiest women I have ever seen, — Mme. d'fitioles. She
knows music perfectly, she sings with all the taste and gaiety
possible, knows hundreds of songs, plays comedy at Etioles
on a stage as fine as that of the Opera, with scenery and
changes of it."
There she is, such as she was before her meeting with Louis
XV., — daughter of a gay mother who was kept by a farmer-
general, married as if provisionally to a nephew of the latter.
It appears that very early the whole family, seeing how
seductive and enchanting she was, destined her for higher
things, and were only awaiting the occasion and the moment.
" She is a morsel for a king," they said on all sides around
her ; and the young woman ended by believing this destiny
as mistress of the king to be the star of her life.
Louis XV. was then in the first glow of his tardy emanci-
INTRODUCTION. 27
pation, and the nation, not knowing for a long time where to
turn, had taken to loving him distractedly. Mme. d'Etioles
did the same. When the king went to hunt in the forest of
Se'nart, not far from Etioles, she appeared before him as if by
chance in a pretty carriage. The king noticed her and gal-
lantly sent her some game ; then, in the evening, a valet de
chambre, a relative of the family, insinuated to the master all
desired details and offered his services for the result. All
this, as a beginning, is not fine, but it is history.
Louis XV., endowed with so fine a face and so many
apparent graces, showed himself from his youth up the
weakest and most timid of kings. Sickly in his childhood,
the young king, whose life seemed to hang on a thread, had
been raised with excessive caution; they spared him all
effort, more even than is customary with princes. Cardinal
de Fleury directed his education in this effeminate manner ;
the old man of nearly eighty, from long habit and wiliness,
kept his royal pupil in leading-strings ; turning him aside
from all that resembled ideas or enterprise and carefully
uprooting the slightest impulse or desire, he accustomed him
to none but easy things. Nature, moreover, had done nothing
to help the royal youth to rise above this senile and effeminate
education. He had no spark of anything in him but that
which soon declared itself for things of the senses. The
young courtiers, the ambitious men who surrounded him saw
with vexation the continued tutelage of the cardinal and the
perpetuation of the king's insipid childhood until he was
more than thiity years of age ; they perceived that there was
but one way to emancipate him and make him master,
namely: to give him a mistress. He had had them for
years, but always as a school-boy and under the good pleas-
ure of the cardinal ; he needed one, the courtiers thought, who
would be really mistress and make him his own master.
28 INTRODUCTION.
Cardinal de Fleury being dead, intrigues were more rife
than ever ; the point was, inasmuch as the king was so de-
void of will, to know what hand should seize the tiller.
Mme. de Tencin, who would fain have pushed her brother,
the cardinal, to the head of the ministry, knew not how to
lay hold of the apathetic will of the monarch. She wrote to
the Due de Kichelieu, who was then at the war, and begged
that courtier to write to Mme. de Cha"teauroux and urge her
to draw the king from the lethargy into which he had sunk
in relation to public affairs.
" What my brother has said to him as to this," she adds, " has
been useless ; it is, as he wrote you, talking to stones. I can-
not conceive of a man choosing to be a nonentity when he
could be everything. No one but you would believe the
point to which the thing has gone. What happens in the
kingdom seems not to concern him ; he is interested in noth-
ing'; in the Council he is absolutely indifferent; he agrees
to whatever is presented to him. In truth, there is enough
to make one desperate in having to do with such a man.
One sees that in all things his apathetic nature turns him
to the side in which there is least trouble, though it may be
the worst side."
Mme. de Tencin and her brother, the cardinal, both so
little estimable, judged of this matter as persons of coup
d'oeil and intelligence. In another letter she suggests the
idea that it might be useful to induce the king to put him-
self at the head of his armies. " Not — between ourselves — "
she added, " that he is fit to command a company of Grena-
diers, but his presence will do much ; the people love their
king from habit, and will be enchanted to see him take
that step, to which he could be prompted. The troops will
do their duty better, the generals will not dare to shirk theirs
as openly as they do now." This idea prevailed, thanks to
INTRODUCTION. 29
Mme. de CMteauroux, who, for one moment, made Louis XV.
the phantom of a hero and the idol of the nation. Mme. de
Chateauroux, then his mistress, had courage and spirit ; she
felt the generous inspiration and conveyed it. She tormented
the king, who seemed to regret he was a king, by speaking
to him of State affairs, of his interests, his glory. " You kill
me," he said to her constantly. " So much the better," she
replied, "a king should resuscitate." She did resuscitate
him, and succeeded for a short time in making out of Louis
XV. a prince conscious of honour who was not recognizable.
We are not so far from Mme. de Pompadour as we
seem. It was this phantom of a king that Mme. d'Etioles
watched as he hunted in the forest of Se*nart and began to
love. She dreamed I know not what of Henri IV. and
Gabrielle. Mme. de Cha'teauroux having died suddenly, she
told herself it was she who could replace her. An intrigue
was at once set a-foot by her people. The details are
obscure, and gossip is not history. But, with that absolute
lack of initiative that characterized Louis XV., it was
necessary to do for Mme. d'Etioles what had already been
done for Mme. de Cha'teauroux, namely : arrange the affair
for him. To princes, under such circumstances, officious
intermediaries are never wanting. Mme. de Tencin, who
had seen her first instrument, Mme. de CMteauroux, broken,
concurred in replacing her by Mme. d'Etioles. The Due
de Eichelieu on the contrary, was opposed to the latter ; he
had another candidate in view, a great lady ; for it seemed
as though to be mistress of the king the first condition was
to be a woman of rank, and the advent of Mme. Lenormant
d'Etioles, Mile. Poisson ! as the acknowledged mistress of
royalty made a total revolution in the manners and morals
of the Court. In this sense, especially, the affair was thought
scandalous, and the great shade of Louis XIV. was invoked.
30 INTRODUCTION.
The Maurepas and Kichelieus revolted at the thought of a
bourgeoise, a "grisette," as they called her, usurping the
power hitherto reserved to daughters of noble blood. Maure-
pas, satirical above all, stayed in opposition, consoling himself
with making songs against her for twenty years ; Eichelieu,
courtier above all, made his peace and was reconciled.
The year 1745, that of Fontenoy, was for Mme. d'Etioles
one of triumph and great metamorphoses. Her connection
with the king was already " arranged," and it was merely a
question of when to declare it publicly. The king was with
the army, and she at Etioles. He wrote to her letter after
letter ; Voltaire, who was staying at her house and whom she
had induced to compose a comedy for the Court fete on the
occasion of the marriage of the dauphin with the Spanish
infanta lent himself to this play of Henri IV. and Gabrielle,
and rhymed madrigal after madrigal about it : —
" He can love and he can fight ;
He sends to this charming spot
Letters worthy of Henri IV.
Signed Louis, Mars, and Love."
The Abb£ de Bernis was then at feioles ; he was said to be
the lover of Mme. d'Etioles, but this is very doubtful. " He
knew, shortly before, that she had arranged with the king."
Those are Cardinal de Brienne's words, and I like to protect
myself with such grave authority in so delicate a matter.
But when the thing had been settled like an affair of State
and the king was about to depart for the army, it became
a question of forming the intimate society of the future
marquise during his absence, and the Abb£ de Bernis was
suggested. He was faithful to his mission ; he made pretty
verses in honour of this royal amour, of which he was the
confidant and almost the chaplain. Faithful to the tone of
the day, Bernis, instead of seeing anything reprehensible in
INTRODUCTION. 31
this royal amour, paints it as a model of chastity and modesty
worthy in all things of the age of gold. The amiable abbe,
who sees no evil but that of inconstancy, assures us there will
be no more of that : —
" All will change ; inconstant crimes
Are thought no longer exploits ;
The Modest soul alone obtains our praise ;
And constant Love recovers all its rights ;
The example now is set by our great king,
And by virtuous beauty."
Thus the young Pompadour enters Versailles with the
title of " virtuous beauty," whose heart is enraptured by a
faithful hero.
It all seems strange and almost ridiculous; but if we
study the new marquise we shall see that there is truth in
this manner of looking at the affair, and that the taste of
the eighteenth century is genuinely in it. Mme. de Pompa-
dour was by no means a grisette, as her enemies affected to
say, and as Voltaire called her on one of his malicious days.
She was a bourgeoise, a flower of finance, the prettiest woman
in Paris, witty, elegant, endowed with a thousand gifts, a
thousand talents, but with a manner of feeling which had
neither the grandeur nor the hardness of aristocratic ambi-
tion. She loved the king for himself, as the handsomest
man of his kingdom, as the one who seemed to her the most
amiable ; she loved him sincerely, sentimentally, if not with
profound passion. Her ideal would have been, on arriving
at Court, to charm him, to amuse him by entertainments
taken from the arts, or from things of the intellect, to make
him happy and keep him constant in a circle of varied en-
chantments and pleasures. A landscape by Watteau, games,
comedies, pastorals beneath the leafage, a continual 'em-
barkation for Cythera, — such was her chosen scene. But,
32 INTRODUCTION.
once transported to the slippery floor of the Court, she could
realize her ideal but very imperfectly. Kind and obliging
by nature, she had to arm herself against enmities and
treachery, and take the offensive to save herself from over-
throw; she was led by necessity to politics and to make
herself a minister of State.
Nevertheless, from the first (and here it is that I see her
faithful to her origin), she brings a certain something of
bourgeois sentiments, the affections and tastes of private life
into even the brilliant scandals of her royal liaison. The
Memoirs of her waiting-woman, Mme. du Hausset, inform
us on this subject and show us with great naive te* of state-
ment the true and habitual sentiments of Mme. de Pom-
padour. I will cite an example that will show what I
mean.
Mme. de Pompadour had, by her husband, a daughter
named Alexandrine, whom she educated with extreme care
and destined for a great marriage. The king had by Mme.
de Vintimille (sister of Mme. de Chateauroux) a son who
was the picture of his father. Mme. de Pompadour wished
to see this son of the master, and found means to bring him
to Bellevue, where she was staying with her daughter.
Leading the king into a conservatory where the two children
were, as it seemed, by chance, she said to him, pointing to
the pan-, " They would make a handsome couple." The king
was chilling, and did not give in to the idea. The Bourbon
blood within him resisted the charm of such an alliance
thus proposed. But she, without fully understanding his
coldness, said to Mme. du Hausset as she thought it over : —
" If he were Louis XIV. he would make that child a Due
du Maine ; but I don't ask as much as that : an office and
patent of duke for his son is very little ; it is because the
boy is his son, my dear, that I prefer him to the little dukes
INTRODUCTION. 33
at Court. My grandchildren would share in a resemblance
to their grandfather and their grandmother, and this mix-
ture, which I hope to see, will some day make my happiness.
The tears came into her eyes in saying these words," adds
the honest waiting-maid.
We perceive, it seems to me, the bourgeois vein, perverted
yet persistent, in this hope of Mme. de Pompadour; she
brings ideas of affection, and family arrangement into even
her adulterous connection. She has feelings ; she thinks in
advance as a grandmother, is moved by that thought. It
was this side of her which so shocked the courtiers, and
made them call her a grisette ; it was caused by a good
quality out of place in those high regions. Mme. de Pompa-
dour represents on still other sides the middle-class at Court,
and foretells in a way its advent, — an advent very irregular,
but very significant, and very real.
She loved the arts and the things of the intellect as not
one mistress of high rank had ever done. Beaching this
eminent and little honourable position (much less honour-
able than she thought it), she at first considered herself as
destined to aid, to call around her, and to encourage, suffer-
ing merit and men of talent of all kinds. Her only fame is
there, — her best claim, as it is her excuse. She did every-
thing to advance Voltaire and to make him acceptable to
Louis XV., whom the petulant poet repelled so strongly by
the vivacity and the familiarity of his laudation. She
thought she found genius in Cre*billon, and she honoured
it. She favoured Gresset, she protected Marmontel, she
welcomed Duclos, she admired Montesquieu and openly
showed it to him. She would gladly have obliged Jean-
Jacques Eousseau. When the King of Prussia bestowed
ostentatiously on d'Alembert a moderate pension she ad-
vised Louis XV. — who was laughing before her at the sum
VOL. I. — 3
34 INTRODUCTION.
bestowed (1200 francs), compared with the term " sublime
genius," in the letter bestowing it — she advised him to
forbid the philosopher to accept it, and to grant him the
double; which Louis XY. dared not do, from motives of
piety, because of the Encyclopaedia. It was not her fault
that we cannot say " the age of Louis XY.," as we say " the
age of Louis XIY." She would fain have made of this king
so little affable, so little giving, a friend of the Arts, of
Letters, and as liberal as a Yalois. " What was Francois I.
like ? " she one day asked the Comte de Saint-Germain who
claimed to have lived many centuries. " There 's a king I
should have loved ! " But Louis XY. could not bring him-
self to the idea of considering men of letters and intellect as
of any account, or to admitting them on any footing at
Court.
" It is not the fashion in France," said this routine monarch
one day, when they were quoting the example of Frederick
the Great before him; "besides, as there are more men of
letters and more great seigneurs here than there are in
Prussia, I should need a very large dinner-table to invite
them all." Then he counted on his fingers : " Maupertuis,
Fontenelle, La Motte, Yoltaire, Piron, Destouches, Montes-
quieu— " " Your Majesty forgets," said some one, " d'Alem-
bert and Clairaut — " " And Cre*billon," he said, « and La
Chausse'e — " " And Crdbillon junior," said another ; " he is
more amiable than his father ; and there 's the Abbs' PreVost?
the Abbd d'Olivet — " " Well ! " said the king, « for twenty-
five years all that would have dined and supped with me ! "
Ah ! all that would indeed have been much out of place
at Versailles; but Mme. de Pompadour would have liked
to see them there, nevertheless, and to have brought about
some connection of opinion between the monarch and the
men who were the honour of his reign. In point of fact,
INTRODUCTION. 35
she was the most amiable and the prettiest of philosophers
and by no means the most inconsequent, who, having a place
at Court, would have liked to introduce there some of
her own kind. " Have you regretted Mme. de Pompadour ? "
wrote Voltaire to d'Alembert on hearing of her death.
" Yes, no doubt ; for in the depths of her heart she was one
of us ; she protected Letters as much as she could ; there 's
a fine dream ended ! "
When, to amuse the king, she plays comedies in the
private apartments Montesquieu has an air of laughing at
her in a letter he writes to a friend (November, 1749) : " I
have nothing more to tell you, unless it is that the operas
and comedies of Mme. de Pompadour are about to begin,
and therefore that the Due de la Valliere will be one of the
first men of the age ; and as nothing is talked of but balls
and comedies, Voltaire enjoys a particular favour." But,
among those ballets and operas at which Montesquieu
sneered, they were also playing " Tartuffe ; " and they played
it within a few feet of the Court of the devout dauphin, and
those courtiers who had neither place nor part in it were
inconsolable.
In the entresol of the marquise at Versailles lived Dr.
Quesnay, her physician, the patron and founder of the sect of
the Economists. He was an original ; a brusque, honest man,
remaining sincere at a Court ; serious with his " apish face,"
ever ready with ingenious apologues through which to make
truth speak. While the king was with Mme. de Pompadour,
Bernis, Choiseul, and the other ministers who governed with
her, the Encyclopaedists and the Economists were talking
freely of all things in the entresol below, and settling the
future. It seems as if the marquise had some consciousness
of the storms that were gathering above her head when she
said, "After me, the deluge!" It was that very entresol,
36 INTRODUCTION.
full of ideas and theories, which inclosed within it those
cataracts of heaven which were sooner or later to break
loose. There were days when around its table, dining
together, could be seen Diderot, d'Alembert, Duclos, Hel-
vetius, Turgot, Buffon, — all that, as Louis XV. said ; " and
Mme. de Pompadour," relates Marmontel, " unable to invite
that troop of philosophers to her salon, would come down
herself to see them at table and talk with them."
The privacy of letters was very little observed in those
days; the director of the Post-office came regularly every
week to bring to the king and Mine, de Pompadour extracts
from the correspondence entrusted to him. When Dr. Ques-
nay saw him pass he flew into a fury against "that in-
famous -minister," as he called him, to such a degree that
he foamed at the mouth. " I would no more dine with
that director of the Posts," he said, " than with the public
executioner." Such remarks as these were made in the
apartments of the king's mistress, and without danger, and
for a period of twenty years. M. de Marigny, brother of
Mme. de Pompadour, a man of merit and worthy of his
sister on more than one good side, contented himself by
saying, " It is integrity exhaling itself, not malevolence."
One day, this same M. de Marigny, being in Dr. Quesnay's
lodging, they began to talk of M. de Choiseul. "He is
nothing but a dandy," said the doctor, " cut out, if he were
a little handsomer, for a favourite of Henri III." The
Marquis de Mirabeau (father of the great tribune) entered,
and with him M. de la Riviere. " This kingdom," said Mira-
beau, " is in a very bad state ; there are no energizing senti-
ments, and no money to take their place." "The country
cannot be regenerated," said La Riviere, " except by a con-
quest like that of China or by some great internal upheaval ;
but sorrow to those who will then be in it; the Trench
INTRODUCTION. 37
people strike hard." " These words made me tremble," says
the good Mme. Hausset, from whom we are quoting, " and
I hastened to leave the room. M. de Marigny did the same,
without seeming to be affected by what was said."
Connect these prophetic words with those that escaped
from Louis XV. himself on the subject of the resistance of
parliament : " Things as they are will last my time " — that
was his end of the world.
Did Mme. de Pompadour contribute as much as people
have said to the rum of the monarchy ? She did not hinder
it, certainly. Nevertheless, given the character of Louis
XV., it may have been the best thing that could have
happened to that king to fall into the hands of a woman
" born sincere, who loved him for himself, and who had
rectitude in her mind and justice in her heart, which is not
to be met with daily." That is Voltaire's opinion when
judging Mme. de Pompadour after her death. Admit the
class, and there was good in her.
Louis XV., so despicable in character, was not a man
without intelligence, nor without good sense. Many apt
sayings, piquant and sufficiently shrewd repartees are quoted
of him, such as come readily from the princes of the house of
Bourbon. He seems to have had some judgment, if that
word is not too lofty to connect with the species of immo-
bility and sloth in which he liked to keep his mind ; but his
greatest need of all was to be governed. He was a Louis
XIII. turned into the eighteenth century, with the vices of
his time, as base, as feeble, and much less chaste than his
ancestor, and without his Kichelieu. He could only have
found the latter in a beautiful woman, and the finding of
the genius of a Eichelieu in the body of a Pompadour is
not, perhaps, within the order of human possibilities. Never-
theless, Mme. de Pompadour comprehended after a time
38 INTRODUCTION.
that the mistress in her was worn-out, that she could no
longer retain or divert the king by that power alone ; she
felt that there was but one sure means of maintaining her-
self, namely, to be the necessary friend and minister, the
one to relieve the king of the trouble of willing in matters
of State. She therefore became very nearly what he needed
her to be ; but in doing so, she forced her own nature, which
was more fitted for the government of little cabinets and
dainty pleasures. Here mythology ceases, and history be-
gins — a far from noble history ! When she had made the
king dismiss the Comte d'Argenson and M. de Machault she
governed conjointly with the Abbd de Bernis and M. de
Choiseul. It was then that the world saw the political
system of Europe overthrown, the ancient alliances of France
interverted, and a whole series of great events undertaken at
the mercy of the inclinations, the antipathies, and the too
fragile, too personal good sense of an amiable woman.
Then was seen a most singular spectacle : that of an
heroic and cynical King of Prussia contending with three
women, three sovereigns, rancorous for his ruin, whom he
characterized, each and all, energetically, — the Empress
Elizabeth of Eussia, the Empress Maria-Theresa, and Mme.
de Pompadour, — behaving to them all as a man not ac-
customed to love the sex, or to fear it. On the other side
was Louis XV., saying naively of this king, whose ally he
did not know how to be, and of whom he was so often the
beaten and humiliated enemy : " He is a madman who risks
his all to win or lose ; he may win, though he has neither
religion, morals, nor principles." It is amusing to find
Louis XV. believing that he himself had more morals and
principles than Frederick.
Beaten without, for lack of a hero, in her duel with
Frederick, Mme. de Pompadour was more fortunate within
INTRODUCTION. 39
the kingdom, in her war to the death against the Jesuits.
She offered to make peace with them at a certain moment ;
they refused her advances, contrary to their custom. She
was a woman, a clever woman, and mistress of the ground ;
she revenged herself. This time she did all the harm it was
possible to do to those who had tried to harm her. Eecent
publications have thrown a vivid light on this interesting
point.1
Thus we find in the career and influence of Mme. de
Pompadour two distant epochs : the first, the most brilliant
and favoured, began on the morrow of the peace of Aix-la-
Chapelle (1748) : then she was completely in her role of
mistress, young, in love with peace, with the arts, with the
pleasures of the mind, counselling and protecting all delight-
ful things. The second epoch is chequered, more often
disastrous and fatal ; this was the whole period of the Seven
Years' War, the period of Damiens' attempt, of the defeat at
Kosbach, and the victorious insults of Frederick. Those
were harsh years, which aged before her time this frail and
graceful woman, dragged into a struggle too severe for her.
To judge of the precise degree of errors committed by each
and all at this date, we must turn to the diplomatic papers
relating to the ministry of Cardinal de Bernis and that of
the Due de ChoiseuL My impression is, from a simple view
of them, that things might have gone to worse, and that
Mme. de Pompadour, aided by M. de Choiseul, did, by
means of the "Family Compact" cover with a certain
prestige her own errors and the humiliation of the monarchy
and France.
It would seem as though the nation itself felt this, felt
1 See " History of the Fall of the Jesuits in the eighteenth century, by
Comte Alexis Saint-Priest ; also Pere Theiner's " History of the Pontifi-
cate of Clement XIV."
40 INTRODUCTION.
above all that after this brilliant favourite was gone the
monarchy was fated to fall low indeed ; for when she died
at Versailles (April 15, 1764), the regret of the population
of Paris, who would have stoned her a few years earlier,
was universal. Mme. de La Tour-Franqueville, a witness
not to be suspected, writes to Jean-Jacques Eousseau
(May 6): —
"The weather has been so frightful here of late that
Mme. de Pompadour must have had less regret in quitting
life. She proved in her last moments that her soul was a
composition of strength and weakness, — a mixture which, in
a woman, is never surprising. Nor am I surprised to see
her as generally regretted as she once was generally de-
spised or hated. Frenchmen are the first men in the world
for everything; it is quite natural they should be so for
inconsistency."
One of those who seemed to regret her the least was
Louis XV. ; it is told that seeing from a window the coffin
as it was being transported in the rain from the chateau of
Versailles to Paris, he merely remarked, "The marquise
will not have fine weather for her trip." His forefather
Louis XIII. was heard to say at the hour of the execution
of his favourite Cinq-Mars, "Dear friend must be mak-
ing an ugly face just now." Beside this saying of Louis
XIIL, that of Louis XV. seems touching in its sensibility.
The arts felt grievously the loss of Mme. de Pompadour,
and have consecrated her memory ; if Voltaire, writing of
her death to friends, could say, " She was one of us," with
much more reason had artists the right to say so. Mme. de
Pompadour was herself a distinguished artist. Directly,
and through her brother, M. de Marigny, whom she had
caused to be appointed Superintendent of buildings, she
exercised the most active and fortunate influence. At no
INTRODUCTION. 41
period was art more living, more in touch with social life,
which expressed and modelled itself through and by it on
all sides. Eendering an account of the Salon of 1765,
Diderot dwells first on an allegorical picture in which Carl
Van Loo represents the arts, disconsolate and supplicating,
imploring Destiny for the recovery of the marquise. " She
protected them indeed," writes the critic : " she loved Carl
Van Loo ; she was Cochin's benefactress ; the engraver Gai
had his wheel in her house; fortunate indeed would the
nation have been had she confined herself to diverting the
sovereign by amusements and by ordering from artists their
pictures and statues." And then, after describing the picture,
he adds, rather rudely, methinks : —
"The suppliants of Van Loo obtained nothing from Des-
tiny more favourable to France than to the arts. Mme. de
Pompadour died at the moment when they thought her out
of danger. Well I what remains of that woman who has
exhausted us in men and money, left us without honour and
without energy, and has overthrown the political system of
Europe ? — the Treaty of Versailles which will last as long as
it may ; the Cupid of Bourchardon, which the world will for-
ever admire ; a few engravings by Gai which will astonish
future antiquaries ; a good little picture by Van Loo which
people will look at sometimes ; and a handful of ashes ! "
There remain other things ; and posterity, or at least the
amateurs who to-day represent it, seem to grant to the influ-
ence of Mme. de Pompadour and to rank under her name
more objects worthy of attention than Diderot enumerates.
I shall rapidly point out a few of them : —
Mme. de Pompadour had a fine library ; very rich espe-
cially in works for the stage ; a library consisting chiefly of
French books, that is to say, books which she read, most of
them bound with her arms (three towers), and some-
42 INTRODUCTION.
times with broad laces covering the sides. These volumes
are still sought for, and bibliophiles give her a place of
honour in their golden book beside the most illustrious con-
noisseurs whose names have come down to us. She pushed
her love of the art so far as to print with her own hands at
Versailles a tragedy by Corneille "Kodogune" (1760) ; only
twenty copies of which were struck off. It may be said that
these were only passing fancies, but they prove the taste and
the passion for Letters in the woman who " would have loved
Francois I."
There exists in the "Cabinet d'Estampes" a Collection
entitled " QEuvre de Mme. de Pompadour," consisting of
more than sixty engravings or etchings. They are chiefly
allegorical subjects, intended to celebrate the memorable
events of the day, but there are some which enter more into
the idea we form of the charming artist : " Love cultivating
a myrtle," " Love cultivating laurels." The Loves are there
in every form, and even " Military Genius " itself is represent-
ed as Cupid meditating before cannon and flags. Not con-
tent with reproducing thus by etchings on copper the engrav-
ings on fine stones by Gai, Mme. de Pompadour seems to
have used the lathe herself on fine stones (agate or cornelian).
Her etchings were retouched with a graving-tool. In short,
even in printing, she put, in many ways, her hand, her pretty
hand, to work ; she is of the trade, and just as the bibliophiles
inscribe her on their list and the typographers on theirs, the
engravers have a right to count in their ranks, with the title
of associate, " Mme. de Pompadour, etcher."
The manufactory of Sevres owes much to her ; she protected
it actively : there she often took the king, who, for once in a
way, felt the importance of an art to which he owed his mag-
nificent dinner-services, worthy of being offered as gifts to
sovereigns. Under the near influence of Versailles, Sevres
INTRODUCTION. 43
soon had original marvels to rival those of Old Dresden and
Japan. Nowhere does the style called " Pompadour " shine
with more delicacy and fancy, or better in its place, than in
the porcelain services of that date. This glory, due to a
fragile art, is more durable than many others.
While M. de Marigny, her brother, summoned Soufflot
from Lyons to put him in charge of the construction of
Sainte-Genevieve (the Pantheon), she interested herself
eagerly, and contributed her share to the establishment of
the Ecole Militaire. Among the very small number of
authentic letters which we have of her, there are two which
give very valuable details on this subject. In one, addressed
to a friend, the Comtesse de Lutzelbourg, she says (January
3, 1751):—
" I believe you have been very glad of the decree the
king has just issued ennobling the military ; but you will
be still better pleased with one that is about to appear for an
Establishment for five hundred young gentlemen whom the
king is to educate in military art. This Eoyal school is to
be built near the Invalides ; it will be all the finer because
his Majesty has worked at it himself for the past year, and
the ministers have had nothing to do with it and did not
know of it until he had arranged everything to his liking ;
which was done at the end of the last trip to Fontainebleau.
I will send you the edict as soon as printed."
If the king worked at this himself and the ministers had
nothing to do with it, we may be sure that he owed its
inspiration to Mme. de Pompadour, for he was not a man
to have ideas of that kind in his own head. Another and
very familiar letter of Mme. de Pompadour, addressed to
Pelris-Duvemey, who had suggested to her the first idea
of the ficole Militaire, shows her to us pursuing that noble
project with solicitude: —
44 INTBODUCTION.
August 15, 1755.
" No, assuredly, my dear ninny [nigaud'} I shall not allow
to be wrecked in port an Establishment which ought to
immortalize the king, render the nobles happy, and make
known to posterity my attachment to the State and to the
person of his Majesty. I told Gabrielle to-day to arrange
to give Grenelle the necessary workmen to finish the work.
My income for this year has not yet been paid to me; I
shall use it all in paying the workmen fortnightly. I don't
know if I can get any security for repayment, but I know
very well that I shall risk, with great satisfaction, one
hundred thousand francs for the welfare of those poor lads.
Good-night, dear ninny," etc.
If the tone seems a little bourgeois, the act was regal.
All the masters of the French school of that day painted
Mme. de Pompadour ; we have Boucher's portrait, also that
of Drouais, which Grimm preferred to all;1 but the most
admirable is certainly the pastel of Latour, in the Louvre.
It is there that we must see the marquise before we permit
ourselves to judge of her and form any idea of her person.
She is represented seated in an arm-chair, holding in her
hand a sheet of music; the left arm rests upon a marble
table on which is a globe and several books. The thickest
of these volumes, which touches the globe, is volume four
of the " Encyclopaedia ; " beside it lies the " Esprit des Lois,"
the " Henriade," and the " Pasteur Fido," bearing testimony
to the tastes both serious and tender of the queen of this
place. On the table, at the foot of the globe, is a blue
volume turned face down, inscribed on its back "Pierres
gravies;" this is her work. One engraving is loose and
i See this portrait in the Memoirs of the Marquis d'Argenson, in this
Historical series. — Ts>
INTRODUCTION. 45
hangs down; it represents an engraver at work and bears
the words, "Pompadour sculpsit." On the ground at the
foot of the table is a box full of engravings and designs,
marked with her arms ; it is fairly a trophy. Farther back,
between the feet of the console stands a Japanese vase (why
not a Sevres vase ?) ; behind her chair is another chair or
an ottoman with a guitar. But it is the person herself who
is at all points marvellous in elegance, sweet dignity, and
exquisite beauty. Holding the sheet of music lightly and
negligently, her attention is suddenly attracted ; she seems
to hear a sound and turns her head. Is it the king who
comes and is about to enter ? She has an air of expecting
with certainty, and she listens with a smile. Her head
thus turned shows the outline of her neck in all its grace
and her hair, very short and deliciously waved, the curls of
which are in tiers, their blond tints just visible through
a semi-powdering that scarcely covers them. The head
floats in a light-blue atmosphere which is, in general, that
of the whole picture. The eye is everywhere satisfied and
caressed. An azure light descends and glides over all the
objects. There is nothing in this fairy boudoir that does
not seem to pay court to the goddess, nothing, not even the
" Esprit des Lois " and the " Encyclopaedia." The flowered
satin gown gives place at the slope of the bosom to several
tiers of those ribbon knots which were called, I think,
" dchelle de rubans," and which are here of a very pale lilac.
She herself has the flesh and tints of a white lilac, slightly
azured. This bosom, these ribbons, that gown, the whole en-
semble blends harmoniously, or rather, amorously. Beauty
shines in all its glow in the opened flower. The face is
still young ; the temples have kept their youth and fresh-
ness ; the lips are equally fresh and have not yet withered,
as it is said they did from being too often bitten and con-
46 INTRODUCTION.
tracted when forced to swallow anger or affronts. Every-
thing in the face, the attitude, expresses grace, taste supreme,
affability and amenity rather than gentleness, with the air
of a queen, which she needs must take, but which, after
all, is natural to her and is sustained without much effort.
I might continue and describe still more of the pretty de-
tails, but I prefer to stop and send spectators to the picture
itself ; they will there find many things I have not ventured
to touch.
Such, in her heyday, was this ravishing, ambitious, frail
woman, who was, nevertheless, sincere, who remained kind
in her eminence, faithful (I like to think this) in her fault,
serviceable when she could be, vindictive, nevertheless, when
pushed to it ; who was, after all, truly of her sex, and whom
her waiting-maid has shown to us in privacy without being
too burdensome and overwh3lming a witness. Mme. du
Hausset's book leaves a singular impression; it is written
with a sort of naivete* and ingenuousness which is honestly
preserved in the midst of vice : " ' This is what the- Court is,
corrupt from top to bottom,' I said one day to Madame, who
was talking to me of certain facts within my knowledge. ' I
could tell you many others/ she answered ; ' but that little
side-room in which you sit must often teach you much.' "
Mme. de Pompadour, after the first glamour of fairy-land
was over, judged her situation for what it was, and, while
continuing to love the king, she kept no illusion as to his
nature, nor as to the species of affection of which she was
the object. She felt she was nothing to him but a habit,
and absolutely nothing else. " It is your staircase the king
loves," the little Mare*chale de Mirepoix said to her ; " he is
accustomed to go up and down it ; but if he found another
woman who could talk to him of his hunting and his busi-
ness it would be all the same to him at the end of three
INTRODUCTION. 47
days." Mme. de Pompadour represented to herself those
words as the strict and sad truth. She had everything to
fear at every moment, for with such a man all was possible ;
a smile, or a more or less gracious look from him proved
nothing. " You do not know him, my dear," she said one
day to Mme. du Hausset, with whom she was talking of
some rival who was trying to supplant her ; " if he meant to
put her in my place this very evening, he would treat her
coldly before every one, and me with the greatest affection."
He acquired this slyness from his early education under
Cardinal de Fleury. Finally she cries out from a secret
sense of her misery, and with an expression which cannot
fail to surprise us : " Ah ! my life is like that of the
Christian — a perpetual strife. It was not so with those
who won the good graces of Louis XIV."
But, in spite of all, she was the mistress who was fitted
for this reign, the only one who could have succeeded in
making something of it in the line of opinion, the only one
who could have diminished the crying discord between the
least literary of kings and the most literary of epochs. If
the Abbe* Galiani, in a curious page, loudly asserting his
preference for the period of Louis XV. over that of Louis
XIV., could say of this age of the human mind so fruitful
in results, "No such reign will again be met with for a
very long time," Mme. de Pompadour certainly contributed
much to it. That graceful woman rejuvenated the Court;
bringing to it the liveliness of her very French tastes, her
Parisian tastes. As mistress and friend of the king, as
protectress of the arts, her spirit was always fully on the
level of her role and rank; as a politician she failed, she
did harm, but not more harm perhaps than any other
favourite in her place would have done at that epoch, when
what we lacked in France was a real statesman.
48 INTRODUCTION.
When she felt herself dying after a reign of nineteen
years, when she was forced at forty-two years of age to leave
these palaces, these riches, these heaped-up marvels of Art,
this power so envied, so disputed, but which" she retained in
her hands unbroken till her last day, she did not say, like
Mazarin, with a sigh, " Must I leave all this ? " She faced
death with a firm eye, and, as the rector of the Madeleine,
having come to visit her at Versailles, turned to go away,
she said, " Wait a minute, Monsieur le cure*, for I am going
too."
Madame de Pompadour may be considered as the last in
date of the mistresses of the king. After her, it is impossible
to descend and enter with decency into the history of the
Du Barry. The kings and emperors who have since then
ruled in France have been either too virtuous, or too de-
spotic, or too gouty, or too repentant, or too domestic, to
allow themselves such inutilities ; scarcely a vestige is now
seen of them ; Mme. de Pompadour remains the last in sight
in the history of France, and the most brilliant.
To return to Cardinal de Bernis and the history of his
ministry under Mme. de Pompadour, during the last year of
it (1758) he does, as it were, nothing but invoke, and call to
his aid M. de Choiseul. He seems to have early chosen and
promised him to himself as his successor 'as soon as he had
provided for the most pressing difficulties. His plan, after
the victories won by the King of Prussia at Eosbach, and at
Lissa, was to make peace. But what peace ? will be asked.
Could France and Austria negotiate on the morrow beneath
the blow of a double defeat? There is a sentiment of
dignity that goes before all else, of high national propriety
and of honour in the crown, as they said in those days.
This sentiment was in the heart of Maria Theresa, but
INTRODUCTION. 49
Bernis had it not ; he reasons in all his letters very much
as Madame de Maintenon did in those she wrote to the
Princesse des Ursins, in which the word " peace " recurs on
every page. Bernis explains himself clearly in a letter to
Choiseul of January 6, 1758 ; he reveals to him his thought
before he imparts it to the king.
" My advice would be," he says, " to make peace, and to
begin it by a truce on sea and land. When I know what
the king thinks of this idea, which is not according to my
way of thinking, but which good sense, reason, and necessity
present to me, I will give you the particulars. Meantime,
try to make M. de Kaunitz [Austrian prime-minister] feel
two things that are equally true : that the king will never
abandon the empress, but on the other hand that he must
not be ruined with her. Our respective faults have made of
a great project, which, early hi September, was infallible, a
broken neck and certain ruin. It was a fine dream which
it would be dangerous to continue, — though it might be
possible to resume it some day with better actors and
military plans 'more judiciously made. The more I have
been closely concerned in this great alliance, the more I
ought to be believed when I counsel peace."
That which Bernis evidently lacks in the whole of this
purely political portion of his career is the nature and stamp
of a statesman ; having neither that character nor the ap-
pearance of it, he did not know how to obtain over his
surroundings an ascendency which is never granted except
to those who cannot be refused. Comprehending as a man
of sense all the difficulties and the causes of the ruin, he
sees no other, remedy than to renounce promptly what had
been undertaken with such levity. Choiseul, however, re-
sists this advice ; he sees the shame and danger of it ; he
makes objections and leads Bernis to explain himself on this
VOL. I. — 4
50 INTRODUCTION.
peace which is of a nature to break up the alliance. Bernis
indicates his plan, which, after all, was never more than a
sketch ; it merely concerned, according to him, negotiating
separately with the King of Prussia ; but " the best way to
bring that king to reason is to make peace with England ;
and it is of that that I think night and day " (January 25,
1758). This idea of a private peace with the English for
which he had begun, he says, to build up little foundations,
became almost impossible after the Convention signed in
London, (April 11), between the kings of England and
Prussia, into which the Court of Versailles never entered.
He began this year of 1758 with the blackest anticipations,
too soon justified. A Colbert for the kingdom, a Louvois for
the war, and a Louis XIV. on the throne were, undoubtedly,
what was needed. Bernis has the merit of feeling, too late,
this utter void, this nothingness ; but while deploring
them he has nothing with which to fill them; he is not
of those who have the right to say, " I will ! " Nature did
not mark him on the forehead with the seal of command
and authority ; he pities himself perpetually and gives way.
In this series of lamentable confidences one feature in
these letters makes me smile; I see, as it were, the seal
and colour of the epoch and the remains of a frivolity
which, in Bernis, still clung to the public man. In Feb-
ruary, 1758, in the midst of the gravest circumstances, he
accepts an elegant commission to be conveyed to M. de
Choiseul: "Do not forget, I beg of you, my commission
for a lady's dress, blue ground, embroidered in white silk on
some spring texture." Slight accident ! M. de Choiseul
makes a mistake, the dress arrives with the despatches at
the end of March. " The ground is white and the flowers
blue, and I was asked to get a blue ground and white
flowers — but they like it just as well as it is." And farther
INTRODUCTION. 51
on : " The gown is thought very pretty." The abbe'-minister
was not, we perceive, entirely on ill terms with chiffon
gallantry.
The situation on the side of France was growing worse
and worse daily. In this absence of all order and supreme
direction the Due de Eichelieu chose to return to Paris as
if he had nothing to do in Hanover; all the generals re-
quested their return. The Comte de Clermont, prince of the
blood, sent as commander-in-chief, made blunder after blunder.
He began by a precipitate retreat of exaggerated length,
which looked like a rout. It seemed as if this descendant
of the Great Conde* saw nothing more urgent than to put
panic into the order of the day. Here, Bernis speaks with
nobler accent : " As for me, I would rather have destroyed
our army by a battle than by retreat ; I even believe that
such a course would have been to the preservation of the
men ... I thought I should die of shame and grief." And
in another place he adds: "I composed the letter which
the king wrote to the Comte de Clermont to prevent him
from quitting the Rhine, where, inconceivable fact ! he thought
he was not in safety (April, 1758). The letter is firm and
decided. But it is not enough to be strong at one moment;
we must be so consistently and at all points. But how
attain it ? My only hope, which, after all, is only a woman's
or a child's sentiment, is that if I am not dead of our shame
it is possible that I am reserved to repair it. I would it
might be so and that I might die immediately after it."
Let us count to his credit such words, in which he is only
to blame for speaking a little too much of dying, and let us
draw a veil over the hideous and circumstantial exposure he
gives of the general degradation of that period — degradation
which had even invaded the camps, that last refuge of honour !
It is not possible, even after the lapse of a century, to read a
52 INTRODUCTION.
certain letter of Bernis, written March 31, 1758, without
blushing. Never was the decadence of the monarchy of Louis
XV. more nakedly exposed ; we feel, from the nature of the
evil, that it is very near to dissolution. A few traits, never-
theless, in this disheartening future must be excepted ; the
soldiers worn-out with fatigue, have kept their willingness,
and are worth much more than those who command them.
Bernis concludes the letter with a few words in which
he does justice to the genius, so full of impetus, of the
French race. His words are profoundly true, applying them
— I do not say to the morals but — to the sentiments
and spirit of our nation, which we have seen more than
once turn and recover itself in a moment under a powerful
hand.
It is here that the insufficiency of Bernis and at the same
time his honesty manifest themselves ; he begins to be sick,
morally and physically. His nerves are affected; exposed
to the universal attack of public opinion which is now
wholly declared in favour of the King of Prussia, without
direct means of remedying the evils and disasters of each
passing day, obliged to provide for the subsidies of the allies,
sensitive to the fear of failing in his engagements if money
fails (and money is very often delayed), — under the press-
ure of all this he utters cries of distress and does not
hesitate to enter into disagreement with Mme. de Pompadour.
She can permit all ; he owes her all, he will never quarrel
with her; but neither does he conceal what he considers
the full truth on the situation, and she does not thank
him for it. The finances, nominally directed by M. de
Boullongue, are exhausted ; all resources depend on P£ris-
Montmartel (brother of Paris-Duverney) ; it is he who
supplies the funds, and the controller-general is, in a way
only his clerk. The country is on the point of bankruptcy
INTRODUCTION. 53
in April, 1758, for twelve millions of notes drawn for the
navy, which Bernis fears will be protested.
Here Bernis shows himself again subject to delusion.
Filled with the idea that what is wanted is unity of manage-
ment, a single motor, a prime-minister in fact, and with
some such title, he deludes himself so far as to believe that
it might be himself, that Mme. de Pompadour could desire
nothing better than that such a minister should be a friend
whom she could govern. He presents a memorial to the
Council on this subject, proving the necessity of a sole and
chief direction. Let us do him the justice to say that he
does not seem to have dwelt long on the idea of being
himself prime-minister. He inclines to propose the Mare*-
chal de Belle-Isle, who would really, he thinks, exercise
authority.
In Paris, the exasperation of the public mind had reached
its height in this summer of 1758, and it lasted until a few
successes of M. de Broglie the following year broke the
cruel uniformity of reverses. " They threaten me in anony-
mous letters," writes Bernis ; and a second defeat of M. de
Soubise would have sufficed to make the populace stone
Mme. de Pompadour in the streets of Paris.
By this time Bernis had reached a state that was one of
disease, of downright nervous exhaustion, infinitely honour-
able in its origin, but which must have made him little
fit to perform the role which, in his heart, he no longer had
any ambition to play. " Do not speak of me again for the
first influence," he writes in sincere tones to Choiseul ; " you
do me wrong ; I seem to be prompting you and to be solely
ambitious, when I am really only a citizen and a man of good
sense." In August, 1758, he opens himself freely to Choiseul,
proposing to him to become his successor. This proposal
was not a lure ; Bernis thought what he said. His delusion
54 INTRODUCTION.
was to suppose that after being the influential minister of
the first rank he could step back at will, associate with him-
self a colleague, not a rival, blend intimately with him, and
under this agreeable form, which he defines himself as " two
heads under one cap," do good to the State, all the while
relieving himself of the sole and odious weight of the burden.
Choiseul is made duke (August, 1758). Bernis is about
to be made cardinal ; this is the moment when the minis-
terial combination meditated by the latter, and on which he
counts, is to be sealed and accomplished. But it was not
enough to persuade Choiseul and convince him that he
ought to be minister; it was necessary to also persuade
Mme. de Pompadour and the king. The proposal was not
at first agreeable to them. Bernis had drawn up a memorial
to the king in favour of Choiseul, which Mme. de Pompa-
dour was to give to him. She disliked and resisted the idea
of a change. We shall not get the key to this ministerial
revolution and its secret spring, which lies in the mental
condition of Bernis, unless we read the truly desperate letters
which he writes from time to time to Mme. de Pompadour.
They are not those of a minister or statesman ; it is a sick
man who writes and enumerates the symptoms by which
he is attacked, — colics that last ten hours, frequent and
increasing giddiness, obstinate insomnia.1
One political idea mingles with the uneasiness and grow-
ing agony of Bernis: M. de Choiseul was not so directly
committed as himself to the policy of the alliance, and on
his entrance to the ministry he would be free to break or
1 Sainte-Beuve, when he wrote this, had no knowledge of Bernis' auto-
biographical memoir. The reader, who has the memoir in these volumes,
will see that Bernis, though his nerves gave way, was not a valetudinarian,
but an over-worked honest man, who tried to make headway with reason-
able ideas against the corruption, apathy, and intrigues around him, and
became worn-out, for a time, in the struggle. — TR.
INTRODUCTION. 55
modify what had been done by others. " None but a new
minister can make new engagements. The Due de Choiseul
is the only one who can maintain the king's system or
undo it." That is Bernis' just idea; but so long as he
applied it to himself personally and turned it against
himself the idea became to him a stinging and intolerable
remorse ; and it is this which explains the word "dishonour "
which returns so often under his pen. "Kemember," he
writes to Mme. de Pompadour on the evening of September
26, " that it is impossible that I should be the one to break
the treaties which I have made."
It is not for us to reproach Bernis for so honourable a
sensibility; but it is evident that his morale was more
affected than was suitable in a man charged with conduct-
ing great public affairs, and that ministerial responsibility
would be henceforth too much for him. He sent his
memorial to the king, in which he developed with some
energy his motives, and gave an undisguised exposition of
the state of things. In it he continued to cling to his
chimera, namely to remain in the Council after resigning his
portfolio to M. de Choiseul, intending to help out the new
minister, and to be helped out by him. Louis XV., dis-
pleased, made no answer on that point ; he simply consented
to Bernis' resignation in favour of M. de Choiseul, in a letter
dated October 9, 1758.
Choiseul could do nothing but return at once from Vienna ;
but the king and Mme. de Pompadour continued displeased
with Bernis. It was at this moment that he received the
cardinal's hat ; he had been loaded with favours and bene-
fits for the last two years ; appointed successively Abb£ de
Saint-MMard, Abb£ des Trois-Fontaines, and Commander of
the Saint-Esprit ; they might wonder, therefore, that he
wearied of serving at the very moment when he could
56 INTRODUCTION.
scarcely obtain any further increase of fortune. Malicious
remarks circulated in the salons of Paris and Versailles ;
words were put into his mouth which he disavowed ; he was
made to say that he retired because he wanted peace and
Mme. de Pompadour did not want it. It was whispered
about that the king was angry with him for resigning the
ministry of Foreign Affairs.
During these last weeks, Bernis was kept explaining at
every turn ; the position, as it went on, became untenable.
The arrival of M. de Choiseul, at the end of November only
complicated matters; for, however loyal and sincere the
successor and the predecessor might be and were, it was im-
possible that good friends at Court should not do their best
to put them on bad terms. The delusion and, if I may say
so, the good nature of Bernis in this position, knowing the
Court as he did, show themselves in his not having consid-
ered in advance these difficulties, which were wholly inevi-
table, and came from the very nature of things.
Louis XV. cut short the difficulty by an order, which
Bernis received December 13, exiling him to his abbey near
Soissons ; a letter of his to the king written on receiving the
order, and another written in the evening of the same day
to Mme. de Pompadour, express sentiments of perfect sub-
mission and infinite gratitude for the past, without a single
word of complaint.
Four days later, from his chateau of Vic-sur-Aisne, near
Soissons, where he was to pass his exile, he wrote to M. de
Choiseul to assure him that he did not impute his dismissal
to him, and to regulate their future intercourse. His corre-
spondence with M. de Choiseul, taken as a whole, certainly
does not elevate Bernis ; it gives and fixes his measure as a
leading minister, and it answers a question which I put to
myself as I entered upon this subject: he had not the
INTRODUCTION. 57
stamina of a statesman, and after the excitement of his
first successes, his organization, put to too strong a test,
manifestly gave way. He was reserved, however, for a
second role, more sheltered, more pacific, where, limited to
diplomacy and official representation, he recovered the use
and full development of his happy qualities and his useful
courtesy.
As to the state of France in those fatal years and those
worst moments of Louis XV., the letters of Bernis are a very
sad revelation; and it is honourable for him to have been
the first to feel and to express that profound sadness which
they continue to communicate to the present day. At the
same time, we issue from the reading of these letters dis-
posed to do justice to M. de Choiseul, who, from a situation
so compromised, so lost in fact, was able to draw results
sufficiently specious, sufficiently brilliant to cast a veil over
the decadence of France, and raise the nation in its own
eyes, while awaiting its regeneration through convulsions,
and its entrance, valiant and rejuvenated (but always ac-
cording to the spirit of the chiefs who guided it), into the
sphere of its new destinies.
Let us return to the general character of Cardinal de
Bernis, whom I did not at first intend to take so politically
nor in a manner so grave. That which seems to me especially
to be remarked in him, as hi many personages of the upper
French clergy of the eighteenth century, is the mixture
of worldliness, philosophy and grace, which, little by little,
brought them, by good sense and good taste, to respect and
esteem ; these prelates of rank, entering too lightly into
their calling, nevertheless acquired the spirit of it with age ;
they became at a given moment Churchmen in the best
acceptation of the word, without ceasing to be men of the
world and agreeable socially ; then, when persecution came,
58 INTRODUCTION.
when the hour of trial and danger struck, they found within
them both courage and constancy ; they had the honour of
their calling; true gentlemen of the Church, they were
ready to share affliction and misfortune, as they had
formerly sought benefices and privileges. This was, with
few exceptions, the part played by the upper French clergy
during the Kevolution. Those of these prelates who survived
it, and who were seen to reappear after the Concordat, such
as the Boisgelins, the Baussets, and others, present to us a
special physiognomy, at once venerable and smiling; they
shine in pure and polished literature of an elegance that is
tempered by holiness ; but Bernis is, in a way, the leader
and senior of them all. He died in Kome, stripped of every-
thing, in the height of the Eevolution, but he would have
worthily passed through all trials to its end. He was — if it
is permitted to thus interpret hearts — he was of those who,
in those memorable hours when acts of sacrifice were de-
manded, recovered their catholic faith through Honour, and,
rising from the frailties of their past, became true Christians
through the force of being honest men.
In December 1758, Bernis, then just fallen from the min-
istry, was in exile at Vic-sur-Aisne, near Soissons, and the
first months, in spite of his philosophy and the gentleness of
his soul, must have been rather painful to him. He had his
family near him, but he did not yet dare to receive his friends
or ask for the necessary permission to do so. M. de Choiseul
watched (and sincerely we may believe) for opportunities to
oblige him at Court and to serve him ; he took the idea very
early of giving him the residence of Eome, but the way had
to be prepared for it. " On my side," Bernis writes to him,
May 14, 1759, "I am thinking only of binding myself to
my profession, and of giving to the course I take in this
direction the time, the reflection and the honesty which are
INTRODUCTION. 59
due to my principles and my character. ... I shall always
be ready to serve the king when you think I can be useful
to him. It is in my heart to do so, but my situation does
not allow of my asking it. When I speak of serving the
king I do not mean, as you can well understand, an office
at Court, for on that point I have neither plan nor hope."
He was to enter the priesthood about the year 1760, being
then forty-five years of age. His nervous illness still contin-
ued and made him desire a change of climate. The idea of
going to Eome as the king's minister pleased him much ; but
he desired not to go until he was a priest, and besides that
a bishop. There was talk as early as 1760 of giving him
the bishopric of either Lisieux or Condom ; the latter would
have suited him best, as being in his native region. But a
difficulty lay in the oath which he was required to take as
bishop before the king himself. Louis XV., who, although
he had neither bitterness nor animosity against Bernis, would
have felt embarrassed and annoyed at seeing him again so
soon. Five long years went by, softened no doubt by visits
from friends and by the journeys and sojourns he was allowed
to make in the South among members of his family; bub
for all that, they were five years of exile and forced separa-
tion from social life. It was not until January, 1764, that
his disgrace ended, and a ray of favour appeared ; on which
Bernis wrote as follows to Voltaire (January 16, 1764) : —
" The king has given me for a New Year's present, my dear
colleague, the best of all benefits, — freedom, and the per-
mission to pay my court to him, which is most precious and
dear to a Frenchman who has been loaded with favours by
his master. I was received at Versailles with all sorts of
kindness. In Paris the public showed its joy ; the makers
of horoscopes have had a hundred idle fancies on the subject,
each more extravagant than the others. As for me, who
60 INTRODUCTION.
have long learned to bear both fortune and misfortune, I
have escaped from congratulations, real and false, and have
returned to my winter home, whence I shall go from time to
time to pay my duty at Versailles and to see my friends in
Paris. The older persons at Court have served me with
friendliness, so that my heart is much at ease ; and I have
never hoped for a position more agreeable, more free, more
honourable."
The horoscopes were too hasty ; Fortune is often slower
in deciding on her method of return than in giving her
first favours. Appointed Archbishop of Alby in the same
year (May, 1764), Bernis had to employ himself in his
diocese longer than he expected. He did so with pro-
priety and even with zeal, for he was good and had that hu-
manity which, at need, is ready for a time to do .the office
and function of charity. Nevertheless, the sacred spark did
not inspire him ; ennui was frequent, and he had long hours
of distaste for his life. It was too much to have to practise
a second time and for so many years the saying of his youth,
" I will wait." In vain had he said, " I love Letters ; they
have done me more good than I have done them honour ; "
Letters alone did not suffice him. It was time that public
affairs and the world should return to occupy this lively and
brilliant intellect. Pope Clement XIII. died, and Bernis
received from M: de Choiseul, February 21, 1769, an order
to start without delay for the Conclave. Kome henceforth
was to be his residence and almost his country, for as soon
as the Conclave ended he was appointed ambassador and
his great career began once more.
During his years of exile and of residence in his diocese,
and even during the first period of his life in Eome, he kept
up a correspondence with Voltaire, which was published for
the first time in 1799, by M. de Bourgoing, and is very agree-
INTRODUCTION. 61
able reading.1 Bernis does not pale at all before his formi-
dable correspondent. To judge properly of the tone of this
correspondence we must not forget the respective positions
of the two personages. Voltaire had known Bernis as a
poet and a man of gallantry ; he had seen much of him in
society and under his first form of frivolity and dissipation.
Bernis had, moreover, the honour of being his colleague in
the French Academy, where, singular to relate ! being twenty
years younger and with so slender a kit, he had preceded
him. There was, therefore, between them a familiarity of
good taste, the limits of which were rather undecided. Vol-
taire, when he saw Bernis become a cardinal, an archbishop,
and thus involved in the highest dignities of the Church,
was disposed to treat him with all flattery and laudation on
condition of mingling therewith more than one malicious
jest, and, if allowed to do so, more than one religious imper-
tinence. Bernis could not, without being pedantic and ridic-
ulous, appear to perceive all the irreverence of his colleague,
and still less to be shocked by it. It sufficed him to turn it
aside, indirectly, with a witty saying ; or sometimes, if Vol-
taire went too far, to recall him to propriety by disguising
the advice with praises. He does not fail to do this ; Bernis
has the merit of remaining true to himself in this correspon-
dence ; he knows how to take a jest, and he also knows how
to stop it discreetly when it passes the proper bounds. To
judge rightly of the spirit of these letters they should not be
taken in detached passages, but should be read as a whole.
The first letter from Voltaire to Bernis is written near the
close of the latter's ministry, when he was about to be made
1 The correspondence with Voltaire is not included in these translated
volumes. But Sainte-Beuve's account of it is given here as affording the
reader a glimpse of a side of Bernis that does not appear in his other let-
ters, which are chiefly political or relating to public matters. — TK.
62 INTRODUCTION.
a cardinal. Voltaire congratulates him the moment that he
hears of it : "I ought to feel more interest than others in this
agreeable news, inasmuch as you have deigned to set my
calling above that of Cardinal Eichelieu." And he pushes
flattery, at the moment, so far as to say : " I do not know if
I deceive myself, but I am convinced that your ministry will
be fortunate and great ; for you have two things which have
gone out of fashion, — genius and constancy."
After this the correspondence stops and is not resumed
for three years ; it begins again during Bernis' exile (October,
1761) : " Monseigneur, thank God who has caused you to
still love Letters ! With that taste, a stomach that digests,
two hundred thousand francs a year, and the red hat, a man
is above all sovereigns ..." Bernis replies by at once
putting his witty correspondence on the tone and point that
he desires : —
" I am not ungrateful, my dear colleague ; I have always
felt and owned that Letters have been more useful to me
than the most fortunate chances of my life. In my early
youth they opened to me an agreeable door into the world ;
they consoled me for the long neglect of Cardinal de Fleury
and the inflexible harshness of the Bishop of Mirepoix.
When circumstances pushed me, almost in spite of myself,
upon the great stage, Letters made the world say of me, ' At
any rate, he knows how to read and write.' I quitted them
for public affairs, but I never forgot them, and I now return
to them with pleasure. You wish me a good digestion ; that
is not possible now. For twelve years I have been very
temperate, but I have a gouty humour in my body which has
not yet fixed itself on the extremities, and may oblige me to
go and consult the oracle of Geneva [Doctor Tronchin]. In
this plan there is as much desire to see you again as to be
cured of my gout."
INTRODUCTION. 63
Let me be permitted here to make a remark on the way of
living and diet of Bernis. It was not what might be supposed
from the accounts that are given of his sumptuous table, and
the plumpness that we see in his portraits. Bernis' cook was
already celebrated in the days of his embassy to Venice ;
and we have seen Algarotti fearing his temptations to glut-
tony, which he knew that he could not resist. The cook of
the ambassador to Kome had no less reputation, and Bernis
felt bound one day to write to M. de Choiseul in reply to foolish
rumours set afloat on the luxury of his table : " A good or a
bad cook makes people talk or say nothing about the cost of
an ambassador's table ; but that cost is none the less, whether
the table is well or ill served, though the result is very differ-
ent." It is recorded that Bernis, at the sumptuous table he
offered to others, lived himself frugally on a wholly vegetable
diet. " I dined at our ambassador's with Angelica Kaufmann,"
writes Mme. Vige*e Le Brun in her Memoirs. " He placed us
at table on each side of him ; he had invited several foreigners
and a part of the diplomatic corps ; so we were thirty at the
dinner, of which the cardinal did the honours perfectly,
while eating himself only two little dishes of vegetables."
This was true of Bernis in 1790, and was already an old
custom with him in 1761.
Bernis also reduces what Voltaire says about his income of
two hundred thousand francs. He had not at that time one
hundred thousand, nor even that until his debts were paid ;
but in the end he was fairly and honourably provided for.
" It is much," he says, " for a younger son of Gascony, even
if it is little for a cardinal. The deacons of the Eoman
church do not have as much ; and I am not sorry to be the
poorest of the French cardinals, because no one is ignorant
that it depended only on myself to be the richest." That
Bernis really had this tranquillity and content of which he
64 INTRODUCTION.
speaks, and that it was his fundamental condition during
his years of inaction and exile, I should not dare to say ; it is
enough that he tends towards it, and turns to it, whenever
possible, by reflection, and that his natural disposition is
never at war with his desire.
Voltaire sends Bernis some of his writings before publica-
tion ; he consults him on his tragedies and asks his advice,
which Bernis gives him in detail, conscientiously and with
sincerity. " Cassandra " was written in six days, and Voltaire
boasts of it, calling it "The Six Days' Work." Bernis
advises him to put six more into improving the style of
the play and perfecting it. He gives his reasons as a
judicious critic and a good Academician. These innocent
consultations are interspersed with jests, more or less keen,
on all sorts of subjects. When Voltaire introduces politics,
Bernis evades them pleasantly. The name of Eichelieu
often returns to Voltaire's pen as if to convey an indirect
flattery : " Ah ! how people act and judge ! how few act well
or judge well I Cardinal Eichelieu had no taste ; and, good
God ! was he as great a man as they say ? I have perhaps
at the bottom of my heart the insolence of . . . ; but I
dare not ..." Bernis never answers these insinuations, and
turns a deaf ear to such exaggerated and, in fact, insolent
praise from a satirical man.
When, however, he is touched in a more truthful manner,
he makes answer, and does it admirably. Voltaire, seeing
him still in the inaction of private life, and excusing him-
self for finding nothing better with which to cheat the years
than the writing of tragedies, says to him: "But what is
there better to do ? Must we not play with life till the
last moment ? Is not life a child to be rocked till it sleeps ?
You are still in the flower of your age ; what will you do
with your genius, your acquired knowledge, and all your
INTRODUCTION. 65
talents ? That puzzles me. When you have built at Vic
you will find that Vic leaves a'great void in the soul, which
must be filled by something better. You possess the sacred
fire, but with what aromatics are you feeding it ? I own
that I am infinitely curious to know what will become of
a soul like yours." Bernis replies with a thought, and, so
to speak, a voice, of enchanting sweetness : —
"You are troubled for my soul in the void of idleness
to which I am henceforth condemned. Acknowledge that
you think me ambitious, like all my kind. If you knew
more you would know that I entered office a philosopher,
and that I left it more of a philosopher than ever, and
that three years of retirement have strengthened that man-
ner of thinking until it is now unshakable. I know how
to occupy myself ; but I am wise enough not to let the
public share in my occupations. To be happy I needed
only that liberty of which Virgil speaks : ' Quce sera tamen
respexit inertem.' I possess it in part; with time I shall
possess it wholly. A hand invisible led me from the
mountains of the Vivarais to the summit of honours ; let
it act ; it will know how to lead me to an honourable and
tranquil condition. And then, for my lesser pleasures, I
shall, in the order of nature, be the elector of three or
four popes, and I shall see again that portion of the world
which once was the cradle of the arts. Is not this enough
to rock that child which you call life?"
The singular sweetness of this philosophy, so truly Ho-
ratian, asks pardon for the Ugerete that still mingles and will
long continue to mingle in it. Let us note, however, the
"hand invisible," which is not in Horace, and to which
Bernis confides himself ; and let us remember that when the
days of serious adversity and ruin come, the cardinal-arch-
bishop, hearing of the rigorous spoliation with which he
VOL. I. — 5
66 INTRODUCTION.
and all the clergy of France are threatened, wrote to M. de
Montmorin : " You must have remarked, monsieur, on a
hundred occasions, that there never was a bishop-ambassador
of the king in Eome more moderate than I, more friendly to
peace, more conciliating; but, if I am driven to bay by
unjust and indelicate demands I shall remember that, at an
advanced age, a man should concern himself only in render-
ing to the Supreme Judge a satisfactory account of the
accomplishment of his duty." These last words of Bernis
ought to remain ever present with us as a height in the far
distance when we abandon ourselves with him to the amuse-
ments and human charms of the journey.
In action, he may have had his vanities, his illusions of
self-love, his desire to appear to have done more than he
really did do ; but in repose and in reflection,' in presence
of himself, he is always modest. Voltaire, in this less
human than he admits, laughs at times to see the King
of Prussia, his " old ingrate," worn-out, and the implacable
struggle of the hunters and the wild-boar going on. " Laugh,"
he cries, "and profit by the folly and imbecility of men.
Here, as I believe, is Europe at war for a dozen years. It
is you, by the way, who belled the cat. You gave me then
an infinite pleasure. . . ." Bernis is not at all proud of
the whole of that r6le which Voltaire attributes to him :
" We will talk some other day of the bell you say I fastened.
... I knew an architect to whom it was said : * You are
to make the plan of this house, but be it understood that, the
work once begun, neither the diggers nor the masons nor the
mechanics are to be under your direction, and they will
set aside your plan as much as they please.' Whereupon
the poor architect flung down his plan and went to plant
cabbages."
He does not regret the ministry on the conditions under
INTRODUCTION. 67
which he left it, and he sums up his political situation
by a decisive saying which is at once a very true judgment
and an honourable avowal in him who utters it : "I feel
with you how fortunate it is for me that I am no
longer in office; I have not the necessary capacity to re-
establish matters, and I am too sensitive to the misfortunes
of my country." He tries to console himself as best he can,
to recompose in this idleness, which, let him say what he
will, languishes somewhat, an ideal of a philosophical and
sufficiently happy life : " Eeading, reflections on the past and
the future, a persistent forgetfulness of the present, walks
abroad, a little conversation, a frugal system, — all this
enters into the plan of my life; your letters will be the
charm of it." This last point is not mere politeness ; no one
could better enjoy than Bernis the mind and the superiority
of Voltaire in all that he did well : " Write me from time
to time ; a letter from you embellishes a whole day, and I
know the value of a day." The manner in which Voltaire
receives his literary criticisms and takes account of them,
stirs him to applause : " You have all the characteristics
of a superior man : you do well, you do fast, and you are
docile."
Bernis has not, in literature, so timid and effeminate a
taste as one might think from his own verses. Voltaire
sends him on one occasion Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar"
and Calderon's " Heraclius," calling them farces or follies to
amuse him and put him in good-humour; to which Bernis
replies in a letter full of grace and good sense : " Our
secretary [of the Academy] has sent me Calderon's * Herac-
lius,' my dear colleague, and I have just read the * Julius
Caesar' of Shakespeare; both plays have given me great
pleasure as serving to show the history of the human mind
and the particular taste of nations. We must agree that
68 INTRODUCTION.
those tragedies, however extravagant and coarse they may
be, do not weary, and I must tell you, to my shame, that
these old rhapsodies, in which there are from time to time
flashes of genius and very natural sentiments, are less odious
to me than the cold elegies of our mediocre tragic writers."
It was not exactly with the intention of producing this result
that Voltaire had sent them ; the true and serious literary
lesson came from him who might have been thought the
least serious.
I fasten to the honourable sides of this correspondence,
to the parts which show in Bernis a man who has propriety
of bearing without pedantry, a gentle wisdom which does
not let itself be encroached upon. I read in the index of
the edition of Voltaire prepared by Miger for the estimable
Beuchot : " Bernis proposes to Voltaire to translate into
verse the Psalms of David." Absurd ! Bernis had too
much tact to make Voltaire any proposal of that kind. But
Voltaire is tempted constantly to send Bernis other things
than tragedies ; he would like to send him his Tales, his
lighter writings, " what pleases the ladies. But I dare not,"
he adds, restraining himself with difficulty. To which Bernis
always answers, especially after he is an archbishop: "If
you send me verses, be sure that they are such as I can
boast of. I am neither a pedant nor a hypocrite, but surely
you would be grieved if I were not what I ought to be and
seem." And another day he says : " Send me your decent
Tales [Contes honnetes] ; and, as it is very reasonable that
I should preach to you a little, I beg you to sometimes quit
the lyre and the lute for the harp. That is a noble style
in which I am sure you could be more lofty, more moving
than any of your predecessors." That word " harp," lightly
used, is far indeed from being a proposal to Bernis to
"translate the Psalms!"
INTRODUCTION. 69
There is a fine passage on Bernis' side in this corre-
spondence. Voltaire has sneered too flippantly on a certain
day ; he has written to the cardinal a gay and even a jocose
letter for New Year's day (1767), sending him his tragedy
of " Les Scythes," and saying : " As for me, puny creature, I
make war to the last moment : Jansenists, Molinists, Fre'ron
Pompignan ; to right, to left ; and the Protestants, and J.-J.
Eousseau. I get a hundred thrusts, I return two hundred,
and I laugh. . . . All is equal at the end of the day, and will
be still more equal at the end of all days." Bernis answers
him, and this answer, fully understood, is, from end to end,
a wise and noble lesson. First, he makes a few criticisms on
the tragedy of " Les Scythes," which are less remarks, he
says, than doubts : " I love your fame, and it is that which
makes me, perhaps, too difficult to satisfy." Then he con-
gratulates Voltaire on the talent which God has given him to
correct the follies of his epoch, and to correct them with a
laugh, making others who have retained a taste for " good
company laugh also. Writers sometimes ridicule this good
company before they are admitted to it, but it is very rare
that they seize its tone ; now, that tone is nothing else than
the art of never shocking any propriety." He points out
certain absurdities of the day which are subjects ready-made
for ridicule. " It is droll," he says, " that pride rises as the
period lowers : to-day nearly all our writers want to be
legislators, founders of empires ; and all the gentlemen want
to pull down the sovereigns." And he ends by a counsel
which Voltaire too little regarded, but which if followed
would have been, in place of the universal sneer to which
he gave himself up, a supreme ideal for the great writer in
these years of his old age : —
"Laugh at all that, and make us laugh," says Bernis,
developing his plan ; " but it would be worthy of the finest
70 INTRODUCTION.
genius in France to end his literary career by a work which
would make men love virtue, order, subordination, without
which all society is in trouble. Gather up those traits of
virtue, humanity, and love for the general good which are
scattered through your works, and compose another which
shall make us love your soul as much as we admire your
mind. That is my prayer for this new year ; it is not above
your powers; you will find in your heart, your genius, in
your memory, so well furnished, all that can render your
work a masterpiece. It is not a piece of pedantry that I ask
of you, nor a stupid sermon, it is the work of a virtuous soul
and an upright mind."
It seems to me that we grasp in this passage the spirit
and meaning of Bernis' correspondence with Voltaire, and
that this leading desire and prayer redeems the rather risky
concessions which the gracious prelate seems to make in
other places to the allurements of his correspondent. For
myself, it is thus that I like to read the writings of celebrated
men, — drawing from them all there is of best and most
elevated ; it seems to me that this brings us nearer to the
truth, even from the point of view of history.
In explaining why he so little regrets the life of Paris
during the years of his exile, Bernis returns more than once
to the idea that politics have become too much an habitual
subject of conversation : " Men and women have to-day in
their heads the idea of governing the State. It is a per-
petual and wearisome dissertation, for nothing is so flat as
superficial politics." He repeats this thought with grace
and renewed vigour, summing up in a piquant manner the
various fashions and infatuations which he had witnessed in
his youth. " As regards Paris (1762), I do not desire to live
there until conversation is better, less passionate, less polit-
ical. You have seen in our day how all the women had
INTRODUCTION. 71
their witty man, then their geometrician, then their Abbe*
Nollet ; now I am told they all have their statesman, their
politician, their agriculturist, their Due de Sully. You feel
how wearisome and useless all that is ; so I await without
impatience the day when good company shall resume its
ancient rights ; for I find myself quite out of place among
all these modern little Machiavellians."
Bernis never returned to live in Paris. What would he
have said on the approaches of '89 ? What would he
have said later? But he has the merit of having been
among the first to feel and point out that which was corrupt-
ing the witty, elegant, and lively taste, and the original
gaiety of our nation.
We have now seen enough to know what to. think of
Bernis as to intellect and judgment. I am therefore sur-
prised to see with what indifference, with what a tone of
superiority, writers who are more or less historians have
spoken of him when they meet him as a witness and
diplomatic confidant of the great affairs of Eome. I have
read with care the principal works in which he is mentioned
as cardinal-member of the Conclave, in 1769, and afterwards
as ambassador to Eome for more than twenty years. These
works, which contain fragments, and even series of letters
and despatches from Bernis, during this last half of his life
are : " History of the Fall of the Jesuits," by Comte Alexis
Saint-Priest ; " Clement XIY. and the Jesuits," by M. Cre'-
tineau- Joly ; " History of the Pontificate of Clement XIV., "
by Pere Theiner; "History of the Pontiffs Clement XIV.
and Pius VI.," by M. Artaud. These various works, which
I am far from putting on the same line, and the last of
which is worthy of very little esteem, have this in common,
that they all rely at every moment on documents emanating
from Bernis, and that their text in very many pages is made
72 INTRODUCTION.
up of them. P£re Theiner is the writer who, having under his
eyes the greater part of Bernis' despatches, probably from the
minutes made after his death and deposited in the Vatican,
enables us to-day to form the best grounded and most com-
plete judgment on them. I shall here confine myself to
giving my general impression on Bernis' line of conduct in
Eome during his first years there, and in that famous nego-
tiation for the suppression of the Jesuits in which he took
much part.
Bernis arrived at Eome in March, 1769, and entered the
Conclave, which had then been open for a month. He had
not at first the leading influence which had been expected,
and on which he had been congratulated. He had his
apprenticeship to make ; he had prejudices to overcome. He,
who was soon to acclimatize himself so well in Kome, to es-
pouse its habits, and feel and contribute to its noble hospitality,
was at first severe, even to injustice against his colleagues, the
Princes of the Church, and towards the Eoman people in
general. His letters to the Marquis d'Aubeterre, ambassador
from France before him (letters which have been partly
published and give the bulletin and journal of the Conclave),
show a reverse side to the tapestry, which, in all matters, and
particularly sacred matters, cannot be divulged without excit-
ing some surprise and a sense of impropriety. It needs a very
judicious reader to correct the exaggerated and disproportioned
impression made upon the mind by such revelations; an
effect greater than the narrator himself intended to produce.
We are shown a thousand indiscreet and rash conjectures, of
which nothing came. Bernis, perceiving in the last days of
the Conclave that Cardinal Ganganelli had the support of the
Spanish cardinals, rallied to him and contributed at the last
moment to make his election unanimous. But it cannot be
said (as so many have stated from courtesy, and as he allowed
INTRODUCTION. 73
them, not unwillingly, to do) that he himself caused the
election. " It was he who made Pope Clement XIV., and
who formed his Council," says Voltaire. Nothing could be
less true than that assertion.
He scarcely knew this pope ; at first he distrusted him ;
he believed he had formal and mysterious engagements with
Spain, contracted at the close of the Conclave, on the subject
of the abolition of the Jesuits. It was not until later, and
after more ample knowledge, that he saw his mistake on this
point, and returned to a more correct opinion of the man and
the pontiff. In December, 1769, Bernis, writing to M. de
Choiseul, says : " I found the pope in good humour on Mon-
day last ; his gaiety depends on his health and the persons
with whom he has been talking. His Holiness is sufficiently
master of his words, but not at all of his face. The more
one sees of him, the more one recognizes in him a basis of
justice, kind-heartedness, humanity, and the desire to please,
which makes him respectable and amiable. I am persuaded
that after the affair of the Jesuits is over every one will be
satisfied. He goes slowly, but he does not waver." Bernis
never departs from this judgment on Ganganelli.
As to the part that he himself had to play in this affair of
the suppression of the Jesuits, which lasted four years be-
fore it was consummated, it is fully related in the work
of Pere Theiner. Bernis personally was in no way hostile to
the famous Society. When it was suppressed in France he
wrote to Voltaire : " I do not believe that the destruction of
the Jesuits will be useful to France. I think it would have
been better to govern them properly, without destroying
them."
But the affair once undertaken, he regards it as policy, and
even as a necessity, to complete it. As for the means, he
desires and advises that they be slow, moderate, as humane,
74 INTRODUCTION.
and as conciliating as it is possible to make an action of
such vigour. So, when he sees the Pope delaying, and
constantly opposing delays to the urgency of the powers, and
especially that of Spain, Bernis, though he thinks these
delays excessive, makes his Government understand that
they are natural, and to a certain point, necessary.
One day, at the beginning of the negotiation, Spain, and
subsequently France, wished to limit, by a sort of ultimatum,
the delay to two months. " I own," writes Bernis to M. de
Choiseul (August, 1769), " that if I had been elected pope I
should have destroyed the Jesuits, but I should have em-
ployed two years in doing it." Ganganelli took four ; it was
the same method, only carried a little farther. Bernis, aside
from the rare instants^ when he was forced to take the initi-
ative, confined himself to assisting Spain, which imperiously
exacted of the pope the suppression of the Society ; but while
aiding the Spanish ambassador, he often strove to moderate
the harsh summons of that Court and to set aside all ways
of intimidating the pontiff, at the risk of compromising him-
self and seeming lukewarm to his allies. In thus acting he
was entirely true to the spirit of his instructions and to the
bent of his own individual nature. He ended by becoming
between the pope and the Spanish ambassador the usual
intermediary, and a conciliator who was agreeable to both.
" I am the anodyne to each," he says.
The summing up of Bernis' conduct in this great and long
affair lies in those words. He was as much of a mediator
as was possible in the most irritating of questions. He won
the esteem and the affectionate gratitude of Clement XIV.,
who treated him with all the confidence that was in his
nature to bestow, and with a distinction which resembled
private friendship. One day the pope made him a gift of
various title-deeds and original documents concerning the
INTRODUCTION. 75
church at Alby, adding to them a brief (letter) in which he
loaded him with marks of honour and proofs of tenderness.
Shortly before his death he appointed Bernis Bishop of
Albano, thus treating him altogether as a Roman and a car-
dinal of the papal house. So, at the death of the pontiff,
when irritated passions sought to wreak vengeance on his
remains, and the catafalque, placed in Saint-Peter's, was not
safe from outrage during the novena of the obsequies, Bernis,
faithful to his friendship and respect for the illustrious dead,
kept, at his own cost, a guard night and day around the
coffin to preserve the inscriptions and prevent all scandal.
Bernis, full of authority by this time and of influence in
the Conclave, contributed a good share towards the elec-
tion of Pius VI. (February, 1775), obtaining the new pope's
friendship and a degree more of confidence. During this
time he continued to represent France at Eome with dignity,
grace, and magnificence. All travellers who have spoken of
him echo this. Mme. de Genlis, who visited Rome during
these years, accompanying the Duchesse de Chartres, dwells
much on the reception the ambassador gave to her Royal
Highness. " Cardinal de Bernis, to whom I had announced
the arrival of Madame la Duchesse de Chartres, sent his
nephew, the Chevalier de Bernis, as far as Terni to meet
her, with two carriages, one magnificent to bring her to
Rome, the other supplied with an excellent dinner. The
cardinal received us with a grace of which nothing can give
the idea. He was then in his sixty-sixth year [he was not
so old], in very good health, with a face of great freshness.
In him there was a mixture of bonhomie and shrewdness,
nobleness and simplicity, which made him the most agree-
able man that I have ever known. I have never seen a
magnificence that surpassed his." After various details on
which she dwells with pleasure, and which prove to what
76 INTRODUCTION.
point the splendid host knew how to mingle his pomp and
his Koman lavishness with that French quality called pre-
cision, Mme. de Genlis adds : " Cardinal de Bernis gave
Madame la Duchesse de Chartres magnificent conversaziones,
that is to say, assemblies of two or three thousand guests.
They called him < King of Eome,' and such he was, in fact,
through his magnificence and the esteem and consideration
which he enjoyed."
Cardinal de Bernis speaks of himself less emphatically ;
and he tries sometimes to excuse the grandeur of the es-
tablishment. " I keep," he says, " the inn of France in the
public square of Europe." He had his palace on the Corso,
where he held his Court, and his house at Albano for the
villegiatura. Show with him was only external. " He has,"
says President Dupaty, " the readiest welcome, the most
equable intercourse." The character of his politeness was
easy and graded, just as his mind seemed, towards the last,
more gentle and reposeful than brilliant.
The events of the Eevolution came to put his firmness
to the proof. He saw this almost royal opulence, which he
had enjoyed for nearly twenty years, and which he used
with a truly august liberality, escape him suddenly, and
poverty return when he was sixty-six years old; he con-
tinued the same man. " When turned of sixty-six years of
age," he says, " we ought not to fear poverty — only this,
that we may not fully do our duty." I have already quoted
many of his noble sayings. He understood the question
posed by the Constituent Assembly to its fullest extent, and,
forestalling, as early as November, 1790, the hour of the
" Concordat," he says : " If men really loved Good, peace,
and order, if they were attached to religion, which alone is
the support of all authority and of all forms of government, no
pope would ever be so drawn towards conciliation as this
INTRODUCTION. 77
one. But if the purpose is to destroy all and make a new
religion, we shall meet with difficulties greater than we
know. The deep roots of religion are not to be torn so
easily out of the hearts and minds of a great kingdom."
It is on these last words that we like to rest with Bernis.
The circle of his life is accomplished, and he shows as he
ends it that his amiable, prudent, and fine qualities, joined to
delicacy of heart, may become virtues.
On the 5th of January, 1791, being summoned to take the
oath exacted by the new Constitution, he sends it, adding
an interpretative and restrictive clause. Informed that the
National Assembly required the oath to be taken as it was,
pure and simple, and warned that he exposed himself to be
recalled if he persisted in his restriction, he answered,
February 22 : " Conscience and honour do not permit me to
sign without modification an oath which obliges me to
defend the new Constitution, of which the destruction of the
ancient discipline of the Church is an essential feature."
The recall was given.
Thus was closed his long and honourable diplomatic
career. He died in Eome, November, 1794, in his eightieth
year. After the loss of his salary in France, he subsisted
on a pension granted to him by the Court of Spain. Happy,
nevertheless ; and favoured to the last in being able by his
final sacrifices to redeem and expiate, in a way, the laxity of
his early life ; confessing a religion of poverty through salutary
adversity, and proving that there was in him, under all
forms, both amiable and dignified, a sincere foundation of
human and Christian generosity.
TBANSLATOB'S NOTE.
THE following volumes contain Cardinal de Bernis' own
Memoirs, and the letters to M. de Choiseul, Mme. de Pom-
padour, and Louis XY. to which Sainte-Beuve refers. At the
time the latter wrote his essay (1853) the Memoirs were not
published, and he appears not to have known of them. M.
Fre'de'ric Masson, librarian to the ministry of Foreign Affairs,
obtained them from the family of Cardinal de Bernis and
first published them, together with the letters above named,
in 1878. From that edition this translation is made.1
The following is M. Masson's account of these documents :
" The Memoirs, the existence of which was known and
affirmed by the editor of the Paris-Duverney letters (1790), by
the Chevalier d'Azara (1795), by M. Albert de Boys (1843),
and lastly by the Due de Broglie (1870), but of which no
extracts have been printed up to the present time, are now
intrusted to me by the Bernis family, on the testimony
which M. P. Fougere, minister plenipotentiary and director
of the Archives of Foreign Affairs was good enough to give
of me. General the Vicomte de Bernis had long determined
to make this publication. He had prepared the principal
elements of it, and I have only annotated and put in order
the materials he had collected. . . .
" The manuscript of the Memoirs is not in the handwriting
1 " Memoires et Lettres de Franfois-Joachim de Saint-Pierre, Cardinal de
Bernis. Publics avec autorization de sa famille, d'apres les manuscrits
inedits ; par Frederic Masson ; Bibliothecaire du Ministere des Affaires
Etrangeres." 2 vols. Paris. E. Plon et Cie. 1878.
80 TRANSLATOR'S NOTE.
of the Cardinal. It was dictated by him to his niece, the
Marquise du Puy-Montbrun, and is entirely written by her.
For a century, except for a time when it was in the hands of
the Chevalier d'Azara, editor of ' Eeligion Avenged ' and of
the Correspondence between Voltaire and Bernis, it has been
steadily in the possession of the Bernis family. Its authen-
ticity is therefore, a priori, indisputable ; and if it were nec-
essary to find proofs a posteriori, the text of the Memoirs
offers others no less positive.
" As for the series of private letters addressed by Bernis to
the king, to the Marquise de Pompadour, and to the Due de
Choiseul-Stainville, their authenticity is no less incontestable.
In 1825 M. de Barante revealed the existence of these letters
hi the * Kevue Frangaise/ and gave some fragments of them.
In 1853 Sainte-Beuve drew from them one of his brilliant
articles. And, lastly, in 1873 M. Aubertin used them in a
volume entitled 'L'Esprit public au XVIIIme Siecle.' It
was, doubtless, from a copy — either that in the archives of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, or that in the possession of
the Chancellor Pasquier — that all these writers drew their
information. At first, I had myself the manuscripts of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs ; but hearing that the Due de
Mouchy possessed certain interesting papers on Cardinal de
Bernis, I addressed myself to him, and he was good enough
to confide to me the precious volume containing all the letters
written by Bernis and the letter to him of Louis XV. It is
from these autograph documents that I have been permitted
to collate the present edition."
It is interesting to observe how the Memoirs, published
twenty-five years after the date of Sainte-Beuve's essay,
confirm the analysis therein made of Bernis' character.
MEMOIRS AND LETTERS
OF
FRANCOIS-JOACHIM DE PIERRE,
CARDINAL DE BERNIS.
LETTER
WEITTEN TO MY NIECE, THE MARQUISE DU
PUY-MONTBEUN.
I CHOOSE you for my secretary, my dear niece, and almost
for my confessor ; I could not give you a greater mark of
friendship and esteem, if it be true that unlimited confidence
is the proof of both.
I will now explain to you the intention of these Memoirs.
It is natural to men to leave behind them a monument of
their existence ; they also feel a certain sweetness in recall-
ing the principal events of their lives ; self-love finds its
gratification in all that; and I shall not deny that I am
susceptible up to a certain point of a weakness so natural :
but as I do not wish to hide from you my most secret
thoughts or my inmost feelings, I shall tell you in all sin-
cerity that the chimera of making myself talked of after my
death is not the object I propose to myself in dictating to you
the Memoirs of my life. My intention and my most posi-
tive orders are that this work shall not see the light, even
VOL. I. — 6
82 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF
after my death. You will regard that clause as the most
explicit article in my will. You must therefore avoid with
the greatest care allowing any one to take a copy of this me-
moir ; and you must confide the trust after you to safe and
tried hands. You will perceive in the course of the work
the essential motives which make, for me as well as for you,
this reserve into a law. I shall tell the truth ; and truth
cannot be shown in its nudity without great impropriety.
My design in telling you the history of my life is to in-
struct you and correct myself, to confirm me in principles
of which I have experienced the good, to strengthen me
against ideas whose false gleams have dazzled or led me
astray, and to gather from my past life useful instructions
for the future. The pleasure of distracting and occupying
my mind at a time when I am deprived of work enters for
much, I acknowledge, in this employment; not to speak
of the interest that I take in your children. If they are
destined to lead a private life, they will find in the first
periods of mine examples to follow and faults to avoid. If,
on the contrary, Providence calls them to great offices, they
will see what the force of circumstances can do within the
space of ten years to lift men up and throw them down;
they will learn to count duty as everything and fortune as
nothing; or, perhaps, after seeing the faults I committed
as a courtier, they may learn how to conciliate with more
art than I did the obligations of a minister with the neces-
sity of pleasing the Court. That art is difficult, I own ; the
hand must be light indeed which can practise it in such a
manner that faithfulness and integrity shall not receive
the slightest shock.
I shall divide these Memoirs into three parts. The first
will contain the events of my private life. In the second
I shall treat of the most remarkable epoch of my life; I
CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 83
mean that in which I devoted myself to public affairs. The
third part will contain my views and principles, with a few
.political memoranda, the most important of which and the
most secret being retained in the archives of the Foreign
Affairs. Any one may compose, if he likes, a fourth part
from my literary works. The first amusements of my youth
being no longer suited to the serious profession I have
embraced will be arranged under the dates at which they
were written, in order that persons may not attribute un-
justly (as they frequently do) to the Cardinal what belonged
to the Comte de Bernis in his earliest youth, before he
bound himself in any manner to the Church or the ministry.
I shall write in chapters, because this form is more con-
venient l and the facts can be more easily classed and with
better order ; besides which, as I do not wish to fatigue my
mind or my memory by this method, I shall not be a slave
to exact chronological order, nor to the thread of a too
connected narrative. I shall study myself chiefly to make
you understand my mind and that of the epoch in which
I have lived. I shall paint my soul and that of others, less
concerned to retrace events than to develop their causes and
their impulse.
In regard to style : do not expect me to employ much art ;
it is long since I have renounced academic adornment.
Assuredly, I do not despise eloquence, but I do not place it
in the symmetry of words: we lose much time in writing
with a certain elegance ; it is easier, shorter, and perhaps
more agreeable to express one's thoughts very simply.
Finally, you must not be scandalized when I say good
of myself; the foundation of my nature is modesty, but I
1 As many of these chapters are very short, some of them not more
than two or three pages and therefore very wasteful of space, several are
put together in the following translation. — TR,
84 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF CARDINAL DE BERNIS.
do not believe I fail in it by thinking of myself as favour-
ably as a judge would do if he read to the bottom of my
heart.
Now that is enough to make you understand the object
of these Memoirs. In choosing you, at the age of twenty-
three, to write them at my dictation, I give, as I believe,
great praise to your manner of thinking and to your
character.
MEMOIRS.
PART FIRST.
I.
1715-1735. — My Birth. — Childhood. — Education. — My Coming to Paris.
— Entrance at the Seminary. — My Journey to Languedoc. — Return
to Paris in 1735.
I WAS born, May 22, 1715, in the chateau de Saint-Marcel,
on the Ardeche, in Vivarais. The seigneurie of that little town
has belonged to my family for four hundred years. It is a
good title of nobility ; it is as indisputable as the possession,
never interrupted, of the same fief. The magistracy of this
estate was formerly much divided. In other days Saint-
Marcel was the residence of various seigneurs, some of whom
were considerable, as much by their birth as from their
possessions. To-day the Marquis de Bernis, my brother,
is the sole possessor of the estate, which, from its extent and
the beauty of its scenery, is one of the principal in the
Vivarais. The king, by letters-patent, has erected this
estate into a marquisate under the name of Pierre-Bernis.
My family name (for only princes of the blood-royal
should say " house ") is de Pierre, Latin Petri. The name
is very ancient in the province of Languedoc; it is cited
with distinction in the history of the first crusade. The
name Bernis has been borne for four centuries by the
younger sons of the family, who have never failed to in-
clude in their titles the rank of seigneurs of this estate,
86 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
which is situated between Nlmes and Lunel. This care on
their part shows the attention they paid to preserving their
rights in this possession, which entered the family of their
ancestors in 1245 through a marriage.
But I do not pretend to make our genealogy here ; I have
known, all my life, how to appreciate, better than others,
the fortuitous merit of birth. I shall have occasion, in the
course of these Memoirs, to express myself on what concerns
nobility. Those of you who wish to know more about our
origin have only to read the article in More'ri concerning
me ; it is done with simplicity and truth ; and is confirmed
by indisputable title-deeds. I snail content myself by
saying here, for the honour of my race, that the heads of our
family were all great seigneurs, and the younger sons, from
whom I descend, have been distinguished by their fidelity to
their princes, their attachment to the Catholic religion, their
military services, and by the most scrupulous integrity. My
branch, in particular, has a considerable advantage in never
having injured by any bad alliance the purity of its origin.
My paternal grandmother was so well-born a damoisel that
she gave me a double descent from the royal house, and
from alliances with the greatest families in Europe. All
this is amply set forth in my proofs for the Order of the
Saint-Esprit.
My father, who was born with all the advantages that
usually lead a gentleman to great fortune, for want of
prudence and patience never derived any benefit from twenty
years' service. Born for war and for society, he had the
barren reputation of being a good officer and an agreeable
man. In 1704 he asked for a regiment of cavalry, and they
offered him one of infantry; he refused it and left the
service, after having squandered about a hundred thousand
crowns.
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 87
My mother, Elisabeth du Chastel de Condres, who had
been married as an heiress, on account of the disinheriting
of a brother, was reduced to a very small patrimony by the
discovery of an entail which settled all the property of her
family on the males. She therefore brought my father only
a small estate, a very ancient name, fine alliances, much
intelligence and virtue, a taste for letters, but little talent to
re-establish the affairs of a household. My father, who
advised his friends well, always took the worst counsels for
himself ; he had abandoned for a small sum in ready money,
(which, by the way, he valued highly) his assured rights to
the considerable property of the Vicomtes Gourdon and de
Blou-Laval. Eeduced to a very small income he kept his
gaiety, and never lost the tone of society in his retirement.
Gay with others, ill-humoured at home, he treated his
daughters harshly, made an effort to educate his two sons,
but refused to buy for the eldest a suitable employment
in the army. This species of inhumanity broke my brother's
neck, for he was born with all the talents necessary for war,
with a mind and a strength of body which would have done
him even more honour in the days of chivalry than in our
age. He could have attained to everything.
My sisters were not better treated than my brother. The
eldest, condemned by her father to the cloister, only escaped
that rigorous sentence by the charms of a pleasant face and
the reputation of a gentle and cultivated mind. These
advantages made the Marquis de Narbonne-Pelet, the head
of that ancient and illustrious house, ask her in marriage
without a dot. My second sister, who was endowed only
with a good heart, had the merit of refusing to be a nun when
her father tried to compel her to it ; but she afterwards took
that course voluntarily when she became the mistress of her
own fate. As for me, I have none but thanks to give to my
88 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. I.
father. He never refused anything to my early education ;
and later, when he diminished the help he was giving me,
I had found resources within myself and was flying on my
own wings. I therefore respect and cherish my father's
memory; my supreme happiness would be to still have
him with me, to share with him the fortune he never
doubted I should attain, and thus enjoy the society of the
gayest, most elequent man and the best company I have
ever met, in Paris, at Court, or in foreign lands.
My birth nearly cost my mother her life, and I have often
attributed, with some appearance of reason, the infirmities
under which]! have suffered to the long labour of her confine-
ment. Being the younger son, I was nursed in the country
in a rustic cottage which I have often seen again with pleas-
ure. My nurse, who was a good farmer's wife, had but little
milk and she soon accustomed me to eat cabbage-soup and
lard ; and perhaps I owe to that coarse food the strength of
my organs which have so often resisted violent maladies.
My intelligence was not long in developing. If the facul-
ties of memory are a proof of it, I can remember quite dis-
tinctly the time I was weaned ; and my first sensation was
the astonishment produced in me by the shadow of bodies ;
I looked, without fear but with intense surprise, at those
phantoms which appeared in the light against the wall of
my room and grew shorter and longer in a manner so excit-
ing to my curiosity, but which I could not comprehend. It
might not be useless to the history of the human mind to
collect with more care than has yet been done the first sen-
sations and dawning ideas of childhood. As soon as I could
walk and turn my eyes above and below and around me,
nothing struck me more than the spectacle of nature ; I never
wearied of looking at the sky and the stars ; of examining
the changes that took place in the air; of following the
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 89
movement of the clouds and admiring the colours painted on
them ; the rocks, brooks, and trees attracted my attention no
less. I examined, not with the eyes of a naturalist but with
those of a painter, all insects and plants. I would often pass
hours in watching the different spectacles of nature. The
observations I made in my childhood were so impressed upon
my memory that when I cultivated poetry I found I had more
talent and foundation than others for painting nature in true
and sensitive colours.
The distinctive character of my mind has always been re-
flection ; I reflected as soon as I could think. I do not mean
that I was not a child with others of my age ; but from the
time I was six years old I preferred to all amusements the
pleasure of listening to people who talked well ; my father
was often surprised that I stayed with him when I might
have been frolicking with my comrades. This singularity
began to give me a reputation for intelligence, which was
increased by reflections which were thought beyond my years.
I shall not repeat here the clever sayings of my childhood ;
I thought them dull and insipid when repeated to me ; but
it is nevertheless true that a child is beyond others when he
has more ideas than those of his age.
My mother, who was very pious, and had enough intelli-
gence to teach virtue without mingling it with pettiness, im-
pressed upon me early a love and fear of God ; those feelings
have never been effaced. I have never loved any thing so
much as God, although in my youth I loved many things very
keenly and even madly. I owe, therefore, to my mother a
love of religion, and to my father, who was not pious but who
had a lofty soul, nobility of sentiments and attachment to
Honour.
I was destined to be a Knight of Malta. That military
career, to which I was vowed from my cradle, had turned all
90 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHJLP. i.
my inclinations to the side of war. This taste of my child-
hood is not entirely destroyed ; I have often found in my
mind many views relating to the military art, and I have
sometimes regretted that it was no longer the fashion to put
cardinals at the head of armies.
I shall finish this account of my childhood by two reflec-
tions which thousands of people have made, hut which are
none the less important. I was born with much courage,
intelligence, and bodily strength, yet the trumpery tales of
nurses and chambermaids inspired me with a ridiculous
terror of ghosts and witches. For twenty years of my life I
was more afraid of the dead than of the living. Neither
reason nor instruction would alone have sufficed to calm
this ridiculous but mechanical fear. I owe the cure of this
malady to an adventure which will find its place later, if I
happen to think of it.
The second reflection that I wish to make is that nothing
is so dangerous for morals and perhaps for health as to leave
children too long under the care of chambermaids, or even
of young ladies brought up in the chateaux. I will add that
the best among them are not always the least dangerous.
They dare with a child that which they would be ashamed
to risk with a young man. I had need of all the sentiments
of piety which my mother implanted in my soul to preserve
my youth from great corruption.
My mother gave me the first instructions in Christianity,
and the first notions of reading and writing. But they soon
gave my brother and me a tutor, a worthy and well-informed
man. I learned from him the elements of the Latin language,
and to him I owe the taste I have always kept for reading
good books. As soon as I could read and pronounce, the
cadence and harmony of verse struck my ear; I lisped
rhymes before I knew how to write prose ; they noticed this,
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 91
and they carefully took away from me books of poetry. My
mother, whose father was the best song writer of his region,
had rather more indulgence for my little talents. I used to
show her my productions secretly, and she had the kindness
and patience to correct them. Her astonishment was very
great to find that my verses bristled with Gallic words, and
she could not understand how I came to use terms that were
out of date by a hundred years. I took good care not to re-
veal the source of my erudition ; it was an old copy of Konsard
which I kept hidden under my bed and to which I owed my
fine knowledge. He was my first master in poesy, but I
proved to be only an ungrateful pupil, for I have carefully
avoided imitating him all my life. They said that I made
passable verses when the Infanta of Spain (now Queen of
Portugal) was sent back to Madrid. What was singular in
this talent so early shown for poesy is that the farther I
advanced in a career of study, the more my fancy for versifi-
cation weakened, until it was extinguished altogether. It
did not wake up again before I was eighteen years old, as
we shall see later.
I said that they gave me an honest man for a tutor. He
left me at the end of two years to take degrees in the
Faculty of medicine in Paris. This excellent man, named
Lejeune, was replaced by a Seminarist, whose ill-directed
piety had heated a head already narrowed by nature and
education. This worthy personage made me fast on bread
and water on the eve of all the feast-days, compelled me to
leave half my dinner for my guardian angel, made me say
my prayers four times a day with my knees on iron spikes,
ordered me to wear bracelets of the same metal also spiked,
chastised me, not to correct me, but to feed me with the
spirit of repentance. It would have been a great crime to
complain, a crime which would have been very severely
92 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
punished. My parents did not know of my hidden auster-
ities until they saw the abscesses which came on my knees
and wrists. They dismissed the pious fanatic, and I passed
successively under three or four preceptors, ignorant, brutal,
or licentious. I here warn fathers and mothers that they
ought to forbid the tutors of their sons to correct them with
the whip or discipline [whip made of small chains].
Without being more of a rogue than other boys, I passed
three years under the rod. Anger, at last, got the better of
me, and after vainly meditating various projects of vengeance,
my head being full of the "Comte de Gabalis," a book
that I believed to be full of all the mysteries of the cabala,
I resolved to vow myself to the powers of hell, to become
a great magician, and transform my unworthy tutor into a
stone or a tree; and with this resolution I rose one morn-
ing at four o'clock and went into a solitary place at day-
break; there I made my invocations and conjurations, but
all to no purpose. Nothing appeared. Then, believing that
the powers of darkness might appear to one more readily in
obscurity, I went down into a cellar, not without some fear.
My trepidation became terror when, having begun my invo-
cation in a loud voice, there issued from beneath the casks
a big black cat, which rushed, miauling, between my legs,
and which I took to be the devil. My hair stood on end
and I fled hastily, believing that all hell was after me.
This adventure made me reflect. Eemorse followed reflec-
tion ; I confessed first to my mother, who did not fail to
frighten me with the enormity of my crime; she was too
well educated, however, not to know how to appreciate it.
I was only seven years old; but they made me confess to
the grand-vicar, and I was absolved. Since then I have not
had much taste for sorcery.
Disgusted with domestic education, my father resolved to
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 93
send me to the Barnabite school in the Bourg-Saint-Ande'ol,
in Vivarais, a little town known for some very remarkable
antiquities. Here I cannot dispense with making one ob-
servation. The profession of tutor ought to be more honoured,
for it is one of the most important ; but those who fill that
post are, at best, regarded as the head servants of the
household; their wages being very paltry, their rewards
none at all or very uncertain, how can you find on such
terms instructors who are capable of forming the minds and
hearts of young men ? Domestic education has other draw-
backs ; it nourishes vanity in children ; they think them-
selves superior in rank because they hear their parents and
their valets say so ; their ideas are narrowed to the conver-
sations of their fathers and mothers. In a word, I prefer
school education to family education, because in schools boys
are equally corrected by the lessons of their superiors and by
their comrades ; the latter never allow an absurdity to pass,
nor any false pretence ; they accustom each other to recipro-
cal consideration, and prepare the mind to submit to different
tones, and adapt itself to diversities of temper, usages, and
characters. It is said that in schools morals are not in such
safety as in private houses ; I think that opinion is inaccu-
rate ; valets and servant-women are more to be feared than
comrades, because they are less watched. I can cite myself
as an example: I kept, throughout my schools and semi-
naries, my morals very pure, together with great piety until
my entrance into the world.
So I was sent to the Barnabite school when I was ten
years old. I was always first in my class, and I must say,
more to my shame than my praise, that I employed, in order
to succeed, a method that I have since made use of in more
important ways. This method gratified and fed a certain
stratum of laziness, self-love, and rivalry, all of which are
94 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
in my character. Every time that in my studies I found
equals, rivals, and superiors, I worked without relaxing,
night and day, until I managed to put them behind me;
then, satisfied to have the first place, I contented myself
by keeping it with easy work, without caring to deserve
a better.
I made good studies at the Barnabites ; and one day when
I did not know how to fill a letter I was writing to my
father, having no longer any hope of the Cross of Malta,
I bethought me of replacing it by the crozier of a bishop ;
so I announced my vocation for the ecclesiastical profession.
My father answered that I must examine it seriously; I
declared that I had made my reflections; then they put
me into retreat for a month in a Seminary, after which
I was tonsured, at twelve years of age. Eighteen months
later my father sent me to the college of the Jesuits in
Paris; as will presently be seen.
I said that my father had ruined his affairs. He never-
theless resolved to give my brother and myself a suitable
education, and, to obtain the means of doing so, he took the
course of writing to Cardinal de Fleury, with whom he had
been very intimate in his youth, though he had little
followed up the intimacy after the cardinal had become
minister. My father wrote with some dignity ; knowing how
to speak of poverty without asking alms ; his letter to the
cardinal produced more than he had hoped for. His Em-
inence replied that he had not forgotten the old friendship,
and remembered the misfortunes that had come upon my
father ; he said that my father's children were very young,
and he himself too old to hope to be useful to them ; but
that as I was entering the ecclesiastical profession, I must
be sent to finish my studies at the Jesuit college in Paris,
and thence to the seminary of Saint-Sulpice ; after which,
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 95
when I reached the age of eighteen, he would ask the king
to give me an abbey, and by means of that favour I could
help my family. In consequence of this answer my father
determined to send my brother to the pages of the king to
do his exercises, and me to the college of Louis-le-Grand.
I owe my fortune to this determination. Had I remained
in the provinces, I should have grown old as grand-vicar of
Viviers, brilliant in the diocese and unknown to the rest of
the world.
My father, on the day of my departure, having embraced
me without any outward sign of tenderness, said to me these
words, which engraved themselves on my soul as he uttered
them : " My son, you are going into a world in which I have
lived much ; I shall not be useless to you there. I would
gladly have taken you there myself, but I am now too old.
Eemember that in that world you will find many equals and
a vast number of superiors. Make yourself beloved by the
first ; and never be familiar with the others ; respect them, but
never fawn upon them. Learn to obey, but remember that
you were not born to be the valet of any man. If the fear of
God does not keep you from women, fear at least to lose
your health." In saying these words he kissed me again,
and then saw with a dry eye my brother and myself get into
the carriage, which took us to Paris under the care of his
old valet.
I arrived at the Jesuit college, in August, 1729. My
expectation was to enter rhetoric after the holidays. The
inspector [of school studies], having examined my capacity,
thought me not fitted to enter third. My self-love was
wounded by this verdict ; I set myself to study with such
diligence, taking hours from sleep, reading and writing by
moonlight, that finally, at the end of two months, I was
allowed to be again examined for rhetoric, and was received
96 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
into that class without difficulty. It is true that I was not
at first in the front rank, but at the end of three months of
industry I reached the highest places, and then according to
my usual custom, I went to sleep upon my laurels as soon as
I felt I had no rivals to fear ; only waking up now and then
when my comrades, by dint of hard work, threatened to
take my place. Vanity won me another success ; I arrived
in Paris with a Languedocian accent; the jests of my
comrades made me lose it in three months. These examples
and many others prove that if self-love is the root of all
vices, it is also the spur to many virtues.
I did my rhetoric under the two most famous professors
who had appeared for a long time : Pere Pore*e and Pere la
Sante. The first was one of the most worthy men I have
ever known ; the pupils loved him as a father, and respected
him as their master ; he knew the classics, he made us feel
better than any one all their beauties ; yet modern taste
drew him to its works, though it never ruled in his lessons.
He loved the stage passionately, and was himself an excel-
lent actor ; his soul, which was seen in all his gestures, made
the art of declamation disappear. To his many talents he
added virtues that were simple and sincere. He was a saint,
very severe for himself, very indulgent for others. His
colleague, Pere la Sante, had much imagination, a fuller and
more flowery style than that of Pere Pore*e; gay, even a
trifle jocose, he was fond of Ions mots, and made himself
liked, but not enough feared. At the end of my rhetoric
year, this good father proposed to me to enter the Society of
the Jesuits. I consulted Pere Pore*e in confidence ; he dis-
suaded me, saying : " My child, that does not suit you ; you
will some day be a pillar and light in the Church." God
grant that that opinion may some day be justified.
Another very celebrated Jesuit had also a very high
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 9?
opinion of me, namely : Pere Tournemine, man of rank and
the ugliest of his epoch. This Jesuit had superficial, but rather
extensive knowledge ; which ranked him for some time
among learned men ; his imagination was lively and singu-
lar; his zeal led him by preference to the conversion of
unbelievers; his room was always full of sceptics, deists,
and materialists ; he never converted any of them, but he
had the pleasure of discussing, arguing, and spending a part
of his life with men of intellect.
My life in college was most edifying ; my childhood had
been serious ; my reputation for goodness was such that
they confided to me the care of young men who were not
permitted to leave college or even take a walk in the streets
on holidays. This commission often gave me much pain
and uneasiness, but I fulfilled it with the approbation of
my superiors, and without losing the friendship of my
comrades.
Before quitting this subject I must relate a rather singular
fact. We were studying, under Pere Pore*e, the second book
of Homer's Iliad ; that second book, printed separately, was
the only copy of the poet which we had. Pere Pore*e, in
making us compose Greek verses, gave us, as a theme, hi
Latin prose, a passage taken from the fourth book of the
Iliad. I dreamed at night of the Greek verses I had to
make ; I thought I had done them, and kept repeating in my
memory the verses I had just composed. I wrote down,
on waking, the four first verses of my composition, having
entirely forgotten the others. My composition finished, I
gave it to Pere Pore*e, who was much astonished to find that
the four first verses were entirely from Homer. He thought
at first that I had copied them, but he was fully convinced
that I had no knowledge of the fourth book of the Iliad.
Cardinal de Polignac, who had no aversion to the marvellous,
TOL. i. — 7
98 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. I.
told me that the same thing had happened to him, and in a
still more surprising manner. Philosophers have not ex-
amined with sufficient seriousness the functions of the soul
during sleep.
I finished my rhetoric with a brilliant stroke : I declaimed
in the grand refectory, in presence of the most learned
Jesuits, a Latin essay in which I tried to prove that elo-
quence was above philosophy. The speech had great suc-
cess, and caused a sort of schism between the rhetoricians
and the philosophers. They answered my discourse. I
asked to reply ; but the director, fearing a ferment from the
argument, condemned me to silence. This quarrel ended
in fisticuffs given and received ; the philosophers were the
strongest, but not the most numerous. I left college after
this fine exploit, with a lively gratitude in my heart for the
education I had received from the Jesuits. This feeling
has never been effaced. I shall have occasion hereafter to
say what I think of that Company, which to-day is making
so much noise in Europe.
I shall finish this subject with a few reflections. Why
employ ten whole years in teaching, very imperfectly, the
Latin language to children ? At a more advanced age they
would know more Latin at the end of six months than they
learn at school after many years. Why should children
who are not in the same condition of Kfe, nor destined to
the same employments be subjected to the same education ?
Would it not be better to teach arithmetic to the son of a
merchant rather than show him how to make Greek and
Latin verses ? I should like to see each one brought up
according to his position and in relation to the employments
he must one day fulfil in society. I see only three points
of education which ought to be common to all men : religion,
by which alone they can be saved; the study of laws, by
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 99
which to defend their own well-being and that of others ;
and lastly, medicine, through which they may hope to pre-
serve their health. Such are, it seems to me, the most
essential objects of education, but they are often the most
ignored.
I value 'the study of ancient languages ; they give the
key to all the treasures of antiquity; but that study is
not as useful to all men as would be the study of living
languages. Every calling, every profession seems to me to
require its appropriate system of education, special and
relative.
In 1731 I entered the Seminary of Saint-Sulpice to study
philosophy and theology. The seminary of Saint-Sulpice
and the college of Louis-le-Grand were considered, at the
time of which I speak, as the two most celebrated schools ;
the highest noblesse were educated there. That is a great
advantage. It resulted, for me, in being connected with
all that was greatest in the kingdom ; such ties of youth are
never forgotten and are easily renewed. We love to recall
our early years ; and perhaps, too, we love always what we
loved first in the age of candour and sincerity.
I found at Saint-Sulpice a tone and manners wholly
different from those of the Jesuits ; the latter company of
priests, dependent on a general-superior, affect the greatest
simplicity and a tone of charity which is not always accom-
panied by much openness of heart. My nature, at all times
decided, has never been inflexible; I have known how to
adapt myself to all usages and all tones, while preserving
my own way of thinking, which has never been the common
way. I was liked at the seminary, as I had been at school,
for my frankness, truthfulness, and gaiety.
My morals had always been pure and my conduct regular,
but after a retreat which I made at the seminary I was
100 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [nut. i.
seized by an extraordinary sense of devotion, which increased
day by day for a year. This fervour, I must allow, owed
a portion of its heat to that of my age and the vivacity of
my passions ; my devotion was very ambitious ; it disdained
all ordinary practices to fasten on whatever was most sub-
lime and most austere in the lives of the saints. My long
night-watches, my prayers, my fastings, the perpetual struggle
of my mind heated my blood in a manner very dangerous
for my health. I came near falling into the pious delirium
of certain mystics; I touched very closely upon ecstasies
and visions ; I felt about the region of my heart when in
prayer a heat that was almost unbearable. I took this
inward fire for that of divine love ; I hoped that some day
I might die consumed by it, and that my heart would be
found reduced to ashes. The vivacity of my imagination,
the emptiness of my heart, which needed to love, had much
to do with these pious excesses. My austerities were very
great. I do not advise the practice to young men. Flagel-
lation, of which much use is made in the communities,
seems to me a practice both indecent and equivocal. It is
at least doubtful if that austerity is more fitted to repress
than to arouse the passions.
I was in the third heaven when a word, a single speech of
my director, who was a man of intelligence, flung me from
this high sphere and caused me to follow a system of devotion
more simple and more reasonable. He had advised me to
write down my resolutions and give him the paper to exam-
ine. My fruitful examination, instead of filling a few sheets,
brought forth a volume. M. de la Fosse (that was the name
of my director) kept the manuscript two weeks, and when,
at the end of that time, I went to fetch it and hear his
opinion, he coldly gave me back my folio, saying : " There are
four faults in French on the first page." Those words chilled
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 101
me to excess ; which proves that we should be careful what
we say to young men gifted with eager minds, able to gather
ideas rapidly and make comparisons.
I was at Saint-Sulpice, as I had been at school, an example
of punctual obedience to rules. I also distinguished myself
in my studies of philosophy and theology ; it was I who
kept the class in the absence or illness of the master. This
species of superiority was not acquired by hard work ; a ready
perception took the place of industry. At first I worked well
to equal or surpass my comrades ; but I stopped as soon as I
had done so. I had, therefore, many hours to fill, and I
employed them in studying belles-lettres. This study soon
acquired me the reputation of a wit, and that reputation was
very fatal to me ; it turned against me the old directors of the
seminary, to whom the study of literature seemed too worldly.
The frankness with which I expressed myself on the limited
education of Saint-Sulpice, and on the too minute practices
which were there in usage, made them tax me with an in-
dependent and dangerous spirit.
Pere Couturier, the Superior, had too much intelligence,
and was too well versed in the ways of the world and of men,
to judge me so severely ; but as it was he who presided over
the choice of bishops, through the confidence Cardinal de
Fleury placed in his discernment, he may have thought that
if I were put into the Church I should have less docility
than men of narrower minds less cultivated. The cardinal
was old ; the Abbe* Couturier wanted to keep his credit and
his influence with him. He always gave the abbeys and
bishoprics to persons who were irreproachable as to morals.
So far all was well ; but in choosing mediocre minds to fill the
chief places in the Church, he did bad service to the episco-
pate, and did not fulfil his object ; for fools are, to say the
least, as ungrateful as men of intelligence ; and they are not
102 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHJLP. i.
more docile, because obstinacy and pride usually prefer to
put themselves in narrow minds.
However that may be, the Abb£ Couturier, while showing
me every mark of esteem and friendliness, allowed me to be
injured in the cardinal's mind. He knew that persons had
done me ill-turns, and he seemed to fear them. He advised
me, in order to avert the storm, to make a journey to my
family, promising to receive me in the seminary on my return.
I felt the snare, but I was powerless to avoid it. Nevertheless,
I took precautions so prudent and adroit that I still wonder
how at that early age my mind was so mature and reflective.
I yielded, therefore, of necessity, to the advice of the Abbe*
Couturier, who wrote the most beautiful letters to my father
and bishop. I bound him also by certain authentic words in
my favour which I made him say to persons of importance
in the city and at Court ; and having taken these precautions,
I prepared for my journey to Languedoc, which was to last,
and did in fact last, only three months.
A few reflections here present themselves which I must
not forget. The Seminary of Saint-Sulpice has been, is, and
will be for a long time, the nursery of bishops ; but the edu-
cation formerly given there was suitable at most to form vicars
and rectors. The love and practice of small things are hi
great credit there ; but a species of horror for. great ones is
inspired. The superiors accustom young men to dissimula-
tion by that which they use towards them. If you have
committed a fault you are warned of it in equivocal words, to
which the heedlessness of youth pays little attention ; but
they punish so severely the slightest wrong-doing that it may
be said there is no proportion between the punishment and
fault. A chicken eaten secretly is a cause for expulsion.
But what is worse is that when dismissed from the seminary
you are certain of having the Sulpicians for enemies. They
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 103
think to justify their prejudice by perpetually doing you ill-
services. How is it possible they can imagine it wise to be
political with youth, or that any good can arise from the art
of narrowing the mind and compressing the heart ? I have
always observed that false natures succeed better in their
houses than open and sincere hearts.
'-'• It must be said, however, to the praise of seminaries, that
they bring up young priests to great purity of morals ; and I
hear it said that the Abbe* Couturier has now put a stop to
much pettiness and mummery. But to make the seminary a
true nursery for grand-vicars and bishops, there must reign a
higher tone, more frankness, and a truer spirit of government ;
eloquence should be cultivated, a talent so necessary to bishops
and men in office ; above all, instead of pupils passing ten
years in the subtile but sterile study of scholasticism, they
should become more learned in the knowledge of Holy
Scripture, the canons, and ecclesiastical history. The doctrine
taught at Saint-Sulpice is fairly correct ; it takes a middle
course between the school of the Jesuits and that of Saint-
Thomas. It is a pity that Jansenism has rendered the semi-
nary of Saint-Magloire suspected, for the education there is
much higher than that at Saint-Sulpice, and it was a good
school to form proper subjects for the episcopate.
I had hardly left the seminary before the temptation to go
to the theatre assailed me, and I succumbed to it. The
Come'die Frangaise affected my heart, the Opera seduced my
senses. From that moment there was kindled within me so
ardent a passion for the stage that the greatest sacrifice I
have made in my life has been to renounce it. This frequent-
ing of theatres produced in me a species of revolution of
ideas and feelings, from which I conclude that it is dangerous
for young men. I even think that the Opera ought not to be
permitted at any age.
104 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
I arrived in Languedoc in the month of December, 1734,
and found a mission established in my father's house, which
sustained for a time the already tottering edifice of my
devotion. Intercourse with women was beginning to seem
to me agreeable ; my vanity was nattered by the praises they
gave to my intelligence and my face. But the reflection
that I was to return to Saint-Sulpice put a bridle on my
heart, all ready to escape me. I passed three months in the
battle of innocence with passions.
One night when my imagination, more heated than usual,
kept me awake, I went out to walk on a terrace which over-
looked a vegetable garden. The moonlight was very beau-
tiful, and the night was still. The light of the moon which
played among the trees seemed to form a thousand varied
figures. I thought to myself that here was the origin of many
of the so-called apparitions. My imagination, recalling to me
the stories of my childhood, began to glow ; I cast my eyes
into the garden and thought I saw distinctly a figure, very
pale, of natural height, leaning against a tree, the hands
crossed on its breast, and the whole form covered from head
to foot with a white veil. Fear seized me, in spite of the
reasoning I made to prevent it. In vain I told myself that
if it was a spirit it would not be visible ; that if it was a
body I had nothing ^to fear, because of the distance at which
we were from each other ; strong and vigorous as I was, all
these reasons did not prevent me from being bathed in sweat,
or my hair from standing on end. I forced myself, however,
to examine the figure attentively ; the more I looked at it,
the more distinct the details became ; it even became taller
to the eye, which I attributed, justly, to the excited state of
my imagination. I asked the phantom several times in a
loud voice what it was, and what it was doing there. Its
silence was obstinate and alarming. My knees trembled
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 105
under me, but I resolved to know the truth or perish. I
went back to my room for a gun, feeling that the phantom
was behind me. I returned to the terrace with my weapon ;
which gave me confidence, for I found the figure smaller
and standing at the same place where it was when I began
to be afraid. I called to it again several times and threatened
to fire upon it. No answer. Then, leaning the muzzle of
my gun on the balustrade, because my hand trembled, I
aimed carefully at the phantom and fired my shot, which
struck full upon the tree against which the spectre leaned.
Its position did not change. Then, seized by a sort of fury
mingled with fear, and resolved to push the adventure to an
end, I crossed the whole chateau in the darkness, ran down
into the garden, saw the apparent spirit, and marched at it
with my hair on end and all my muscles strained. I was only
four steps from it when I saw it very distinctly ; I sprang
upon it and clasped, very closely between my arms, — the
tree. From that moment the illusion dispersed, and I saw
no more of the phantom. My senses calmed themselves,
and I searched tranquilly for the cause of my error. I saw
that the tree was peeled of its bark and rotten at the core ;
that the moonlight striking into it caused the whiteness to
which my imagination had added all the rest. There was
in this adventure as much courage as cowardice. If I had
not fathomed it I should all my life have believed in the
silly tales of nurses.
On my return to Paris in 1735, the Abbd Couturier re-
ceived me with open arms, but he told me that I could not
have a room in the seminary for a week. He put me off in
this way, from week to week, for three months. This con-
duct did not surprise me, I had foreseen it ; but it afflicted
my family. My father's friends in Paris, who did not sus-
pect the sincerity of the Sulpicians, thought it was I who
106 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
had a repugnance to shut myself up in the seminary. The
matter had to be cleared up. The Abbe* Couturier assured
me that I was master of re-entering Saint-Sulpice, that he
had given his word for it, but that all the other superiors
were prejudiced against me ; therefore my stay at the sem-
inary would be more injurious to me than useful. I yielded
to necessity, and begged the Abbe* Couturier to write to my
family and get them to adopt the plan which he advised.
This was to enter the college of Bourgogne with several of
my comrades of the seminary ; the Archbishop of Lyon,
Montazet, was one of them. This plan was followed, but I
had experienced for six months such treachery, such false-
ness, that I took a horror of what in society is commonly
called mitraille.
Meanwhile my fate became clearer at Court. Cardinal
de Fleury declared to the Mare*chal de la Fare, who com-
manded in Languedoc at that time, that he had been on the
point of giving me a considerable abbey, but that now, so
long as he lived, I should have nothing ; so that luckily for
me, I was young and he was old. He spoke with the same
harshness to the Bishop of Viviers (Villeneuve). These
gentlemen sent these curt, decisive answers without any
explanation to my father. He was grieved to the heart.
He wrote to me with indignation, and left me without
support for two years. My relations and friends in Paris
shut their doors and turned their backs to me. Imagine the
situation of a young man of nineteen, without means, with-
out advice, left to himself in a city like Paris. No one
endures disgrace at that age. If I had had vices they would
have been developed under such critical circumstances. I
armed myself with courage ; I was able to choose a course,
and to profit by the lesson of adversity, which is a good
teacher.
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 107
My misfortune lasted long ; the cardinal did not die till
1743, but my fate did not change till 1751. Keduced to
the resources of my own soul, I made my plan ; and this
plan was an honourable one : I vowed myself to the most
scrupulous integrity, to patience, and to courage. I looked
to Letters as a resource and as an amusement ; I renounced
the studies at the Sorbonne, my means not allowing me to
follow them.
I sought for friends in the great world, and I found them ;
the reputation for intelligence which I had already acquired
opened the door to me. A rather brilliant imagination,
a sustained gaiety, the look and the charm of health, a noble
way of thinking, a loftiness of soul without assumption, an
independence which had the air only of liberty, productions
that were merely easy and agreeable, but, above all, discretion,
secrecy, and a spirit of conciliation and gentleness, were the
qualities which admitted me into good society, and soon
made me sought there.
From that moment, I put a fixed intention into my whole
conduct. I made a methodical system of the life I would
lead, frivolous as it seems to be, and I foresaw that the plan
would be very useful to me. I resolved to study men of
all classes and all orders, and to instruct myself in knowl-
edge of the human heart while amusing myself. I compre-
hended that this study of the world would render me capable
of great employments should circumstances call me to them ;
but at any rate I could hardly, living in good company and
making myself considered there, fail to find a way to
obtain some benefices on which I could live with decency.
As soon as I ceased to lead the ecclesiastical life I re-
nounced the idea of taking the vows of that profession.
The honour and constancy with which I held to this inten-
tion very nearly ruined me under the ministry of the Bishop
108 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
of Mirepoix. One need not be surprised if fortune was long
in smiling upon me, and if she made me feel her rigour and
her caprices; I often sacrificed her to friendship and to
honour, but I never sacrificed anything to her. Neverthe-
less, my existence never caused me anxiety. Many wit-
nesses still living, who were sometimes alarmed about my
future, can certify that I was convinced I should be a man
of importance by the time I was forty. The principal
quality of my mind has been to see clear and see far.
My misfortune had some relief. I bore it with gaiety and
courage on entering society ; it made me interesting. More-
over, without violating the rules of prudence or neglecting
decorum and respect, I did not restrain myself in speaking
of Cardinal de Fleury. He was not without enemies; all
prime-ministers have them. Such men sought me ; and I
was admitted very early into the intrigues of that day.
I was secret, though frank ; that quality made them forget
my youth. I thus learned very early to know the Court,
and as reflection has always been the distinctive attribute
of my mind, I made great profit of the many anecdotes
that were confided to me.
At twenty years of age I was admitted into the society
of the Torcys, the Polignacs, the d'Aguesseaus, the Boling-
brokes. At the same time I was dining with Fontenelle,
Montesquieu, Mairan, Maupertuis, Cre* billon. My talk was
not foreign to that of men so different. Beading furnished
me with enough to pay my contingent in many ways; the
ideas of others germinated readily in my head and gave birth
to more. No one ever seized more quickly the peculiarities
of each man and each social circle. It cost me nothing to
take the tone of others, without, however, losing my own.
This facility of manners and mind made me acceptable in
society ; I became what they call in the world a coqueluche
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 109
[reigning fancy]. People had to take time by the forelock
to get me to supper. I was the fashion, without these
successes giving me inward vanity or an air of self-conceit.
Women did not spoil me more than men did. I found
among them much cordiality and very favourable prepos-
sessions. Here would be the place for the history of my
errors, but the picture would be perhaps more dangerous
than useful. I ought to warn those who will read these
Memoirs of the danger of giving way to the sensibility of
their hearts. Happy they who have never felt the action
of the soul upon the senses and the senses upon the soul.
It is very difficult to be young and to be virtuous. All that
I can say is that in my youth I had many reproaches to
make to myself as a Christian, but none as a man of honour.
I have always fled bad company and had a horror of de-
bauchery.
Society saw me poor and gay under misfortune, seeking
friends and disdaining patrons, without fortune but taking
no means to obtain it. They thought me the happiest man
in the world, and attributed to temperament what was due
to courage. I was born sensitive to excess. My situation
humiliated me ; I tasted all the bitterness of it, but I knew
well that a sad face does not interest long and soon wearies
others. I had, therefore, the strength to keep my griefs to
myself, and to let nothing show to the eyes of others but
my imagination and gaiety.
In 1733 Gresset's first works appeared : " Vert-Vert," and
especially " La Chartreuse," had the greatest success. I felt
more than others the merit of those works, but I did not
give way to an enthusiasm that seemed to me excessive.
People said to me, " Do better." I answered that as good
might be done in the same style; and I wrote as he did,
joking at myself, the " Epistle on Laziness," of which many
110 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i.
copies were handed about ; it was even printed without my
taking part in the matter. It was believed to be by Gresset.
I heard people of taste, who did not know I was the author,
say that the " Epistle " was in the best style, and resembled
the good works of the " Temple." This first success gave
me the idea in 1736 of the " Epistle to my Penates," which
was at first attributed to Gresset and had great vogue.
This Epistle was also printed without my knowledge, and
in a furtive manner. The veil which covered me was now
torn aside and my name went from lip to lip ; it even ceased
to be unknown in foreign countries ; so true is it that a few
happy verses give celebrity more rapidly than a purely useful
work.
It was thus that the talent I had for poesy from my cradle
awoke in me once more and made me known to the public. I
knew that the king did not like poems, and that poets have
always been rather generally regarded as frivolous and
dangerous persons. But I was unhappy, I needed distrac-
tions ; besides which, I lived in an age when wit was much
enjoyed ; so I chose the most agreeable course. It cost me
little pains to succeed ; to me it was a play, not a labour.
At the bottom of my heart I thought but little of my pro-
ductions ; but I knew they were rapidly establishing the
reputation of my intellect; that this reputation would be
useful to me; that by abandoning poetry later I should
escape the inconveniences attached to it, while the celebrity
would remain to me. I was not mistaken in my opinion.
The Bishop of Lu§on (Bussy-Eabutin), who had been the
friend of my father and mother, and was called in society
the "God of good company," sought me out and took a
friendship for me. He wanted to reconcile me with Saint-
Sulpice. I gave him full powers ; but with all his clever-
Bess he failed in his negotiation, just as I had predicted to
1715-1735] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. Ill
him. Convinced that I could obtain nothing from Cardinal
de Fleury, he brought me back, nevertheless, into my father's
good graces ; he obtained from the Archbishop of Paris
(Vintimille) the promise of a canonry in Notre-Dame.
The day that we were to go together to Conflans, to con-
summate this affair, he died of an indigestion. Accidents
of the same kind have often deprived me of establishments
which seemed quite certain.
I owe my fortune to the Bishop of Lu§on, through a
remark of his which made the deepest impression on
my mind. " So long as you are young," he said, " you can
easily bear the situation in which you are. You are agree-
able, you will be sought ; pleasure and self-love will stand
you hi place of all else ; but remember that there is nothing
in Paris so melancholy, or more humiliating than the state
of an old abbe* who has no means." That exhortation
never left my head ; it roused me often from my indolence,
and it did much, about my thirty-fifth year towards making
me choose a course.
Something essential would be lacking to the history of
my youth if I neglected to describe the manners, morals, and
spirit of the times in which I lived. Neither will those who
come after me be sorry to find here the portraits of some of
the principal personages who figured on the stage of the
world and with whom I have" been, from the time of my
entrance into society, on terms of some intimacy.
112 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. II.
n.
1735-1744. — Manners and Morals of the Age. — Cardinal de Fleury. —
Cardinal de Polignac. — My Journey to Auvergne and Languedoc in
1739. — Return to Paris in 1741.— The Bishop of Mirepoix. — My
Entrance to the French Academy in 1744. — Men of Letters. — Women.
— The Great Seigneurs.
THE Court and capital decide the national manners and
morals, as they do the fashions. I shall therefore speak here
of none but those which reigned in my day at Paris and at
Versailles.
Madame de Maintenon had made the Court of Louis XIV.
very devout, or, to speak more truly, very hypocritical ; but
the Regency raised the mask that hid the vices. The Due
d'0rle*ans, to whom were attributed great crimes, did not
believe in integrity, though a man of honour himself. Al-
though so enlightened a prince, he did not sufficiently feel
how important it was, even politically, to respect and cause
to be respected religion. The king had one day signed the
orders for the benefices of which the Eegent had the bestowal.
The latter, as he took his chocolate, announced the news to
those about him saying : " The Jansenists will be satisfied
with me this time, for I have given everything to grace [fa-
vour], and nothing to merit." M. Massillon, Bishop of Cler-
mont, told me that, complaining one day to the Regent of the
rascalities of a man whom the prince had sent him in order
that they might work together on the affairs of the clergy,
the Regent interrupted the recital of the man's knavery by
saying to Cardinal Dubois, who was present, " Abbe*, we must
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 113
allow he is a great rascal." M. Massillon thought to himself,
" Good ! there 's one unmasked and ruined : " but the Eegent
added, " Yes, a scoundrel of the first order, but very adroit —
Abb£ " (to Cardinal Dubois), " we must make an ambassador
of him." That was all the satisfaction he gave to the com-
plaints laid before him ; and I could add a hundred other
instances as striking.
All those who thought daringly of religion had a claim to
please the Kegent. He allowed a new edition of the " Dic-
tionnaire de Bayle " to be dedicated to him, — a work by which
persons became learned very cheaply. Scandalous anecdotes
were heard everywhere and scepticism was presented in its
strongest light. Even women began to free themselves from
prejudices. The spirit of unbelief and free-thinking was
abroad in the world. The irreligion of the Eegent and his
debauches found ready imitators in a nation whose natural
character it is to imitate servilely the virtues and vices of its
masters : corruption became almost general ; people boasted
of materialism, deism, pyrrhonism ; faith was relegated to
the common people, the bourgeoisie, and the religious com-
munities; it was no longer good taste to believe in the
Gospel
The Eegent did not do less harm to honour, the national
and distinctive virtue of Frenchmen, than he did to religion.
It was not that the Due d'Orldans was not personally full
of honour and integrity ; but he was so convinced that all
men were scoundrels that he treated equally those who were
honourable and those who were not ; he even gave marked
preferences to the latter, and he did so great an outrage to
virtue and honour by making Cardinal Dubois prime-minister
that it is not to be wondered at if Honour, that sentiment
which President Montesquieu regards as the most powerful
mainspring of monarchies, was weakened under the Eegency.
VOL. I. — 8
114 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
Women, who have always had the ambition to govern,
hoped to lay hold of the reins of empire under a prince who
could not do without mistresses, and who had reasons to
change them often. But they never had with him any other
influence than that of enriching themselves at the cost of
the State, and of sometimes appointing to offices men who
were incapable of filling them. It may be said that dissolu-
tion reached its height during the Regency. The women
grew accustomed to unbelief, indecency, love of money, and
the notion of governing men in power ; nothing was lacking
to complete the work of corruption but to push luxury to
extremes.
The system of Law, which could have liberated the country
from debt had the bank-notes been kept to a reasonable rela-
tion to coin, completed the moral ruin through the extrava-
gant fortunes it occasioned. Millions were spent on debauch-
ery and high living with the same ease with which they were
acquired. People became accustomed to " marriages for
money," a consecrated term of the present day, to the shame
of the nobility ; for a financial wife can only bring into a
home the sentiments which make wealth preferable to all
A warrior nation is very near to bastardy when this way of
thinking becomes that of its leaders.
The Due d'Orleans had much intelligence ; he loved and cul-
tivated both science and the arts with success ; he made them
the fashion, and that fashion still reigned with fury in my
early days. I did not find on entering the world the impiety,
debauchery, and corruption of morals on or near the throne
as they were during the Regency. The weak and troubled
ministry of M. le Due had, to be sure, changed nothing, but
that of Cardinal de Fleury brought within narrower limits
the outward corruption of morals ; the same vices existed,
perhaps, but with less brilliancy and protection. It is natu-
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 115
ral, therefore, that I should here place some features of the
life and character of that minister.
Cardinal de Fleury governed France with all the power of
a prime-minister and all the simplicity of a modest favourite.
His influence during a long period of years never had any
diminution ; but he lived too long for his fame, and died just
in time not to survive his credit.
He was born at Lodeve ; his father was a receiver-general
and a counciller of State ; one of his sisters married a gentle-
man of Languedoc, from whom are descended the Dues de
Fleury. The cardinal's father gave him an excellent educa-
tion, and sent him to make his studies in Paris. The Abbe*
de Fleury allied himself early with people of rank ; his
person was agreeable, he had wit, and narrated marvellously
well, — a quality that was quite common under Louis XIV.,
but is to-day no longer the fashion ; he wrote and spoke ex-
cellently. I will mention here in passing that the cardinal
had a damask bed at school which was magnificent ; but what
was very modest and perhaps a little affected was that the
all-powerful minister used that bed throughout his life, and
died in it.
As soon as he had taken his licentiate's degree he wished
to buy an office of chaplain to Madame la Dauphine. I re-
member a story as to this which he told himself, and it is
rather singular that he dared to do so. He related how his
family consigned him to a Pere of the Oratoire, whose name
I forget ; this personage had much intelligence, knowledge of
the world, and severity. " I don't know why," said the
cardinal, " but this good F£re suspected me of being ambi-
tious ; he was always preaching to me on that point, and
forbade me especially to go to Court, on pain of eternal
damnation." It became necessary, however, that he should
tell his mentor in confidence about the office of chaplain ;
116 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
the confidence was ill-taken ; he was scolded, and received
the cold shoulder ; but the thing being done it was necessary
to appease his director. " Well," said the reverend Pere,
" you have got the mania for going to Court ; I will now give
you a piece of advice by which to conduct yourself wisely
and safely : stupefy your mind and ossify your heart." The
Abbe* de Fleury became gallant and intriguing at the Court
of Louis XIV. The king, who was beginning to turn to piety,
had always detested the gallantry and intrigue of priests ;
the Abbe* de Fleury had become his chaplain ; he let him
grow old in that office, without ever being willing to appoint
him to a bishopric, in spite of the efforts of intriguers, male
and female, who caballed for him, and in spite of the recom-
mendation of his own confessor.
M. Hubert, rector of Versailles, was then in great considera-
tion at Court ; he was the confessor of Cardinal de Noailles,
who at that time enjoyed the whole esteem and, I may say,
the entire friendship of the king. The Abbe* de Fleury took
the course of confessing to M. Hubert, and for two years he
was so well able to show his director the noble sides of his
soul that the virtuous priest became convinced that Louis
XIV. was doing injustice to his character in not confiding
to him the care of a diocese: He spoke of it to Cardinal de
Noailles, whose candid soul was easily persuaded in favour
of the Abbe* de Fleury. Matters being thus, the king's con-
fessor made another attempt. Louis XIV. said to him, " You
are the dupe of a hypocrite." " Sire," replied Pere Tellier,
" two men more enlightened than I am, and in whom your
Majesty places a just confidence, think as I do." "Who
are they ? " asked the king. " The Cardinal de Noailles and
M. Hubert," replied Tellier. " I will question them," said the
king, much surprised at what he heard. The information
was favourable to the Abbe* de Fleury ; the king yielded, in
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 117
spite of himself, to such respectable testimony, and the Abbe*
de Fleury was appointed to the bishopric of Fre'jus. But in
signing the nomination the king exacted from his confessor
that he should render an account to him of the thanks he
received for it. " You will see," said the king to the Jesuit,
" that all the intriguers at Versailles will come and tell you
of their joy and gratitude." He was not mistaken ; Louis
XIV. knew his Court well.
The Bishop of Fre'jus left it with regret to go to his diocese.
Though neither liked nor esteemed by his master, he left
friends near him who were useful to him and did justice,
with reason, to the services he rendered in his diocese and to
Provence. He knew how to manage with ability and dignity
the interests of his province; he obtained much from the
Due de Savoie, and he deserved the respect and friendship of
that prince.
The sorrows which tried the great soul of Louis XIV. at
the close of his reign are well known ; the grave engulfed
the heirs of the throne in succession. One child alone re-
mained in charge of the Duchesse de Ventadour, an old friend
of Fleury. The Mare*chal de Villeroy, whom the king loved
(in spite of lost battles), because he believed the marshal
loved him, and he knew his unalterable integrity, was made
governor of the young dauphin. The mare'chal and Mme. de
Ventadour together obtained, in spite of the king's resistance,
the nomination of the Bishop of Fre'jus as tutor to the young
prince. This first step, which M. de Fre'jus owed wholly to
his friends, was the solid foundation of the great fortune and
boundless power that awaited him in his old age.
, M. de Fre'jus thought only of pleasing his pupil, and of
causing no mistrust to the Eegent. When Marshal de
Villeroy was dismissed, he cleverly avoided the storm ; and
as he was one day paying his court to the Due d'0rle*ans
118 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
with an air of very decent sadness, the Eegent said to him :
" Here you are, very much grieved ; you have lost your
benefactor, your protector, your friend; but, after all, you
are master of the dice. Oh, well ! I am glad to warn you
that if you wander from the straight path I shall have
twenty-four hours ahead of you in which to throw you out
of the window." — "And you will do right, monseigneur,"
replied M. de Fre*jus, smiling, in the calm and gentle tone
that people of a Court employ, even at times when they are
most troubled.
I said that Cardinal de Fleury thought only of pleasing
his pupil; he knew well that the friendship of children
depends on the compliance shown to them, and especially on
a little indulgence for their idleness. The child he was
educating was king ; it was natural that the ambitious but
modest prelate should think of establishing a sure founda-
tion of confidence and predilection in the heart of his
master. He succeeded, perhaps beyond his hopes. We
should praise the cardinal for having implanted JLQ the soul
of the king unchangeable principles of religion ; but we
must also blame him for having [alienated from work a
prince born with intelligence, memory, accuracy in dis-
cernment, and a great desire to do well and to render every-
one happy and content. The Bishop of Frdjus inspired the
king, unfairly, with an immense distrust of himself, and as
great a distrust of others. By this means, the cardinal made
sure of the exclusive power of governing public affairs.
Great God! that a subject should be guilty of preventing
the master, father, judge of a nation from learning the art of
governing that nation and employing himself solely in the
care of rendering it happy ! How repair so unjust and
criminal a usurpation of power?
I heard M. de Somme'ry, the king's sub-governor, say that,
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 119
wishing one day to know what took place during the lessons
of the tutor with his pupil, he entered the room unex-
pectedly on some pretext, and found the Bishop of Fre*jus
sitting on a stool, the king standing by him and putting his
tutor's gray hair into curl-papers ; that is not exactly the
way to instruct a child-king, but it is certainly the way to
find the secret of pleasing him.
The Kegent, Due d'0rle*ans, whose talents and genius
cannot be too highly estimated, but whose errors, on the other
hand, cannot be too strongly deplored, died in the arms of a
mistress. This was a loss. He was attached to the king,
no matter what envy may say; and he was more capable
than any other of training him in the art of government.
After his death the king chose M. le Due for prime-minister.
If integrity and good intentions could have sufficed to fill
that important post, M. le Due might have hoped to succeed
in it ; but great talents were lacking to him, and often
sound advice.
M. de Fre*jus was beside the king, playing for the public
the r6le of a silent personage, but in reality ruling the mind
of his master. M. le Due did nothing without communi-
cating it to M. de Fre*jus; the latter approved of all in
the tete-a-tete with the prime-minister, but not so in hk
t§te-a-te"tes with the king. PSris-Duverney, a man of great
talent on many lines and of a bold and lofty spirit, advised
M. le Due to ask the Bishop of Fre*jus for a written appro-
bation of each project he communicated to him. This pre-
caution might have saved the duke; it was an infallible
means of preventing M. de Fre*jus from doing him ill-service
with the king, or of convicting him of treachery. M. le
Due thought he had no need of that precaution. When any-
thing succeeded it was always M. de Fre*jus who had given
the advice ; whereas, before the public, M. le Due was laden
120 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAF. n.
with all the failures and iniquities. This odious and danger-
ous r61e finally became annoying to the prime-minister ;
he complained to the king of M. de Fre'jus, and the latter
asked to be allowed to retire from Court, that he might not,
he said, be a stone of stumbling. The king, in spite of his
own wishes, consented.
The bishop did not exile himself very far ; he retired to
Issy, two leagues only from Versailles. The king wrote to
him every day. M. le Due's good-nature was much blamed for
not profiting by the occasion to send M. de Fre'jus to his
abbey of Tournus near Chalons. The king regretted his
tutor; he grew sad and pensive. The Due de Mortemart,
first gentleman of the Bedchamber, a man of intrepid
courage, of a probity that was more than Eoman, but sin-
gular in character, noticed the king's sadness, divined the
cause, made the king acknowledge it, and had the boldness
to go to Issy and bring back M. de Fre'jus under the very
eyes of M. le Due. From that moment every one expected
the dismissal of the latter ; he alone would not perceive it ;
it is true that the king, although so young, could dissimu-
late like an old man. Louis XIV. at nearly the same age
employed the same art with Fouquet. I "wish it were not
made so great a merit in princes to know how to play a
farce with subjects. M. le Due was arrested one day as he
came out from working with the king, and taken to Chantilly.
On which, M. de Frejus, who was soon after [made cardinal,
had all the power of a prime-minister, without taking either
the title or the show of one.
M. le Due had made the marriage of the queen [Marie
Leczinska] ; it was quite natural, therefore, that she should
feel gratitude for so great a service. This feeling displeased
the cardinal; he did not like the queen, and was even
accused of doing her ill-turns with the king ; but he took
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 121
great pains to deceive her by an air of confidence, and some-
times even of "gallantry. Persons of the royal household
have declared that this old Eminence set a trap for the
queen which can never be imagined or explained ; but the
queen, well advised by her father, the King of Poland, had
the prudence not to complain of it.
No ministry was ever longer, more absolute, or less stormy
than that of Cardinal de Fleury. He possessed the heart
of his master exclusively; he had, besides, one great ad-
vantage in disconcerting intrigues: not only had he great
experience in that art, but he had seen the birth of all the
courtiers, he knew their ties and intimacies from childhood
and the strength and weakness of their minds. Jealous of
his power, he nevertheless was at one time willing to share
the burden of it with M. Chauvelin, whom he had always
liked, and who, in truth, had great talents, knew public
affairs, managed with adroitness foreign courts, but was
never able to take the tone of that of Versailles.
It was said that he showed too much impatience to
succeed his benefactor. Becoming Keeper of the Seals, he
shared the homage of the Court with the cardinal; he
embarked him in the war of 1733, which was very glorious
for France and gave to M. Chauvelin a great reputation.
People are always a little jealous of their heirs ; the cardinal
became so of this work of his hands, and as he could not do
without a Keeper of the Seals while the war lasted, he hastened
to make the Peace of Vienna. M. Chauvelin was arrested,
sent first to his Chateau of Grosbois, and then to Bourges.
It was said, perhaps wrongfully, that the Marquis de Mar-
tignac, who had passed as the satellite of the Keeper of the
Seals, denied the intimacy on one occasion after his dis-
missal. The Duchesse d'Aumont, who was indignant, inter-
rupted him saying, "And the cock crew," which made
122 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
everybody laugh. The saying was good, and is worthy of
being preserved.
After the cardinal's death, Chauvelin's friends advised
him to write to the king and send his Majesty a memorial,
in which the cardinal was harshly mentioned. The king
saw in this risky step ingratitude and a want of respect to
himself. M. Chauvelin was relegated to Issoire; his exile
lasted many years.
The Peace of Vienna was the crown of the cardinal's
glory. If, after giving Lorraine to France, weakening the
House of Austria, and establishing a branch of that of France
in Italy, he had had the courage to abdicate as prime-
minister, he would have ranked among the greatest min-
isters ; he would have kept all his credit, all his influence
even, and his memory would have been held in respect by
Europe. But he trusted to his immortality ; his health was
excellent; and by means of a little rouge put into water,
with which he rubbed his face, and false teeth, he made
his enemies despair and deluded himself. Moreover, great
public matters had never kept him from sleeping ; his head
was cool and his stomach warm. One day when he was
eating all sorts of unwholesome things, some one said to him
that he risked making himself ill. "Pooh!" he replied,
" I have a stomach that digests iron." M. de Campo-Florido,
Spanish Ambassador, a malicious monkey, hearing the re-
mark said, " I am glad of that, monseigneur ; for this after-
noon I have things to say to your Eminence which are hard
of digestion."
Invulnerable as the cardinal was, he had, nevertheless,
a dangerous illness at Fontainebleau, and everybody thought
he was dying; they could not believe that at his age he
would recover. The Spanish ambassador, whom I have just
mentioned, was perpetually in his antechamber watching
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 123
for news of his health, about which they were very inquisi-
tive in Spain; every one knew that the queen (Farnese)
hated the cardinal. M. de Campo, to make himself sure,
was continually asking to see his Eminence ; the latter, who
liked well enough to make fools of people, gave orders, when
his strength was returning, to let the ambassador come in.
M. de Campo found him in an arm-chair, looking more like
a corpse than a living man; his head was sunk into his
chest, and his voice, feeble and broken, seemed to come from
the other world. The ambassador, on the testimony of his
own eyes, decided that his Eminence had not three days
to live ; he went away and immediately despatched a courier
to Spain with the good news. That done, he returned to the
chateau, and the first person he saw on entering the king's
apartments was the cardinal, straight as a cedar, rosy in
complexion, finest teeth in the world, on his way to do
business with his Majesty; he bowed as he passed the
ambassador, and asked him if he had not just despatched
a courier to Spain.
After the Peace of Vienna the cardinal enjoyed a consid-
eration that was almost universal ; he could flatter himself with
having won the confidence of all the Courts, even those that
were most inimical to ours. The Emperor Charles VI. treated
him as a friend ; this prince had his aims ; he knew that by
flattering the cardinal he could make France guarantee the
Pragmatic Sanction [Article 10 of the Treaty of Vienna].
It is a question still to be decided whether this guarantee
was, or was not, a great political error ; but we are obliged to
agree that having so solemnly secured the succession of the
House of the States of Austria, France ought never to have
invaded them on the death of Charles VI. ; and all the more,
because, without striking a blow she could have drawn great
advantages from that succession. But the Mare*chal de Belle-
124 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
isle, for whom Madame de Le*vis had inspired the cardinal
with a great predilection, presented very fine plans, and one
may truly say that he bewitched his Eminence by a species
of magic and made him undertake, against his principles
and against his taste, an enterprise much above his strength,
and which his great age would not allow him to see finished.
It was then that the limits of the cardinal's capacity were
seen ; he adopted a great plan and had but little power to exe-
cute it ; he had the grief to see the treasury exhausted, —
he who all his life had sought to replenish it by prudent
economy, which it may justly be said he carried to excess.
He saw with bitterness that he would survive his repu-
tation, and perhaps his influence; for the king, who was
beginning to take pleasure in the society of women, did not
always show his usual deference for the cardinal's advice.
He finally died at the seminary of Saint-Sulpice at Issy,
January 29, 1743, in his ninetieth year. It has been said
that he might have made an excellent minister to some
minor sovereign. Without ostentation himself, he set an
example of general economy; orderly in his private affairs,
he liked order in those of the State. His spirit was wise.
Violent methods were not to his taste ; and if, on many
occasions, he did not uphold the king's authority firmly, he,
at any rate, seldom compromised it. His zeal for religion
and for the decency of morals was most praiseworthy.
Possibly he might have followed a better system of healing
disputes ; but it can be said that at his death there was no
longer any question of Jansenism, the ashes of which have
been of late years very unwisely stirred up. Under the minis-
try of Cardinal de Fleury, the king's Council had more author-
ity, and kept its secrets better ; the great bodies in the State
were more submissive; the ministers more respected; and
France herself more respectable.
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 125
We must also praise the~ cardinal for having thought so
late of elevating his family. If he obtained great titles and
great places for his nephews, it was not at the expense of the
State ; these gifts were pure favours, and the men to whom
they were given were among the best and most honourable
persons in society.
I have said the good ; I shall not disguise his errors.
The greatest of all, I have already noted ; it was that of
diminishing in the king any taste that he might have had for
work. The prince needed occupation ; he had all the quali-
ties necessary for useful labour. The distrust with which
Cardinal de Fleury inspired him for his own ideas was
unjust and unreasonable.
Cardinal de Fleury preferred men of mediocrity. He
carefully set aside all who bore the stamp of superiority.
He wished to reign, and he knew his weakness. Economy,
which is the basis of all administration of the finances, will
prevent their ruin, but is not enough alone to regenerate
them. Cardinal de Fleury had none of the views of a great
minister, either on commerce, or on the marine, which is
the strength of commerce, or on agriculture, or on popu-
lation, the primary sources of the wealth and strength of
States. He courted financiers in order to obtain from them,
at need, resources of money, and by this method he made
the operations of the government dependent on bankers. It
is not the wealth of a few private individuals which ought to
sustain a State in a crisis; it is rather the wealth of the
State which should protect and save the fortunes of subjects.
And lastly, the cardinal hated men of letters, and gave
too little protection to the arts and sciences which made so
illustrious the reign of Louis XIV., and brought more money
into his kingdom than his wars, often undertaken unad-
visedly, took out of it.
126 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
One of the first acquaintances which I made on entering
society was Cardinal de Polignac, to whom, on the paternal
and the maternal side, I have the honour to be related. I
owe to the friendship with which he favoured me a tribute
of gratitude to his memory; moreover, he well deserves
in other ways not to be forgotten.
Cardinal de Polignac was one of those men to whom
nothing is needed in order to be great but a little more
vigour of character. No one had a nobler air ; his person
would have been imposing if gentleness had not tempered
its majesty. He spoke with grace and eloquence ; one did
not notice that he spoke at too great length until one was
no longer with him. His memory was as correct as it was
well-furnished ; his knowledge extended over many matters ;
it might, however, have been desired that the depth of that
knowledge had equalled its extent. He played a great
part in the world without ever having been fortunate or
sufficiently able. He committed imprudences in Poland ; he
brought back from Gertruydenberg only the fame of having
spoken eloquently. One of the plenipotentiaries of the Dutch
republic said of him : " It must be acknowledged that the
Abbe* de Polignac did his humanities well." At Utrecht he
showed that he was not well informed on the boundaries of
Acadia (which are to-day the cause of our war with Eng-
land), nor on the importance of the valleys ceded to the
king of Sardinia. The Peace of Utrecht does him, neverthe-
less, great honour. To properly judge of a work we must
enter into all the circumstances under which it was done.
In Home, Cardinal de Polignac acquired a less disputed
reputation. Magnificent, loving antiquities, knowing the
arts, cordial to artists, he was there in his element. His
palace was a species of academy, where more dissertations
were made than diplomatic business done. Despatches
Riacutd.
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 127
were often sacrificed to the Muses, and the reading of works
of intellect delayed the departure of couriers. It may be
said that Cardinal de Polignac had all the knowledge that
belongs to a statesman, and even the views of one, but not
the character ; his soul was too soft and too indolent.
No one ever had as much coquetry of the mind as he ; he
wanted to please and to be liked. This weakness led him into
the commission of many faults. It dragged him into the
miserable intrigues of the Duchesse du Maine, which caused
him to be exiled for the second time. If the cardinal had died
in Kome, or in his archbishopric, he would have left behind
him a great reputation ; but he returned to Paris with the idea
of playing the grand personage by the mere weight of his
name, his talents, and his services. Honest man and citizen,
he disdained intrigues, and refused himself to the Jansenist
party which opened its arms to him. Cardinal de Fleury
ceased to fear him, and even dared to turn him into ridicule ;
many others, following this example, were as bold : so that
this man, so distinguished for his birth, his intellect, and his
dignities, was reduced to being the ornament of the academies.
I have said somewhere that he was not averse to the mar-
vellous ; I do not mean that his mind was weak, but before
deciding that anything was impossible he wished to fathom
it in every direction, and know all that could be said about
it, both for and against. He was relating one day the legend
of Saint-Denis, and how that saint had carried his head in
his hands for a distance of several leagues. A clever woman,
impatient with the tale, said very wittily : " The number of
leagues has nothing to do with it, monseigneur ; c'est le pre-
mier pas qui cotite"
No one employed better than he, nor for a longer time, the
right of speech. Some one asked Voltaire one day : " Where
are you going so early ? " "I am going," he replied, " to listen
128 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
to a monologue by Cardinal de Polignac." M. de Mairan,
referring to the same thing, wanted a portrait made of the
cardinal in which he should be represented seated comfortably
in an arm-chair, his hand stretched forth a little, in the atti-
tude of a man who is talking, and around him an infinitude
of ears, women's little ears, philosophers' big ears, the ears of
theologians, archaeologists, artists ; beneath which should be
inscribed the words: "The Paradise of Polignac."
In spite of these jests, it may be said that M. de Polignac
was a rare man, who did honour to his epoch. The Latin
poem he left behind him [Anti-Lucretius, sive de Deo et
natura ; libri novem] is more esteemed by foreigners than by
Frenchmen. Latin poetry has declined in France, the phil-
osophy of Descartes still more so ; but this work alone would
have won for Cardinal de Polignac a distinguished place in
men's esteem, had he had no other claim to it.
I owe to the confidence of this celebrated man, and to the
pleasure he took hi instructing me, a great quantity of detailed
knowledge which is not to be found in books. From the
time I was twenty I seldom passed a day without conversing
with Cardinal de Polignac for an hour or more; he was a
universal dictionary which I went to consult. He put me
into communication with his oldest friends ; M. de Torcy was
one of them. This minister is known for his Memoirs, which
are written with much nobleness, simplicity, and truth ; but
the virtues of M. de Torcy were much above his talents. It
was also through Cardinal de Polignac that I made acquaint-
ance with Chancellor d'Aguesseau, that great and virtuous
magistrate, who had no other defect than that of being some-
times undecided by force of having many ideas.
It will be supposed, of course, that Cardinal de Polignac
presented me to the Duchesse du Maine, by whom he had
allowed himself to be loved all his life. This princess had
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 129
great intelligence ; she had the art of preserving around her
the air of a Court, and of gathering at Sceaux the sciences,
the arts, and at the same time all that there was of sublime
and frivolous, best and worst company in Paris. Mme. de Staal
de Launay, whose Memoirs we have, had fixed the favour of
this fickle princess by force of merit. The Duchesse du
Maine always passed rapidly from serious things to trifles,
from the Academy of Sciences to a puppet-show. The Coun-
tess of Sandwich (who had the most masculine face and mind
that I have ever known in any woman) said of Mme. du
Maine, with whom she passed her life : " If the duchess
had the sceptre of the world, she would find the way to make
a rattle of it." The definition was correct.
It was in the society of eminent and enlightened persons
that I passed my youth ; my productions were welcomed
there, and thence I drew my first lessons in taste and the
usages of social life. I was, besides, in close intimacy with
Fontenelle, President Montesquieu, and the other "beaux
esprits of the period. The amateurs of art were all acquaint-
ances of mine. Foreigners of distinction did not escape me.
My plan was to know all Europe without leaving Paris ; to
fathom the manners and morals of all societies and States ;
in a word, to study men rather than books. This study has
since been very useful to me.
Pere Tournemine, the Jesuit, whom I have already men-
tioned, proposed to Cardinal de Polignac to give me his Latin
poem of "Anti-Lucretius" to translate into French verse.
The cardinal told me I could do better; that he himself
had only attacked the materialists, but that in a work of the
same character I could fight with the sceptics. My spirit
was fired by this advice, and I began at once my poem called
"Eeligion;" I composed the first four cantos in 1737 with
surprising facility. I carried weekly to the cardinal what I
VOL. I. — 9
130 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OP [CHAP. n.
wrote, and read it before the most distinguished men of
letters; so it is seen that all the works of my youth were
not frivolous.
Cardinal de Polignac died November, 1741, at the age of
eighty-one, with much religion, courage, and presence of
mind. I have a fancy to add to this account of him
certain verses of the Duchesse du Maine, which describe
her Ion ami marvellously well : —
" De son divin Systems
Polignac penetre*,
Va voir l'£tre supreme
Qu'il nous a demontre".
II se met en cheinin ;
Mais bientot tout 1'arrete
Bois, bergers, et moutons, don, don ;
Partout il s'arreta, la, la ;
Bref, il manqua la fete."
The famous Ninon 1'Enclos, to whom they presented him,
as the fashion was, when twelve years old, said, after asking
him many questions : " Some day he will have more wit
than he needs; and that is a great pity."
The agreeable life that I led in the world had procured
me many friends, and a rather great celebrity ; but fortune,
which I neglected, never ceased to ill-treat me. I was ap-
pointed in 1739 to a canonry at Brioude in Auvergne ; it was
a suitable place for a gentleman, but the revenue was very
insufficient. I left Paris to take possession of my county —
that is how they call the canonries of Brioude. The church
of Saint-^Etienne is one of the most ancient of the Gauls ; its
chapter dates back to the reign of Clovis the Second ; it is
necessary for a candidate to produce proof of four generations
of nobility, on the side of both father and mother.
I recovered in Auvergne from the prejudice that a man
can live nowhere but in Paris ; I found in that province
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 131
men of solid minds, and sometimes agreeable men. I lived
there a year, and made the nattering conquest of M.
Massillon, Bishop of Clermont. That excellent man passed
part of the year at the country-house of Beauregard, so-called
on account of the beauty and singularity of its situation.
It was in this retreat that M. Massillon retouched and ar-
ranged the admirable sermons which have appeared since
his death. I have never known a man who, with the
simplest exterior, inspired more easily veneration and love.
His mind developed only by degrees; but once roused, it
took on the most brilliant yet the most natural colours.
Adored in his diocese, he had banished from it all disputes
about religion, though Clermont was one of the cradles of
Jansenism. One day when he was showing his garden at
Beauregard to a foreigner, and the foreigner was exclaiming
at the beauty and richness of the view, he said : " Come into
this path and I will show you something more remarkable
than all that." The path was dark, and the foreigner ex-
pressed his surprise at seeing nothing remarkable. " What ! "
said M. Massillon, "don't you see that Jesuit and that
Father from the Oratoire playing ball together? That is
what I have brought them to."
I showed M. Massillon the first four cantos of my poem
against sceptics ; he exhorted me to extend the work and
finish it. He wanted to attach me to the Church, to give
me Orders, and make me his grand-vicar, saying : " I have
only my reputation, but there is some regard still paid to
that at Versailles ; you will be sooner a bishop by working
under my eyes than if you attach yourself to some great
seigneur." I made him understand, with great detail, the
motives of religion and honesty which forbade me to take
that course. He approved of my scruples, and liked and
esteemed me the more for them.
132 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. rr.
But he advised me to attach myself to Foreign Affairs,
and told me that I should have much success in the career
of negotiation. He made me promise, moreover, that on my
return to Paris I would have an explanation with Cardinal
de Fleury. " You know how to speak," he said ; " your
frankness and candour create an interest in you ; the harsh-
est men do not hold out against that seduction ; perhaps you
will bring the cardinal back to you ; at any rate, you lose
nothing by attempting it." I promised to follow his advice,
and did so in 1743, with what result will be seen presently.
From Auvergne I went to Languedoc, where I spent three
months with my father. I did not think from the good
health in which I found him that I should lose him in two
years. I composed in his house, without any assistance
from books, the six last cantos of my poem on " Keligion." l
It would hardly be believed with what ease I wrote in those
days. The canto of "Pyrrhonism," which contains nearly
eight hundred lines, was begun and ended in twenty-four
hours without any interval; and I ought to say that such
rapid work did not need as much correction as might be
supposed. That poem finished, I returned to Paris, with
my portfolio full, but with very little money; which did
not cause me any anxiety; at the bottom of my soul I
always found hope, and a species of certainty to make my
way to fortune.
I did not find Paris cold to me on my return from Lan-
guedoc. My ideas had ripened in retirement ; my spirit was
more manly, and my imagination had lost nothing; bril-
liant health, and twenty-five years of age are always well-
1 The following are the titles of the ten cantos : 1. Introduction.
2. Idolatry. 3. Atheism. 4. Materialism of Epicurus. 5. Spinozaism.
6. Deism. 7. Pyrrhonism. 8. Heresy. 9. Corruption of mind and
morals. 10. The Triumph of Religion.
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 133
received in the great world. The fashion of mind and
intelligence had not passed ; we may even say the malady
was epidemic. My poem of " Eeligion " excited much curi-
osity; men of letters and men of society were equally
desirous of hearing it, and it was good style to have listened
to it.
One circumstance, which I shall here relate, aided my
celebrity. I remembered the promise I had made to the
Bishop of Clermont and I resolved to have an explanation
with Cardinal de Fleury. Barjac, that famous valet-de-
chambre to whom nearly the whole Court cringed, but who
never forgot himself, arranged an interview for me with his
master. He announced me to his Eminence, whom I can
see now, leaning upon a little table with a large hat on his
head. As he heard me named he bowed and said, shaking
his head a little, " Ah ! ah ! "
I went forward with a modest but confident manner, and
said : " Monseigneur, as long as I was a mere child I re-
spected the prejudices of your Eminence, but to-day I am
of an age to endeavour to remove them ; honour even makes
it a duty to do so. I have come to ask your Eminence
how it was that I, so young, could have been so undeserving
as to displease the king ; of what am I accused ? Have I
failed in religion, in my duty as a subject, in honesty — ? "
" Monsieur," interrupted the cardinal, " you are taking the
matter in a very grave way : you are not blamed for any-
thing that affects principles. But you have no vocation."
"You reassure me," I replied. "God alone reads the
heart; and since your Excellency has nothing essential
against me, I venture to claim the kindness which you
promised to my father; if I am guilty of none but the
follies of youth, I could tell you more of those than you
know, and I do not believe they would injure me in your
134 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IL
mind, for every man has been young; therefore I entreat
your Eminence to come to my assistance — "
I saw, toward the end of my harangue that the cardinal's
face darkened, and here he interrupted me with temper and
said in a harsh tone, " Oh ! monsieur, as long as I live you
shall never have a benefice."
" Well, then, monseigneur, I will wait," I replied, making
him a low bow.
I perceived as I withdrew that the cardinal thought the
speech witty ; and it was he who divulged it. All the good
company of the Court and city applauded it. They thought
it simple, noble, courageous, and decent. It wounded an old
man and disarmed him at the same time. In short, the
speech had a great vogue ; every one was curious to see a
young man who had dared to give a rap to an all-powerful
minister. That speech, which became celebrated, seemed
to square so well with the events of my life that I took it
for my motto, and I say to-day, as in 1742, "I will
wait."
The cardinal did not make me wait long; he died in
1743. The king, who was, they said, very weary of him,
seemed to regret him; but he soon consoled himself and
never mentioned his name for many years. It is only lately
that he has spoken of him, when occasion offers, without
praise or blame.
As for me, I gained nothing by the cardinal's death. His
successor in the ministry of Church Affairs, Boyer, Bishop
of Mirepoix, put such conditions to the favours I asked that
my way of thinking would not allow me to accept them.
This bishop received the portfolio of benefices immediately
after the death of Cardinal de Fleury, and it may be said
that he knew how to make himself master of his department,
and that no one had power or any real influence over his
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 135
mind. His intentions were upright, but his discernment
was not brilliant. He did not like the nobles, and preferred
to be deceived by obscure persons. He conducted the affairs
of religion with more zeal than prudence. The ministry of
Cardinal de Fleury had almost annihilated Jansenism in
France. The Convulsionaries had cast great ridicule on the
party ; the celebrated writers who had defended it were
dead ; only one suspected bishop was left, and he had one
foot in the grave. It was now necessary to simply establish
in the Church the grounds of fixed doctrine, to oppose con-
tempt and silence to the vain efforts of an expiring faction,
and all would have been ended; the Church and State
would have enjoyed a continued tranquillity. The Bishop
of Mirepoix, by dint of zeal and harshness, contrived to
rekindle the dying embers of Jansenism. He was the cause,
or the occasion, of the protection which the parliaments gave
to it ; in a word, that party recovered its strength. Would
it not have been wiser and safer to allow it to die a lingering
death ?
The Bishop of Mirepoix thought he possessed a very
singular talent. He believed he read characters on counte-
nances, and this uncertain science often decided him in
making important choices. In other respects the bishop
had no knowledge of the world nor of the Court. The King
of Spain had charged his ambassador M. de Campo-Florido
to ask the king for a benefice for an ecclesiastic who had
been a monk, and whom his Catholic Majesty protected.
The king sent the ambassador to the Bishop of Mirepoix.
M. de Campo went to see the prelate on Ash- Wednesday,
and told him his mission, which was very ill-received, and
as the ambassador insisted, in the name of the king and the
name of his own master, the bishop said angrily, " How can
you expect me to give an abbey to a man who has been
136 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. u.
a monk ? " " Moussiou, memento homo," replied the ambas-
sador, walking away.
M. de Mirepoix had not inherited Cardinal de Fleury's
prejudices against me. A Benedictine who had written
against the Convulsionaries (and who, by the bye, instead of
stamping the pretended miracles as false, adopted the danger-
ous principle of explaining events that seemed to him super-
natural by the power of the devil), this Benedictine, I say,
becoming Bishop of Bethlehem, was the oracle of M. de
Mirepoix, and had taken such a friendship for me that long
before the latter was minister of benefices, he had inspired
him with a high idea of my talents and a desire to attach me
to the Church. So now the Bishop of Bethlehem introduced
me to the Bishop of Mirepoix by a letter, in which, thinking
to make my court to the prelate, he spoke advantageously of
my poem of " Eeligion." He knew him ill. M. de Mirepoix
received me in relation to that work as if I had written the
tales of La Fontaine. I saw with surprise the limits of his
intelligence. It was necessary to explain to him that poesy
had always been consecrated to religion; that the Psalms,
the Song of Songs, the Book of Job were poems ; that the
fathers of the Church had fought heresy with verses ; and
finally, that the Church had blessed the use of hymns and
canticles. He could not answer my arguments, but he kept
his prejudices. To make my peace, we agreed that nothing
further should be said about my poem, but that it should not
be considered an irremissible crime to have occupied my
youth with a defence of religion.
These preliminaries signed, we entered upon the main
subject. The Bishop of Mirepoix said to me these very
words : " You have great talents ; you must consecrate them
to the Church, and take the final vows. Monsieur," he
added, pressing my hand, " it is in the name of the Church
1735-1744] CAEDINAL DE BEENIS. 137
that I speak to you ; sub-deacon, an abbey ; priest, two years
grand-vicar, then bishop."
" Monseigneur," I replied, " I advise you not to make those
offers to every man ; you would have them accepted ; as for
me, I will reflect upon them."
" Monsieur," added the bishop, hastily, " if you do not take
Orders, you will have nothing."
" I will reflect," I saici, " and let you know my decision ;
be sure that it will conform to religion and honour."
I reflected that my fortune depended on the course I should
now take. All my friends advised me to defer to the opinion
of M. de Mirepoix. As for me, I felt an invincible repug-
nance to make those sacred vows from the double motive of
interest and ambition. I informed the bishop of my way of
thinking ; he approved it, while informing me that I could
look for no ecclesiastical favours. Some years later, the
king had the kindness to speak to M. de Mirepoix for me
about an abbey ; the bishop intrenched himself behind the
fact that I was not in Orders. I was strongly urged to take
them ; but I was immovable, preferring an honourable poverty
to an opulence ill-obtained.1 I have always ascribed to that
act of honesty and courage, not only the esteem with which
the king has honoured me, but even the fortune I have since
made.
The king gave way to M. de Mirepoix's resistance, but he
gave me a pension of 1,500 francs out of his privy-purse.
1 The following anecdote I hold from M. Firmin-Didot himself, who told
me he had it from the original and from tradition. Bernis, in the days of
his great poverty and his dinners with Diderot at six sous a head, was
employed as proof-reader by the publishing and printing-house of Didot,
great-grandfather of my informant. There he had his lodging and break-
fast with the family. One day the head of the house, not seeing him, said ;
" Is not Bernis coming to breakfast ? " " No," said one of the family,
" he is busy just now ; he is mending his breeches." — SAINTE-BEUVE,
138 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
It will be seen under what circumstances and from what
motives I finally took Holy Orders, being then ambassador in
Venice. As long as the Bishop of Mirepoix lived I neither
solicited him nor allowed him to be solicited in my behalf.
Pope Benedict XIV. appointed me in 1749 to a benefice hi
Bretagne [the pope disposing for eight months of the year of
all benefices falling vacant in that province during that time].
The Bishop of Mirepoix congratulated me. I said to him,
" The pope has raised the interdict you put upon me." That
speech made the Court laugh. It was the only revenge I
allowed myself against the bishop's harshness. But that
harshness was vanquished in the end. On my return from
Venice in 1755, 1 obtained the abbey of Saint-Arnould, and it
was M. de Mirepoix who bestowed it, with all the grace in
the world. I may call it his swan's-song ; he died six weeks
after announcing to me that gift of the king. He had never
been much esteemed, and was little regretted.
My life up to the year 1744 had been nothing but a series
of disappointments, for which the pleasure of being loved and
valued was the only compensation. I had just closed to my-
self the door of benefices ; it was absolutely necessary to find
another career. I bethought me of entering the French Acad-
emy. The Academy was, as the Abbe* de la Bletterie wittily
said to the dowager Duchesse d'Aiguillon, " the tabouret of
talent." It was pleasant to enter that Company at my age,
and I desired to take my place there more as a man of rank
than as a writer. I took, in consequence, the proper steps.
All the best company of Paris and Versailles interested
themselves for me. Mme. de Tencin put herself at the head
of the opposite party. We had to give battle ; the combat
was long, and victory for a long time was undecided. I shall
remark, in passing, that I have always obtained that which
I strongly desired ; although it is true that fortune has con-
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 139
tested her favours, and I was forced to snatch them. The king
fell ill at Metz ; and my adversaries profited by that event to
postpone the election to the Academy.
The king's illness made him know the hearts of his sub-
jects. Never was grief more keen or more universal; it
can only be compared to the intoxication of joy which the
return of the health of the monarch caused. I shall not
relate here all the intrigues at Metz during this illness, and
the dismissal of Mme. de Cha*teauroux and her sister. The
Bishop of Soissons was exiled, and so were the Dues de
Chatillon and de La Kochefoucauld. I neither justify nor
blame their conduct ; we may suppose their motives to have
been good, inasmuch as every one does homage to their integ-
rity. I shall only say, in regard to M. de Soissons, that it is
sometimes a most unfortunate thing to be forced to tell the
truth to princes ; and, in regard to the others, that you must
never think a king dead until he is really so, and that mean-
time you should behave as if he were not ill at all.
The king, escaping the grave, went in very severe weather
to the conquest of Fribourg ; he returned triumphant to Paris,
and this prince who, a month earlier, was the idol of all
hearts, was received with very faint applause in his capital.
The rumour had spread that he intended to take back
Mme. de Chateauroux. Nothing more was needed to chill
all hearts. The people, corrupt as they are, desire then- kings
to love their wives ; they know, moreover, that mistresses do
not diminish taxes.
I must here relate a circumstance which plainly shows
the nature of courtiers. M. de Villeneuve, former ambassa-
dor to the Porte, had been appointed minister of Foreign
Affairs. The king on his return from Fribourg, lodged in
the Tuileries ; an immense crowd attended his lever ; I was
there ; it was impossible to stir. M. de Villeneuve had not
140 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
yet seen the king since his appointment ; he came to thank
him, so it was supposed, for the office confided to him. His
external appeararice was not imposing ; but the vast crowd
opened to let him pass, and an air of respect was visible on
all faces. He entered the king's presence ; in a few moments
the news flew about that M. de Villeneuve had told the
king that the mediocrity of his talents and the bad state of
his health did not permit him to take upon himself so great
a burden : it was the act of a wise and virtuous citizen.
The king yielded to his entreaty, which was known at once
in the antechamber, and when M. de Villeneuve came out
no one would make way for a personage before whom ten
minutes earlier they had prostrated themselves. The Due
d'Orle'ans, regent, once said of a man at Court " He is a per-
fect courtier — without honour and without temper." The
definition would have been perfect if he had added, " with-
out shame."
In spite of the intrigues of Mme. de Tencin, I was received
at the French Academy, the duties of which place I fulfilled
for several years with punctuality and some distinction. I
soon became the friend of my colleagues and the benefactor
of those who had opposed me. But, content with having
made myself a name in letters, I did not wish it to be thought
that I confined myself to cultivating them. Too great an
assiduity at the sessions of the Academy would have been
harmful to the views that I was beginning to have. I
avoided therefore the sort of ridicule that people in society
would certainly have put upon me, and by this conduct I
saved myself from the danger there is from satire to those who
live closely with men of letters. M. Piron said a very good
thing about my entrance at the Academy : " We are getting
the Invalids very young."
Before continuing the history of my life, which will soon
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERtflS. 141
become more interesting, I think I ought to make known the
three classes of persons with whom in my youth I chiefly
lived : men of letters, women, and great seigneurs.
First, men of letters. The essential and distinctive charac-
ter of these men is self-love. This is what often makes inter-
course with them both fatiguing and dangerous ; fatiguing,
because we must compel ourselves to praise them constantly,
or to hear them praise themselves ; dangerous, because the
least scratch to their vanity kindles their hatred and excites
their vengeance. A woman never pardons a disparagement
made upon her face; the man of letters never forgets a
want of respect for his mind. Thus I advise men of sense
never to quarrel with authors, or else to avoid their
intercourse.
I never knew any one but Fontenelle who had all the
charms of intellect in society without the inconveniences of
the lei esprit. This was not because he was devoid of self-
love, but because his usage of the world and of philosophy had
made that self-love gentler and more sociable. Here are a
few traits of M. de Fontenelle which will make known his
character and the turn of his mind. He was in favour dur-
ing the Regency, and carried upon him when he went out a
pocket-book full of bank-notes. Some one told him that he
risked much at night, there were thieves about, and he ought
to take precautions. " What precautions ? " he asked. " Poc-
ket-pistols," was the reply. " Pooh ! " he said " they would
steal those."
Towards the end of his life he went to see a woman who,
like himself, was nearly a hundred years old. " Death has
forgotten us, monsieur," she said to him. " Hush ! " he re-
plied, putting his finger on his lips, " he may hear you."
When I solicited his vote for the Academy he said : " You
know how much I like and esteem you, but I have made a
142 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
vow to my country never to say a yes or a no." When I re-
turned from Venice he clasped me tightly in his arms and
said : " I love you much, and for that reason I wish you may
not live to be as old as I am."
President de Montesquieu also had all the appearances of
modesty ; seeing him so simple you had to search for the
great man in him. Voltaire, whom I consider the finest
mind [le plus lei esprit] of his epoch, has the air of an author
only with authors ; in society he is a polished courtier, witty
and well-informed. Cre*billon senior also shows the simplic-
ity of a man of genius, but his mind has nothing but strength
and no charm. His son, on the contrary, adds to imagination
much fire and gaiety ; it is a pity he writes nothing but tales
and romances. Piron, Duclos, and Marivaux have much
intellect, but Marivaux has given in to false taste, and Piron
has turned to singularity. Voltaire, meeting Piron after the
first representation of "Semiramis" [Voltaire's tragedy in
five acts], asked him if he liked it, saying that he should be
much flattered if it received the praise of a man like himself.
" Ah ! " said Piron, " you wish that I had written it." Duclos,
with better intellect than either, did not always avoid the
rock of singularity ; his soul, which is very honourable, ought
to render him dearer to his friends than even his mind. It
is a great pity that Gresset has neglected his talents, and
that despair of obtaining the first place has made him take to
silence. Bernard [Gentil-Bernard], who has always kept his
works in his portfolio, writes in the style of Ovid, with a more
correct but less flowing pen. I speak here of those men of
letters only who were most in society and whom I knew
best.
I lived a little with d'Alembert, but much with Mairan
and Maupertuis. D'Alembert writes well; Mairan has
many ideas, and wisdom of mind ; Maupertuis wanted to be
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 143
singular, and he has become so more than was necessary;
Buffon is a man of merit, who knows how to write and how
to conduct himself. [His " Natural History " did not begin
to appear till 1749.] As for the Abb£ Terrasson [Jean
Terrasson, translator of Diodorus Siculus], he was one of
the men I liked best to meet; he was naive in character,
eloquent when an argument grew warm, and in the daily
current of life the best and most original of men without
assuming to be so.
I have said that on my entrance into the world wit was
much the fashion; every circle of society had its little
illustrious; the academies overflowed into city and Court;
men of letters ceased to work in their studies, they became
men of gallantry, and all the women thought they had
intellects ; books were multiplied and soon became frivolous ;
conversations degenerated into dissertations. To wit and
lei esprit succeeded the sciences ; every woman had her
geometrician, as she formerly had her page. To-day politics
and theories of government have banished from the great
world wit and science. Ambassadors have taken the place
of poets and men of science; everything in turn is the
fashion in Paris, even vice and virtue.
That which has always most revolted me in the society of
men of letters is the spirit of independence they very gen-
erally affect towards all spiritual and temporal authority.
Most of them like to turn sacred things into ridicule, as if
there were merit in attacking what is necessary to and
respected by other men. This literary pride and boldness
does not exist, however, except in men of letters who have
no hopes of fortune ; for none are less philosophical than
philosophers, and these grumblers at courtiers are base and
creeping enough when they do get some entrance at Court.
It must be understood that I am speaking generally ; for I
144 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
have met among men of letters pure, noble, modest souls,
submissive to authority.
Before ending these remarks, I wish to say a word of wit
and intellect [esprit], to which every one pretends and which
each man defines as he pleases. I long thought it was suffi-
cient to say and write pretty things to be a man of intellect ;
but since then I have reflected; I think that one can be
agreeable, amusing, original even, without being very wise.
A man of intellect, as I now think, is one who enlightens
his epoch by useful works, renders men happy by wise laws,
renders them better by purifying morals, and by teaching
precepts ennobled by eloquence and embellished by imagina-
tion. All work which does not fulfil in some superior man-
ner a purpose of physical or moral utility ought not to win
for its author the reputation of a man of intellect. In a
word, I do not separate intellect from good sense and
virtue.
When I entered the great world I found it was thought
ridiculous for a husband to love his wife, or for a wife to love
her husband; manners and morals in this respect were so
general that Pierre de la Chausse*e thought himself per-
mitted to attack this subject in a comedy which had much
success. Conjugal fidelity was at that time a virtue in the
minds of none but the bourgeoisie. This depravity of morals
is not so much the fashion at present ; society may not be
more virtuous, but it is at least more decent.
I have often heard the question of the superiority of men
over women discussed. When we have well reflected upon
it I believe we shall think that the superiority of men lies
only in the strength of their organs and a better education.
Madame Dupin, who has been very pretty, and has always
had more desire to think than she has actually thought, has
worked ten years to prove that men have no superiority,
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 145
even bodily, over women. I do not believe that her work,
if it ever appears, will change received ideas. Strength of
body must give to men real superiority, that of domination.
They have been masters, and they had to be so ; the strong
always rule the feeble. Men have founded States, because
they alone could conquer and defend them. If to this
physical advantage is joined that of a more enlightened and
more extended education, we can conceive without difficulty
that men, superior in strength, must also be superior in
knowledge.
I know in women but one evil common to their sex which
is not equally the attribute of men : I mean self-love, vanity
of their persons. This love in women is the first of all
their loves ; and it is in proportion to the art shown in
nattering that weakness that men secure the feelings of
women ; wisdom and virtue do not protect women from this
weakness. Queen Elizabeth, who had the mind of a man,
was flattered by a coarse speech made by an attendant on
the Dutch ambassador as he looked at her ; the pleasure of
making an impression on the senses of an unknown man
made his insolence and temerity disappear to her eyes. I
know one of the greatest and most virtuous princesses in the
world, who rapidly raised to the highest military rank a
foreigner whom she thought was in love with her ; flattered
self-love persuaded her soon after that she could confide to
him the welfare of her States. We see that this frenzy of
vanity is a distinctive weakness of the sex, to which we
must chiefly attribute the childish character which scarcely
ever abandons women wholly. We may even regard this
weakness as the root of all other weaknesses.
Apropos of the childish spirit, I will not let posterity
believe that the Marquise du CMtelet, sung by Voltaire, and
the commentator of Newton and Leibnitz, was a grave
TOL. I. — 10
146 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
personage, I have seen her for hours together ordering the
trimmings of a gown, and setting in motion an army of
pagoda idols of which her room was full
I think that the present intercourse with women has
changed the] morals of Frenchmen. Formerly men were
not admitted among them until they were at least thirty
years old. Up to that time men lived with men, their minds
were more manly, their principles of conduct more firm.
To-day it is the women who are teaching men to think ; at
seventeen years of age, and sometimes earlier, they are
received in society ; it is natural at that age to regard pleas-
ing women as the most important point of all ; they are
early accustomed to effeminacy, to frivolity, and they enter
public employments with empty heads, and their hearts
filled with false principles.
It is asked sometimes whether women are more capable
of friendship than men. This question would be easy to
answer if the friendship of women for men were not always
a little passionate ; it is rare that a woman, however virtuous
she may be, does not love in her friend the charming man
whom she believes she pleases to the exclusion of others.
That is why the friendship of women is always jealous ; but
it must be allowed that it is more tender, more delicate,
more spiritual, more generous, and often more faithful than
that of men. What examples of this I could cite! The
women friends I have lost, and those I have preserved have
made the sorrow and the happiness of my life.
i It must be owned, to the shame of our era, that the women
whose sole object is the pleasure of loving and being loved
have less of the great vices than other women. The am-
bition to govern belongs to the sex; but the means that
women take to do so are not all legitimate ; tender women
seek to reign only in the hearts of their lovers, but women of
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 147
cold natures have all the other passions very keenly ; pride,
self-interest, ambition, revenge, reign within them in default
of love; and these passions are all the more dangerous
because they are nearly always hidden behind a veil of
falseness or a mask of hypocrisy.
In two words, women are the most faithful friends of
men, and the most doubtful friends of their own sex ; they
are the charm of society and the source of all our missteps.
Formerly the term "grand seigneur" was understood to
mean a man of illustrious birth who possessed, with great
estates, the great offices of the crown; or else one who,
being master of his own region, did not disdain to live there ;
having influence with the king, but seldom showing himself
at Court. These former great seigneurs had almost as many
followers as they had vassals, and the lesser nobility did
not blush to be attached to them. The reason is very simple :
great seigneurs had in those days enough influence to make
the fortunes of such gentlemen. But times are changed;
the possessors of the great fiefs no longer live on their
estates, the seigneurs of to-day have, it is true, their titles
and dignities, but none of the influence that properly belongs
to them. This reflection regulated my conduct in society ;
I sought friends among them, but I never sought for pro-
tectors, because such protection seemed to me little honour-
able, often useless, and not worth the price to be paid for it.
Honour has been given to Cardinal de Eichelieu for
having drawn the great seigneurs to Court and taking from
them a power and influence which, it must be owned, they
often abused. It is not true that Cardinal de Eichelieu was
the one to restore to the king the "power that these great
seigneurs had arrogated to themselves; it was Henri IV.
who began, and almost completed, this great work. It is
known that Henri IV., the best prince in the world, found
148 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. n.
it necessary to sacrifice Marshal de Biron to his authority.
But nothing finer can be seen than the tranquillity which
Henri IV. established and maintained in his kingdom after
the League, and after he had conquered all France, bit by
bit, and sword in hand. The ministry of Cardinal de Kiche-
lieu, on the contrary, was perpetually agitated by civil wars
and conspiracies. He shed much blood, but not that of the
great men or the clever men who resisted him. After
the death of Louis XIII., who scarcely survived his minister,
it was seen that the great seigneurs had not been brought
by Kichelieu under obedience. It was Henri IV. who
began that work, and Louis XIV. who finished it.
Still, I do not know whether drawing all the great nobles
to Court has really been so great a good for the king and
for the kingdom. The revenues of their estates, which
ought to circulate in the provinces, is now lost in the gulf
of the capital; the multiplication of courtiers multiplies
intrigues, embarrasses and wearies the ministers, occasions
absurd claims, and adds to the expenditure of the royal
treasury, — not to speak of exemptions of all kinds, ranks,
distinctions, and favours bestowed.
It will be seen by what I have said how much the great
seigneurs of to-day differ from those of former times. With
less influence and wealth than in the days of Louis XIII.
and Henri IV, they have also less dignity and less appear-
ance than they had under Louis XIV. ; their expenditures
are underhand ; they love money, and do not blush to ask
for it, and sometimes to take it; the employment they
generally make of it cannot serve as an excuse for the
disorder of their affairs. They have vanity, but no real
dignity. Nothing is so rare as to find characters at Court
in the present day ; no one rises above his fellows ; they all
appear to be of one height. People have never been able
1735-1744] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 149
to rely on friendship at Court, but they could always rely
on hatred; to-day friends are as fickle and faithless as
formerly, but enemies are no longer irreconcilable ; relations
change from day to day. It is very easy for the king to be
master of such a Court; the trouble of it falls upon the
ministers ; they are obliged to become courtiers themselves,
in order to decipher intrigues and not allow the game to be
taken out of their hands by these sudden transformations
of partners.
It must be admitted that the great seigneurs are less
ignorant to-day than they were in the good old times. It is
not rare in these days to find good writers among persons of
rank ; but it must also be said that formerly better generals
and abler ministers were found among those old seigneurs,
many of whom scarcely knew how to read and write ; it is
not books that make great men, it is public affairs, loftiness
of soul, and Honour.
150 MEMOIBS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
III.
1745-1751. — The year 1745. — The campaign of Fontenoy. — A few
important events. — The year 1748. — The state of affairs from the
peace of Aix-la-Chapelle to 1751. — The ministers in office till 1751.—
My situation in 1751. — A conversation with M. de Puysieux.
THIS year is the period to which must be referred the ori-
gin and source of all the greatest events of my life and the
brilliant fortune that I have made ; if it were permissible to
believe that one has a star, I was certainly in a position then
to believe I had one. My youth was slipping away ; I had
neither an establishment nor revenues ; the door of benefices
was closed to me ; the career of Letters, which I had entered
more as an amateur than as a writer, could never become a
resource to me ; it had won me celebrity, and that was all I
could expect of it. In spite of my economy and the entire
sacrifice I had made of all the natural fancies of my age, I
owed twelve hundred francs. That sum was not considerable
in itself, but of course it increased yearly. This prospect
alarmed me ; I saw with a sort of horror that I might die
without paying my debts ; my soul, on which the principles
of honour were stamped from childhood, suffered martyrdom.
No one is more sensitive than I ; master of my outward self,
I have never been master of the impression that the emo-
tions of my soul make upon my bodily machinery ; anxiety
consumed me ; it caused a terrible upsetting of my health ;
bile mingled with my blood, and I had a long and distressing
illness; remedies were useless, because the cause of the
trouble was unknown to the doctors.
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 151
One day, during my convalescence, as I entered my room
I saw a box on my bureau, carefully tied up and addressed
to myself. I opened it and found a note, in which, were these
words : " Your situation is known ; you wish to pay your
debts ; you will find in this box twelve hundred francs ; the
sender will not be made known to you until you are in a
position to return them." I attributed this noble act to a
hundred persons of my acquaintance who had never dreamed
of it. I did not learn until two years later that I owed the
homage of my gratitude to one of the most beautiful women of
the Court, whom I scarcely knew, and who had refused me
permission to visit her. It was, in fact, by mere chance that,
relating my history one day to the Princesse de Kohan-Cour-
cillon, I was illuminated, as it were, by a flash of light.
" Ah ! " I cried, " ah ! it was you, madame." She denied it ;
but I made her feel that it was not becoming in a gentleman
to be so long ignorant of the one to whom he owed an obliga-
tion. I have lost that friend, whose soul was as noble as her
face, which the women picked to pieces, though it had no
other defect than that of girlishness and too great sensibility.
A part of my family, and I myself owe to her memory an
eternal recollection and a changeless gratitude.
As soon as my affairs were in order I recovered my health,
and as if the combinations of misfortune were exhausted in
regard to me, there happened during this same winter an
event which opened to me the gates of fortune.
The Duchesse de Chateauroux was dead. The king, as we
know, returned to her after the Fribourg campaign. She had
exacted the ruin of her enemies, and also that the Count de
Maurepas, whom she regarded as the worst of them, should
himself announce to her that the king recalled her. She did
not long enjoy her triumph ; that very day she was seized
with fever, and her illness proved mortal. People did not
152 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CMAI*. in.
fail to say that she was poisoned. It may have been so, but
I do not believe it.
The king was for a time in convulsions of the sharpest
grief ; but the affliction caused by love is violent rather than
lasting ; friendship alone is never consoled. The king was
young, covered with glory, governing the kingdom himself,
the handsomest of men, as he was the greatest of kings ; we
can easily see how the conquest of such a monarch would
excite emulation among women. Beauty, grace, youth, or
intelligence seemed to each a claim to aspire and to succeed ;
the crowd of female pretenders was immense. Nothing
could be more amusing than to see all those young heads,
each with a project for governing the State — for princes
need not delude themselves, their sceptre is more loved than
their person. I could not fail to be the friend of whatever
mistress the king might choose ; for I knew intimately all
those who had pretensions.
There was a ball at Versailles in the winter of 1745, at
which all the beauties of the Court and city assembled. It
was a Judgment of Paris; but whichever one was to get
the apple hoped also for the helm of State affairs. The king,
at the beginning of the ball, ogled much a young lady of my
acquaintance who had more brilliancy than beauty ; the posi-
tion of her parents, who were in finance, did not disgust the
king, who was weary of the intrigues and the ambition of the
Court women ; he hoped that a bourgeoise would think of
nothing but loving and being loved. He gave this young
girl rendezvous at a ball which was to take place a few
days later at the Hotel-de-Ville. Her parents, alarmed but
dazzled, consulted me as to what they should do ; I strength-
ened them in honour and virtue ; the young girl was not at
the ball. Very great seigneurs went to her house to persuade
the mother ; it was all in vain ; the affair came to nought, and
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 153
what does much honour to the girl in question is that she
knew I was the cause of this failure, and bore me no grudge
for it.
That same night the first outline of the affair of Mme.
d'fitioles, now Marquise de Pompadour, was sketched. This
intimacy increased day by day, but was not known to the
public until some time later. Mme. d'fitioles had all the
graces, all the freshness, all the gaiety of youth ; she danced,
sang, and played comedy marvellously well; no agreeable
talent was lacking in her. She loved Letters and the arts.
She had a lofty soul, sensible and generous. It is true that
to make a good use of the influence she was about to have,
she was deficient in knowledge of men and affairs. The
public were astonished at the preference the king gave her ;
they were ignorant that, after her marriage, he saw her
frequently when hunting in the forest of Se*nart; that his
equerries were constantly at her house, and that Mme. de
Mailly had dreaded Mme. d'Etioles more than any other
woman.
The Comtesse d'Estrades was a connection by marriage
of Mme. d'Etioles ; I saw the latter very often at the house
of the Comtesse, who was one of my friends. Mme. d'fitioles'
mother, Mme. Poisson, had not the tone of society, but
she had intelligence, ambition, and courage. She and her
daughter had often pressed me to go to their house ; I had
constantly resisted because the company they received was
not what suited me. This refusal ought 'to have injured me
with them. One day I received a note from the Comtesse
d'Estrades asking me to go to her; I went. She told me
that Mme. d'fitioles was the king's mistress ; that, in spite
of my refusals, she desired to find a friend in me, and that
the king approved of it. I was asked to supper at Mme.
d'Etioles' one week later to settle the agreement. I ex-
154 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [PHAP. m.
plained to Mme. d'Estrades my great repugnance to lend
myself to such an arrangement ; though, in actual truth,
I had no part in it; but it seemed to me little in keeping
with my profession. She insisted, however, and I asked for
time to reflect. I consulted the most honourable persons;
they all agreed that having in no way contributed to the
king's passion, I ought not to refuse my friendship to an
old acquaintance, nor the good which might result from my
advice. I determined then to accept; they promised me
and I promised them an eternal friendship. It will be seen
that I kept my word. The king was to go to the war in
Flanders, and Mme. d'Etioles was to pass the summer in
the country. It was agreed, and approved by the master,
that I should see her often.
The king was not held back from this campaign by the
pleasure of his new engagement. He went very early to
the army, then besieging Tournai ; the dauphin accompanied
him. Two bullets might have deprived France of her master
and her hopes. I shall not relate the events of this cam-
paign. The Mare'chal de Saxe, after the eventful day of
Fontenoy, said to the king: "Sire, you now see on what
the loss or gain of a battle hangs." As long as the Mare'chal
de Saxe lived, he enjoyed the esteem of the army, and that
of all Europe ; but a portion of the Court had always re-
fused him its suffrage : he could do without it. At his
death, all voices united in regretting him; but nothing is
so great a eulogy of this general as the conduct of those who
commanded our armies after him, — excepting Mare'chal de
Broglie, who deserves to be distinguished.
Mare'chal de Saxe had the genius of a commander-in-chief ;
he had, for war, only those defects which are inseparable
from humanity. Before he commanded armies, he talked
about himself and rather exaggerated his merits ; his
Liotard
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 155
modesty came to him with his glory. I remember that
some of his friends and I did all we could to make him
talk of his campaigns in Flanders during a rather long
supper ; we could not get a word from him except this :
"I made many blunders." It is a pity that so great a
warrior gave himself up to love, debauchery, and bad com-
pany; it may truly be said that opera-girls deprived France
of a support most necessary to her. Mare'chal de Saxe liked
bad company less from taste than from haughtiness; son
of a king [Augustus the Strong of Poland], he preferred
to live with sycophants, avoiding his own equals. His
" Keveries " will seem a work of little importance to common
minds, but those who have military genius will find many
sublime ideas in it. The greatest gift that God can make
to a monarchy is that of an able general ; the mistakes of
ministers are reparable, those of a general usually are not ;
the safety and glory of a nation are absolutely in his
hands.
I was often at Etioles during the summer of 1745. With
the exception of the Due de Gontaut, who stayed there
several days, I was the only man of society with whom
Mme. de Pompadour could have any intercourse. I went
weekly to Paris ; and there I did justice, without exaggera-
tion, to her sentiments and intentions. I advised her to
protect men of letters ; it was they who had given the name
of Great to Louis XIV. I had no advice to give her as to
seeking and cherishing honest men ; I found that principle
established in her soul. I did not then discover in that
soul any other defect than a self-love too easy to flatter or
wound, and a too general distrust as readily excited as
calmed. In spite of this discovery, I resolved to always
tell her the truth without any precaution; I have often
risked displeasing her by this frankness and firmness ; but
156 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
a true friend can play no other part. I ought to say to
her praise that for twelve years she preferred my truths,
sometimes harsh, to the flatteries of others. When she was
presented at Court it was agreed between us that I should
see her weekly for an hour or two in private. This was
done for a month ; but I soon saw that I excited the envy
and uneasiness of the whole Court. I found the position
too delicate; and I arranged with her that I should only
see her with others, but that I should write to her on all
that concerned the highest glory of the king, and the happi-
ness of honest people. When I examine my own conscience,
I find not the smallest reproach to make to myself during
all the time this intimacy lasted ; the temptations of favour,
which are so dangerous, never made me deviate from prin-
ciples of justice and probity.
The Court and the public were astonished to see the wife
of a farmer-general, still living, presented to the queen
under the title of the Marquise de Pompadour. After
a time the Court and public accustomed themselves to see
the same person lady of the palace of the queen, and seated
in her Majesty's presence. In France the king is master of
not only the property and lives of his subjects, but of their
minds also. What power! and how easy it would be to
turn it to great advantage!
In spite of my great favour, all I obtained at the beginning
of 1746 was a lodging in the Louvre and a pension of fifteen
hundred francs on the privy purse. This meagre condition
continued till 1751, and the reason was this : I have never
been grasping ; I sweated blood when I had to tell of my
affairs. Mme. de Pompadour had obtained many favours
from the king, to which the ministers always put obstacles.
I avoided embittering the favourite against them; so the
obstacles prevailed: in a word, the Court would not lend
1745-1751] CARDINAL BE BlSRNlS. 157
itself to my elevation, and I did not seek then to make
a distinguished fortune.
My situation at Court was very singular up to 1751 ; I
was placed between favour and fortune, able to dispose of
the one but never attaining the other ; I influenced consider-
able events, I had part in many benefits obtained for others,
but for myself I could not procure even a moderate com-
petence. I had limited my wants to eighteen thousand
francs a year. I could have got that, and more too, if I had
been willing to mix myself in what are called "affairs."
But I have always regarded them with contempt and horror,
in spite of the force of repeated examples. To receive
money in return for obtaining an office for some one is, in
the first place, selling our services ; in the next, it is deceiv-
ing the sovereign by presenting to him a person who may
often have no other merit than that of having bought my
influence. It was not that I did not know the instability
of all things human ; I knew very well that Cardinal Ma-
zarin and many others had maintained themselves only
by thus putting under cover considerable sums ; but honour
silenced all such reflections. I kept to the same way
of thinking, and still more scrupulously when I became
minister.
The king, whom I saw every day at Mme. de Pompadour's,
never brought himself to speak to me for three years, so
great is the shyness of this prince towards persons to whom
he is not used ; especially if those persons have the reputa-
tion of being clever men. As soon as the king had con-
quered himself as far as to say a word to me he had no
longer any embarrassment; he even gave me a great mark
of favour by taking me with him to the little entertainments
in the cabinets, where, at first, only a very few courtiers
were admitted. The King, by placing me in his own box,
158 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
wished to show that he was informed of my birth. These
theatricals soon became public, with more constraint to the
king and much less decency.
The favour which I enjoyed, being useful only to others,
made me fewer enemies than if it had been profitable to
myself, but it excited the attention of the Court and the ill-
will of the ministers. My friendship for Mme. de Pompa-
dour fixed me to a plan that was very dangerous. In order
not to give her umbrage, I resolved to be attached only to
the king, who was my master, and to depend for my ad-
vancement only on her, who was my friend. I followed
this system steadily, and I never regretted it, because it was
honourable. But my attachment to the favourite never had
an air of baseness or slavery ; I always told her the truth,
and I never sacrificed a friend to her ; though I had several
who might have displeased her. It was difficult for conduct
so unusual to avoid annoyances and storms. If I had been
ambitious I might have been more adroit; as it was, I
wished to be only a friend and philosopher.
Two remarkable events followed the peace of Aix-la-
Chapelle: one was the arrest in broad daylight of Prince
Edward Stuart, who was bound and pinioned like a common
criminal. No event ever so vexed me for the king's sake.
The Pretender was inexcusable for wanting to lay down the
law to France ; he deserved to be arrested ; but it ought to
have been done at night, with the consideration due to his
rank, and, above all, to his misfortunes. Those who advised
the king on this occasion forgot to remind him that Prince
Edward was a grandson of Henri IV. and that the French
throne has ever been the support and shelter of unfortunate
princes.
Another event which made much noise at Court was the
disgrace of M. de Maurepas. The sudden death of Mme.
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. • 159
de Chateauroux had saved him from exile ; but the risk he
had run then did not prevent him from being on equally
bad terms with Mme. de Pompadour. His system was, not
to depend in any way on the favourites ; a laudable system
in itself, provided it did not fail in respect to the king by
attacking what he loved. The Court thought it saw a
coolness on the part of the king for Mme. de Pompadour,
and a secret cabal went to work to bring back Mme. de
Mailly, who was playing the part of the repentant Magdalen
in Paris. They hoped that the king, who was used to her,
would also get used to her piety. To strengthen this pious
intrigue Paris was inundated with satirical songs against
Mme. de Pompadour. The conspirators hoped to humiliate
the king's self-love in that way, for he himself was inso-
lently attacked in these lampoons. They grossly deceived
themselves. The king was more indignant at the contempt
cast upon his choice than upon the personal insults to him-
self. M. de Maurepas, having charge of the department of
Paris and the Court, was accused of not having duly sought
for the authors and disseminators of these infamies.
He was exiled, and the king's Council lost an enlightened
minister and one better informed than many others on the
laws and regulations of the kingdom.
The Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle (October 18, 1748) put an
end to the conquests of Mare*chal de Saxe and to the glory
of our arms ; it left hi existence our differences with England,
and it winked at the establishment of the Spanish princes in
Italy. Hence this treaty gave occasion for two almost cer-
tain wars ; one with England, the other in Italy on the death
of King Ferdinand of Spain. Our alliance with the Court
of Vienna saved us from that second war, which would
have become general. Few persons in France perceived this
good effect of the Treaty of Versailles, but, with Frenchmen,
160 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
the mind does not readily seize the connection of political
ideas.
The Comte de Saint-Severin negotiated the Peace of Aix-
la-Chapelle. As a reward he was made minister of State
He was, as Voltaire somewhere calls him, " the most inefficient
inefficiency " among the ministers.
As I found that favour gave me nothing but consideration
and a pleasant life, but did not procure me suitable establish-
ment, I judged it best to leave my Chapter of Brioude and
enter that of Lyon. It was an honourable pis-aller, which
I kept to fall back upon in case fortune should continue to
be against me ; I was connecting myself with an illustrious
body in the Church of France and securing a retreat for my
old age. I busied myself therefore in collecting the title-
deeds necessary to prove sixteen quarterings, which the
Chapter of Lyon requires before appointing to a vacancy.
This precaution is very wise ; it saves the Chapter from being
sued by those whose proofs may be rejected, and who would
not fail to appeal to Parliament to get them admitted.
My proofs were presented to the Chapter on All-Saints'
day of the year 1748, and received by the Chapter on Saint-
John's day of the following year. The proofs of my geneal-
ogy went back, by an almost unexampled distinction, to the
year 1116; which will some day be a fine title for my
family. The king has granted a decoration to the Comtes
de Lyon ; it consists of an enamelled cross on a red ribbon
edged with blue; the two colours recalling the military
nobility and the nobles, distinguished by the colour of the
Orders of Saint-Louis and the Saint-Esprit. When Cardinal
de Tencin saw me wearing the Lyon cross, he declared that
I should soon be an ambassador ; he was not far wrong.
As soon as I was a member of the Lyon Chapter I re-
nounced frequenting theatres both at Court and in Paris ;
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 161
this sacrifice cost me much. I made another which seemed
to me less painful : I abandoned the frivolous style of poetry.
History, politics, and morals became my only occupations ; I
wished to accustom the public by degrees to regard me as
a man of serious mind fit for public affairs. I have all my
life had the talent of transitions, which to be good should
be gradual.
I have made myself a law in speaking of the affairs of State
never to allow the secrets of government, whether in regard
to politics or to finances, to transpire ; in spite of the wisest
precautions, all that is written may be made public or pass
into questionable hands. Consequently, I shall speak only
of affairs in general, without disclosing the secret bond that
connects them, and without giving a precise idea of the state
of our resources and our debts. No minister was ever more
enabled than I to give an exact picture of our situation, but
I shall not forget the oath which I took to the king. These
Memoirs will be less interesting ; but it must be remembered
that I write them only for my own amusement and the in-
formation of my nephews.1
The Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle had procured for the king no
other advantage than that of showing his moderation to Eu-
rope, and of relieving him from the prejudice, established in
the days of Louis XIV., of an agressive ambition, which France
can well do without if she is properly governed, and of which
she cannot fulfil the object when her government is feeble
or vicious.
The king, having kept none of his conquests, and hav-
ing failed in the object which Mare*chal de Belleisle was ex-
1 Bernis* descendants regarded his wishes so faithfully in this respect
that it was nearly 120 years before they were published or generally
known. They end in the year 1758 and were first published, as already
stated, in 1878. — TR.
VOL. I. — 11
162 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHA*. in.
pected to carry out, namely, the weakening of the House
of Austria and the transfer of the Empire to another family,
had, of course, to expect a new war as soon as the belliger-
ents recovered breath. But France needed a long peace ; it
was necessary, therefore, on the one hand, that the wisdom
and foresight of the Council should carefully endeavour to
end our differences with England and ward off all that might
increase them ; on the other, that, as we were not certain
of ending the settlement of our boundaries, we should pro-
vide far in advance for our colonies, make their defensive
easier and more formidable, rectify and simplify their ad-
ministration, and, above all, confide it only to pure hands
incapable of rapine. The whole attention of the government,
in the uncertainty in which we were as to the duration of
peace, ought to have been given principally to the mainten-
ance, the increase, and the good administration of the navy.
As it is incontestable that a marine war with a great power
leads, in six months or a year later, to a continental war, it
was essential, 1st, to seek, after the deaths of the Mare'chal
de Saxe and Mare'chal Lb'wendahl, for two generals capable
of commanding our armies ; because, in spite of French van-
ity, if the nation does not furnish great warriors the safety
and glory of the State require that they be sought elsewhere ;
2d, it was equally necessary to form a good militia, and
make sure of the good government of the soldier by the good
conduct and capacity of the officer ; 3d, it was necessary to
replenish our arsenals, supply our fortresses, and repair their
fortifications ; 4th (and most important point of all), it was
essential to bring order into our finances and prepare, in
advance, secure resources in case of war, to enable us to
sustain it the necessary time and not be forced to a disad-
vantageous peace by the imperious law of a last crown in
the treasury ; 5th, it was plainly wisdom, in view of foreign
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 163
war, to appease the intestinal wars of religion, to prevent the
two bodies of the clergy and magistracy from clashing, and
that parliament should be stopped from making a species of
League, injurious to the authority of the king and to the
public opinion of his power and his administration ; 6th, and
finally, it was the part of prudence to better consolidate the
political system of the king, and not allow it to depend so ab-
solutely on the fidelity or infidelity of the King of Prussia.
In saying what ought to have been done after the Peace of
Aix-la-Chapelle, one is stating precisely what was not done.
The negotiation with England was badly conducted ; it was
supposed that that power neither would nor could go to war.
We were in a position to make her some little sacrifices in
order to establish a solid peace of which France and its com-
merce had need ; instead of that we committed little acts of
hostility against the English in America ; we put up forts
where they could only create jealousy ; we sent much money
for the proper defence of our colonies, which was ill-employed
and wasted ; the navy was badly administered ; we searched
for no generals; we enervated the militia by multiplying
grades ; our fortresses and arsenals were neglected ; instead
of paying our debts, we increased them in a time of peace ;
the burden on the people has not been relieved according to
their needs ; we have allowed religious quarrels to be revived
without an effort to smother at its birth the fermentation of
the clergy and the parliaments ; while distrusting the King
of Prussia we rested tranquilly on the faith of his alliance
— hi a word, we have conducted ourselves ill, and we
ought to impute to our own faults all the misfortunes of the
present war and the embarrassments in which we find our-
selves. After giving this picture, it is essential that I should
make known the ministers who at that time composed the
king's Council.
164 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS o* [CHAP. m.
The chancellor was M. de Lamoignon, whose name is
illustrious in the magistracy, but who could not replace M.
d'Aguesseau either for ideas or knowledge. He is a very
honest man, but the post of chief of law and justice demands
superior talents. The king having asked the chancellor one
day from what point he had seen the fireworks given at Ver-
sailles on the birth of the Due de Bourgogne, the Due d'Ayen
forestalled the chancellor's answer by saying, "From his
dining-room, sire," — M. de Lamoignon having gone into his
hay-loft to see the sight. When it is permissible to make such
jokes as that on the head of law and justice, what authority
can he have over the magistracy ?
The Marquis de Puysieux had the department of Foreign
Affairs after the dismissal of the Marquis d'Argenson,
surnamed the Stupid [le BUe] to distinguish him from his
brother, Comte d'Argenson. M. de Puysieux has a wise and
just mind ; he speaks nobly and with dignity ; his principles
and his acts are honest; he knows his master well, and
knows how to conduct himself at Court and in public ; but
one feels the difference there is between an adroit and vir-
tuous courtier and an able minister, — between an upright
mind and a broad one.
The Comte d'Argenson was charged with the war depart-
ment. On entering office he had created, so to speak, the
king's armies. I have known few men who had more ideas
hi their minds than he ; but by dint of multiplying the supe-
rior grades in the army he extinguished emulation, and
gave birth, in subalterns, to misplaced ambition. His
quarrels with M. de Machault were very pernicious to the
king's affairs, and his rupture with Mme. de Pompadour
finally deprived the State of an enlightened minister.
M. de Machault, successively controller-general, minister
of the marine, and Keeper of the Seals, had at that time only
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 165
the finance department. He was beginning to show the
despotism of his mind, and he hid beneath a cold exterior
and a grave countenance the little depth of his knowledge,
which was veiled by the prestige of a rather penetrating
mind and a laconic language that was clear and precise. In
trying to destroy the privileges of the clergy he unmasked
too soon his real design of suppressing all privileges ; from
that time he aimed for the post of Keeper of the Seals. The
chief president [of parliament], M. Maupeou, also had views
for that place. The Court had flattered his hopes, and he
restrained parliament just so long as he believed those hopes
well-founded. M. de Machault, after having displeased
Mme. de Pompadour, found the secret, not of pleasing her,
but of governing her in State affairs.
M. Kouill4 had succeeded the Comte de Maurepas as min-
ister of the marine, but he did not replace him in either
knowledge or capacity; without intending to be governed
by his subordinates, he was so, despotically, for the simple
reason that where one is not well-informed one must rely on
others.
Besides these departments the king had as ministers of the
State : Cardinal de Tencin, who soon retired to his diocese,
and did well ; the Marshal de Noailles, a man of much in-
telligence, writing well and having much information, but
more of a courtier than a statesman ; the Comte de Saint-
Severin, whose greatest merit was to have persuaded M. de
Puysieux that he was a great man, descended in direct line
from the kings of Aragon; the bishop of Mirepoix, who
ruled the affairs of the Church with the harshness and des-
potism of a monk ; he had placed in the see of Paris M. de
Beaumont, cherished in Vienne, adored at Bayonne, fitted
to occupy those two places, but not to fill a post of such im-
portance as the archbishopric of Paris,
166 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
Though the Prince de Conti was not in the Council, he
worked with the king on matters of importance, more foreign
than internal.1 He is a prince of much intelligence and
knowledge, but, unless the king admits into the Council a
prince of the blood, it would be wiser to keep him aloof
from great affairs. He has quarrelled with Mme. de Pompa-
dour. All these quarrels of the king's mistress with the
ministers have been the source, or the occasion, of great
troubles and misfortunes to the kingdom.
I was too well-informed as to public affairs not to fear
to embark upon them ; on the one hand, I should have been
glad to be useful to the State, and to make myself an
honourable reputation ; on the other, I foresaw the confusion
into which the evils of the coming wars would almost in-
fallibly cast the country. Moreover, I knew my own nature ;
I foresaw that I should be too sensitive to the evils of the
State as soon as I was charged with some administration ;
that, jealous of my honour and reputation as well as the
glory of my master, I should make every effort to re-establish
order, regardless of the enemies so firm a course would give
me; from that I foresaw dismissal and exile if circum-
stances called me to the ministry. All these reflections
attached me more and more to the free and philosophical
life that I was leading ; but I was thirty-six years old, I had
no career, and a numerous family depended on my making a
fortune to supply the deficiencies of theirs. This last con-
sideration was stronger than my repugnances.
A step which I took at this time ended my irresolution.
There had been some question for me of a place as coun-
1 Louis-Franpois de Bourbon, great-nephew of the Great Conde; his
grandmother was Anne Martinozzi, Mazarin's niece; he managed
the secret correspondence of Louis XV. with French agents in the
north of Europe, one object of which was to put him on the throne of
Poland. — TB.
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 167
cillor of State on Church Affairs, which I should have
obtained if the dauphin had not asked for it for the Abb£
de Marbeuf, one of his tutors. I wrote to Mme. de Pompa-
dour to ask for the next place of the kind that fell vacant.
She answered that the king would willingly give it to me
if I served him in his negotiations; but that his Majesty
was surprised that I had made no effort to enter that career,
for which both he and his ministers thought me fitted. The
Marquis de Paulmy [son of the Marquis d'Argenson] hav-
ing been associated with his uncle in the ministry of war,
the embassy to Switzerland was vacant. I applied for it,
but it was given to M. de Chavigny in reward for his long
services ; that of Venice was promised me, with an order to
keep the matter secret.
Meantime M. de Puysieux resigned the ministry of
Foreign Affairs. He would have liked the king to choose
M. de Saint-Severin to succeed him, but his Majesty,
influenced by M. de Machault and the Mare*chal de JSToailles,
preferred M. de Saint-Contest, who, to speak frankly, brought
no other qualifications for so great an office than that of
being the son of a minister plenipotentiary at the Congress
of Eastadt, and of having read the newspapers assiduously
for thirty years. This new minister was not one of my
friends : first, because his mind and mine were not of the same
stuff; second, because his creator, M. de Machault, had never
liked me. Thus it came about that I was treated rather
shabbily in meeting the immense costs of my outfit ; so that
I began my diplomatic career by being forced to borrow
eighty thousand francs, with the annoyance of passing in
public for a well-treated favourite.
As soon as I had made up my mind to enter upon a public
career I renounced all pleasures, all amusements, and all
tastes which did not conform to it ; I informed myself f unda-
168 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
mentally on whatever might help me to some superiority ;
and I accustomed myself henceforth to adopt the tone and
manners of foreigners ; through the flexibility of my nature,
I soon had the tone of the foreign ministers then in Paris.
I formed a plan at this time for twenty years, which I
desired to devote to the service of the king in foreign Courts ;
all places at our own Court were excluded from this plan ;
and my final prospect was — after serving the State, being
useful to my family, and acquiring reputation for myself —
to spend the remainder of my days far from the great world
and from public affairs, in the enjoyment of my life and of
friends. Circumstances which it was impossible to foresee
subsequently upset a plan so wise, and so in harmony with
my inclinations.
Up to the moment when I was appointed to the embassy
of Venice, I had passed in the world for an honest, agree-
able man, having many talents, but too lazy to employ them
usefully, and too devoid of ambition ever to make my way.
I warned my intimate friends that as soon as I was an
ambassador I should have a totally different reputation in
society; I should be supposed to have vast ambition, and
the art to have known how to conceal it for seventeen years
under a mask of careless indifference. I was not mistaken.
My embassy was announced the last of October, 1751; I
thanked the king the next day, and as I left his cabinet a
courtier said to me with a sly air, " Your Excellency, I
offer my congratulations to your Eminence ; " and a few steps
farther on, another courtier said with a rather sour smile,
" Monsieur 1'abbe*, the file grates [la lime sourde]" A week
later the news ran through Paris that my embassy to Venice
would not last long, as I should soon be recalled to the post
of tutor to the Due de Bourgogne ; I was supposed to have
that aim, and they doubtless imagined that by unmasking it
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 169
they could make me miss it. From that moment I lost the
flattering illusion of having many friends ; I discovered that,
on the contrary, there were many who envied me.
I ought to remark here that during ten years of favour all
I had obtained was fifteen hundred francs a year, to which I
limited my ambition. Therefore it was proved to me that
I could not make a medium fortune, for as soon as I took
the resolution to rise to a great one, embassies were flung
at my head. Did that mean that Providence destined me
for great things ? The end alone can clear up this doubt.
I think I ought to relate here a conversation which I had
at Fontainebleau with M. de Puysieux, who, although he
had resigned the ministry of Foreign Affairs, still preserved
a portion of the king's confidence in regard to them. This
conversation will show better than anything else what the
spirit was that guided my conduct at Court.
It was rather extraordinary that I had been appointed to
an embassy without ever having spoken to the minister of
Foreign Affairs, or ever paying him a visit. I did not wish
this singularity to make a bad impression on M. de Puy-
sieux' mind, because I respected him. Accordingly, after
the first compliments, I told him that I had come to make
my general confession, and I was too jealous of his esteem
to let him think I had neglected to fulfil a duty I owed to
him, or that I was impertinent, or a man of the other class.
" It is true," he replied, " that you have had the air of
saying, ' Messieurs, I wish to be an ambassador, and I shall
be one without your meddling in it.' " This answer made me
laugh, and I at once began my justification and told him my
history ever since my arrival in Paris. I made him take
notice of the honesty and courage of my conduct ; I justified
the frivolous works of my youth by showing that I held
them at their just value ; but I made him agree that without
170 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. in.
them I sliould never have acquired the reputation for intel-
lect which put me in the way of being chosen for great
places. I made him see the close connection there had
always been between my ideas and my actual plan of con-
duct, and that in leading the life of a man of society I had
reflected much and had studied the heart and the passions
of men.
I made him remark how modestly I had used my favour ;
how my attachments had been free from baseness and
flattery ; and to what a point I had been disinterested. As
all I said was sustained by facts well-known to M. de
Puysieux, I saw that my argument made an impression,
and brought the minister suddenly to the delicate point
which touched himself. I then employed to win him the
only art I know — that of truth. I said to him : —
" You will not accuse me of being ignorant that, wishing
to be an ambassador, my first step ought to have been to ask
for your consent; neither will you suspect me of having
neglected that act of propriety and obligation from misplaced
arrogance. I shall therefore tell you the secret of it: I
wanted to be an ambassador, and I never should have been
one had I set foot in your house. You can readily see that
as soon as I appeared there all the Court would have said,
'It is now clear enough; he is aiming for the Foreign
Affairs.' From that instant all who had the same aim,
the friends of the Court and of some of the ministers, would
have persuaded Mme. de Pompadour that it was breaking
my neck to let me be appointed an ambassador before my
fortune was made ; that I should have to begin by running
in debt; that the Bishop of Mirepoix would still refuse
me an abbey, or if he gave it, its revenues would go to the
payment of my debts ; therefore that the true way to help
me was to conquer the obstinacy of the Bishop of Mirepoix,
1745-1751] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 171
and induce the king to give me some other favour which
would put me in the way to serve him and not ruin myself.
This apparently friendly language would have made an im-
pression on the mind of my friend ; and if it did not change
her intentions it would certainly have retarded the result."
(M. de Puysieux agreed to that.) " Well, then," I said, « by
taking the course of not seeing you, and being scarcely
known to you, I calculated that I should infallibly become
an ambassador."
M. de Puysieux began to laugh; he embraced me and
said : " I now think that you are worthy to be one. I will
return you confidence for confidence ; I shall not conceal that
I did all that depended on me to prevent the king from
choosing you for his ambassador. I could not tell him you
were a scoundrel, because every one avers you are an honest
man ; or that you are not a gentleman, because it is proved
that you come of an ancient race ; nor could I say that you
.were a fool, because everybody says you have intellect; but
I made him fear that your intellect would turn to the side
of imagination and away from that of good sense. He
wanted to send you to Poland ; I insisted on the danger of
intrusting you with so delicate a mission, and I consented
finally, but with difficulty, to the Venetian embassy, because
if you committed follies there they would not be important."
This frankness on the part of M. de Puysieux touched me
to the bottom of my heart. I asked him for his friendship
and promised him mine. He soon gave me, as I shall tell
hereafter, flattering marks of his esteem ; and I have been
fortunate enough in my turn to prove to him mine.
It was in the same frank and open manner that I gradually
won, if not the friendship, at least the esteem of all the min-
isters of the king before I started for Venice.
172 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IT.
PART SECOND.
IV.
1762-1755. — That which preceded my Departure for Venice. — My Debut
there. — The foreign Ministers resident in Venice. — Affairs which I
negotiated during iny Embassy. — Some interesting Particulars. —
Journey to Parma early in 1755. — Return to Paris in June, 1755. —
State of the Court and Country in 1755.
I HAD changed my condition, I now changed my life ; my
mind, which, in my days of idleness, had busied itself solely
in works of pure charm, now applied itself solely to public
affairs. My conversion in this respect has been so sincere
that I have lost the taste and talent that I once had for poetry.
It was only by accident, to conjure away my griefs or my
weariness, that I had given such career to my imagination ;
serious things were of a nature that best suited the character
of my own mind ; therefore, on entering upon the duties of
public life I was not, as they say, all abroad. The study
that I had made of the government of Venice, of the manners
and spirit of that republic, put into my mind such clear ideas
on the subject that I did not have many corrections to make
later. They sent me to Venice as into a cul de sac of little
interest, but I resolved to make my despatches more interest-
ing than those of the king's ministers in the chief Courts of
Europe, and to find the art and the means of soon acquiring
the reputation of a meritorious ambassador. It will be seen
that I did not disappoint my own hopes.
I left the Court in the agitation of a most complicated
intrigue. Clear-sighted persons thought they saw a diminu-
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNlS. 173
tion in the favour of Mme. de Pompadour ; they suspected
that the king had a fancy for Mme. de Choiseul, a little
serpent whom the marquise had warmed in her bosom. I
could not count securely on any of the king's ministers. M.
de Puysieux had known me so recently, and M. d'Argenson,
towards whom, in spite of his quarrel with Mme. de Pompa-
dour, I had always shown the most honourable and courageous
conduct, had very weak regard for me, which was not likely
to resist long the influence of his mistress, Mme. d'Estrades,
who had ceased to like me when I could not be induced to
abandon, like herself, Mme. de Pompadour. If I had been
less honourable I might have had the support of the Prince
de Conti, who wished to attach me to him and to have me
appointed to the embassy to Poland in order to execute there
a scheme known only to himself, the king, and M. d'Argenson,
which was revealed to me. But the Prince de Conti was
the declared enemy of Mme. de Pompadour, and that was
enough to deprive me of his useful protection, which might,
according to circumstances, become necessary to me.
I may add to this the aversion M. de Saint-Contest
showed to me. He tried to treat me superciliously, but I
did not allow it, and, although I was dependent on him,
I spoke to him firmly, knowing well that inferior ministers
are more rancorous than superior ones. Moreover, I left
beside Mme. de Pompadour M. de Machault, in whom at
that time she had the utmost confidence, and who could
not endure me. The king had promised me the first vacant
place of Councillor of State for Church affairs, but the
promise might be forgotten. The Bishop of Mirepoix, des-
potic distributor of benefices, was against me ; I had bor-
rowed eighty thousand francs, and I had no property to
cover that sum. The present was disquieting, the future
alarming.
174 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
Under these circumstances my friends wanted me to
remain at Court, enjoy the salary of my embassy, and wait
to see if Mme. de Pompadour succumbed or triumphed.
The advice seemed wise, but my opinion was different. I
was resolved to make my way by my own work and the
development of my talents. I saw in this course another
advantage, that of allay ing the jealousies I was beginning to
excite at Court. No one would fear me in Venice; the
worst that could happen to me would be to be forgotten;
therefore I urged my departure with as much eagerness as
other ambassadors show in delaying theirs. Mine was fixed
for August, 1752.
The quarrel of the Archbishop of Paris with the parlia-
ment was beginning to grow heated ; I foresaw the results
with a precision that surprises me now that I look back
upon it. I wrote a memorial containing the principles of
conduct which the king ought to maintain under the cir-
cumstances ; in it I foretold the disasters which would
infallibly arrive if these principles were abandoned. Shall
I say it? I foretold in 1752 that spirit of fanaticism
which had produced so many dangerous attempts during the
reigns of Henri III. and Henri IV. ; in 1757 my prediction
proved but too true. I communicated this paper to M. de
Puysieux, who was struck by it. He took a copy, and
sent it to the king without a word to me, but he cut out
the passage relating to horrors already produced and about
to be produced again by fanaticism. He accompanied the
memorial with a letter in which he sung my praises and
assured the king that I should be one of his best minis-
ters ; that my memorial contained the true principles ; that
the king would do well to keep it always in his portfolio
and under his eye ; and finally that it was without my
knowledge that it was sent, and he asked the same secrecy
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 175
from the king. His Majesty kept it faithfully, and never
said a word of it to me.
I took leave of his Majesty in the month of August, and
went to Lyon to the house of Cardinal de Tencin, where I
met the Marshal de Belleisle, with whom I made fuller
acquaintance. Cardinal de Tencin, who had taken me in great
affection since seeing me on the road to fortune, offered me
two hundred thousand francs when I left him for my em-
bassy, using these remarkable words : " In the career on
which you are entering, remember that talent does not suf-
fice to do everything." On my return from my embassy he
wished to make me his coadjutor in the archbishopric of
Lyon. I did not yield to any of his offers, but I am not
sorry to record the recollection of them. It is to be remarked
that this cardinal, who had been the scourge of the Jansen-
ists when Abb£ de Tencin and Archbishop of Embrun, ceased
to persecute them towards the end of his life.
I may say here that if I had been willing to accept all the
offers made to me at this time I could have carried with me
to Venice a million in ready money. And what is very sin-
gular is that when I was minister and secretary of State, en-
joying the favour of my master, no one ever offered me money.
Was this because men expect more of a man who is begin-
ning to make his fortune than of a man who has made it ?
The first can only rise, the second can only fall.
I had been announced in Venice as an agreeable man and
a younger son without resources. People expected gallantry
and a very ordinary style of living. I balked this public
expectation on both points ; I made very honourable outlays,
and I kept my house without abusing any of the privileges
of an ambassador. I used that of free customs with great
restraint ; this is the only honest way to retain a right to
them. My predecessors had brought in contraband supplies
176 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IV.
with more or less ostentation; I abolished that unworthy
system. An ambassador is the representative of his master
and his nation ; what care he ought therefore to take of their
fame and his own honour. I wished my household to be
regulated like that of a Chartreux establishment ; I required
that silence and order should reign there ; that my retinue
should be polite and respectful towards all citizens, and that
libertinism should be banished. Two or three timely exam-
ples made me master of establishing these rules and forcing
their observance. This wholly new system of life attracted
the attention of the Venetian government and caused a
little jealousy in the ambassadors from other Courts.
M. de Chavigny, who preceded me, had lived only eighteen
months in Venice. He made himself a reputation there by
his good fortune in becoming, in a way, the mediator of the
disputes between the Kepublic and the Court of Vienna on
the subject of the patriarchate of Aguila. It was not easy for
a new minister to make such a predecessor forgotten ; all the
more because from his present embassy in Switzerland he
continued, under the rose, to meddle with the matters with
which I was charged. Without injuring the union and
friendship which existed between us, and by taking the tone
and air of a disciple rather than a rival, I cut short these
little intrigues and soon made myself an independent name
and consideration.
When I arrived in Venice I found the people, and a large
part of the government, Austrian or English ; the French were
held in such dislike that they ran the risk of being insulted
if they appeared in public places. I set myself to change that
national feeling ; and I succeeded by means that are simple
but infallible whenever persons have the intelligence to adopt
them, and the steadiness to employ them without interrup-
tion. I studied the manners and customs of the place ; I
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 177
conformed to them without having an air of being annoyed
by them ; and I kept the spirit of my own nation only in
those graces which please, without any tincture of that
arrogance that makes us hated by foreigners.
The Venetians were astonished after a time to find me
insensible to the charms of women, hi a country where that
weakness is not thought a vice. From this time the Senate,
which is informed and takes note of all, considered me as a
man master of himself, on whom the force of example had no
power. It wondered, nevertheless, how a cadet without for-
tune could be so magnificent and disinterested. A crowd of
illustrious foreigners of all nations, whom the pompous cere-
monies of Holy Week drew to Eome, passed through Venice ;
my house was open to them, and there they were treated
with distinction, magnificence, and ease. No other foreign
minister would do this ; they preferred money to the reputa-
tion it gives. As for me, I regarded these travelling foreigners
as my trumpeters, who would sound my praises throughout
Europe ; I knew that the flattering noise would echo to Ver-
sailles, and when my friends scolded me for the great expen-
ses I incurred I answered : " I am putting my money into a
sinking-fund at very advantageous interest. You will see
what it will bring me back in abbeys and dignities. Besides,
I represent a great master ; I wish to re-conquer for France
the heart and mind of Italians, who are eager for show and
for all that has an air of magnificence. Moreover, it is my
business to efface the shame of the niggardliness of my
predecessors."
I shall always advise the king to send magnificent ambas-
sadors to foreign courts, but, to avoid expense, I should not
keep regular ambassadors there, with fixed residence ; I
should employ habitually simple ministers, able men and
well-chosen, but whose character and position would need no
VOL. I. — 12
178 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IV.
display. When I sent an ambassador extraordinary, I should
surround him with all the pomp and majesty suitable to the
master he represents. It must be owned that if that ambas-
sador has not a great and noble soul his Court may give him
a great salary uselessly. Avarice and meanness will show
behind riches. It is more necessary in republics than else-
where that ambassadors should make a great appearance.
Before my embassy to Venice, the nobility in the theatre
and other places of meeting never bowed to the ambassadors,
nor did the ambassadors bow to them. I changed that
savage custom ; I accustomed the nobles and the ladies to
be bowed to by me, and to return my bow ; gradually they
became so accustomed to it that they ended by bowing first.
I alone enjoyed that civility which the other foreign min-
isters had tried in vain to obtain.
The embassy to Venice is usually considered as a post of
little importance. This is why the Courts have not, for a
long time, sent men of much ability to fill it. It is true
that it does not seem very necessary to do so in view of the
little influence the Kepublic of Venice now has in the affairs
of Europe. And yet I do not know a better school in which
to train ambassadors. Nothing is of indifference in that
country ; every word, every action produces its effect ; thus
an observing and reflecting minister accustoms himself to
reason out all his actions, and to consider nothing as of no
consequence. Moreover, in Venice he treats with an invisi-
ble government, and always by writing ; which forces him
to great circumspection in order to send nothing to the
Senate that is not well-digested and maturely reflected. He
must, moreover, if he hopes to make the affairs with which
he is charged succeed, employ an industry all the greater
because it must be employed with prudence.
The Court of Home, on my arrival .in Venice, had as
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 179
nuncio M. Caraccioli, a man regular in his morals, full of
fire and activity, but less liked than feared and respected.
I allied myself closely with him, — keeping, however, the
reserve that should always be maintained with the ministers
of other Courts, and especially the Italian Courts.
The Spanish ambassador in Venice was M. de Montalegro,
Duke of Salas, who had been for ten years prime-minister in
Naples. He is a man of much intelligence and talent, who
has all the ideas necessary to render a man agreeable in
society ; it is a pity that so many fine qualities are obscured
by defects and weaknesses. My intimacy with this minister
was agreeable to him, and very useful to me. M. de 1'En-
cenada, prime-minister of Spain, had been his comrade and
remained his friend, as far as two ambitious ministers can
be friends. These two men were in regular correspondence ;
I managed so well that before long the letters were com-
municated to me ; and in that way I was able to give my
Court much more correct ideas than M. de Duras, then the
king's ambassador at Madrid. His accounts and mine did
not agree ; the king's Council had, naturally, more confidence
in its minister on the spot than in an ambassador in Venice
who had not the Court of Spain before his eyes. So M. de
Saint-Contest and the Mare*chal de Noailles made light of
my tales ; but in course of time they saw that my predictions
were correct, for while M. de Duras was assuring the king
that M. de 1'Encenada was secure as prime-minister, I, on
the contrary, had for some time past announced his fall.
The veil was torn off, and they began to have faith in my
statements.
My principal usefulness in Venice was saving the money
of the king. But I did give very good news about all the
Courts of Europe, which I procured by my industry, and at
my own expense. No minister in a foreign land was ever
180 MEMOIfcS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
better informed than I, without showing the least curiosity
or eagerness for information ; the spies that were sent to
fathom me were the ones from whom I got most profit and
knowledge of what it was important to know. I have always
had a talent for reading physiognomies, and enlightening
myself by chance words, of which I have often made the
application with great accuracy.
My work in Venice was thus heavy without my having any-
thing to do, or the appearance of doing anything. I chose
the post-days to go to the theatre, and to pay visits ; whereas
my colleagues were mysteriously shut-up on those days.
But I had no mistresses, and the evenings were long. My
readings and writings were incessant, though I gave more
time to society than others. So much work, joined to want
of exercise and the swampy air one breathes in Venice,
began to injure my health ; I may say that no one ever
sacrificed a finer or better health to the service of his
king.
Nothing could be more limited than the instructions given
to me. M. de Saint-Contest had few views and little in-
dustry. He had dismissed the Abbe* de la Ville [chief
clerk of the ministry of Foreign Affairs], who was a man
of mind and talent, and had put in his place M. de la
Chapelle, who thought he was a philosopher, and was, in
point of fact, a very ordinary man, and a very lazy one.
He said to me one day that the proper style for despatches
was very different from the academic style to which I was
accustomed. I answered that I knew but two sorts of style ;
that of men of intelligence, and that of fools ; and when
I reflected that it was to those two personages that my
despatches were addressed, the pen would sometimes drop
from my hand.
I sometimes used with the Venetians an innocent trick,
1752-1755] CAKDINAL DE BERNIS. 181
which always succeeded. I knew they opened my letters,
and when I wanted to impress something on them I wrote
a despatch, which I was careful not to put in cipher, in
which I advised the manner in which they should be treated
in case they refused to do as we wished. They read it, and
it frightened them. But of course I could not often use
that means.
The confidence of the Eepublic in me grew to be so great
that in a very serious squabble which it had with Genoa
it chose me as mediator ; and the two republics accepted the
plan of agreement which I laid down. It was after this
affair, which made much noise in Italy, that the Senate
charged its ambassador in France, on three different occa-
sions, to express to the king the satisfaction that all classes
had received through my conduct. M. de Saint-Contest did
not think it worth while to tell this to his Majesty, and the
Eepublic, being informed after the death of that minister of
this omission, renewed the same orders in a manner still
more precise and nattering to me, so that the king was at
last informed of my success.
No ambassador before me had ever sent to the Court such
detailed memoranda on all the parts of the Venetian govern-
ment ; I fulfilled my ministry in that respect with the great-
est amplitude, and I will venture to say that my despatches
made the Eepublic of Venice better known than all that
had been previously written on that celebrated and singular
government. I employed, for the writing of these memo-
randa, one of my secretaries at the embassy, the Abbe*
Deshaises, who has talent and merit, and in whom I know
no other defect than that of being a little too much con-
vinced of it. I charged his comrade-secretary, Emmanuel
Brun, with the arrangement of all the documents and memo-
randa which had relation to the affairs about which I ne-
182 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
gotiated with the Eepublic. He is a man less brilliant than
solid, who has an upright mind and an honest heart. When
I was dismissed he exposed himself to the loss of his
position in the ministry of Foreign Affairs to accompany me
into exile ; I regard him as my friend.
It will be seen, from this exposition of affairs which I
had to manage in Venice, that the field was a very restricted
one. I looked about me for a way to extend it. I knew that
M. de Saint-Contest had taken to the king's Council only
such of my despatches as were devoid of facts and reflec-
tions, and all those which could give an opinion of my ideas
and my views were pitilessly suppressed, as well as all my
memorials relating to the government of Venice. (M. Eouille',
who succeeded M. de Saint-Contest, afterwards resuscitated
this buried labour and brought it before the Council.) It was
therefore important for me to find subjects of such interest
that M. de Saint- Contest could not avoid laying my despatches
before the king. This was difficult to do in times of peace
and from the midst of a republic eternally neutral by system,
education, and perhaps necessity. I despaired of my object,
when one day, looking over a map of the Venice territory, I
was struck by the utility this government might be to France
» in any wars that we might have with the House of Austria
in Italy. I saw that the Eepublic was in relation to Germany
what the King of Sardinia was in respect to France ; that is
to say, that both are masters of the passes and may be
regarded as the gates to Italy. I perceived that by securing
to ourselves the Grisons we effectually closed all entrance
into Italy to the Germans. This point of view suddenly
made the embassy intrusted to me very important to my
eyes. But I feared that my predecessors had had the same
idea, and that it might be used-up by being handled. I
therefore looked through all the despatches of the ambassa-
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 183
dors of the king in Venice for the past fifty years, and I
found with as much surprise as joy that so simple an idea
and easy to seize was perfectly new. From that moment I
saw no difficulty in making my correspondence interesting,
and I formed the bold project of persuading the Kepublic
of Venice to put itself, withstanding its pride, under the
protection of the king.
To succeed in this design I felt it was necessary to win
all minds, to please equally the people and the nobles, and
become in a way a citizen of Venice. I succeeded in this
preliminary above all hopes. It cost me much in care and
money. I helped the poor nobles, I succoured the indigent
people, I flattered the republican pride, I interested the
naturally good hearts of the Venetians. In a word, I
changed the mind of that nation, deeply prejudiced against
ours, to such a point that a Senator said to me one day that
the Senate was so convinced of my impartiality that if I asked
anything of it contrary to its interests it would have difficulty
in refusing it, and its confidence in me would not be shaken.
When I had got all minds into this condition, I waited
till some event should enable me to lead the Senate to feel
the necessity of gaining a protector, and from that to the
idea of the protection of France.
I told no one of my project; I wanted the republic to
come of itself to think of what I desired ; I made it perpet-
ually conscious of how much it had to fear a project of
aggrandizement from the House of Savoie, and in conse-
quence of the losses made by that of Austria; the latter
House was looking for compensation for Servia and for the
kingdoms of Naples, Sicily, and a part of Lombardy. From
what State could she get it with less risk and more facility
than the State of Venice, whose fortresses and, above all,
whose militia, were scarcely respectable.
184 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
These reflections were like so many serpents which I set
gliding through the heart of the Senate. They laid their
spawn, which a single event might hatch. That event was
not long in coming.
The projected marriage of the third Archduke of Austria
with the Hereditary Princess of Modena, gave me a canvas,
which I filled with some dexterity and cleverness. I made
the Venetians aware that the claims of the former Dukes of
Ferrara on the Polesina, the fiefs of Este, and a part of Padua
were about to be revived, and that the son of the Empress
Maria Theresa would have all the forces necessary to support
these old claims, and to make them an incontestable right.
I made the picture so striking that the Senate was almost
terrified. They began to talk to me of the measures they
ought to take, and they said that the Kepublic had the
utmost confidence in the friendship of the king, and his pro-
tection. As soon as I had heated these spirits I became
myself much cooler. I even made myself aloof by showing
that I might embarrass my Court ; and when matters grew
more advanced and nearer to maturity, I exacted that the
Eepublic should, by some positive act or writing, authorize
me to make my Court a statement of the Senate's views,
without which the king's Council might suppose that I
related fables merely to do myself credit.
The Eepublic objected strongly to so delicate a step, but
I finally brought the Senate to it on the occasion of the
visit of the Due de Penthievre [Louis de Bourbon, son of
the Comte de Toulouse, legitimatized son of Louis XIV.].
This prince was travelling incognito ; but the king desired
that he should be received with the honours due to his
rank. It should be remarked that no prince of the blood
had ever openly passed through Venice. I induced the
Senate to violate its customs in the reception of the Due de
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 185
Penthievre; he was received as son of a king; and in the
speech pronounced on that occasion by the son of the Pro-
curator Emo, the Eepublic openly declared its sentiments on
the protection it sought from France. A copy of this dis-
course was sent to me, which I transmitted to Versailles ;
but, to my great astonishment, the minister of Foreign
Affairs did not approve of taking the Kepublic of Venice
under the protection of France. It may be said that by this
indifference he deprived the reign of Louis XV. of a great
lustre, and, it may be, of a great utility during future wars in
Italy. It will be seen by what I have just said that I did in
Venice something that was out of the common, and also that
I little thought in that year, 1754, that I should be in 1756
the negotiator of an alliance between the Courts of Versailles
and Vienna.
I have never ceased to wonder that Venice, placed between
ten different States, without gates or walls, where soldiers or
guards are never seen, which is the receptacle of all the
evil-doers of the region, and where there is almost never a
public execution, should yet be the city of Italy in which
there is least murder, and least robbery. I have seen on
Shrove Tuesday, in the Piazza San Marco, more than forty
thousand persons assembled; one could hear a pin drop
during the plays which were acted for the people ; not even
a handkerchief is lost ; and yet there are neither sergeants
nor archers to restrain the crowd. The reason for the order
that reigns in Venice is the certainty every one has that the
government is informed of everything, and that the State
inquisitors will put to death without formalities those who
disturb public order. The fear of secret executions awes
men more than public punishment.
I must here relate a little fact which proves the con-
sideration that the Senate of Venice showed to me. A
186 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IT.
portion of the nobility protected the Abbe* Chiari, a rival,
very inferior, to the celebrated Goldoni, who is the Moliere
of the Italians. This abbe* gave to the public a comedy
entitled " The Venetian Lady in Paris." The play had a
great success on its first representation, but I was warned
that it spoke indecently of French valour. The Austrian
ambassador (Kosemberg) urged me, no doubt maliciously, to
go and see the play. I promised him to go the next day,
— which I did; and I saw throughout the performance that
all eyes were turned to me to examine the expression of my
face, on which no displeasure appeared. The next day the
government sent questioners to ask what I thought of the
comedy; I said simply that I thought it pretty, except
the part of a Frenchman, for the first rule of the stage was
to give to each nation the character that belonged to it. I
said no more; and that night as the play was about to
begin before an audience more numerous than before, a
messenger from the State inquisitors arrived with an order
not to play the piece, which, in spite of cabals, has never
been returned to the stage. The next day an amusing notice
was posted up which said : La Veneziana in Parigi morta
improvisamente del morbo gallico.
It must not be supposed that, although the Venetian nobles
are forbidden to hold any intercourse with ambassadors (a
very wise severity ; if the Eepublic ever renounces it, she will
lose her morals, and soon she will change her laws ; the one
follows the other) , it must not be thought, I say, that in spite
of this rigour foreign ministers do not have any sort of inter-
course with the magistrates ; they speak to one another by
third parties ; they communicate many things by signs at the
Opera, a circumstance which renders the frequenting of thea-
tres and the use of the mask necessary to the foreign ministers.
Very warm and constant friendships are even formed be-
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 187
tween them and the Venetians. Such has been the union
established between me and the Procurator Emo, who by
his wisdom, his ideas, and his enlightenment may be regarded
as the first man in the Eepublic. On arriving in Venice I
asked who was the man of the most credit and influence and
who was the woman who had the most important friends.
They named to me the Procurator Emo and Madame Barbar-
igo. From that moment I directed all my coquetries towards
those two personages ; they succeeded, for I have been able
to count them among my veritable friends. Some days be-
fore my departure from Venice I had an opportunity to speak
to Madame Barbarigo ; she promised me her friendship in a
very amusing manner: "Be sure, Monsieur 1'ambassadeur,"
she said, " that I shall be ever constant to you and never
faithful." I know that she kept her word. I had spoken to
her but twice, and only once to the Procurator Emo ; but we
always love a little where we esteem much.
I brought from Venice a very rare manuscript, in which
the genealogies of the Venetians are drawn at full length, as
much in what is mythical as in what is true. Though this
manuscript destroys a number of chimeras, it proves that the
ancient Venetian families may boast, with just claims, that
their nobility goes farther back than that of any other in
Europe ; and as each patrician exercises in a measure the
functions of sovereignty, we must agree that those who are
the most ancient have a marked advantage over the less
illustrious nobles. The House of France alone is out of this
ruling, for nothing is comparable to eight hundred years of
royalty, and such royalty !
I had asked permission to pay my court to Madame Infan-
ta [Louise-Elisabeth of France, daughter of Louis XV.]1 on
her return from her journey to France ; it was granted, and
1 Married to the Duke of Parma, second son of Philip V. of Spain. — TB.
188 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
I went to Parma early in the month of January, 1755. I
there found awaiting me very urgent letters from Court re-
questing me to return at once to Versailles. Mme. de Pom-
padour, in one of hers which had been sent back from Turin,
supposed me already on my way. This urgency gave me
food for thought, because the motive for my recall with so
much eagerness was not explained. Madame Infanta, to
whom I showed the letters, and to whom the king wrote reg-
ularly every week, could not enlighten me. By dint of reflec-
tion, I divined the real object of the journey they proposed
(for M. Rouble*, then minister of Foreign Affairs, did not give
me a positive order to return). I imagined that the Court
had at last opened its eyes to the accuracy of the statements
I had made about the Spanish Court, and that there was
doubtless a desire to recall the Due de Duras and send
me in his place.
With this idea, which proved in the end correct, I decided
to reply that, unless a positive order were sent to me, I would
not leave Italy at a time when my presence was necessary
there. The Sultan had just died ; the king had also just lost
M. des Alleurs,his ambassador at Constantinople. His Maj-
esty at this time had only a charg£ d'affaires in Vienna.
Thus I was the only minister to give proper news of the
Porte at the beginning of the new reign. Moreover, the
affair of the " Decree " had put a coldness between the
Court of Eome and the Republic of Venice, which was then
in a state of fermentation [a Decree suppressing various
privileges of the Court of Rome in relation to dispensations,
briefs, bulls, and indulgences]. The Comte de Stainville,
now Due de Choiseul, a friend of Pope Benedict XIV., had
taken this affair much to heart, and advised the pope to
carry it through with a high hand, which did not seem to
me the best means of success.
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 189
All these circumstances needed attention. I had, more-
over, come to a resolution to enter Orders ; a course I had
always resisted taking so long as I was urged to do so.
My intention was to go into retreat on returning to Venice
and prepare myself to enter the Order of sub-deacons.
On this answer, which I sent to M. Kouille*, the king said
that I must be allowed to do as I wished, and be told to
return whenever I judged it best to do so. I congratulated
myself then on the wise decision I had made to remain some
time longer in Italy. In so doing, I gave the Due de Duras
time to improve his position, and I left the Court to re-
call him if it wished, without my having any part in the mat-
ter. The Due de Duras was my friend from our school days ;
I owed him consideration ; besides which, it would have been
imprudent in me to offend his mother, Mme. la mare'chale, a
woman who knows very well how to assist and how to in-
jure. Accordingly, I paid my court to Madame Infanta for
three months ; I won her esteem and confidence, which she
gave me until her death, no matter what people have said
about it. This princess had great qualities and the defects
of a child. She did me, during my stay in Parma, many ser-
vices with the king, the dauphin, and the royal family ; I
have been fortunate enough since then to render her others
of still greater importance.
In the month of April I left Parma and returned to Venice,
where I made a two weeks' retreat ; after which I took Orders
as a sub-deacon from the hands of the Patriarch, Monsignore
Alviso Foscari, who was the best and most saintly old man I
have ever known. After the ordination he said to me, " Now
I can sing the song of Simeon."
The ministers no longer urged me to return to France ; in
fact, I saw that they felt a little embarrassed to know what
to say to me. But I was nearly forty years old, with no solid
190 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
prospect before me. I needed an abbey and the place of
councillor of State for the Church, which had long been
promised to me. My presence at Court became necessary for
the arrangement of my private affairs; I therefore put in
order those of the king, and left Venice the last of May,
1755, to go to Parma and thence to France. I carried away
with me the esteem of the Senate, that of Cardinal Eezzonico
(now pope), the love of the people, and a well-established
regard throughout Italy, which still lasts in spite of my
dismissal and exile.
In Parma I obtained not only the kindness, but the friend-
ship of Madame Infanta, and in Turin the King of Sardinia,
the Due de Savoie, and the ministers of that Court over-
whelmed me with civilities.
I was received by the king at Versailles (June, 1755)
with kindness and familiarity ; by the royal family as the
friend of the Infanta, for that is the title she did me the
honour to give me ; by M. Eouille and the other ministers as
a favourite to whom they could not deny some merit; by
Mme. de Pompadour as an intimate friend from whom she
expected consolation and advice. But, as I had foreseen, they
were a good deal embarrassed at having five months earlier
urged my return ; M. de Duras had mended matters, and the
whole Council, which in January had unanimously thought
that I ought to be sent to Spain, had changed its opinion.
The king alone, as I learned from Mme. de Pompadour, was
firmly resolved to make me succeed M. de Duras.
After viewing the scene, I decided to ask to return to Italy
in August. Mme. de Pompadour opposed my resolution for
a long time, but yielded at last to the good reasons I gave her.
I could not, in fact, prolong my stay at Versailles without
exciting a jealousy against me that was dangerous. M.
Kouille', a sufficiently honest man, who was not treacherous
1752-1755] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 191
to me, and who even did me justice, was too narrow-minded
not to be jealous. M. de Machault had put him in the
Foreign Office because it suited him to have the navy himself,
but M. Eouill^ was not in the least suited to deal with the
cabinets of Europe. This minister said to me, " I shall never
cease to say that you are the best ambassador employed, even
though you should be my successor." I saw, besides, that
M. de Machault, the Prince de Soubise, and other particular
friends of Mme. de Pompadour viewed with an evil eye the
preference she gave me over them on all occasions. The
royal family treated me with kindness and distinction ; Mme.
de Pompadour congratulated me upon it, but it was easy to
foresee that it might make her anxious; though, to tell
the truth, nothing better could happen to her than to have
her friend in the confidence of the king's family. It was
for this purpose that I reconciled her with Madame
Infanta.
That which alarmed me most was to see France on the
point of going to war with England, and consequently with a
part of Europe, without being aware of it or taking any
effectual means either to avoid that war or to sustain it. I
considered with the same terror that three years in my
embassy had made me regarded as the ablest minister of the
king and his greatest resource ; which proved the paucity of
men ; and I could not doubt that as soon as they found them-
selves in difficulties they would keep me at Court, and fasten
me to public affairs. This was what I dreaded most. In a
foreign country I was certain of the success of my ministry,
because I had the entire confidence of my Court, and could
always be sure of my means. But it was not the same at
Versailles, where I had against me the jealousy of all the
ministers and all the courtiers. A single misunderstanding
with Mme. de Pompadour might ruin me hopelessly; I
192 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IT.
knew how easy it is, in matters of influence, to get em-
broiled with friends, especially female friends.
All these considerations determined me to fix the date
of my departure for Venice as the 12th of August. I got
the king to sanction my determination, and I obtained
from him the permission to make it public. As soon as
people were informed of it I saw joy sparkling on the
faces of the ministers and courtiers, with an air of serenity
which showed me that I had done wisely. But Providence
(for I cannot otherwise explain what happened soon after)
decided otherwise.
Before returning to Venice I wished to secure my means
of living. The abbey of Saint-Arnould of Metz had become
vacant. I asked for it and received it instantly with all
the graciousness in the world on the part of the Bishop
of Mirepoix ; the salary of my embassy was increased ; a
sum was fixed to pay for my public entry into Venice; I
was again assured of the first vacant place as councillor of
State for the Church, and the king had the kindness to
promise me the cordon lieu as soon as I received my ap-
pointment to the Spanish embassy. If I had been more
grasping I could have had more, for at that time Mme. de
Pompadour loved me sincerely, I pleased the king and his
family, and the ministers would have consented to any-
thing to get me away ; no situation was ever more brilliant
or more dangerous.
The king had caused the cessation, for a time, of the in-
ternal troubles of the kingdom by recalling, without con-
ditions, the parliament which he had exiled to Soissons, and
by enregistering an edict containing a law of absolute
silence on the disputes which had risen over the bull Uni-
genitus. The recall of parliament without submission on its
part could not fail to give it fresh strength, and, on the
1752-1755] CARDINAL t)E BE&NIS. 193
other hand, the law of silence, very wise in itself, had the
inconvenience of being easier to propose than to enforce;
besides which, the enforcement of the law being in the
hands of parliament, it was making one party the judge, and
could, of course, reduce to silence none but the bullists.
External peace was no better secured than that within the
nation. The Due de Mirepoix, the king's ambassador in Eng-
land, had let himself be amused by the ministers in London.
This was not surprising. The Due de Mirepoix was virtu-
ous, but shallow; what was surprising is that the king's
Council trusted to the statements of such an ambassador;
and that it should have been believed at Versailles that the
Court of London was pacific, when all Europe saw clearly
that it was about to declare war upon us.
The king had no other basis for his political system than
his alliance with the King of Prussia, who was distrusted
with good reason, and for sole maxim the desire to preserve
peace as long as possible. But it is well known that a State
which excites the jealousy of its neighbours can preserve
peace only by a good internal and external administration ;
in other words, when it is in a condition to defend itself and
to attack.
The finances of the kingdom, which were then governed
by M. de Se*chelles, a man of intelligence but worn-out, had
only an appearance of good administration ; for, since the
Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle the State had spent every year
far more than its revenues ; the burdens on the people were
not diminished ; and all the money of the kingdom was
virtually in the hands of the financiers. Commerce was
nourishing, but without support from the navy. We had
many hulks, and few vessels. Our militia, though numerous,
was neither well composed nor well disciplined; and our
frontier forts, ill-provided and out of repair, completed a
VOL. I. — 13
194 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. iv.
very sad picture of the state of France. In the Council,
no union; open war between M. d'Argenson and M. de
Machault ; unbridled license in proposals, no subordination
established ; the Prince de Conti having an almost universal
department, yet not a minister ; Mme. de Pompadour openly
at war with that prince ; the king holding the balance in the
midst of these divisions; overflowing luxury of the most
scandalous nature ; the people poverty-stricken ; no true en-
lightenment in the Council ; no citizen courage at the Court ;
no generals by land or sea on the eve of war.
Such were the threatening sights that came before me on
my return from Venice.1
1 This brief statement tallies exactly with the Marquis d'Argenson's
bitter complaints and details. The two men were as wide apart as the
poles in temperament, in their methods of dealing with men and things,
in their judgment also on many points ; but they were both honest men,
with eyes and minds to see the truth and state it. — TB.
1755] CARDINAL DE BEKNIS.
V.
1755. — The Situation of Mrae. de Pompadour in 1755. — - Capture of
the Vessels " Aleide " and " Lys." — My Appointment to the Spanish
Embassy. — Secret Proposals of the Court of Vienna, September, 1755.
— My first Conference with the Austrian Ambassador. — Account
rendered by me to the King of the Memorial of Vienna. — Continuation
of the Negotiations. — First Secret Committee on the Vienna affair. —
Affairs of Vienna, Berlin, and Dresden. — My own Position.
ON arriving from Venice, I found Mme. de Pompadour in
a very different position from that in which I had left her ;
she was no longer the woman environed with all charming
talents, who governed France from a centre of pleasures.
The king had ceased for some years to feel passion for her ;
nothing remained in him but friendship, confidence, and that
bond of habit which, in princes, is the strongest of all ties.
Mme. de Pompadour needed consolation ; she saw me return
with the liveliest joy. I was her tried friend; I had ac-
quired a rather high reputation, which she regarded as her
work. She did not delay opening her heart to me and un-
covering all its wounds. She told me of the king's intrigue
with Mme. de Choiseul, who, one year earlier, had died in
child-bed; she told me how Mme d'Estrades, instigated by
M. d'Argenson, had conducted that intrigue with the basest
ingratitude. She related to me the manner in which she had
been able to convict the king of his unfaithfulness to her,
which ,he denied. The Comte de Stainville (now Due de
Choiseul) had made himself master of certain letters written
by the king to his cousin, Mme. de Choiseul; these he
gave to Mme. de Pompadour, who took them to the king.
196 MEMOIRS AtfD LETTERS OF [CHAP. V.
So important a service, and one so dangerous to render,
produced the effect which the Comte de Stainville expected.
He had no trouble in persuading Mme. de Pompadour that
a feeling stronger even than love had led him to risk all to
be useful to her. Mme. de Pompadour felt, like a grateful
woman, the importance of this service; from that moment
she changed to friendship a species of aversion she had
always felt to M. de Stainville; her heart, naturally kind
and feeling, was touched by the danger he had run to do
her service ; she made him her friend. For justice should
be done to Mme. de Pompadour; all the coquetry which
people attribute to her is honestly in the mind; her heart
is not susceptible of it. Not only did she save the Comte
de Stainville from the king's anger, but she got him ap-
pointed to the embassy of Kome, not being able to obtain
for him that of Turin, which he desired, and which M. de
Saint-Contest made haste to give to M. Chauvelin. Such
was the origin of the great fortunes of the Due de
Choiseul.
I found Mme. de Pompadour much disgusted with the
Court. She showed me copies of letters that she had written
to the king to obtain permission to retire from it ; nor did
she make a mystery to me of those she wrote to him on
public matters. The first convinced me that she was only
filled with anger and disgust, and I did not find in them a
firm resolution to quit the world ; the second, on the con-
trary, seemed to me admirable. I advised her to change
the tone of the first letters, which were certain in the end
to weary the king, and to remain at Court, from which she
was not really detached, and where she could be useful. This
advice was given without any risk of wounding virtue, for
the tie between Mme. de Pompadour and the king was
now pure, and without danger to either. There was only
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 197
the scandal to avoid. I shall have occasion later to tell
the means I suggested to the king to escape that evil.
With regard to the letters Mme. de Pompadour had
written for the improvement of public affairs, I should
never have supposed her capable of telling the truth to the
king with such energy, and even eloquence. I loved her
the better, and esteemed her the more for them. I exhorted
her not to weaken that style, but to continue to tell the
truth with force and courage.
I made her feel that she had acted unwisely in the
jealousy she had shown of the Prince de Conti; that the
more she insisted on keeping him at a distance, the more
she risked encountering the resistance of the king ; that in
acting with greater moderation, and less temper, her repre-
sentations would have much greater weight ; and, in short,
that there was but one thing to say to the king about the
Prince de Conti : " If you wish to charge him with your
affairs put him into the Council ; if you have not confidence
enough in him to give him that place, give back to your
ministers the management of those affairs which the prince
has usurped." Mme. de Pompadour followed my advice in
this respect, and found the benefit of it. The king soon
after gave to me the affair of the parliament, and the Prince
de Conti worked no longer with his Majesty.
I was not less fortunate in persuading Mme. de Pompa-
dour that she ought to banish temper and bitterness in her
intercourse with the king; that she no longer had the right
to be jealous ; and that all her attention should be confined
to making her society amiable and agreeable to the king,
in order to make her advice more useful. I pictured to her
the condition of the kingdom, the disorder of the finances,
the universal insubordination, and the loss of the king's
authority. I made her feel how fatal the quarrel between
198 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
M. de Machault and M. d'Argenson had been to the State ;
I urged her to make up her own quarrel with Comte
d'Argenson, and to sacrifice to the public good her personal
resentments. She yielded, with some difficulty, to my advice ;
but at last she charged me with the negotiation, to which
M. d'Argenson steadily refused to agree, not only at the
time I now spoke to him, but some time later, before his
dismissal.
M. d'Argenson made the mistake of nearly all ministers
who have been well treated by their master. They think
they have need of no one, and they imagine that when their
enemies wish to be reconciled, it is because they are
frightened, because their position is bad, and therefore that
it would be very stupid to prevent their fall.
It can now be seen from what I have said how much
Mme. de Pompadour had need in those days of the counsels
of a friend " honest man." It will be seen in the sequel that
this was not the only occasion on which I did her im-
portant services, and that if she contributed to my fortune
and my elevation, I acquitted myself towards her, not only
as a sensible friend, but also as a courageous man who knew
how to sacrifice all to friendship and gratitude.
I followed the king to Compiegne ; the foreign ministers,
seeing my favour, paid me more assiduous court than they
did to the minister of Foreign Affairs ; I was the depositary
of the complaints they made against M. Eouill^, whose
incapacity and arrogance revolted them. The Baron de
Knyphausen, minister plenipotentiary of the King of Prussia,
never left me ; he tried to persuade me that I was the only
minister of the king to whom he could speak, and the only
one in whom his master had confidence. He represented
to me in vivid colours the blindness of my Court, which,
without being aware of it, was on the verge of war with
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 199
England and her allies. He complained that our ministry
would take no measures in common with his master, who
was thus left exposed to attack ; he insisted that we ought
to forestall our enemies, and declared that if the king would
enter the Low Countries, his master was ready to enter
Bohemia at the head of 140,000 men. These confidences,
which he professed to make in the greatest secrecy, were
faithfully reported by me to the king; but I was much
surprised to learn that what M. de Knyphausen whispered
in my ear he was proclaiming on the house-tops. This
affectation seemed to me suspicious ; and it will be seen that
I was not mistaken.
It was under these circumstances that we heard of the un-
expected attack on our squadron by the English off the banks
of Newfoundland, and the capture of the frigates " Alcide "
and " Lys," without any previous declaration of war. All
persons of good sense saw that a naval war was certain, and
that a land war must soon follow. But the majority of the
king's Council absolutely persisted in thinking that war with
England could be avoided by mildly complaining of their
proceeding and making no reprisals. It was then that two
contrary opinions rose violently in the Council. The Comte
d'Argenson and all the military regarded the aggression of the
English as the first step in a scheme long meditated and agreed
upon by all the allies of England; and that consequently
that scheme should be frustrated by seizing the Austrian
Low Countries. M. Kouille*, minister of Foreign Affairs
accepted that opinion and supported it by memorials, to
which M. de Machault and the rest of the Council replied by
contradictory memorials. I was far, indeed, from thinking
then that I should be the instrument used by the king to
unite him with the empress, and as I was firmly convinced
that England had not taken this overt step without a previous
200 MEMOIES AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
understanding with Austria, her ally, I insisted strongly on
the necessity of breaking up this dangerous concert of our
enemies.
This pen war soon became indecent, because each side, in
order to make partisans, communicated its memorials, thus
divulging to the public the secrets of State. All the
Court, not excepting the women, hotly supported either one
side or the other ; the military came in crowds to Compiegne
asking to serve. What a sight for the foreign ambassadors
then assembled at Court, to see the gravest and most serious
affairs talked of as if at a cafe ! This question, so important
for the State, excited such warmth solely because of the
personal interest taken in it by the two chief ministers. M.
d'Argenson desired a land war to render his ministry brilliant ;
M. de Machault, on the contrary, desired that the war be
confined to the navy for reasons equally personal But it
was not a question of the respective interests of these tw6
ministers when the good and glory of the State had to be
decided on. A council was held, at which the Mare*chal de
Noailles, who had been absent for some days, appeared. The
course was taken of taking none ; of negotiating with Eng-
land, preparing slowly for a sea-war, and leaving our ports
open to the English while the latter were seizing our
merchant-vessels. With regard to the invasion of the Low
Countries, that was also rejected.
It was under these circumstances that M. de Knyphausen
renewed his declamations with an indecency and publicity
unparalleled ; and one day when he spoke to me with more
heat than usual I could not help saying to him : " If I were
minister of Foreign Affairs here is what I should think of
the vehemence with which you preach the double invasion
of the Low Countries and Bohemia. I should believe that
your master wants to involve us for his own interests in a
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 201
war with Austria, and that if the offer that he makes us is
refused, he will consider himself quits with us and will,
perhaps, make arrangements with our enemies, under pretext
of shielding himself." I was a prophet without knowing it.
The King of Prussia was then beginning a negotiation with
England by means of the Duke of Brunswick; but we
knew nothing of that.
Some time after this conversation, M. de Knyphausen
changed his tone and language. He praised the pacific
system of the king, and agreed that the interests of
France required her to keep to a sea-war only. He even
offered me, from his master, plans which he thought in-
fallible for humiliating England. This contrast confirmed
my suspicions ; I no longer doubted that the King of Prussia
was escaping us. I communicated my ideas to the min-
istry, but, with the exception of the king and, perhaps, M.
de Machault, the whole Council was Prussian. Neverthe-
less, by dint of insisting to Mme. de Pompadour on the
danger there was in not knowing exactly what to look for
from the King of Prussia, it was resolved (after some
months) to send the Due de Mvernais to Berlin.
The only measure that was taken to support the war
was that of searching for money. It was simple enough to
re-establish the dixieme, but M. de Machault obstinately
insisted that the king should, by declaration, re-establish
the two vingtiemes. The dixieme would have been equally
productive and would not have made the people fear that
one vingtieme would be kept on after the war. Parliament
made representations that were not listened to ; heads grew
heated, and the fermentation in the parliaments, which had
scarcely subsided, began again with more indecency and
uproar than ever. The king was obliged to register his
declaration at a lit de justice held at Versailles. M. de
202 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
Maupeou, the chief-president, addressed the king in a
speech that, to say the least, was bold ; the two vingttimes
were established with much difficulty, discredit for authority,
and great murmurs on the part of the people.
I groaned deeply at the species of paralysis with which
the government was attacked. I represented France to
myself as a wounded man, but full of life, whose legs and
arms were bound so as to compel him to lose blood and be
helpless for vengeance. The ministers replied to all my
representations with the popular proverb: Eira lien qui
rira le dernier. This supposed, at least, that serious prepara-
tions were being made ; but in reality all was sunk in
torpor. This fatal lethargy excited my blood to the point
of making me seriously ill ; it was not the first nor the
last time in my life that I have experienced that, for some
souls, love of country is the strongest of all loves. I own,
nevertheless, that such extreme sensibility is a defect in a
minister; but it must also be said that it is not common,
and that it presupposes the first of all virtues — love of
the public welfare.
During my illness the king had the kindness to write me
a note in which he promised to make me a commander of
his Order the next time that promotions were made in my
profession ; that flattering mark of his kindness cured my
fever, and redoubled the patriotic zeal that brought it on.
As soon as I recovered I thought of taking leave of the
king and returning to Venice. I was much astonished when
M. Kouille*, by order of the king, forbade me to start. I
was then ignorant that the Due de Duras, our ambassador
in Spain, had presented, without being authorized to do so,
a memorial which had greatly displeased the Court of
Madrid. The king and Council thought it necessary to recall
him and appoint some one in his place immediately. In the
1755] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 203
month of January all the ministers had agreed in my favour
to fill that post; but times were changed; they esteemed
me then, and did not fear me ; but now I excited an almost
universal jealousy. Each minister proposed to the king his
own protdgd for the ministry to Spain, but his Majesty held
firm ; he thought that as I had had all the suffrage in
January, I deserved in the month of August a preference
over others.
Thus I owed the embassy to Spain to the firmness of the
king, and perhaps, in part, to the friendship with which
Madame Infanta honoured me ; she had the greatest interests
to be managed in Spain, and could count on no one as much
as on me. It is true that I was the first minister who had
made the king feel how improper it was that the fate of her
husband the Infant, Duke of Parma, had not been settled
by the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle.
The commission intrusted to me was as important as it
was delicate. The Due de Duras, out of zeal and from being
too eager to establish a family compact between the king
and King Ferdinand of Spain, had spoiled everything. He
had given himself up to M. de 1'Encenada, who was now
overthrown ; he was on bad terms with the Queen of Spain,
and on still worse with M. Kicardo Wall, a minister of State,
whom he represented in his despatches as sold to the
English.
As soon as my appointment was made public, envy, which
had not known where to bite me, used a means it had em-
ployed before when I went to Venice. It reprinted a col-
lection of prose and verse which had appeared under my
name in 1739, when I was in Auvergne; I had publicly
disavowed it before my reception into the French Academy
in 1744. In truth, that collection does not belong to me ;
the maimed writings of several living authors are inserted
204 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
in it ; and the pieces of which I am really the writer are so
altered and disfigured that I have the right to disavow them.
A great number of copies of this collection were sent to
Madrid, but people there thought, as in Italy, that if I was
the author of it I had one talent more than other ministers.
In spite of its poor success, this form of malice was renewed
whenever it was hoped to injure me. I am very fortunate
to have had no hidden wrong-doing ; for its turpitude would
have been quickly unveiled.
It was towards the end of this trip to Compiegne that
Mme. d'Estrades, who owed everything to her cousin Mme.
de Pompadour, was sent away from Court. She had been
long at the head of the intrigues of Comte d'Argenson, and
had guided that of his niece, Mme. de Choiseul.
I was making ready for my journey to Spain, on which I
was to start in about a week, when, one evening after leav-
ing M. Kouille", I received a note from Mme. de Pompadour
telling me to go to her the next morning at ten o'clock
without fail. I saw that some urgent affair had come up,
but I should never, in a thousand years, have imagined what
it really was. I was there at the appointed hour. Mme. de
Pompadour showed me a letter to her from Comte Starem-
berg, minister plenipotentiary of their Imperial Majesties,
in which he asked Mme. de Pompadour for an interview for
the purpose of giving her certain secret proposals with
which he was charged by the Empress Maria Theresa. He
asked at the same time that the king should select some one
of his ministers to be present at this conference, who should
be authorized to convey to his Majesty these proposals, and
return the answer which the king might think proper to
make. Nothing could equal the surprise that this letter
caused me. A crowd of ideas came into my mind concern-
ing the object of the Court of Vienna, and also about my
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 205
own interests. At that first moment, I saw only a trap set
for the king, and a very dangerous reef for my fortunes and
my peace of mind. I asked Mme. de Pompadour if it was
she who had proposed me to his Majesty for this confidence.
She assured me she had not ; saying that the king, of his own
monition, had chosen me in preference to the other ministers,
not only from the idea he had of my capacity, but because he
knew the prejudices of his ministers against the Court of
Vienna.
I then developed to Mme. de Pompadour all there was to
fear in entering into a negotiation with the Court of Vienna,
whether it was sincere, or whether it was only seeking to
amuse us. In the first case, the king risked two things :
first, the total change of his political system and that of
Europe, which could not fail to upset all minds, and might
produce a general concussion. I added that, in that first
case, it could not be doubted that Austria would drag us
into a war with the King of Prussia, and that a conflagration
might become general from the fear felt by the Protestant
princes at the union between the two great Catholic powers.
I made her feel also that such a war, foreign to the interests
of the nation, would displease all France ; that the king had
no tried generals fit to lead his armies, nor a treasury in
sufficiently good condition to sustain the burden of a dual
war by sea and land.
In the second case, the Court of Vienna, the enemy for
the last three hundred years of that of France, had great
interest in causing jealousy to our allies by feigned negotia-
tions ; so that we could without injustice suspect it of wish-
ing to amuse us and so gain time to strengthen an alliance
with England, Holland, Eussia, and, perhaps, the King of
Sardinia. I represented the danger there was of rendering
the King of Prussia uneasy, and thus giving him a pretext
206 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
for unfaithfulness, in case France was left without allies;
for Austria, having succeeded in detaching them from us,
would not fail of pretexts herself to break off a specious
and frivolous negotiation.
As I was ending these reflections, the king, to whom I
had never yet spoken on public business, entered the room
and asked me abruptly what I thought of M. de Starem-
berg's letter. I repeated to his Majesty what I had just
said to Mme. de Pompadour. The king heard me with
impatience, and when I ended he said, almost angrily,
" You are like the rest — the enemy of the Queen of Hun-
gary." I answered that no one admired that princess more
than I did ; that I knew she had sent Comte Kaunitz to
Versailles to make a treaty of alliance with his Majesty;
that I was not ignorant of a conversation the queen-empress
had held with Blondel, our minister in Vienna ; besides which
I had heard it said that her father, Charles VI., had advised
her on his deathbed to unite herself with France if she de-
sired to keep her dominions ; but that all these reasons could
not prevent me from pausing on the two reflections I had
just explained to his Majesty, and which I submitted to his
judgment ; moreover, his Majesty, would do well to consult
those of his ministers in whom he had most confidence.
" Well, then," said the king, with some emotion, " I may as
well make a fine compliment to M. de Staremberg, and tell
him he will not be listened to." " That is not my meaning,
sire," I answered; "Your Majesty has everything to gain
by learning the intentions of the Court of Vienna, but care
must be taken as to the answer that is made." The king's
face became more serene ; he ordered me to listen to M. de
Staremberg's proposals in presence of Mme. de Pompadour,
who was to be present at the first conference only.
The empress exacted from the king, and promised him
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 207
in return, inviolable secrecy, in a form which I cannot repeat
because it relates to the secret pledge they gave to each
other. The empress also asked that no secretary be em-
ployed for the writings; and that when the king or the
empress judged it best to admit one of their ministers to
the secret they should give each other notice reciprocally.
Thus for a long time there was no one at the Court of
Vienna but the empress, the emperor, and Count Kaunitz
who knew of this negotiation, and no one in France but the
king, Mme. de Pompadour, and myself who knew of it ; the
intention of the empress being to negotiate as if she were
tete a tete with the king. This singular system redoubled
my fears and my suspicions. If I had been merely an
ambitious man I should have seen the advantage of being
alone in the confidence of my master, and having in my
hands the thing he had most at heart ; for the king did not
conceal that what he had desired all his life was to have
the Court of Vienna for his ally ; that he believed it
was the sole means of securing a long peace and maintain-
ing the Catholic religion. This decided bias of the king did
not prevent me from representing to him in the strongest
manner that it was necessary I should be aided and advised
by his minister for Foreign Affairs, or by such other member
of the Council as his Majesty might think proper to select.
My urgency was in vain; all that I could obtain was a
promise the king gave me to think of it after the negotiation
had begun to take a serious form.
Seeing the king inflexible, I asked him for a power
written by his own hand authorizing me to listen to M. de
Staremberg and answer him in the king's name; with a
formal order to me to report to his Majesty alone what took
place at these conferences. I also obtained from the king
that he would approve with his own hand the answers
208 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
and memorials that I should give in his name to M. de
Staremberg, — a wise precaution which I did not relinquish
throughout the course of this long negotiation. The king
ordered me to draw up the form of power that I wanted ;
I wrote it under his eye ; he took the minute, carried it to
his cabinet, and fifteen minutes later brought the power
back to me, written and signed in due form by the royal
hand. I never saw as much satisfaction and serenity on
the king's face as I observed at that moment. He ordered
me to make an appointment with M. de Staremberg for the
next day, in order to arrange with him the day and place
of the first conference.
A moment later the king went away to attend the Council.
I remained alone with Mme. de Pompadour, who told me
that M. de Kaunitz, during his embassy, had frequently
solicited her to bring the king to agree to the desire the
empress had to ally herself with France ; that the king had
always wished for this alliance, from his friendship and
esteem for the empress, from motives of religion, and also
from the little confidence he felt in the King of Prussia, who
had shown him much unfaithfulness and might show him
more. I comprehended, from what was said to me, that the
alliance with the King of Prussia weighed upon the king,
as much on account of the difference in religion as because
of the little circumspection with which the King of Prussia
had talked about his government and other matters personal
to the king.
I made Mme. de Pompadour feel that all these motives
must be made to harmonize with prudence and the good of the
State ; I congratulated her on the flattering confidence shown
to her by the Court of Vienna, and on the certainty that her
position would become the firmer and her favour the more
assured by her being so closely allied to an affair of such
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 209
great importance. For myself, I showed her only regret at
being charged with this affair ; it is true that I saw in this
negotiation too great an embarkation for France, and for me
a dangerous commission, which, though raising me very high,
might fling me down into disgrace. Mme. de Pompadour
reassured me on the liking the king had for me, and the con-
fidence with which he honoured me. In spite of that, I told
her I should act in the matter with the same precautions as
if I expected to be arrested in three months. I do not be-
lieve in presentiments, but I trust to my first coup d'ceil ; it
has never deceived me.
The king returned from the Council and had the goodness
to tell me that he had sounded two of the ministers in a very
adroit and guarded manner on the objections I had made as to
the danger of negotiating with Vienna under present circum-
stances. " You will be pleased," he added, " for they thought
as you do." I saw that this conformity of opinion increased
his confidence in my advice. From that time he treated me
with a kindness and familiarity which showed that he was
much at his ease with me, — a condition which greatly dimin-
ished the awe he always inspired in me.
In conformity with the king's orders I went to see M. de
Staremberg to tell him I had been chosen to treat with him.
He assured me he had never doubted that the choice would
fall on me ; he seemed very glad of it, and we talked of the
reciprocal desire our sovereigns had to unite themselves by the
ties of sincere friendship. We fixed the first conference for
the next day, in a little house at the lower end of the Belle-
vue terrace, where we were to go from different directions,
after sending away our servants and carriages. I shall say
here, in passing, that my meetings with M. de Staremberg
were so secret that for more than six months the foreign
ministers never suspected our intercourse.
VOL. 1.— 14
210 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. r.
I was the last to arrive at Bellevue. M. de Staremberg
read his memorial. I had agreed with Mme. de Pompadour
(who was present at this first conference) that while M. de
Staremberg was explaining the proposals of the Court of
Vienna we should not betray our thoughts by look or ges-
ture ; the precaution was wise, for M. de Staremberg did not
read a line without searching in our eyes for the impression
made upon us. I own that nothing ever surprised me more
than the way the empress took to propose her alliance to the
king ; she supposed him displeased with the King of Prussia
and aware of the latter's negotiations with the English Court,
— a circumstance which was until that moment entirely un-
known to the Court of Versailles. The empress, instead of
using by-ways and craft, imparted her views to the king
with the utmost frankness, proposing to his Majesty advan-
tages which would, of necessity, interest his heart, and an
extensive plan about which I am not at liberty to speak.
After the reading of the memorial, M. de Staremberg dic-
tated it to me, word for word, and collated my copy. We
separated without any signs of approval or disapproval.
Mme. de Pompadour had withdrawn after the reading of the
memorial. I was left with M. de Staremberg, and from him
I heard several particulars which I reported to the king. I
am able to state only one : the Court of Vienna had long
hesitated whether to address itself to Mme. de Pompadour
or to the Prince de Conti as the means of making its pro-
posals to the king. MM. de Kaunitz and de Staremberg
turned the scales in favour of Mme. de Pompadour.
The memorial of the Court of Vienna informed us of the
negotiations of the King of Prussia with England; that
knowledge was the first advantage we gained from the mem-
orial. Secondly, the Court of Vienna told us its secret inten-
tions, without knowing whether we would tell ours; and
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 211
though the result justified the boldness of this step, I have
always wondered that M. de Kaunitz advised it. The plan
proposed to the king was the work of M. de Kaunitz. It
was large, perhaps too vast, too complicated; but it pre-
sented objects of real interest to France, means of securing
the peace of Europe on solid foundations, and some matters
capable of moving the affectionate and paternal heart of the
king in respect to his children and grandchildren; my duty
does not allow me to say more.
After reflecting carefully over this plan thus proposed, I
felt that the king ought to answer with much circumspec-
tion overtures so important and so unexpected. I drew up
the answer that I thought ought to be made, and went to
Choisy to submit it to the king. I made his Majesty feel, in
the account I gave him of the first conference, that the reflec-
tions I had previously made to him on the danger of this
negotiation were just. The king approved the plan of con-
duct I suggested to him to avoid the rocks on which this
great affair might cast us.
The king answered the Court of Vienna in the memorial
as I had written it, approved in his own handwriting, saying :
that nothing could be more agreeable to him than to unite
himself with the empress by the ties of unalterable friend-
ship and an eternal alliance, but that, faithful himself to his
friends, he could not suspect their sincerity, still less take
any measure which could be adverse to them ; that his whole
desire was to maintain the peace sworn at Aix-la-Chapelle,
and that if the empress judged it well to work in concert
with him for so salutary an object his Majesty was all ready
to concur.
This answer had no drawback for us ; the king played a
fine role ; the empress might certainly regret having advanced
so far ; but that was precisely what removed all fear that she
212 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
would take part with our enemies before she knew exactly
what to expect from France.
The king, in spite of his extreme desire to unite himself
at once with the empress, felt and approved the wisdom
of this answer and the plan of negotiation it suggested. I
saw that his confidence in me increased ; in fact, from that
day the king never opposed any of my projects nor any of
my memorials. This indulgence on his part redoubled the
fear I had in being intrusted alone, and without help from
the ministry of Foreign Affairs, with a negotiation so impor-
tant in itself and in its possible consequences. I again made
earnest requests that the Council of the king, the whole
or a part, might be informed of my commission and told to
enlighten my work. My efforts were useless, and it was
not until six weeks later that I obtained the king's per-
mission to have conferences with four of the ministers, as I
shall presently relate. If I had been more ambitious than wise
I should, after representing to the king the necessity of my
being aided by the advice of his ministers, have yielded to
his repugnance and remained sole master of a most impor-
tant State affair, obtaining easily the power and influence
necessary to direct and terminate it. But, as I have already
remarked, I feared the results of the negotiation, both for the
kingdom and for myself.
One of the principal points in the plan of conduct I pro-
posed to the king was the sending to the King of Prussia an
enlightened minister who could fathom the sentiments of that
king and, so to speak, feel his pulse and discover his true
intentions at the moment when war was imminent between
France and England. The minister was also to be charged
to clear up the suspicions the Court of Vienna had given us
as to the negotiations of the King of Prussia with the English
through the Duke of Brunswick ; in this way the king would
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 213
avoid the double risk of suspecting a faithful ally or of being
the dupe of a perfidious friend. Moreover, a knowledge of
the sentiments of the King of Prussia was necessary to ex-
tend or contract the arrangements that we might make with
the Court of Vienna ; for if it was true that the King of
Prussia was abandoning us, the king would be without allies,
and he must either unite himself to the Court of Vienna or
run the risk of being exposed to a league of all the great
powers of Europe. These reasons struck the king's mind, and
soon after the Duke de Nivernais, a well-informed man of a
wise and enlightened mind, was chosen to go to Berlin.
I expected that the Comte de Staremberg would not be
satisfied with the reserved reply I had orders to transmit to
him ; he did not conceal from me either his surprise or his
vexation; but he finally copied the king's reply from my
dictation and sent the letter the next day by a courier, whom
the Court of Vienna sent back without delay. M. de Starem-
berg notified me of his arrival and communicated the reply
of his Court, which, without being harsh, was cold and laconic.
The empress renounced the plan she had proposed, as it was
not to the taste of the king, and would wait for his Majesty
to explain the objects which might serve as a basis for the
two Courts to take common action.
I soon remitted to M. de Staremberg a second reply from
the king, in which I studied to remove the fears and
umbrage which our reserve had roused in the Court of Vienna.
That first impression did not begin to fade for more than six
weeks, and after many replies and responses from the two
Courts. I then perceived that it was possible to detach the
empress from her alliance with England, and that by binding
the King of Prussia not to break the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle,
the peace of the continent could be secured ; the king would
then have no other burden to support than that of the war he
214 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
was about to have with England. That prospect, happy for
France and for Europe, dispersed my anxieties, inspired my
work, and warmed my zeal.
I conceived then the project of a treaty of reciprocal
guarantee between the States of the king in Europe and
those of the empress-queen, to which their respective allies
should be invited to accede, with the exception of England ;
this last point would of course be difficult to obtain. I drew
up the articles of this treaty of union and guarantee. The
king approved them, and felt how fortunate he would be if
the work could be thus terminated ; it would be the means of
securing the peace of Europe during his reign and that of the
empress. His Majesty authorized me to make the first over-
tures of this salutary plan to the empress's minister. The
memorial which I gave him was welcomed fairly well in
Vienna ; the empress had in fact advanced too far to venture
on making no agreement with us. She answered that she
would authorize her minister to discuss with me the different
points of this treaty of union and guarantee.
In this condition of things, the negotiation taking a more
serious turn, I was unwilling any longer to be the sole
person charged with an affair so important. I represented
to the king that in spite of all my attention I was liable
to make considerable mistakes, not being informed of what
was happening in the different cabinets of Europe, whereas
M. de Staremberg was aided by all the lights of his Court ;
that the game was not equal, and that no earthly induce-
ment would make me involve the king in such serious
engagements unless I were enlightened by his ministers.
I asked him therefore to appoint such members of his
Council as he judged suitable, to whom I could render an
account, in committee, of what had passed up to this time
with the Court of Vienna, and of the negotiation now opened.
1755] CAEDINAL DE BERNIS. 215
The king yielded with difficulty to my request ; but finally
he chose, to confer with me, M. de Machault, then secretary
of State for the navy, M. de Se*chelles, controller-general of
finances, M. Kouille*, minister of Foreign Affairs, and M.
Saint-Florentin, minister of State. I expressed some sur-
prise that M. d'Argenson, minister of war, was not admitted
to this secret committee; the king told me that when the
affair was further advanced he would be called into it as
well as the other members of the Council.
The surprise of the ministers of the king whom I have
just named can be imagined when I told them what had
happened since the month of November. M. de Machault
and, above all, M. Kouill£ could only imperfectly conceal
their vexation. The Comte de Saint-Florentin was the only
one who expressed any joy at seeing me in the confidence of
the sovereign. I showed them my order and power from
the king to negotiate with M. de Staremberg, and all the
memorials sent to the Court of Vienna, approved in the
hand-writing of his Majesty. It was agreed between us
that in future, before treating with the Austrian minister,
and before presenting to the king any memorial relative to
the negotiation, I should, each time, explain to the com-
mittee the object of my conference, and the subject of my
memorial. This system was constantly followed throughout
the whole course of the negotiation ; I wished the latter to
be regarded, not as my own work, but as that of the king
and his Council; it was the only way to shelter myself
from possible events.
It is easy to understand now the excessive labour this
involved. I wrote with my own hand, under M. de Starem-
berg's dictation, the answers and memorials sent by his
Court, of which I made a copy for the minister of Foreign
Affairs; I did the same for the replies and memorials
216 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
returned in the king's name ; besides this, I composed and
made minutes of all the projects and counter-projects relat-
ing to treaties and conventions ; at each difficulty I was
forced to write memorials to explain matters ; and when the
king was absent from Versailles, and the Council dispersed,
I was obliged to write detailed despatches to all the members
of the committee. For this immense labour I was not
allowed to employ a secretary from the month of September,
1755, until the month of March, 1757, at which time my
health totally broke down. To preserve the secret of this
negotiation, I was obliged to give myself up to society, and
to lead the life of a man who has nothing to do ; I was
therefore compelled to spend my nights in work. Add to
these fatigues of the body the anxieties of a man who excites
the jealousy of all the king's Council ; the perpetual watch-
fulness necessary to avoid the snares laid for me in all
directions, and the spies which the foreign ministers and
those of the king not admitted to the committee set upon
me ; a picture will thus be had of a situation which I am
now astonished that I was able to resist. I am not less
surprised that the secret of the affair confided to me has
never transpired.
The king, at my entreaty, had sent the Due de Mvernais
to Berlin. The King of Prussia neglected nothing to cajole
that minister, who, ignorant of our negotiations with the
Court of Vienna, was strongly of opinion that the king
ought to renew his treaty with Prussia. That king testified
to the duke the greatest attachment to France, and excessive
fear of the treaty of subsidies which England had just
concluded with Russia for the payment of eighty thousand
men [signed in Petersburg, September 30, 1755]. This
alarm of the King of Prussia was reasonable enough, but
he exaggerated it to give himself an excuse in our eyes for
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 217
the convention he had just signed with the English Court. It
was not until February, 1756, that his Prussian Majesty
admitted this arrangement plainly to the Due de Nivernais.
He then showed him the treaty, signed by his minister in
London, and in spite of the Due de Mvernais' solicitations,
he ratified it before his very eyes, offering at the same time
to renew his treaty with us ; thus contracting at the same
time with two powers at enmity, which had an appearance
of veritable derision.
When I was consulted as to this renewal of alliance with
the King of Prussia, I said distinctly that it ought to be
done, provided the King of Prussia would abrogate his
convention with England ; for it could not be permitted that
he should sign a treaty with his right hand with England,
and one with his left hand with us. This opinion was that
of the committee also, and the king adopted it. The Due
de Nivernais was, in consequence, written to, and recalled
after making vain efforts to induce the King of Prussia to
break his treaty with the Court of London. M. de Niver-
nais was ignorant of our negotiations with the Court of
Vienna. I must not forget to mention here that the King
of Prussia said to him, when he reproached his Majesty for
concluding a treaty with England without our knowledge :
"Here you are, very angry; why don't you make a treaty
with the empress ? I should have no objections." He was
reminded of this remark when the Treaty of Versailles was
communicated to him.
As soon as I saw that we could no longer count on the
King of Prussia I made every effort to induce the Council
of the king, especially M. Kouille', to grant a subsidy to the
King of Poland, Elector of Saxony, in order to oblige that
prince to maintain an army of fifty thousand men, and
secure Saxony against an invasion by the King of Prussia.
218 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. v.
The Comte de Broglie, our ambassador in Dresden, vehe-
mently solicited this treaty of subsidy. M. Rouille* was
rather inclined to it, but MM. de Machault and de S^chelles
opposed it strongly. In vain I represented that as soon as
the King of Prussia knew of our relations with the empress
he would not fail to attack Bohemia unexpectedly, and take
possession of the Electorate of Saxony. They answered
that I did not know the King of Prussia ; that, bold as he
seemed, he would die of fear the moment he saw that we
had allied ourselves to the Court of Vienna ; that he could
not do anything without us ; and would think himself very
lucky if we did not attack him. Can it be believed that the
Council of the greatest king in Europe could have judged
so falsely of the King of Prussia ? This bad judgment was
the cause of all the evils of the present war. I shall often
have occasion to refer to it. No doubt persons will be
amazed that the king, having more confidence in me as to
foreign affairs than in any other of his ministers, should not
have followed my opinion on a point so essential; but I
was alone against many, and people count votes more than
they weigh them.
We shall see, in the end, on how many important occa-
sions my opinion on public affairs was opposed and neglected.
I had been chosen as the architect of a great work, but I
was never master of its guidance, and the choice of means
and workmen often depended on persons the most opposed
to the system the king had undertaken to carry out. Will
it be believed that during our two years' negotiations with
the Court of Vienna, M. Rouille*, minister of Foreign Affairs,
was never willing to communicate to me what was going
on in the Courts of Germany and the North, and that he
limited all my information to letters which arrived from
Madrid, on the pretext that I was only the ambassador to
1755] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 219
Spain. Not only did he refuse me lights which were neces-
sary to negotiate advantageously with M. de Staremberg, but
he often gave instructions to the king's ministers in Ger-
many that were very contrary to the language that I held
to the ministers of the empress, so that complaints and
distrust were continual from the Court of Vienna.
The king was informed of conduct so extraordinary and
so prejudicial to his interests; he groaned over it; but M.
Kouilld was old and infirm, the king knew his jealousy and
his weaknesses, and, by excess of kindness, he would not
mortify him by commanding him to open to me the portfolio
of Foreign Affairs. To conciliate his interests with his
kindness, and in order that I should be fully informed of
what it was so important for me to know, it will presently
be seen that the king appointed me to his Council; the
same motive subsequently determined his Majesty to make
me minister of Foreign Affairs in 1758. Thus it was to
the jealousy of M. Rouill£, and not to the favour I enjoyed,
that I owed these two important positions. The intention
of the king was not to let me occupy them until after my
return from my embassies to Madrid and Vienna. I am
assured of this fact by a letter from the king to Madame
Infanta which she communicated to me at Versailles.
220 MEMOIES AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
VI.
1755-1756. — The Affair of the Kequisition, and that of Minorca. — Con-
tinuation of Negotiations with Vienna. — The Treaty of Versailles. —
Publication of the Treaty in July, 1756. — Negotiations with the Court
of Vienna. — The King of Prussia assembles his Forces and threatens
an Invasion of Saxony and Bohemia.
I FELT certain from the cautious treatment shown by our
ministers to England that some sort of negotiation had
suspended the activity of the government in France; but
I had no certainty of this fact when, dining one day with
the Marquis de Puysieux, I found there the speech with
which the King of England had just opened his parliament.
In it he said : " With a sincere desire to secure my people
from the evils of war and to prevent, in the midst of present
troubles, whatever could lead to a general war in Europe,
I have been ever ready to accept all honourable and reason-
able terms of agreement; but up to this time France has
proposed none. Consequently I have limited my views to
preventing that power from making further usurpations or
maintaining those it has already made; to letting it be
known distinctly that we have the right to demand satis-
faction for hostilities committed in a time of profound
peace ; and to bringing to nought designs which, as various
appearances and many preparations give reason to believe,
are now being formed against my kingdom and my domains."
This speech left no uncertainty as to the intentions of
the Britannic Court, and it was plain we could no longer
reasonably expect to be at peace with that power. A
means presented itself to my mind of bringing the Council
rl Van Lo>.
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 221
at Versailles to ask an explanation from the English min-
istry. This means justified at the same time the king's
inaction, not only in the eyes of his subjects oppressed by
the English, but also in the face of all Europe, and threw
back the odium of the war on the Britannic Court ; in short,
it furnished the king with a means of revenge both useful
and honourable. I went at once into my cabinet where I
drew up a first memorial (which will be found among my
papers).
Before speaking to the king of my great project, I wanted
to make sure that means could be found to execute it. I
went to see M. Paris-Duverney, intendant-general of military
subsistence, a man of genius and resources, who has ideas
in his mind and loftiness in his soul. I read him my
memorial ; he seized at once and admirably the full extent
of the plan, and the political and military bearings of
the double project it presented. M. Duverney assured me
that the subsistence side of the affair could be ready in
three weeks, and that his brother, M. Paris-Montmartel
would furnish the necessary money. We went together to
see the latter, who applauded no less than his brother the
contents of my memorial ; he promised that the money
should not be wanting as soon as the king had given his
orders. M. Montmartel has enriched himself in serving the
king ; but it must be said that his fortune and his credit
have both been useful to the State on several important
occasions.
We agreed, all three, that my memorial should be com-
municated on the following day to his Majesty. In the
interval, M. Duverney sent me a very clear and strong
statement of the means to employ to make sure of the
supplies and munitions necessary to the success of the
enterprise. After having taken these precautions I went
222 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
back to Versailles, and gave my memorial to the king,
assuring him that if he adopted my project, neither the
money nor the other means would be lacking.
The king has a naturally sound mind. He liked the plan ;
but he wished before adopting it to have it approved by
the Council, and, in consequence, he ordered a committee,
at which all the ministers should be present.
My project consisted in making to the Court of London a
Kequisition, by which the king declared that, to avoid the
evils of war, he would willingly forget the insult offered to
his flag by the irregular capture of the " Alcide," and the
" Lys," and by the still less excusable carrying off of the
merchant-vessels of his subjects, on condition that England
would restore at once and without reserve the said vessels ;
also that if his Britannic Majesty accepted a proposition so
equitable, his Majesty was ready to renew the negotiation,
now interrupted, for the settlement of the North American
boundaries ; but that if, on the contrary, the King of England
refused so just and amicable an overture, his Majesty would
regard that refusal as an open declaration of war.
This Eequisition [published in the " Gazette de France,"
1756] was to be accompanied by a letter from the minister
of Foreign Affairs, to Mr. Fox, and sent through the king's
ambassador at the Hague to Mr. York, Britannic minister in
Holland, for transmission to his Court; the answer to be
returned to our ambassador. At the same time copies of
the Eequisition were to be sent to all the Courts of Europe,
to let them see the moderation and equity of the king.
But as this step towards the Court of London was threaten-
ing in case of a refusal, the threat was not to be lost in air,
and I supported it by a detailed plan for attacking Minorca.
The Kequisition was but the preamble of that means of
vengeance, and the two things were so bound together that
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 223
my plan involved renouncing the Kequisition, if the attack
on Minorca was not practicable. In case the attack on
Minorca was determined on, I wanted that all arrange-
ments to begin that enterprise should be completed by the
time the answer came from London ; so that there might be
no interval between the refusal of England and the attack
on the island.
All the king's Council, with the exception of M. de
Machault, praised this project very much, as a whole and
in parts. As for the Keeper of Seals [M. de Machault], he
contented himself by saying coldly : " That Eequisition will
give us war." M. de Se*chelles, who rolled his r's, said,
stamping his foot, " Eh ! jarni, monsieur, is n't it war al-
ready ? " M. de Machault knew that well enough, but he
saw that the attack on Minorca would give M. d'Argenson
a role to play, and that displeased him. Moreover, M. de
Machault was in the confidence of an underhand negotiation,
with which the Court of London had been for some time
amusing us ; a banker in Paris being the negotiator. When
the king ordered M. Eouill^ to disclose to me that mystery,
I was immensely surprised that the ministers should have
given attention to so clumsy a trick. I soon made the
king feel the indecency, danger, and uselessness of such a
negotiation.
Though the king's Council adopted my project, it was not
without much difficulty and effort that I succeeded in getting
it executed. I wrote many memorials on the subject, to
develop the plan and facilitate its execution. I asked that
the king should appoint a general of reputation to command
on our ocean coasts, and another on the coasts of the Mediter-
ranean. Forty thousand men were to be marched to the
former to threaten England with the phantom of an embarka-
tion on the ocean side. All the success of the enterprise
224 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHA*. vi.
against Minorca depended on the belief that England might
give to these demonstrations; which in my plan were not
altogether chimerical ; for if the English were too unready to
take their forces to the Mediterranean, nothing need prevent
us from attacking the islands of Jersey and Guernsey.
While this feint was preparing at the West, everything was
to be made ready at the South, in the harbours of Toulon and
Marseille, for the transportation of thirty-five battalions,
convoyed by a squadron sufficient to protect them. These
double preparatives, by dividing the attention of England,
set a trap for her which it would be hard to avoid, especially
if the secret of the Minorca expedition were well kept. As it
was, England fell into it, and it was only in consequence of
our delays that the squadron of Admiral Byng arrived to the
succour of Fort Saint-Philip, though even then long after the
disembarkation of our troops.
It must be allowed that the English could scarcely regard
as serious an expedition about which so much public talk was
made. This was the first time it was ever useful for a
government not to know how to keep its secrets. Another
incredible fact is that the king had no plan or map of the
actual condition of Fort Saint-Philip ; and they proceeded to
attack that place on a plan which M. Massones, the Spanish
ambassador, gave me, which he thought very good ; but which
was only that of the old fortress hi the days when the
Spaniards possessed it. We should never have undertaken
the siege of that fortress had we known to what a formidable
condition the English had brought it ; therefore its capture
may be regarded as a species of miracle. I remember that
when M. Duverney read me the lists of the utensils and
implements collected for the siege of Port-Mahon, I said
to him: "You have forgotten the most essential thing;
add scaling-ladders." This reflection seems prophetic, and
1755-1756] CAKDlNAL DE BERNIS. 225
did not prove useless, for they took Fort Saint-Philip by
assault.
After many committee-meetings, memorials that I took to
them, and intrigues that thwarted my project, it was decided
to send the king's Kequisition to the Court of London. I
asked the minister of the navy whether the transports and
the squadron would be ready by the time the answer of the
King of England arrived, and whether, in case of refusal, we
could act immediately, — a condition necessary for success,
inasmuch as the enterprise against Minorca was reasonable
only so long as it was possible to seize the island before it
could be succoured. He assured me that all would be ready
in a month. It must be told that, although on the part of the
minister of war, all was ready at the time agreed upon, it was
not so in the Mediterranean ports ; but M. d'Argenson desired
the enterprise, and M. de Machault did not [M. de Machault
was Keeper of the Seals and minister of the navy also].
As soon as the king's Kequisition had started, I urged the
appointment of the generals who were to command on the
coasts of the ocean and the Mediteranean. The Mare'chal
de Belleisle was chosen for the Western coast, and I contrib-
uted much to the selection of Mare'chal de Eichelieu for that
of the South. In consequence of these appointments great
movements of troops took place, and many transports were
collected in the ocean ports ; but the naval preparations in the
Mediterranean for the attack on Minorca were very slow and
few in number. Part of the ministry flattered themselves
that England would seize the means offered her by the king
for peace; and, in fact, if the Court of London had not
resolved on war it would not have rejected so reasonable an
offer of conciliation. But its course was already determined,
and it was counting on an enterprise, then unknown, which
was to make us lose Canada. In France, on the contrary,
VOL. I. — 15
226 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
the English were thought to be pacific because we were so
ourselves.
A courier was sent to Marechal de Belleisle who was
then at Bisi bidding adieu to the Due de Nivernais, who was
starting for Berlin. The mare'chal came at once to Court,
being wholly ignorant of the king's Kequisition and the
project of attacking Minorca. The king ordered me to in-
form him of this affair. M. de Belleisle was not then in
the Council, but he entered it shortly after in place of
Mare'chal de Noailles. After the taking of Minorca Mare-
chal de Belleisle allowed his friends to say that he was the
author of the plan of that expedition ; M. de Machault, by a
few cold words, sustained that idea, and quite recently the
ill-informed author of the " Political Testament of the Mare'-
chal de Belleisle " has attributed to him all that merit. I
do not deny that others besides myself may have had the
idea of attacking Minorca, but the plan that was followed
for the taking of that island belongs to me alone.
As long as the affair seemed a doubtful one, I was blamed
for being its instigator; when it succeeded, my credit for
the plan was disputed. When the answer from England
arrived, and her refusal made war certain, I was not, as the
saying is, " fit to throw to the dogs ; " and the ministers
reproached one another for having listened to the counsel of
a young man; even Mme. de Pompadour thought herself
obliged to console me for the little success of my memorial. I
told her that I did not need consolation ; that I had all along
expected the refusal of England, because I had better known
her intentions. I assured Mme. de Pompadour that she
would soon see the good effect produced in all the Courts of
Europe by the king's Eequisition ; that it was only neces-
sary that she should urge the departure of the troops for
the attack on Minorca, and that she must not worry
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 227
herself at what they might think at Versailles of my
projects.
The result was that Europe applauded the moderation of
the king ; and if all wishes were not in our favour, at any
rate we had all the votes, and the blame fell on England
only. The king's Council then began to do justice to my
views. But the minister of the navy would not hasten his
preparations; the secret of the expedition got wind; the
affair was actually talked of three months before it was
undertaken. M. de Eichelieu spit fire and flame ; he feared,
with good reason, that the English would forestall him. I
made him resolve to start for Marseille, telling him that his
presence could alone hasten the preparations.
In point of fact, his activity triumphed over the slowness
of the navy, the indiscretions of the government, and the
negligence of the English. The rest is well known. Mare*-
chal de Kichelieu, after the successful battle of M. de la
Galissonni^re against the English fleet, had no fear that
Port-Mahon could be succoured for a long time ; but he did
not advance very much in the taking of Fort Saint-Philip.
I have already said that if we had known the strength of
that fortress, we should never have determined to attack it.
It is perhaps the first time in our history that the ignorance
of a ministry has been useful to the State. Mare*chal de
Eichelieu, rightly judging that he would have difficulty
in reducing Fort Saint-Philip by regular approaches, con-
ceived the bold design of carrying it by general assault.
This undertaking, almost foolhardy, succeeded by the ex-
traordinary valour of his troops, the slackness of the besieged,
and especially by the inexperience of Lord Blakeney, to
whom, however, the English nation raised a statue to com-
memorate his fine defence.1
1 See Appendix I.
MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
This success intoxicated France, disconcerted the Court
of London, and threw it into consternation ; we made pretty
songs, and believed that in future it would be as easy to
conquer the English as it now was to laugh at them. I
ought to have felt more nattered than others by this victory,
inasmuch as I was the original author of it, but I saw in
this advantage only a certain means of ending the war
gloriously. I proposed to the king's Council, he being then
at Compiegne, to address a second Kequisition to the Court
of London, in which the king offered peace with the restitu-
tion of Minorca, provided England returned our vessels,
sailors, and merchandise, and freed us forever from the stipu-
lations of the Treaty of Utrecht in regard to Dunkerque.
This action on the part of the king was calculated to
cover him with glory, and to secure peace. It seemed to me
impossible that England should not accept these pacific
propositions; the expedition of General Braddock into
Canada had failed; the British ministry was harassed,
divided, dismayed. By this means the maritime war was
at an end, and it was more than likely that the King of
Prussia, seeing us freed from all naval embarrassments,
would not risk uniting all our forces against him by attack-
ing the Courts of Saxony, and Vienna. This monarch had
sent to Minorca Prince Frederick of Wurtemberg, who, on
his return, passed through Compiegne, and scandalized us
all by the contemptuous tone in which he spoke of our
troops and our generals. Dunkerque, freed from its servi-
tude, was worth far more to us than Minorca ; Louis XV.
would have had the advantage of wiping out the shame of
Louis XIV.'s misfortunes ; Europe would have had a long
peace ; a million of men would still be living ; the peoples
would not have been exhausted; in a word, the idea was
luminous.
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 229
They laughed at me. When I proposed it the ministers
told me that the people of Paris would fling mud in my face if
it knew me to be the author of such a project (as if the
intoxication of a light-minded populace should rule the
Council of a wise king !). In a word, this view was rejected
with a species of derision. At the present moment, when
we feel all its merits, it is shown to have been valuable ; but
when men are at the head of a great State, they ought to be
able to see in advance the true point to lay hold of.
The foreign ministers were informed that I had given
this salutary advice; and they congratulated me at Com-
piegne, at the king's lever.
It has been seen that I led the Court of Vienna to a
simple treaty of alliance and guarantee. That work ad-
vanced far during the months of December, January, and
February; by the beginning of March, 1756, only a few
difficulties remained to smooth away, when we suddenly
learned that the King of Prussia had not only signed, but
ratified a convention with the Court of London. This con-
vention was all the more alarming to the Court of Vienna,
because the Low Countries were not included in the species
of guarantee conveyed by that treaty, so that those Countries
might be invaded by France, or attacked by England and
Prussia, if the Court of Vienna made no arrangement with
the Court of Versailles, or that of London, to put them in
safety. The empress, in truth, could not remain long ex-
posed to this double danger. On the other hand, the king
had much reason to complain of his Prussian Majesty, his
ally, not only for having negotiated secretly with our
enemies, and for ratifying this treaty against our solicita-
tions, but especially for trying to deprive the king of a right
he had acquired by the treaty of Westphalia, that of coming
to the assistance of the princes and States of the Empire
230 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
when oppressed : a unique right, which France and Sweden
had bought at a cost of much blood and money, and
the laborious acquisition of which immortalized Cardinal de
Eichelieu, who conceived the project, and Cardinal Mazarin
who had the happiness and the ability to conclude it.
Under these circumstances the Court of Vienna conceived
the hope of making the king adopt the first plan proposed
by the empress in 1755. The king's Council was of opinion
that to calm the anxieties of the empress and gain time, it
was well to examine and discuss that first plan, the bad con-
duct of the King of Prussia towards us authorizing his Majesty
to do so. I was not of that opinion ; I thought it wiser and
more decent to make a treaty of neutrality, or one of alliance
purely defensive, than to enter upon the negotiation of a
plan which the Council had no intention of carrying out. But
my voice was not the strongest, for it was the only one on
that side ; besides which, I found myself in opposition to the
paternal heart of the king, which had long sought means to
strengthen the uncertain position of his daughter and her
husband, the Duke of Parma. I was therefore charged to
declare to M. de Staremberg that the king no longer refused
to treat with the empress on her original plan which had
previously been rejected.
The Court of Vienna, having compelled us to make this
stride, did not delay proposing to us an arrangement which
seemed all the more reasonable because, without changing
our system, it secured us reciprocally from war with each
other. M. de Staremberg communicated to me the form of a
treaty, or convention of neutrality, on which the Austrian
Court insisted strongly, in order to remove from its mind all
uneasiness as to the Low Countries. Will it be believed that
this proposition was unanimously rejected by the king's
Council ? That very Council which did not hesitate to make
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 231
far more serious engagements with the empress refused to
make a simple agreement of neutrality !
Under these circumstances I fell ill ; I was bled several
times, — the last time in the foot, when I was wounded in
the periosteum. Though ill and crippled, my work did not
diminish. To sufferings of the body were added most
grievous distresses of a heart capable of friendship. A re-
spected and ultimate friend of mine [the Comtesse de Eohan]
was dying in Paris, and at the same time I lost a niece whom
I loved much. I had myself carried to their houses and
received their last farewells. That sight, and their deaths,
which followed immediately, renewed my illness to the point
of making it very serious. It was in the midst of all this
anguish that the courier despatched to Vienna with our re-
fusal of the treaty of neutrality returned to Paris.
I shall remember all my life on Good Friday how on that
day M. de Staremberg came to tell me the nature of the
despatches he had received. I was extremely weak, I had
been bled four times ; while in that state the imperial
minister declared to me that his Court, justly alarmed at our
refusal, demanded as a guarantee of the king's intentions, not
only that the agreement of neutrality be signed, but also a
treaty of defensive alliance ; in default of which the empress,
exposed equally to Prussia and to England, would be obliged,
for her own safety, to renew her treaties with her former
allies.
I have said already that I was not permitted to employ a
secretary for the work that related to the affairs of Vienna.
I therefore wrote for three hours under dictation of M. de
Staremberg. That labour done, I began another, lasting four
hours, to render account to the king of the bad effect pro-
duced in Vienna by the refusal of neutrality ; also to M.
Kouill^ and the other members of the committee, who were
232 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
dispersed in their country-houses for the Easter holidays.
This negotiation lasted a week, — without my illness, which
gave me fever, relaxing for a moment. I will say here, in
passing, that I have always had more difficulty in negotiating
with my own Court than with foreign Courts. I am sur-
prised that at this crisis my health sufficed for what I did.
I succeeded, by these writings, in calming the minds of the
ministers and in making them understand that there was no
more danger in signing an agreement of neutrality and a
treaty of purely defensive alliance with the empress than
there had been in signing a treaty of guarantee and alliance
which they had resolved to do a month earlier. I was there-
fore ordered to declare to M. de Staremberg that in the very
first days of my convalescence the last proposals of the em-
press would be definitely determined on in a meeting at which
the whole Council would assemble.
0 my nephews ! for whom alone I write these Memoirs,
keep yourselves, so far as it depends on you, from entering
upon great public affairs ! Let the knowledge of all that my
heart and mind have suffered deter you ; but if your duty
calls you there, learn of me with what uprightness, prudence,
courage you must conduct yourselves.
The Treaty of Versailles was signed May 1, 1756.1 I shall
say nothing about it ; it is known to all the world. Both
sides agreed that it should not be made public until the two
crowns had informed the Court of Madrid of its existence.
The king was never so pleased as at the moment when I
went to tell him that M. Eouille' and I, as his ministers
plenipotentiary, had signed the treaty of eternal alliance
between himself and the empress; his Majesty owned to
me that this was the completion of the work he had most
desired to perform.
1 See Appendix II.
1755-1756] CAKDINAL DE BERNIS. 233
The publication of the treaty was not made until we had
given notice of it to the Courts of Madrid and Berlin, and
after the exchange of ratifications. It is to be remarked
that the secret of so long a negotiation had not transpired
in any way, despite the vigilance and curiosity of the foreign
ministers. At first the treaty made a most favourable im-
pression upon France ; it was regarded as a masterpiece of
prudence and policy ; the nation desired peace, and it was
thought that this alliance gave it and would maintain it.
The applause it gained tempted M. Rouill^; his friends
and his family declared him to be the author of it. But
when the King of Prussia invaded Saxony, and war became
certain, they returned the treaty to me in full, and no mem-
ber of the Council would admit having had a part in it.
The foreign Courts, for the most part, looked with jealousy
and fear on this union of the two most powerful Houses in
Europe. The King of Prussia, to whom the king communi-
cated the treaty, did not seem vexed by it. That dissimu-
lation failed to reassure me as to the future. His minister,
M. de Knyphausen, congratulated me with much politeness.
The Court of Turin and all Italy became uneasy and
alarmed; Germany shared those feelings; as for England,
she did not conceal her vexation, and qualified the alliance
as monstrous and unnatural. At Versailles, they regarded
the affair as strengthening Mme. de Pompadour's influence
and elevating me. From that time, our enemies set to work
to break up our union, in which they succeeded eighteen
months later.
I own that, disgusted by the jealousies of the ministry
and by M. EouilM's obstinacy in concealing from me not
only what was happening in the Courts of Europe, but even
the instructions which he gave to the ministers of the king
in Germany, which conformed so little to the spirit and
234 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
letter of the Treaty of Versailles that M. de Staremberg
was continually bringing me, and not without reason, most
serious complaints, — I own, I say, that all these impediments
and inconsistencies made me earnestly desire that the king
would let me go and exercise my functions as ambassador
in Madrid. I even proposed to leave in the hands of the
king a memorial in which I should state the principles by
which to direct the conduct of the new plenipotentiary
whom the king would select to carry on this important
affair. But his Majesty thought that no one was as capable
as I to conduct a negotiation which I had had in hand for
over a year, and of which I knew all the advantages, incon-
veniences, and dangers. His Majesty therefore opposed my
departure for Spain and thought that by putting me into
the Council he should remedy the provoking practices of
M. Kouill4, who could not then keep from me a knowledge
of what was happening in the cabinets of Europe nor the
instructions he was giving to the king's ministers at foreign
Courts. His Majesty decided, therefore, that I was to take
my seat at the next Council as minister of State.
Mme. de Pompadour, in speaking to me of this intention
of the king, told me that he did not wish to inform the
ministers of his determination, but that his Majesty had
permitted her to tell M. de Machault, of whom she was
sure. I applauded the confidence she had in her friend,
but I assured her that that confidence would close the door
of the Council against me, redouble M. Kouille*'s jealousy,
and rouse that of the other ministers. The marquise would
not believe it, declaring that M. de Machault had lately
said to her that after the death of M. Kouille*, which seemed
near at hand, the king would have "a great minister of
Foreign Affairs in me." That eulogy did not make me
change my opinion ; and I was right, for as soon as M. de
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 235
Machault received her confidence he sent M. Kouille to the
king to make serious remonstrances and touching jeremiads.
That minister represented to his Majesty that he himself
had removed him from the navy department to that of
Foreign Affairs ; that it was dishonouring him and taking
from him the confidence of foreigners to make me a minister
of State in consequence of the Treaty of Versailles ; that all
Europe would see in me the real minister, and in him a
figure-head; that if he had lost the confidence of the king
he asked only to retire ; and finally, that, informed as I was
in all matters relating to Spain and the rest of Europe, he
could not find at this important crisis any one capable of
replacing me. This argument did not convince the king,
but it embarrassed him. He reassured M. Kouille as to his
fears and spoke to him with such kindness that the little
man thought himself justified in treating me haughtily, and
accusing me to my face of an unreasonable ambition which
would never be gratified. I was master of myself ; my life
at Court had long trained me to patience; I answered,
judiciously and firmly, that I had never thought of the
place of minister of State; that I did not mind its being
taken from me provided the service of the king and my own
reputation did not suffer in consequence.
M. de Machault, the author of this mischief, proposed
to me, in order to conciliate matters, that the Marquis
d'Aubeterre, then minister at Vienna, should be sent to
Spain, and that I should go, clothed with ambassadorial
dignities to the Imperial Court. This snare was very
shrewd ; if I refused so important an embassy it was easy
to present me to the king's mind as an ambitious man,
whose project was to govern the Court ; consequently I did
not hesitate one moment in accepting M. de Machault's
proposition, and I asked him to inform Mme. de Pompadour
236 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
at once of my acceptance. The marquise, who began from
that moment to distrust M. de Machault's sincerity, wished
to refuse this expedient; but I made her comprehend the
necessity of giving in to it, in order to put the king at his
ease and to disarm by this moderation the jealousy of the
minister, at any rate, for a while. At the same time I
wrote the king a letter, in which I made him see the purity
of my intentions, the simple character of my views, and
the limit of my ambition. I made him feel that the idea
of my entering the Council came from himself, and that,
provided his Majesty put me in a position where I could
be better informed and less thwarted than I now was,
I asked no more. The king was satisfied with my senti-
ments and my conduct, but he had much difficulty in
renouncing his intention to put me in the Council ; in fact,
it was more than three weeks before he could resolve to
appoint me to the embassy of Vienna.
Meanwhile, in the midst of all these intrigues, our ulterior
negotiations with Vienna advanced but slowly and with
many difficulties. I at last forced the imperial minister to
consent that our offensive action should be subordinate to
the one case of the King of Prussia being the first to violate
the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle. This will show how just and
fair the king was towards his Prussian Majesty, and how
destitute of all foundation were the pretexts with which the
Berlin Court tried to colour its unjust invasions.
This first difficulty settled, there remained a host of others
to smooth down, as much in regard to the tranquillity of
Italy as to that of the Low Countries, and to the objects
I had always proposed to myself in the negotiations with
the Court of Vienna, namely : uprooting all germs of war
between that Court and ours in the present and for the
future ; detaching from England her principal allies ; increas-
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 237
ing in France harbours, fortresses, resources, and, finally,
maritime advantages and positions able to render uneasy,
and even to weaken, the commerce and navy of England. I
would that I were permitted to explain this more clearly ; it
would then be seen that no minister of France has ever had
sounder views, or suggested measures more fitted to secure
the tranquillity of Europe, to weaken England, and procure
for France solid resources against an inimical power now
grown formidable.
We should, at the same time, reflect on the striking singu-
larity offered by the union of two Courts enemies for three
centuries and now allied for the last three months; the
reciprocal hatreds, the great distrusts were smothered, but
suspicions remained which private interests and contending
political principles nourished on both sides. This delicate
and embarrassing situation for the negotiators required on
their part great prudence, patience, and cleverness: these
qualities alone would not have sufficed without respective
sincerity ; it must be said that both Courts put much into
their manner of negotiating with each other.
During the course of these thorny discussions, we heard
from all sides that the King of Prussia was assembling his
forces, preparing magazines, and mounting his artillery.
The king's Council, in defiance of M. d'Argenson, per-
sisted in regarding these offensive demonstrations as vain
threats on the part of the King of Prussia, who was seeking
to make himself of importance, they said, and show Europe
that the union of the Courts of Versailles and Vienna
inspired him with no fear.
As for me, who, six months earlier, had said to the king's
Council that the publication of the Treaty of Versailles
would determine the King of Prussia to attack Saxony and
Bohemia before the Courts of Vienna and Dresden could
238 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OP [CHAP. vi.
take precautions to prevent it, I felt the gravest anxiety for
the fate of Saxony and Bohemia. The empress had only
from twenty-five to twenty-six thousand men ready to be
called into the field; the Electorate of Saxony only eighteen
thousand ; the Court of Dresden floated between misplaced
confidence and helpless anxiety.
It was under these circumstances that the King of Prussia
presented a singular memorial to the Court of Vienna, in
which he asked the empress to declare to him formally that
she would not think of attacking him for two years ; and he
went on to say that in default of that express declaration he
should be under the necessity of forestalling his enemies
and dispersing the storm which threatened him. This pro-
posal was, it must be allowed, as extraordinary as it was
insulting. It was converting the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle,
guaranteed by all the European powers, into a two years'
truce. Thus the Court of Vienna was very excusable for
answering as it did; but it had only twenty thousand men
assembled in camp at Kolin, whereas the King of Prussia
had a hundred thousand under arms. It would certainly
have been wiser, while calling the attention of the Court of
Berlin to the indecency and singularity of its proposal, to
have given the king the assurance he demanded; such a
course would, at any rate, have postponed the war, given the
empress time to assemble her forces, sheltered Saxony from
sudden attack, brought the other Courts, whom we desired
to unite in our measures, to an explanation, and given our-
selves time to make military and financial preparations.
The Court of Vienna hastened to reply to the King of
Prussia, and did not communicate to us its answer until
it was sent.
This precipitation filled me with distress. I saw that the
theatre of war was thrown open before the actors were pre-
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 239
pared to enter upon the stage. I felt the confusion, disorder,
and, possibly, the disasters which would come of so hasty a
step. The Court of Vienna excused itself on the ground of
the indecency of the King of Prussia's memorial, on its out-
raged dignity, and on the danger of giving two years more
to its enemy to prepare for war. But the secret motive of
this haste was founded on a greater and more essential in-
terest ; the Court of Vienna was now nearly at one with us
on all the fundamental points; it therefore hastened to
embark the affair for fear lest some event, some circumstance
might prevent us from openly taking its side ; it considered
that it would never have a finer opportunity to reduce the
King of Prussia ; that, the war once begun, negotiations would
be keener and more prompt; that the Court of Kussia
(which that of Vienna had long been sounding) would decide
upon its course more readily after the invasion of Saxony
and Bohemia ; that the said invasion would arm the Empire
against the King of Prussia and determine France and
Sweden (in their capacity as guarantors of the Peace of
Westphalia) to come to the succour of the oppressed States ;
and, finally, that if the King of Prussia had successes at first,
the scene would change through the union of the forces of
so many powerful monarchies.
All these reflections were just, and results proved them
so in a great measure ; but it is not less true that the pre-
cipitate haste of the Court of Vienna was the real cause of the
loss of Saxony and of the battle of Lowositz (October 1,
1756) ; and to it must be attributed a part of the misfortunes
of the whole war, especially of the distress into which we
were thrown in the matter of finance. I do not hesitate,
therefore, to assert that the Court of Vienna made, by this
action, a capital blunder ; it rushed an affair which might
have been settled by time, and in consequence France, Swe-
240 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vl.
den, the Empire, and the Court of Vienna were hurried into
war while still unprepared for it.
I shall not relate here the manner in which the King of
Prussia comported himself in Saxony, nor the conduct of the
King of Poland ; I do not pretend to write the history of
the war.1 If military maxims excuse the King of Prussia for
having besieged the latter prince in Pirna in a time of abso-
lute peace, and, after making his army prisoners of war, hav-
ing incorporated it into his own; if politically he had the
right to force the cabinet of Dresden, to search the archives
of that Court for knowledge and motives that might justify
his invasion, no reason whatever can excuse the treatment to
which he subjected the Queen of Poland and the royal
family.
It is known that the want of resolution of the Saxon army
prevented it from joining the Austrian army, of which Gen-
eral Brown had led a portion with some ability into the
neighbourhood of Pirna, and that this general lost by his own
fault the battle of Lowositz when the King of Prussia had no
longer any hope of winning it.
The King of Prussia may be blamed for the invasion, but
not for the occupation of Saxony : in the first case he com-
mitted an injustice ; in the second he behaved as a general
and an able prince, hi procuring for himself advantages
and military resources without which he would infallibly
have succumbed ; the capitulation of Pirna was a fine model
to follow for that of Kloster-zeven. In war all is justified
by success ; besides the fact that the beaten always pay the
forfeit, the temporizers are blamed when they fail, and are
often despised by their public and by posterity. It is
1 For the military history of the Seven Years' War, viewed from the
Austrian side by one who fought its battles, see the Memoirs of the Prince
de Ligne, in the present Historical Series. — TB.
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 241
shameful to humanity that maxims so unjust should be con-
secrated by the history of all ages.
As soon as the King of Prussia had entered Saxony, the
empress claimed from us the twenty-four thousand men stip-
ulated for by the Treaty of Versailles. Orders were given
to put that body in motion. I was of opinion that we ought
to send our German troops at once to the support of the em-
press ; adding to them only two French regiments of four
battalions each, which could be replaced by two others in
every new campaign ; thus we should gradually train to war
our whole French infantry, and recruit the twenty-four thou-
sand men from the Empire without making a drain upon our
provinces. My advice was rejected. M. d'Argenson, minis-
ter of war, at heart an enemy to the new system, but who
sought to profit by it to enhance his department, wished, by
employing all his forces, to make himself necessary, become
firmer in his post, and eclipse his enemy, M. de Machault.
He represented that we were now too closely in accord with
the Court of Vienna to keep strictly to the Treaty of Ver-
sailles ; that the season was too advanced for our twenty-four
thousand men to reach Bohemia in time (which was true);
that the corps, marching at this season, would be half de-
stroyed before it got there, and could only be fit for action
much later ; that our German contingent would give a less
good idea of France than our national troops ; that the em-
press desired to be served by Frenchmen, of whom she knew
the value (this also was true, and, moreover, she well knew
that a corps of French troops would be better kept up than
one of foreign troops) ; in short, that to send these troops now
was to put twenty-four thousand men into the hands of the
Court of Vienna as hostages, and make our ulterior arrange-
ments more difficult.
These arguments prevailed ; besides which, the king ar-
YOL. I. — 16
242 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
dently desired that the great plan negotiated with the Court
of Vienna should be carried out in its entirety. M. de
Machault, who had been eager for the whole scheme of the
treaties with the empress so long as he believed that the
King of Prussia would never enter upon a war, now began
to feel differently ; but he no longer had any support in the
king's Council. The Mare*chal de Noailles and M. de Se*-
chelles had retired from it, also the Marquis de Puysieux.
They were replaced by the Marechal de Belleisle, great
Prussian at heart, but won over by M. d'Argenson ; the
mare'chal, knowing well, moreover, that a continental war
would bring his military talents and experience into activity,
was opposed to the temporizing system of M. de Machault.
Thus, contrary to my advice, the twenty-four thousand men
did not march ; and I was charged with making the impe-
rial minister consider this delay satisfactory by a memorial
which held out hopes of still greater assistance when we had
agreed on certain ulterior objects. The Court of Vienna lent
itself to these ideas, and the negotiation resumed its former
activity.
M. de Machault still hoped to avert the land war by
demanding sixty-six millions annually for the navy so long
as the war should last. They were granted to him as if the
king had a fairy wand for the creation of gold. It is to be
remarked that the most costly campaign — that during the
ministry of M. de Seignelay, when France had nearly two
hundred ships of war and frigates — had cost the late king,
including the colonies, only twenty -eight millions. I know
that costs of living and labour have increased ; but the pay
of the soldier and the salary of naval officers remain the
same. This operation completed, no ground was left for
this shrewd minister (though little versed in great affairs)
to make reasonable objection to a land war.
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 243
The misfortunes of the King of Poland, the tears of his
daughter the dauphine, and the loss of the battle of Lowositz,
contributed not a little to decide us. The king's generosity,
his love for his family, the ardour always felt for new
allies, joined to the advantages we and our friends expected
to derive from our conventions with the Court of Vienna,
combined to make us take the resolution of entering upon a
continental war, in case we agreed with the Court of Vienna
as to ulterior arrangements. I was ordered to declare to
M. de Staremberg that, in case the king decided to act with
nearly all his forces and those of his allies, the Imperial
minister must present as soon as possible a general plan of
convention, as much for the sake of his own Court as for us
and our allies, — a plan on which we could, within a short
time, reach a final decision.
For the rest, I may say it is demonstrable that the ar-
rangements taken with the empress-queen were maturely
reflected upon, discussed, and weighed by the king and his
Council ; that this great work, for which I was held respon-
sible after events, was the work of the king and his min-
istry ; and that I myself, being charged as I was with all
the labour, was neither relieved nor helped nor protected
by any one; that I was constantly refused the means of
informing myself of what was happening in Europe; and
that when, January 2, 1757, the king finally determined to
make me enter the Council of State, he had less in view
to reward me for my long and painful labours than to put
me in the way of being better informed of his affairs, in
order to make me more capable of supporting them against
the imperial minister.
Madame Infanta told me that the king wrote to her at
this time a letter in which he said expressly that he
could have desired I should serve him a few more years
244 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vi.
at foreign Courts before entering the Council, but that cir-
cumstances obliged him to advance that period in order that
I might be in a better position to terminate the important
affairs with which I was now charged.
It was towards the end of the month of December, 1756,
that, weary of the eternal jealousy of M. Rouille*, the im-
pertinences of his wife and his family, and foreseeing that
a machine so ill-mounted would never be solid, I determined
to leave to that minister the direction of the definite ar-
rangements. I asked seriously to be sent to Vienna to
fulfil the functions of my embassy. M. Rouille' acquiesced
with joy ; the king appeared to consent, and he promised
me the cordon lieu on the first of January; but, for all
that, he had resolved to appoint me a minister of State,
from the same views and with the same reasons as before.
I was not informed of this resolution until the evening
before New Year's day. Thus, instead of being commander
of the Order of the Saint-Esprit, I entered the king's Council,
January 2, 1757.
The Marshal de Richelieu, who was serving that year as
first gentleman of the Bed-chamber, said to me a quarter
of an hour before the king ordered him to call me to
enter the Council: "Why, having so much business with
the king, don't you ask for the entrees to the chamber ?
If you like, I will make the proposal to the king for you."
I answered, laughing, that I accepted his offer willingly.
He was much astonished a moment later to hear the
king say to me, "Abbd de Bernis, take your seat at the
Council."
Mme. de Pompadour, taught by experience, was careful
this time not to impart to M. de Machault my coming
ministry. The silence she kept disconcerted the intrigues
which would otherwise not have failed to oppose me.
1755-1756] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 245
Before going farther, it is necessary to treat separately of
what gave rise to a lit de justice, which the king held in the
month of December, 1756, and to give a general idea of
the affairs of parliament, by an historical summary of what
had taken place there during the last twenty-five years.
246 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. TII.
VII.
Affairs of Parliament, and what related thereto during my Ministry.
1732-1758. It is well known that the parliaments of
France are never so firm in their principles, nor so heated
in their assemblies, as when it is a matter of their inde-
pendence of our kings and of the power of the popes, or
when they have to debate questions which touch upon
religion and ecclesiastical jurisdiction; and that their zeal
in this respect flies to arms at the slightest encroachment
of the Court of Kome. The latter ought, therefore, to take
account of this disposition, and regulate its conduct by it, in
all that relates to the Church of France and our liberties.
The French clergy also ought never to risk what may rouse
the ardent and rather suspicious zeal of the parliaments.
The Church has always lost in this conflict of jurisdiction ;
the public has need of the parliaments for the administra-
tion of justice ; the Court has need of them for the registra-
tion of financial edicts. Thus the parliaments will always
rise above any attack made upon their legitimate rights,
just as they will always succumb when they attempt to
cross their prescribed limits. I will state presently the prin-
ciples that should be followed in the affairs that relate to
parliament, and the methods by which that Assembly can
infallibly be restrained within the limits of its essential
functions.
Without speaking here of the heat with which King Louis
XIV. was made to act in order to obtain from the Court of
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 247
Eome the bull Unigenitus, I shall remark that the ministry
of Cardinal de Fleury was perpetually troubled by the mut-
ual clashing of clergy and parliaments in relation to that
same bull Unigenitus. We know what happened in 1732.
The king issued, on the 18th of August, a declaration which
forbade the parliaments to make repeated remonstrances,
under pain of disobedience; it allowed the grand-chamber
alone to receive appeals against abuses, take cognizance
of ecclesiastical matters, of the liberties of the Gallican
church, of the maxims of the kingdom ; but it forbade the
grand-chamber from holding any deliberation on the above
matters except on the requirement of the king's lawyers, or
on the proposition of whoever presided over the said grand-
chamber ; it deprived also the chambers of inquests and
petitions of their freedom to deliberate on any public mattei
elsewhere than in the general assembly of the chambers ;
and it forbade parliament to cease its functions without
permission of the king, under pain of disobedience and
deprivation of its offices. Parliament refused to enregister
the declaration. The king held a lit de justice at Versailles,
September 1, 1732, and had the declaration registered.
Parliament, on its return to Paris, protested against the
registration and insisted on the recall of certain of its exiled
members. The king, irritated, exiled one hundred and thirty
more September 7. But Cardinal de Fleury, who was pre-
paring for war, and who felt that they could neither destroy
parliament nor supply its place, and that the kingdom could
not long do without the administration of justice, recalled
the exiled members without any condition, and the king
consented that the effects of his declaration should be
suspended.
We see in what happened then the history of what has
happened since ; and what will always happen when the
M8 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAF. TIL
Court acts without a plan, without preparation, and without
principles ; it weakens, or at least it compromises the royal
authority by acts little reflected on and by indecent retreats.
After that period, Cardinal de Fleury carefully kept him-
self from employing such violent means, and as the idea of
the king's authority is graven in France on all minds and all
hearts, that authority recovered its rights as soon as they
ceased to expose it to the resistance of parliament. In fact,
in spite of the nullification of the king's declaration enregis-
tered in 1732 at a lit de justice, the king seemed more master
than ever of his parliament, until the trouble excited by the
certificates of confession [billets de confession] which the
Archbishop of Paris, M. de Beaumont, thought it his duty to
exact at deathbeds, the affair of the Hospitals, and that of
the Filles Saint-Marie, again lighted the almost extinct
embers of discord and fanaticism.
The protection which the king unwisely gave, by advice of
Comte d'Argenson and the Bishop of Mirepoix, to the Arch-
bishop of Paris in these matters excited the greatest fermen-
tation in the parliaments, was the cause of the attempted
assassination of the king by Damiens, January 5, 1757, and
has ended by giving to the enemies of the bull Unigenitus
an air of victory and triumph. So that the misguided zeal
of a few bishops made that bull lose by degrees a part of
the protection which the late king Louis XIV. and the
reigning king granted to it.
The open quarrel between Comte d'Argenson and M. de
Machault aided much in the anarchy into which the govern-
ment fell in consequence of the affairs of the bull The
intrigues of those two ministers set in opposition the clergy
to the parliament and the parliament to the clergy ; the
direction of affairs concerning those bodies passed, in turn,
from one to the other of the two ministers, until it came at
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 249
last into the hands of the Prince de Conti, who set himself to
win parliament, and who, by his private work with the king,
obtained day by day more respect and more influence in that
assembly.
On the other hand, M. de Maupeou, chief-president, who
joined to the talent of eloquence external graces of intrigue
and cajolery, led his parliament at the pleasure of the Court
just so long as he retained the hope given to him of being
made Keeper of the Seals ; but as soon as he perceived that
this intention was changed, and that M. de Machault was to
have that important post, he comprehended that, having
nothing more to expect from the Court, he had no other way
to make himself important than to attach himself wholly
to parliament, and substitute the firmness of the magistrate
for the suppleness of the courtier.
It was in the midst of this great fermentation that M.
de Puysieux gave to the king, as I have already said, my
memorial in which I stated the principles that ought to
guide the conduct of his Majesty in the affairs relating to
the clergy and the parliaments. This memorial will be
found among my papers. It foretold what has happened
since, and roused a fear of the revival of that fanaticism,
as dangerous for the king as for the State, which armed, un-
der very different circumstances, the parricide hands of the
Clements and Eavaillacs. I called to mind my prediction on
the 5th of January, 1757, and I deplored the blindness of a
ministry that had precipitated the State into such trouble,
for want of foresight and principles of administration.
All affairs that can agitate parliament, especially those
that concern religion, ought to be smothered at birth and
destroyed in their germ whenever men of wisdom in these
assemblies, however few in number, are able to quench at
its origin the progress of the fire. But when matters have
250 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. VIL
once started, judicial forms and methods cany them rapidly
along, and a decision once given, the wisest minds find them-
selves linked with the hottest heads; they cannot then,
without violent shocks, abolish or reform the decrees of
parliament.
We all remember that in May, 1753, the gentlemen of the
courts of inquests and petitions were exiled to various parts
of the kingdom, and that two days later the presidents and
counsellors of the grand-chamber were transferred to Pon-
toise by lettre de cachet. The refusal of the sacraments, or-
dered, often improperly, by the Archbishop of Paris, had
caused parliament to issue injunctions to administer them :
both sides passed their due limits ; but was the king well-
advised to exile his parliament ? He attempted in vain to
replace it by the creation of a royal chamber, the work of
M. d'Argenson, which the other ministers did much to dis-
credit.
It is impossible to exile and supersede the parliament
of Paris without all the other parliaments in the kingdom
espousing its cause ; hence it would be necessary to suppress
them all; but what rash head would dare to give that
counsel to the king ? What disturbance would be caused
to the whole machinery of the State if it came to that!
Into what anarchy would affairs be plunged ! Where find
the necessary money to buy back the offices ? and even
if money could be had, who would dare to resolve on
striking so great a blow without having the means ready
to supply by other tribunals the functions of the parlia-
ments ? What tribunal already established would be will-
ing to take charge of them ? Could new tribunals be
composed of magistrates drawn from companies ? Would such
magistrates be trained in affairs belonging to the jurisdiction
of the parliaments ? Before they had acquired the necessary
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 251
knowledge and experience how could justice be rendered
to the king's subjects ? Besides, would the public have any
confidence in the new tribunals, at any rate unless they
showed the same firmness and the same principles as the
suppressed parliaments ? So that the king would meet with
more opposition in the parliaments of his new creation than
in the former ones. You cannot destroy in a day bodies
which have sent such deep roots into the very foundations
of the monarchy. Is it to be supposed that the king could
try and judge in his Council all the contentious affairs of
the kingdom ? or that the registration of his edicts done
by his own Council would fail to inspire fear and great
distrust in his provinces and his subjects ? or that this
passage from monarchy to despotism could take place
tranquilly and without danger ? No ! The king, after being
sufficiently enlightened, must be master of his kingdom;
without which, anarchy and confusion, disorder and trouble
would infallibly reign and the State would be in danger;
but it is necessary to put a curb on the despotism of
ministers, to enlighten at times their ignorance, to rectify
their blunders, to remedy the caprices of favourites, to prop
their failures, to guard the weakness of their government
against undertakings from within and without.
When the king no longer lacks money he will have
no need of his parliaments; they will not then prevail
through their compliance or their resistance. Thus it is
of consequence to regulate the finances, to refrain from
overtaxing the people, to avoid unnecessary expenses, in
order not to be obliged to have frequent recourse to the
registration of bursal edicts. When the people are not
oppressed, when the course of law and justice is not inter-
rupted by storms at Court and fermentations in parliament,
the public in France is always for the king ; the distinctive
252 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAT-, vn.
characteristic of the nation is to love its master, to respect
his authority, to defend him against all, provided that
authority does not treat the people with rigour.
But pains must be taken to govern the parliaments and
to prevent the storms that arise there. By a few deserved
distinctions, by confidence, by concert of feeling, it would be
easy to maintain the calmness and subordination of those
great bodies. For it must be said, to the praise of the magis-
tracy, that it is the part of the nation which has preserved
the best morals and the most integrity; all things can be
done with it by gentleness, by wisdom, by conforming to
rules and system. What strange abuse of power it has been
to force the king to act always by authority ! Do we not
feel that instead of increasing that authority, which is
so necessary, it is weakened by enterprises that have often
proved ineffectual ?
The whole secret of legitimate and recognized authority
consists in never compromising itself, and, consequently,
in estimating correctly the resistance that projects may
encounter in execution. But in 1753 the king's Council
was far indeed from that opinion and much opposed to such
wise maxims.
Parliament was relegated from Pontoise to Soissons; it
was recalled to Paris in August, 1754, without any condi-
tions, which further weakened public opinion, not of the
authority of the king, but of that of his administration. The
Prince de Conti had much to do with this return of parlia-
ment, and with the declaration of the king ordering silence
on matters of religion and enjoining parliament to take in
hand the enforcement of this silence, so necessary to the
welfare of religion and the tranquillity of the State, and
see that it was neither troubled nor broken on either side.
This declaration was sent to parliament and registered Sep-
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 253
tember 4, 1754; it was a criticism on the whole course
of the ministry up to that time.
I have already remarked that it would have been very wise
in the king to establish that law if his Majesty had himself
undertaken to execute it; but it was certainly an impru-
dence and even a contradiction to have made parliament the
sole and absolute judge of the respective inf ringers of silence.
We must, however, allow that the law was wise, and that
it did restrain the two parties up to a certain point.
A short calm succeeded all these tempests; the Eoyal
chamber [substituted for parliament], decried equally by
the Court and the public, was abolished in September,
1754; but the refusals of the sacraments still continued,
and the king, in order to withdraw the Archbishop of
Paris from the proceedings of parliament, exiled him to
Conflans.
The assembly of the clergy held in Paris in May, 1755,
was remarkable. Cardinal de La Kochefoucauld, who pre-
sided, and was given that same year the ministry of
benefices, was the head of this famous assembly. The
bishops were divided on the great question, namely : was the
refusal to accept the bull Unigenitus a mortal sin, or merely
a sin of grave import ? Sixteen bishops were of the first
opinion, and seventeen of the second.1 This division scan-
dalized the public and considerably weakened the strength
of the clergy, which consists chiefly in its union. Pope Ben-
edict XIV. was consulted by both parties, and the Comte de
Stainville, afterwards Due de Choiseul, was charged to ob-
tain from the pope an encyclical letter settling the principles
of this matter in relation to the conduct which it behooved
i For a fairly dispassionate account of what the bull Unigenitus really
was, and how it originated, see the "Memoirs of the Due de Saint-Simon,"
Vols. I.-IV. of this Historical Series. — TR.
254 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vn.
bishops and rectors to follow in the administration of the
sacraments to those opposed to the bull Unigenitus.
If the letter of that wise and learned pontiff had remained
such as he first conceived it, nothing could have been clearer
or more decisive ; but the fear of alarming the party of the
over-zealous bishops caused the insertion into the letter of
generalities which gave the Archbishop of Paris and other
prelates occasion to find in it an approval of their conduct.
It must be admitted, however, that this letter has certainly
moderated the too ardent zeal of some and sustained the too
timid courage of others, and that the peace of the Church
has gained something by it. If Cardinal de La Eoche-
f oucauld had lived longer, and if he, who added to the ad-
vantage of illustrious birth social and ecclesiastical virtues,
a dignified presence, and a desire for good, had had a little
more force of character, much might have been hoped from
his influence on the affairs of the Church.
The exile of the Archbishop of Paris to Conflans had
re-established a sort of tranquillity in parliament ; but the
hostilities of England, which foreboded war, having forced
the government to increase its financial resources, M. de
Machault insisted obstinately on the levying of the two
mngtiemes in preference to the dixibme. The latter tax would
have been voted unanimously by parliament, which feared,
with good reason, that after peace was made one of the
mngtiemes would be kept on under various pretexts, and so
become a lasting burden on the people.
Parliament refused to register the edict ; minds became
heated ; and we saw the revival in a moment of the former
fermentation of the parliaments. From that time their
union grew closer, the boldest doctrines were developed in
their remonstrances ; the system of a single parliament in
France, of which each of the parliaments should be a portion
1732-1758] CARDINAL BE BERNIS. 255
or special class, was clearly developed and stoutly sustained.
They began to discuss the mystery of " the incarnation of
parliament with the king, and the species of production or
emanation of the sovereign power resulting from that
wonderful union." The Court was indignant at such prin-
ciples, and alarmed at the sort of league which was beginning
to be formed between the different parliaments of the king-
dom. But without refuting solidly such novel maxims, it
contented itself with registering the edict of the two ving-
tiemes at a lit de justice held at Versailles, at which M. de
Maupeou, chief-president, spoke with the greatest force and
made his hearers face " stupendous evils."
At this period the heat of the parliamentary assemblies,
becoming hotter by degrees, communicated itself to the
public, and this unbridled license made thoughtful minds
afraid of some catastrophe. Our enemies conceived the
greatest hopes from such an effervescence of spirits, and I
know, in a manner not to be doubted, that England set
everything at work, intrigues and money, to inflame these
first germs of discord. The whole of the year 1756 was
marked by actions which showed the discontent of the par-
liaments and the murmurings of the people ; but in Paris
especially the government was criticised in society with an
indecency and boldness of language which the silence of the
Court seemed to authorize.
The Keeper of the Seals, who was working in secret to
pacify the clergy and put a curb on the parliaments, com-
posed with two or three magistrates certain edicts and decla-
rations which were to be registered at a lit de justice. This
minister thought the work so promising that he would not ,
share the glory of it with his colleagues. I can say that if
it had not been for me these edicts would have gone to the
lit de justice without being examined by his Majesty's
256 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vn.
Council. This blind confidence was the first cause of the
downfall of the Keeper of the Seals, and also the cause, or
the occasion, of a much greater evil. It is rash to attempt
suddenly, by the employment of force and authority, to chain
up the most vigorous and most powerful bodies in the State.
I was not informed until two days before the lit de justice
of the bold enterprise of M. de Machault. Mme. de Pompa-
dour informed me, December 11, 1756, of a document, pre-
pared in the cabinet of that minister, which the king was to
take before parliament on the 13th to be enregistered at a lit
de justice. The marquise, biased in favour of her friend, be-
lieved the success of this affair infallible. I made her feel the
impropriety and the danger of it ; she began to see with what
imprudence they had proceeded in an affair of that nature.
They expected that the masters of inquests and petitions
would send in their resignations, but they hoped that the
grand-chamber would remain faithful and be sufficient for
the whole work of parliament ; they felt fully assured of the
faithfulness of that chamber, that the Chatelet would con-
tinue its functions, that the lawyers and barristers would
not shut the doors of their offices, and that the other parlia-
ments of the kingdom would refrain from making common
cause with that of Paris. I made her comprehend the
emptiness of these illusions. I showed her that the Keeper
of the Seals was compromising the king and compromising
herself in risking so perilous an enterprise without having
previously communicated it to the Council of his Majesty.
The king, who saw the justice of these reflections, re-
solved, though the letters-patent for the lit de justice had
already been sent to President de Maupeou, to have his
Council examine the declarations and the edicts on the
following day. The Council, consulted at such a late
moment, merely observed that the affair was already under
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 257
way, that had they been consulted earlier they might have
had important reflections to make, but as it was, they could
only hope for the success of the lit de justice. Thus the
ministers flung back upon the Keeper of the Seals the
iniquity of a work of which they would have appropriated
all the merit in case of success. M. d'Argenson was the
secret instigator of this unworthy act on the part of the
Council. I should remark here that the Keeper of the Seals,
out of hatred and jealousy of President Maupeou, had never
consented to consult with him. The latter, indignant at
this contempt, followed an artful conduct in the course of
this affair, of which, however, he was the dupe some years
later, as we shall presently see.
The king started, December 13, 1756, to hold his lit de
Justice in Paris. The capital received him in gloomy silence,
and parliament with a half-formed intention of quitting its
functions. The declaration concerning the affairs of religion
was merely an interpretation of the law as to silence, and
the king spoke of the characteristics and effects of the
bull Unigenitus in a manner that was too theological, and
not sufficiently correct. This declaration, so far, was not
likely to meet with any difficulty in parliament ; but the
ruling that changed the internal discipline of that body
was certain to excite the very deepest opposition.
The whole was registered by authority. The lit de justice
over, nearly all the magistrates who composed the parlia-
ment gave in their resignation to the chief-president, who
made no great resistance to arrest a step so injurious to the
king, and so prejudicial to the public ; a small number of
the presidents and counsellors of the grand-chamber promised
to fulfil their functions ; but how could so small a number
do the work of the whole body ?
The king went off to the chateau de la Muette, and all
VOL. I. — 17
258 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vn.
the ministers dispersed to their country-houses. The start-
ling character of the course taken by parliament enlightened
the Keeper of the Seals, and made him see the depth of
the abyss into which he had plunged the State and him-
self ; his courage began to abandon him, and M. d'Argenson
then saw the ruin of his rival secured. The trouble became
extreme in Paris; when parliament ceases its functions
some twenty thousand persons are brought to the verge of
famine; the race of attorneys and scribes is intermediate
between the bourgeoisie and the people, and its agitation
soon stirred the whole of Paris.
Mme. de Pompadour, three days after the holding of the
lit de justice, sent me an express asking me, from the king,
for my opinion as to the conduct that should be adopted
under the circumstances. I answered that it was necessary
to do to-day what they would be compelled to do six months
hence, and then with much greater annoyance and difficulty;
that the king ought to send for the chief-president, order
him to re-assemble parliament in the grand-chamber, and
declare to the assembly that his Majesty willed him to tear
up in their presence all the resignations, and leave no
vestige of so precipitate an action, one so contrary to the
oath which each member of parliament had taken, and so
opposed to the spirit of the magistracy, and to the respect
that was due to the king ; that his Majesty was very willing
to regard this act as one of mistaken zeal ; that he ordered
his parliament to resume its usual functions, and, as he
desired to be enlightened, he would receive the representa-
tions of his parliament on the laws he had just given.
That course would have saved all ; a few changes would
have been made in the edicts and declarations, and all
things would have returned to their accustomed order.
The king and his Council at first approved of so reasonable
1732-1758] CABDINAL DE BERNIS. 259
an action, but a ministerial intrigue prevented its adoption.
The confusion and license then became extreme, and on the
fifth of January, 1757, the attempt to assassinate the king
took place (I shall speak of that horrible event later).
The assassination of the king determined a great number
of the counsellors and presidents of parliament to write
a pathetic letter to the chancellor, begging him to say to
his Majesty that, solely occupied by their grief, moved only
by the desire to please him, and give him marks of their
zeal, they were ready to resume their functions : this first
decent and very proper letter I have seen and read. But an
ambitious magistrate, acting in collusion with an intriguing
minister, caused this first letter to be changed, and replaced
by a second, which was much less becoming than the first.
The king's Council discussed what answer should be made
to the letter. I insisted strongly that the chancellor should
answer favourably on the king's behalf, without quibbling
over equivocal expressions; the serious interests involved
being of more importance than the form. My opinion was
opposed by the plurality ; it even gave me, with some of the
Court, an air of being too favourable to parliament. In a
word, it was decided, against all policy and prudence, that
the chancellor should reply with a haughtiness and stiffness
that chilled the zeal of the magistrates, and gave rise to an
anarchy which reigned in public matters from that time
until September, 1757.
How could intrigue prevail to such a point against sense
and reason ? We were in the midst of a maritime war ; we
were about to throw ourselves into a continental war; we
had no money ; we dared not leave the people to suffer, the
city of Paris in agitation, all the parliaments of France
in a ferment; and yet, here we were depriving ourselves
of the indispensable help of financial edicts at a time when
260 MEMOIRS AKD LETTERS OF [CHAP. vil.
the king was taking upon himself the most costly engage-
ments ! The ministers went farther still ; they proposed to
the king (in spite of the resistance I made to so unjust and
useless an action) to select from among the magistrates who
had given their resignations sixteen of those most distin-
guished for their talents, and these were exiled and punished
personally for what was the fault of all; and, moreover,
they roused his Majesty to declare publicly that these sixteen
magistrates would never be allowed to resume the functions
of their office. What blunders ! what imprudence ! Each
minister thought himself authorized to negotiate with parlia-
ment ; M. Berryer, of the council of despatches, and the
chief-president, agreeing in public, but secretly rivals, broke
up all the measures of the other negotiators to arrogate to
themselves the honour of the affair; both aspired to the
office of Keeper of the Seals, and both enjoyed the confi-
dence of Mme. de Pompadour.
As for me, who had never lived among men of the long
robe, I was reduced to giving my opinion in the Council;
but before long several distinguished members of parliament
addressed themselves personally to me. The first who came
to see me was a counsellor named Mercier de la Kiviere,
since intendant of Martinique ; he had good intentions and
talents, but not much influence in the Assembly. MM.
Mole", Joly de Fleury, and d'Ormesson opened themselves
to me soon after with as much zeal and more resources.
They represented to me the necessity of calling parliament
together ; they assured me that the assembly was disposed
to place great confidence in me, through the opinion of my
integrity and loyalty which I had won from the public.
The king allowed me to treat with these magistrates ; mean-
time M. de Moras, controller-general, M. de Maupeou, M.
Berryer, and several others, not counting the Prince de Conti
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 261
(who had hitherto been the man between the king and
parliament), were entangling their negotiations, or rather
intrigues, which crossed, re-crossed, and contradicted one
another, and had no other result than to lower the royal
authority.
However, my negotiation with M. Mole*, President d'Or-
messon, and the solicitor-general began to take colour. I
obtained permission from the king for the members of
parliament to assemble at the houses of their seniors, and
thence to issue a species of declaration manifesting the
desire they had to resume their functions and to give the
king proof of their zeal and obedience. This memorial was
drawn up and approved by the greater number of the
counsellors and was brought to me by President Mole* for
presentation to the king. His Majesty seemed satisfied
with it; but I made him observe that the expressions at
the end were not sufficiently respectful ; it was a question
of changing them, and this was agreed to; but the chief-
president, who did not wish that MM. Mole*, d'Ormesson,
and de Fleury should have the honour of terminating so im-
portant an affair, sent missives everywhere advising that
nothing be changed, as they were already assured of the
king's approbation. This miserable intrigue made my ne-
gotiation a failure.
I then advised the king to forbid his ministers from
treating in future with the members of parliament, in order
to cut, for a time, the root and branch of so many intrigues,
and to resume negotiations later under better auspices and
with more dignity. The anarchy in civil matters then
began again ; the lawyers refused to plead, and the grand-
chamber concerned itself with nothing but the Damiens
affair and the return of its members.
This was the situation when in July, 1757, M. Boullongne,
262 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vii.
who had succeeded M. de Moras as controller-general of
the finances, having no longer any resources with which
to meet the costs of the war and the subsidies, made the
king feel the absolute necessity of calling parliament to-
gether in order to register the financial edicts and procure
the indispensable money. What I had foreseen happened ;
they were now forced to do what I had proposed they should
do of their own free will three days after the lit de justice
in 1756. His Majesty charged me with arranging the
affair of assembling parliament with the presidents Mole"
and d'Ormesson and the king's lawyers.
I succeeded in reuniting parliament by the simplicity
of the plan I followed, by the solidity of the principles
from which I started, and by the truth and candour with
which I negotiated with the four magistrates I have already
mentioned. It must be said, to their praise, that they put
great zeal for the State and a probity worthy of their
character and their office into this affair, on which depended,
I dare to say so, the safety of the State; for England
regarded the cessation of our courts of law and our intestinal
discords as powerful auxiliaries in the war she was making
upon us, and I have the proof that she spared neither
money nor intrigues to increase the heat of our divisions.
It was to be expected that the other parliaments would
cease to administer justice if the king did not reinstate in
their offices the dismissed members and the sixteen exiled
counsellors. Everybody knew that the necessary resources
to support the war and meet indispensable expenditures
would come to an end in a very short time. It was in this
critical situation that I formed my plan. Here are the
simple principles on which I relied: —
Parliament has force only through that of the voice of the
people ; the fermentations in its assemblies are nothing if
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 263
not supported by a public fermentation. Therefore the
Court, by convincing the public of the justice and kindness of
the king, disarmed the parliaments. As soon as Paris says
that the king is right, parliament has to obey ; its resistance
is not only useless, but it becomes as irritating to the public
as it has been to the Court. Parliaments must yield as soon
as they are abandoned by the public. This truth, confirmed
by experience, determined me to fix upon a plan, in concert
with the three magistrates I have already named, analogous
to those principles.
The king had consented formally, though with regret and
from necessity, to the return of the sixteen exiled members.
Either he had to break all the treaties he had contracted
with the chief powers of Europe and withdraw his armies
from Germany, or he must obtain money to support them
and to pay the agreed subsidies. The controller-general, M.
Boullongne, whose genius was neither fruitful nor very en-
lightened, saw no resource except in the verification and
registration of financial edicts. Parliament must, therefore,
be re-established. But that assembly would have refused
the registration of the edicts so long as its sixteen members
were exiled, or at any rate until a pledge was given for their
return. The king was therefore forced to grant that hope ;
I obtained that it should depend on the good-will of the
king, and that the time of the recall of the sixteen should
not be fixed. This point was difficult to settle, because all
the magistrates distrusted the Court and feared that after
they had obeyed the king's will their colleagues would be
left to languish in exile unless a period were fixed for their
return. But I threatened to abandon the negotiation if they
did not consent to make it in keeping with the power and
independence of his Majesty.
It was agreed that the king should order his parliament
264 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vn.
to assemble on such a day in its grand-chamber ; that the
king's lawyers should then carry to it a lettre de cachet, com-
manding parliament to be at Versailles at a certain hour on
the same day, to listen to the king's orders. The sending of
the king's lawyers and the tenor of the lettre de cachet were
to remain secret ; and, above all, the chief-president was not
to be informed until he had actually taken his seat in the
chamber ; this secrecy was carefully observed, and it saved
the affair. When the members of the grand-chamber reached
Versailles the chancellor was to pronounce in the king's
name a discourse in which his Majesty would speak more as
a father than as a master ; and while this was going on at
Versailles immense quantities of the chancellor's speech
were to be distributed in Paris, even in the cafe's, theatres,
and on the public promenades, in order that Paris, before the
return of parliament, should have time to change its opinion
on the inflexibility of the Court and do justice to the kind-
ness and good intentions of the king ; so that parliament,
returning to the grand-chamber, should find the scene changed
and the disposition of the public mind totally reversed. I
knew that such a revolution is the work of a moment
when excitement has passed and lassitude begins to take its
place ; all men are susceptible of these variations, but French-
men more than others.
That is the simple machinery on which I built my edifice
of a negotiation on the success of which depended the fate
of the war and the internal tranquillity of the nation.
I did not doubt that in changing the opinion of Paris the
resistance of parliament would be brought to an end. I
even announced it to the king, who had not much faith,
neither had Mme. de Pompadour, in the success of my nego-
tiation. The draft of the discourse to be delivered by the
chancellor, M. de Lamoignon (man of integrity, frank, and
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 265
good citizen), was determined on; also the tenor of the
lettre de cachet which the king's lawyers were to deliver to
the assembly in the grand-chamber. But meantime in-
trigues were multiplying, the minds of the parliament grew
more and more bitter, until at last the fermentation became
so violent that my three negotiators lost heart on the eve of
the battle. In fact, it all seemed desperate. When the
session in the grand-chamber was called, members took
oaths not to be present, and to refuse to deliberate. I was
warned by couriers of this excitement, and I went to Paris
at once to reassure the generals of my little army. I heard
from them that no one as yet knew that parliament was to
be summoned to Versailles, and also that the coming speech
of the chancellor was still unrevealed. " You think all is
lost, gentlemen," I said to them ; " but to-morrow all will be
won." They told me afterwards that they were astonished
at my courage ; for if the affair had failed they were lost,
and I should equally have lost my credit and influence. I
was at that moment charged with the affairs of Europe, and
the events of a war of which I was thought to be the author
rolled entirely upon me.
The crisis came the next day, September 1, 1757 ; it was
most violent, both at Court and in parliament. M. Berryer
gave Mme. de Pompadour to understand that the king must
order the discourse of the chancellor to be examined before
it was delivered, that very day, to parliament. MM.
d'Argenson and de Machault had been exiled some months ;
the Council was not numerous, nor was it favourable to
the negotiation I had now brought so near to its goal, and,
against the advice of the chancellor, that of M. de Saint-
Florentin and my own, it voted by a plurality to change the
whole form of the discourse, to make it threatening instead
of paternal ; they desired to make Louis XIV. speak, not
266 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vn.
Henri IV. ; instead of soothing minds in Paris and in parlia-
ment it seemed as if they were resolved to exasperate them.
At nine o'clock in the morning these corrections were
made. Parliament was to be at Versailles at five in the
afternoon ; the whole safety of the affair lay in the modera-
tion of the speech of the chancellor. I took good care not
to let my negotiators in Paris know of this total upsetting
of all our measures ; hut I profited by certain bad news
which arrived from the grand-chamber to persuade the king
to replace the speech of the chancellor in its first integrity.
In truth, from hour to hour, the news grew worse ; the
excitement in the chamber was very great. M. de Maupeou
seemed endeavouring to pacify the clamour>but did not suc-
ceed. The king, to whom I reported all that was taking
place, repeated to me constantly, " I told you you were
too confident." At last the king's lawyers entered the grand-
chamber, and the deputation was appointed. It was then
that I decided the chancellor and M. de Saint-Florentin to
go to the king and represent to him that it was playing the
State on a toss-up, and risking all for a few pedantic phrases,
to change the tenor of the speech. I accompanied them,
and spoke with such force that the king yielded, after the
dauphin, who had been much opposed up to that moment to
the negotiation, had given his opinion, and that opinion was
very wise. Thus the speech I had concerted with the three
members of parliament was again resolved upon, and couriers
distributed about Paris three thousand copies of it as soon as
the deputation from parliament had started for Versailles.1
The deputation listened to the speech in gloomy silence ;
after it was over not a word could they be made to say. But
when parliament met again after the return of its deputation
the scene had changed ; by that time it was openly said in
i See Appendix III,
1732-1758] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 267
Paris that if parliament did not respond to the king's kind-
ness it deserved his indignation and that of the people. The
wiser heads were then enabled to get control over the excited
ones; parliament resumed its functions and ordered repre-
sentations to be made on the third declaration, concerning
the interior discipline of the assembly ; the two other dec-
larations remained untouched and were executed according
to their form and tenor.
The king replied that he would willingly receive the
memorials his parliament would address to him on the sub-
ject of his third declaration ; these memorials were never
presented, and things returned, in this respect, to just what
they were before the holding of the lit de justice. Hence it
results that the will of the king is in a great measure
executed.
His Majesty, much pleased at the success I had had in
this great affair, was not ignorant of how thwarted I had
been throughout the negotiation. The cabal tried to take
away from me all merit by instigating parliament to de-
mand the return of the sixteen exiles vehemently. To cut
short these demands I advised the king to answer the depu-
tation from parliament that the chambers ought to enjoy
tranquilly the return of his good-will, which they would
cease to deserve if they doubted it. His Majesty shut their
mouths by letting them know that the return of their col-
leagues was certain; and he made them feel at the same
time that they were wanting in the respect that was due to
him by demanding that the period of this return should be
fixed.
Parliament insisted no longer ; its usual work began once
more, the laws were administered, justice was rendered to
the people, the fermentation ceased, and England, which had
counted on the results of this agitation, began to reckon as
268 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vii.
able the minister who had conjured away the storm ; whereas
at Versailles a part of the Court, and Mme. de Pompadour
at its head, reproached me for having weakened the authority
of the king. Was it my fault that the king had been induced
to hold a lit de justice so unwisely ? that he was advised to
seize sixteen magistrates for a fault common to the whole
parliament ? that his controller-general, at the opening of a
maritime and continental war, was without resources, and
was obliged to have financial edicts registered ? It is a
maxim of good politics that small considerations shall yield
to great interests ; the king always appears to advantage in
pardoning ; and if his authority was weakened in his con-
test with parliament, it was when his Majesty, having exiled
it to Pontoise and vainly endeavoured to put in its place a
royal chamber, allowed it to return without conditions and
without giving any external sign of obedience.
M. de Maupeou, as I foresaw, having proclaimed that he
had taken no part in the negotiation, found himself out of
countenance and asked to retire ; M. Mold, a man of integrity
and good birth took his place. Mme. de Pompadour contin-
ued to M. de Maupeou an esteem of which she gave him
striking proof five years later, on the death of M. Berryer,
who ended his career of minister of the navy and Keeper of
the Seals under public and private aversion. I shall have
occasion to speak later of this minister.
As soon as M. Mold was at the head of parliament the
aspect of things changed ; nothing was done without agree-
ment ; affairs were discussed before they were taken to the
general assembly of the chambers ; the course of studies in
theology at the Sorbonne, long interrupted, was re-estab-
lished; a great number of exiles were recalled; benefices
were made the reward of prudence as well as of piety ; the
Archbishop of Paris, exiled to Conflans, was recalled to the
1732-1758] CAKBINAL DE BERNIS. 269
capital (we shall see later what were the results of my
negotiations with him) ; the waves of parliament were stilled ;
the edicts of the king were registered with obedience and
zeal ; confidence was re-established within and without the
assembly. The enemies of France applauded, in spite of
themselves, this fortunate change; but mine, on the con-
trary, persisted in declaring that I should have done better
had I exposed the person of the king a second time to fanat-
icism, broken the treaties made with all Europe, recalled our
armies from the Ehine — in short, had I risked everything
rather than bring back sixteen members of parliament who
had resigned with the rest, and whose only personal crime
was that of having more credit in their chambers than others
for eloquence or superiority of mind.
As for me I was, on the contrary, in favour of choosing
among those sixteen magistrates intendants for our colonies
and for our provinces. A counsellor of parliament who has
merit, and feels he has it, has nothing to hope from fortune ;
his fate is fixed where it is. Neither fear nor hope can act
upon him ; he is shielded by the aegis of parliament, which
is his only judge, which protects him under dismissal and
insists on his recall. But his office subjects him to a hard,
laborious, and retired life ; no salary, no distinction is
attached to his labour ; he must seek, necessarily, to gain
through reputation what he cannot hope to gain from for-
tune ; and this reputation never has more brilliancy than
when he determines his assembly to resist the Court in mat-
ters which concern religion or the welfare of the people.
Consequently, every magistrate of genius is likely to be in
the party of the opposition until it pleases the government to
open to MM. the counsellors and the presidents that door
to fortune of which his Majesty carries the key in his pocket.
It is thus that the king, by rewarding merit in his parliament,
270 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. TII.
might make those eloquent lips speak in his favour which
now open only to restrain him. Hope is the first motive
power of men, fear is the second ; when men can be assured of
great places and great fortunes by taking sides with the
Court the king will be sure of their obedience so long as
the fundamental laws of justice are not violated. Thus, if
the Court wishes to govern the sovereign courts it must open
careers to the able men who compose them ; it must, before
sending an edict or a declaration for registration by the
chambers, communicate its substance to their wisest mem-
bers ; time must be given to answer objections, to familiarize
minds with novelties, or with certain contradictions between
new laws and former ones.
It is impossible that a numerous assembly can be of one
mind on wholly new matters (often ill-digested) about which
the Court has not deigned to inform them previously ; all the
resistances of parliament have come from this want of com-
munication and concert of minds. You cannot govern en-
lightened men except by reason and by confidence; the
corruption which the Court often seeks to employ is a dread-
ful method, ruinous to morals, and does more harm to the
government which employs it than to those whose integrity
that government debases.
It was with these maxims that I directed for two years the
affairs of parliament. That assembly, I may dare to say it,
placed such confidence in me that I could have answered to
the king at all times for its good conduct, had it pleased
his Majesty to confide its direction to me for a longer
period.
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 271
VIII.
1757. — That which happened a few Days after my Entrance into the Coun-
cil of State. — The Crime of Damiens. — The Dismissal of MM. d'Argen-
son and de Machault. — The Conclusion of definite Arrangements with
the Court of Vienna.
I ENTERED the Council, January 2, 1757 ; I was present at
the Council of State, and the next day at that of the des-
patches. In the interval, I had with a minister, a man of
intelligence, now dead some years, a conversation which
struck me, from the picture of horrors he made me foresee in
the near future ; he exhorted me to bring to bear, in those
circumstances, all the firmness, courage, and probity he
believed me to possess. I confess that I then applied
these tragic reflections of the minister only to the disorder
in the finances, the evils of the war just then beginning,
and the vices of the government. He did not like Mme.
de Pompadour, and I thought that these prophecies were a
satire against her credit and influence. Perhaps he may have
had in view none but those things, and it was this considera-
tion which prevented me, after the misfortune of January 5th,
from giving an account of this singular conversation. Never-
theless, it has always remained in my head, and I now have
difficulty in repressing the suspicion that the minister had
some vague idea of the attempt which was about to be made
against the person of the king ; he may have feared it in a
general way, without knowing anything positive, — for I do
not accuse him of the guilt of keeping silence., had he pos-
sessed any real knowledge.
272 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. nn.
For a long time threatening letters had been written ; but
such letters are common in times of public excitement ; it is
not surprising that no notice was taken of them. Some time
before the catastrophe of January 5th, species of hiero-
glyphics drawn on paper were flung about ; on some of them
was a broom and a dagger. After the event, this emblem
was interpreted as having meant: "Sweep out the Court
(that is, the mistress), stab the king." Many persons re-
marked that before the assassination of Henri IV. the
same sort of letters had been written, announcing in general
some sinister event. All such remarks are easy to make
after the event; nevertheless, I think that a wise govern-
ment ought to pay more attention to the circumstances that
give rise to them; perhaps if some lively search had been
made for the writers of those anonymous letters, and the
designers of the emblematical figures scattered among the
notaries of Paris, this horrible drama might have been dis-
covered, or at least averted.
However that may be, I had slept in Paris on the night
of January 4th, and I should have reached Versailles at
the moment when the crime was committed, had my carriage
been ready when I asked for it. M. Eouilld was awaiting
me at Versailles, to give me the despatches which were to
be taken to the Council of State on the 6th. As I got out
of my carriage at his door, his porter told me abruptly that
the king had been murdered half an hour earlier. My
blood turned back into my heart ; I was silent for a moment ;
then I asked the man if the king were dead; he told me
no, but very bad. The Court was then at Trianon, and
Versailles was almost deserted. I went up to the king's
apartments, making as I went all the reflections that could
be made by a minister attacked by jealousies, charged with
important affairs, who had many enemies, and for sole
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 273
friendship that of a woman ^- and that woman likely, accord-
ing to all appearances, to be driven from Court within a
few hours. These reflections came into my mind with
singular rapidity and clearness, and as I mounted the stairs
to the king's chamber I resolved to be a faithful minister
in the strictest sense, and a courageous friend to the
marquise, without allowing my personal interests to affect
my duty or my sentiments.
I felt, as I entered the king's cabinet, a presence of mind
and a courage that were almost supernatural; all extraor-
dinary events arouse the soul, and double its forces. I
had inwardly resolved, as I crossed the courtyard and
mounted the marble staircase which leads to the king's
antechamber, that if that prince died of his wound I
would request the dauphin, then king, to permit me to
retire from the Council, and resign my place as minister;
there would still remain to me that of counsellor of State,
and the Abbey of Saint-Me*dard ; those were enough for a
younger son of Languedoc, whom circumstances, and not
ambition, had raised higher. The dauphin was Mme. de
Pompadour's enemy ; he knew me then under the prejudice
of my attachment to her ; by asking for my retirement in the
first moments of his reign I should avert the storm to which
that intimacy exposed me. Either he would permit me
to retire at once, or he would order me to remain in the
Council until the important affairs now in my hands, both
within and without the kingdom, could be handed over to
ministers more acceptable to his Majesty. In the first case,
I should be very happy, at forty-two years of age, as a
counsellor of State with an abbey of thirty thousand francs
a year ; in the second case, I should persistently entreat the
new king to grant me leave to retire ; possibly, on knowing
me better, he might retain me, or he would send me away
VOL. I. — 18
274 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OP [CHAP.VIII.
without disgrace, as an honest man who did justice to him-
self, and to whom no reproach could be made.
As soon as I had chosen this course, and I chose it
instantly, I felt myself full of strength and courage. I
resolved to serve the king and the State at so critical
a moment without looking either to the right or to the left,
and to give to the marquise every proof of my friendship,
so far as it was compatible with the duties of my ministry.
On entering the king's cabinet, I saw the extreme-unction
on the table and the priests in surplices ; such was the first
sight that struck my eyes. Those ministers who had not
the right of entrance were assembled in the cabinet; the
Mare*chal de Belleisle and M. d'Argenson were alone in his
Majesty's chamber with the royal family. After inquiring
about the moment of the catastrophe and the state of the
king, which at that time seemed very doubtful, I heard that
he had confessed to a priest of the Grand-Commun ; and
that a messenger had been despatched for his usual con-
fessor, Pere Desmarets, a Jesuit, a tranquil man, at any rate
in appearance. I found the Court more occupied with what
was to happen to Mme. de Pompadour than with the dread-
ful attack on the king. " Would she go ? would he see her
again ? " — those were the questions on which the attention
of the Court seemed principally fixed.
I went down to her ; she flung herself into my arms with
cries and sobs that would have touched the heart of her
enemies, if the heart of courtiers were ever touched. I
begged her firmly to collect all the forces of her soul, to
expect all, and to submit herself to Providence ; adding that
she must not give way to timid counsels ; that as the king's
friend, and no longer, for several years, his mistress, she
ought to await his orders before leaving the Court; that,
being the depositary of State secrets and of the king's papers,
1757] CARDINAL BE BERNIS. 275
she could not dispose of her person ; that I would inform her
hourly of the king's condition, and that I would divide my
time between what I owed to the State and friendship.
I left her after saying these words, and returned to comfort
her every hour of the night, which I passed wholly with the
king, and after that, twenty times a day while his illness
lasted.
The greatest seigneurs attached to the marquise, and the
ministers who were her friends consulted me as to the
manner in which they should behave to her at this crisis ;
alleging that the more zeal they showed her, the more they
increased the hatred of her enemies and the activity of the
cabal which was seeking to profit by the tragic event to
drive her from Court. I answered that courtiers who had
neither obligations to Mme. de Pompadour nor friendship
for her would do well to behave like the weathercock on
the chateau of Versailles ; but that her true friends should
appear still more so at a moment so terrible for her, the only
one, perhaps, in which they could show their gratitude for
the services she had done to them ; that as for myself, I
should act in that way, and I believed there was less to fear
in being an open friend than a shamefaced and hidden one.
My feeling was not adopted by every one ; they saw her
but little, and took their time in paying her attentions.
M. de Machault, especially, showed on this occasion a timid
and embarrassed behaviour which made him suspected of
compromising with the opposite side. It was even thought
at Court that he advised Mme. de Pompadour to retire ; but
that is false ; for I inquired about it from herself. He dared
not, one day when the king called him during his illness,
report immediately to Mme. de Pompadour, as he was
accustomed to do, what had passed between his Majesty
and himself ; and this was the more extraordinary as the
276 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vin.
conversation related to her. He thought himself bound to
postpone till the next day informing her of this interview
with the king, although I had made him feel that he was
leaving the king's friend and his own too long upon the rack.
He answered, with his usual cold air and laconic speech,
that it would be remarked by the Court.
It must be admitted that after the first moments of tender
grief and despair the marquise showed great courage and
apparent tranquillity during the eleven days when the king
left her without a single consoling word. His Majesty was
watched by the whole Court and by his whole family ; he
kept watch upon himself under circumstances in which
he may well have made dark reflections. But inasmuch as
he had not sent his favourite away during the first day after
his attempted assassination, the Court ought to have compre-
hended that he would not do so when his danger was passed ;
religion had great power over the king, but nature has even
more over all men. The king knew that the marquise was
only his friend, and he believed that if reparation of the
scandal required him to separate from her it need be done
at the last moment only. She was the depositary of the
secrets of his soul ; she knew ultimately all his affairs ; she
was the centre of his ministers; she was not a mistress,
to be sent away; she was a friend, whom no one could
replace. We judge kings severely, but they are men like
us ; why have less indulgence for them than for ourselves ?
Grace alone can triumph in our hearts over friendship, and
grace does not always do miracles.
It must be agreed that if the marquise were spoiled by
good fortune, if she had made herself too free with supreme
grandeur and omnipotence, she had time during those eleven
days to come back to a sense of her nothingness. But the
danger over, reflections vanished ; she seated herself once
1757] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 277
more upon the throne with as much, and perhaps more
security than before, as we shall see in the sequel.
I shall not detail here all that passed during the king's
illness and the trial of the parricide Damiens. I shall
choose a few facts more connected with my private history
than with general history ; and to begin, I shall say that
an hour after entering the king's cabinet I was struck with
the idleness in which the ministers were left, with the
liberty in which every one was allowed to look at the wretch
who had struck at the king ; the same thing had happened
in the case of Kavaillac, to whom any person was free to talk
for many hours. I expressed my surprise to the ministers
at so dangerous a neglect, and at an inaction which would
surely be regarded as criminal by the public; for it was
of the utmost importance to profit by the first moments
after the crime to discover accomplices, to arrest suspected
men and unknown persons who might endeavour to leave
the kingdom; it was not less important to reassure the
public, especially the city of Paris, so given to excitement
and to tranquillize our allies on the eve of a general war.
All the ministers agreed to the justice of these reflections,
but they all answered that the king alone and the dauphin,
to whom the king had said, " I make you my lieutenant ;
assemble the council and preside over it, if necessary," could
give the orders. I even saw that the principal ministers,
afraid of getting into some trouble themselves, were retir-
ing to their homes. I then decided to ask to speak to
Mare'chal de Belleisle and to Comte d'Argenson, who were
in the king's room. I told them of my reflections ; but I
found them not at all disposed to set the dauphin in action ;
for fear perhaps that the king, after his recovery, might be
inwardly displeased with them for allowing his son to play
so important a part. It showed little knowledge of the king,
278 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
and little feeling for the welfare of the State, to give way to
such caution at such a moment. In vain I represented to
them that the dauphin, wholly occupied with the king's state
and his own grief, could not foresee the inconveniences that
would arise from the inaction of the Council, and that if the
king died of his wound, nothing could justify the government
for having allowed the thread of this odious conspiracy to
be lost.
M. d'Argenson said that I spoke as a true minister ; " but,"
he added, " who is to take the initiative ? " " You, monsieur," I
said ; * you are in the king's room with the dauphin." The
answers of the count and the mare'chal were alike. "We
fulfil our duty," they agreed in saying, " when, under critical
circumstances, we are ready to execute orders, without fore-
stalling them." Impatience got the better of me. " Yes,
gentlemen," I said, " that is enough to save us from being
ruined, but not enough to fulfil the duties of a ministry." All
my representations were useless.
Then, seeing that precious time was being lost, I got the
Baron de Montmorency, my relation and old friend, to ask
Madame Adelaide, whose gentleman of honour he was, to
make the dauphine see how important it was for the safety
of the king, the good of the State, and the dauphin's reputa-
tion, that the latter should assemble the Council to consult
on the measures to be taken both within and without the
kingdom. The commission was well-executed. A few
moments later the dauphin came out from the king's room,
and addressing himself to me and to MM. de Moras and
de Paulmy, he asked if we thought that the Council ought to
be assembled. "Undoubtedly, monseigneur," I replied; "it
was never more important to summon them." " But," said
the dauphin, " the other ministers are not here." " Give
your orders, monseigneur, and they will be here." The dau-
1757] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 279
phin then returned to the king's room, took the orders of
his Majesty to assemble the ministers, and gave them to the
Mare*chal de Kichelieu, the gentleman of the Bedchamber on
service.
The Council assembled in the king's inner cabinet. The
dauphin explained with dignity and tenderness for his father,
and with the greatest precision, the objects on which the
Council was to deliberate. He questioned me first on my
opinion, as I was the last to enter the Council. I do not know
if I deserved the praises given to the detail I made of the
measures that ought to be taken in the kingdom and towards
foreign countries, but my plan was unanimously adopted;
perhaps because the ministers were very glad not to take
anything upon themselves in circumstances so critical.
However that may be, from that moment the dauphin con-
ceived an esteem for my character and the turn of my mind,
and also a liking of which he gave me flattering proofs un-
til his death.
Another Council was called for the morrow ; and after
that there was one daily, also committees with the chancellor,
and a very secret one with the Keeper of the Seals. I shall
not say here what passed, but I cannot refrain from speaking
of certain circumstances that occurred.
The majority of the council was of opinion that Damiens
ought to be tried by a commission of counsellors of the State
and masters of petitions. I was strongly opposed to this.
The commission was already chosen. M. d'Argenson and
the Keeper of the Seals maintained that it was the only
course to take. The grand-chamber of parliament was notified
of this ; President Mole* and the king's lawyers came out to
Versailles to ask an explanation of the chancellor M. de
Lamoignon, who told them plainly that such was his opinion.
These gentlemen met me and told me what they had heard
280 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
from the chancellor's own lips. I took upon myself to say
that either they had ill understood him, or the chancellor had
explained himself badly ; that nothing was decided, and that
the king had confidence in the fidelity of the grand-chamber
of his parliament.
I had, a few hours earlier, met the Keeper of the Seals at
Mme. de Pompadour's, and I had made him feel how such a
commission on the king's assassination would rouse the
suspicions of the people. He cited examples, which I re-
futed ; and I gave him so great a fear of consequences that
he changed his opinion and made several others change
theirs. When the Council met, I spoke strongly in favour of
carrying the trial by letters patent to the grand-chamber ;
this plan was adopted. They wished that the princes and
peers should assist, and that seemed decent and reasonable
at first sight, though the inconveniences were felt later.
I suppress a great number of curious anecdotes, because
nothing is more dangerous in regard to the assassination of
a king than to relate facts which put ideas into the minds
of villains. For this reason I opposed with all my strength
the printed publication of Damiens' trial That wretch was
well informed on the slightest circumstance of Eavaillac's
trial. The monsters who resemble the latter take lessons of
firmness and adroitness from his printed record; besides
which, the public was never satisfied about the interroga-
tions on that trial, which left an odious ambiguity over the
affair. As for me, I shall not say what I think. It is pos-
sible that a villain who believes he has personal cause to
complain of the king may conceive the idea of killing him
and braving the peril he runs and the horrible punishment
that awaits him ; he may have the audacity to execute his
project ; revenge may blind a man to that point ; but fanat-
icism alone arms regicides who have no other motive than
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 281
to do (according to their way of thinking) good service to
religion and the public.
During Damiens' trial and for some time after, those
about the king did not cease to show him threatening letters
and atrocious and seditious placards, and to warn him of
other conspiracies. They wanted to frighten him ; he had
not sent away the marquise, and they wanted to force him
into it through the dread of being stabbed again. I have
heard the king, after reading one of those dreadful letters,
speak with a coolness, firmness, and reason above all praise.
During his illness he treated me with the greatest kind-
ness, and with a confidence which binds me to him by ties
that nothing can break or weaken. The royal family
allowed me to approach his bed, being convinced that I
would give him no bad advice. I had declared to Mme. de
Pompadour that if the king spoke to me of her and asked
my advice I should endeavour to avoid giving it ; but that
if the king exacted it of my honesty I could not prevent
myself from telling him that he was bound to regard her and
treat her eternally as a friend, but that he ought to put an
end to scandal by no longer living with her in close familiar-
ity. No doubt she did not love me the more for thinking
thus, but it did not prevent her from esteeming me more.
It is remarkable that the king, who called me to him as
soon as I entered the room, and who affected to talk to me
in a low voice about his family, his affairs, his griefs, never
once mentioned Mme. de Pompadour's name. He had
often said to me, in speaking of Madame Infanta, " She has
confidence in you, and she is right, for you are indeed a very
honest man." Perhaps it was this idea of honesty which
made the king fear that if he asked me the truth as to
things that were near his heart I might have the courage
to tell it to him.
282 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
The Comtesse de Toulouse, who had friendship for me,
was charged, she told me, by the royal family (after the
king was out of danger) to induce me to advise the mar-
quise to retire, adding that this retirement would not di-
minish the king's confidence and friendship, would secure
to her at all times the protection of the dauphin, and cover
her with glory in the eyes of Europe. I answered that if I
were only the private friend of Mme. de Pompadour I would
willingly accept the commission, and I had a sufficiently
good opinion of her to feel sure that this commission would
be well received ; but as minister of the king, I could not
without knowing his intentions give advice of that nature to
a person who was dear to him, and who, moreover, was the
depositary of all the secrets of State. This answer satisfied
them ; it was, in truth, that of reason and justice.
At the end of eleven days the king wrote to Mme. de
Pompadour. Intrigues and intriguers were disconcerted;
everybody now tried to make his peace with one who, from
that moment took a much greater ascendency and a far more
important part than she had ever yet had in affairs of State.
The courageous friendship I had shown to her went
without reward. She said to me one day that I was very
shrewd, inasmuch as I had found a way to enchant the royal
family while giving to her the most unequivocal marks of
attachment. That reflection, so full of sourness, jealousy, and
distrust, filled me with indignation. I replied that it proved
that the more a man was honest, the more he was sure of
pleasing the royal family. She felt her injustice, and tried
to repair it.
Before ending my account of this sad affair, I wish, in
order to enliven it, to relate a thing which happened one
evening in the king's chamber. Three days after the at-
tempt at assassination, all the courtiers entered while his
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 283
Majesty took his bouillon; I entered too, among the crowd.
Pere Desmarets, the king's confessor, saw me as I was
struggling through the throng to approach the king's bed.
"Come this way," he said, "and I will show you a place
where, although you will be behind everybody, the king will
see you the moment his curtains are opened." It seemed to
me impossible, but he insisted, and I let him place me.
Sure enough, I was directly opposite the opening of the
king's curtain, and he called me at once ; whence I conclude
that his confessor is well versed in the laws of optics.
After this, I persuaded Mme. de Pompadour to get the
dauphin admitted to the Council of State; he was not
ignorant that he owed this to me.
For the last five or six years the marquise had employed
all her influence, all the manoeuvres of M. Berryer, lieutenant
of police, and all the adroitness of M. de Machault to induce
the king to dismiss Comte d'Argenson. That minister had
intellect, was agreeable, possessed a noble presence, and had
conducted himself better than all the other ministers during
the king's illness at Metz ; in addition, he was not wanting
in the quality of intrigue, and was not slow in using it. I
had often advised him to be reconciled with the marquise,
but always in vain ; he was profoundly sunk in the common
error of ministers who have been favourites, and who there-
fore believe they will always be loved. Whether from pride,
or from his conviction of the king's good-will, he rejected all
offers that were made to him from time to time to come to
terms with the marquise.
After the attack upon the king, seeing that she was no
longer satisfied with the Keeper of the Seals, I again urged
her to be reconciled with M. d'Argenson ; I made her com-
prehend how much she would comfort the king by no longer
importuning him against a minister whom his Majesty
284 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
thought necessary, or whose services, at any rate, were agree-
able to him ; I insisted on the good that would result to
the war, then about to begin in Germany, from a true har-
mony between herself and the secretary of State for war,
and on the great evils that might result from the lack of
it. After arguing the matter for a long time, she yielded
to my reasons, and made me her ambassador to M. d'Argen-
son, charging me to assure him of the desire she had to live
on good terms with him for love of the king, and for the
benefit of his affairs.
The whole Court now saw that as the king had not sent
away the marquise at the moment of the assault upon him,
she would certainly have more influence than ever, especially
as it was now known that the Empress Maria Theresa had
addressed her in regard to obtaining the treaty with France.
Nothing of all that seemed to strike Comte d'Argenson ; he
saw in the advances of the marquise only the last efforts of
a drowning person endeavouring to cling where she could.
I saw his error, and tried in vain to correct it by represent-
ing to him that he risked nothing, if he declared to the
king that he reconciled himself with Mme. de Pompadour
solely out of respect for his Majesty, and for the benefit of
his affairs; that this reconciliation could not prevent the
king from dismissing the marquise if he wished to do so ;
but that it certainly sheltered himself from the revenge of a
woman who was very powerful if she retained her influence ;
" for," I said, " the stronger the advances she has made to
you, the less she will forgive you if you despise them." I
did not conceal from him that it was only with much
trouble that I had brought Mme. de Pompadour to desire
this reconciliation. My words were in vain. He assured
me he was prepared for all results ; he had been made to
bear all sorts of indignities, and was well-accustomed tx?
1757J CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 285
them. " But you are a clever man," he said ; " make a civil
answer to her for me."
I did so ; and, in consequence, Mme. de Pompadour sent
for Comte d'Argenson, and spoke to him with some ardour.
He answered her with irony, in a jesting manner. He saw
that she was about to get rid of M. de Machault, his
enemy, he despised her, and he did not wish to make him-
self dependent on her. I should have comprehended this
manner of thinking as being justly proud, if he had not been
so attached to his office, and if he had been more philosophical
than ambitious; self-love is blinding. He could not con-
ceive that the marquise, after vainly endeavouring to cause
his ruin, would bring herself to have recourse to him unless
she had thought that step necessary to strengthen her totter-
ing influence. I now saw, by a few words dropped by
chance, that Mme. de Pompadour was henceforth resolved
to sacrifice everything in order to drive Comte d'Argenson
from Court ; and in taking this resolution she consulted the
interests of her vengeance more than those of the State.
M. d'Argenson had ideas and experience ; his nephew, the
Marquis de Paulmy, lacked the necessary firmness to take
his place at the opening of a war in which so many interests
were to clash. The dismissal of M. d'Argenson caused, in
a great measure, the disasters that came upon us hi the last
war. He never desired the success of the Treaty of Ver-
sailles, but, for the sake of his own reputation, he would
have conducted the war well, and checked the license and
insubordination which reigned in our armies.
It must also be said that the dismissal of M. de Machault
was done at the wrong moment. That minister was suffi-
ciently well trained in the affairs of the navy ; the officers
respected him and even loved him. Certainly M. de Moras,
whom I believe to be an honest man, was not in a condition
286 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
to take his place ; for M. de Machault had the presence, self-
possession, and dignity of a minister; too little openness,
perhaps, too much despotism and curtness, too pedantic an
air, not enough knowledge of Europe, and too much confi-
dence in his clerks ; but these defects were balanced by intel-
ligence, insight, adroitness, and a suitable deportment.
It is said that the marquise sacrificed him to the king to
make sure of the dismissal of M. d'Argenson. I think this
opinion false. The king dismissed M. d'Argenson because
he was persuaded to think him a knave who, by his intrigues,
was stirring up discord in Paris and at Court. His relations
with the Comtesse d'Estrades did him much harm. He was
also accused of not having paid enough attention to the
department of Paris which was confided to him, and of hav-
ing spared the authors of seditious placards. In a word, they
persuaded the king that he was guilty of having tolerated
disorders for the purpose of intimidating his Majesty and
making him believe that as long as he kept the marquise
daggers would be ready for him.
As for M. de Machault, the marquise was convinced that
he had failed her during the king's illness ; also that at the
moment when parliament quitted its functions and sent in
its resignations his head gave way ; she did not blame his
heart, but she believed that fear had confused and obscured
his brain. Madame Infanta told me that the king, in writ-
ing to her, said that it was with much pain he dismissed the
minister in whom he had most confidence, but that circum-
stances required it. Possibly the king was induced to believe
that as long as the Keeper of the Seals was in office, parlia-
ment would never be tranquil.
However that may be, the marquise confided to me only in
part the dismissal of the two ministers. I own I did not
believe she could succeed in sending away M. d'Argenson at
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 287
the opening of the war. As for M. de Machault, it was plain
that she could no longer endure him ; she avoided being
alone with him, and often detained those who, out of discre-
tion, were about to leave them tete a t§te. Here are the
letters of the king dismissing the two ministers: —
February 1, 1757.
MONSIEUR DE MACHAULT : Though I am convinced of your
probity and of the uprightness of your intentions, present cir-
cumstances oblige me to ask you for my Seals and for the
resignation of your office as secretary of State for the navy.
Be always sure of my protection and friendship. If you
have any favours to ask for your children you can do so at
all times. It is best that you should stay some time at
Arnouville. Louis.
I continue your pension of 20,000 francs as minister of the
navy, and your honours as Keeper of the Seals.
February 1, 1757.
MONSIEUR D'ARGENSON : Your services no longer being nec-
essary to me, I order you to send in your resignation as secre-
tary of State for war, also of your other offices, and retire to
your estate of Les Ormes. Louis.
M. d'Argenson and M. de Machault were exiled on a Tues-
day at the same hour, neither of them expecting the catas-
trophe. The king had treated them both equally well in
public and in private ; each inwardly believed, seeing that a
storm was about to burst, that his enemy was the one who
alone would be crushed. I remember that two days before his
exile, M. d'Argenson said to me: "You are playing the
mysterious, but you know very well that Machault is pack-
ing up ; the marquise does not choose to see him ; his dismissal
288 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
is the affair of a week at most." And thereupon he made
jests which I thought misplaced ; I even told him that I
thought ministers ought never to jest on the disgrace of their
colleagues, for they were often very near to it themselves ; I
did not think I spoke so truly.
The evening before the exile of these ministers I found
the king with Mme. de Pompadour in such ill-humour, and
she so sad, that I thought his Majesty must have received
another threatening letter, or else that the two had quar-
relled. After the king's departure she told me that the king
had said nothing of what was troubling him. He had just
given M. Kouille and M. de Saint-Florentin the letters in
which he dismissed the two ministers. The king always
resolved with great difficulty on doing harm to any one, and
above all, in dismissing an old servant. He did not inform
the marquise of the orders he had given until an hour after
midnight, so that she could not warn me of them ; therefore
the next morning when all the foreign ministers came to talk
to me about the exile of MM. d'Argenson and de Machault,
who had been seen, they said, starting for their estates, I
maintained to them that it was not true, with all the more
confidence because I had seen the king and the marquise so
late the night before, and because I was too much in favour
at that time not to have been informed of so important a
resolution.
M. de Paulmy [son of the Marquis d'Argenson, who
had died a week earlier] succeeded his uncle in the war
department, in which he had been assistant-secretary of State
for some years, and M. de Moras united the office of minister
of the navy with that of controller-general of finances.
They took those places two days later at a Council of State.
M. de Moras complaining one day to the Sieur Fayet, his
confidential surgeon (a bold and sometimes amusing Gascon),
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 289
that the burden was too heavy for him, Fayet replied: "So
much the better, monseigneur; the more the ass is laden,
the better he goes."
The misfortunes of France began at this period. The
king's Council was no longer respected. The war and the
navy soon felt that the hands that held the reins were too
weak; license and confusion took possession of the two
departments. Mme. de Pompadour, with her childlike con-
fidence, believed that with her help all would go well ; I did
not think so, nor our allies either. They regarded as a
capital fault the dismissal of the two ministers under present
circumstances.
M. d'Argenson, on hearing of his disgrace, bore it for a
time with sufficient firmness ; but at the end of five years
ennui laid hold of him, grief took possession of his soul,
and he had a fall which completed the ruin of his physical
machinery. On the death of his wife, April, 1764, he
obtained permission to come to Paris and attend to his
affairs. I had then returned, about six months earlier, from
my own exile. I found M. d'Argenson in the grasp of
death, still struggling with ambition. No sermon ever made
such an impression on me as the sight of that dying minister.
He said to me repeatedly, " Your fortune does not astonish me,
but your return does." It is true that my return was very
different from his; the king and the public had welcomed
me; I had just been appointed to the archbishopric of Alby ;
and his Majesty had crowned that favour with all that could
make it most agreeable. M. d'Argenson, on the contrary,
was still exiled ; he did not even hear before he died that
the king had permitted him to live in Paris ; his head was
full of intrigues and projects while the chill of death was
on his body. He died, August, 1764, with the desire to
live and to reign.
VOL. I.— 19
290 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
M. de Machault, on the contrary, who was believed to be
much more crushed by his dismissal, has given himself up
to solitude. He sees few persons, but is well in health and
growing fat, which is the sign of a sound head in dismissed
ministers. I do not know if he has renounced all ideas of
influence and power; he is still young enough to hope for
them, but circumstances and the present condition of minds
are not favourable to him.
Never was any negotiation so keen conducted so slowly
as that of the definitive arrangements between the Court
of Versailles and that of Vienna ; eight whole months had
been employed in constructing the Treaty of Versailles, and
one year went by before the king and empress had agreed
as to the object and the after results of the war. Each
article was severely examined, and cost me long memorials
for the discussion of matters in the Council. At last, when
Comte de Staremberg and I had agreed, the totality of the
work, long discussed piecemeal in the committees, was
taken before the Council of State and approved unanimously
by the king and his ministers. This great work, joined to
troubles of mind and heart caused by the attack on the king
and the jealousy of the minister, occasioned me a nervous
illness the symptoms of which were much like those of a
violent poison. It was in that state that I was obliged to
work day and night, often without sleeping fifteen minutes
consecutively. I can say that I pushed my zeal for the
king's affairs almost beyond the possible, and that if I had
not had the strongest constitution I could not have borne
the life six months. It is true that for the next five years
I felt with great violence the effects of the inward agitation
and excessive labour to which I had been condemned for
two years. It was in the month of March, 1757, that my
health suddenly broke down as if from a thunderbolt ; but it
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 291
was not until the following May, one year after the signing
of the Treaty of Versailles, that our last agreements with
the empress were signed by M. Kouille*, myself, and the
Comte de Staremberg.
Our armies had crossed the Ehine before we had come to
a settled agreement, so anxious was the king to support his
allies and give proofs of his good faith to the Court of
Vienna. I have already stated that, before the campaign
began, the negotiation for neutrality was broken off. It is
known that the King of Prussia, after a battle won by a
miracle, shut up nearly the whole of the empress' forces
behind the walls of Prague. That army, commanded by
Prince Charles of Lorraine, was not lacking in food but in
powder, to the point of having only forty rounds left for each
soldier. Marshal Daun, with a rather weak army, took up
a good position, where the luck and the skill of the King
of Prussia were both broken, after having the advantage
all day over the Austrians.1 Mar^chal Daun had given
orders for his army to retire, but when that order was taken
to General O'Donnell, he said he had been retreating for
twenty years and was tired of it, and would do nothing of
the kind that day. He accordingly ordered a charge of
cavalry, which threw into disorder the Prussian cavalry and
knocked over the infantry which had gained the plateau on
which Mare"chal Daun had drawn up his army in line of
battle. The King of Prussia chose his course like a great
man, and Mardchal Keith, as a good general, raised the siege
of Prague. The city was only slightly injured by Prince
Charles ; and the Court of Vienna which, five weeks earlier
had been nigh to ruin, now resumed until the end of the
campaign an air of superiority over the Prussian king.
1 Battle of Kolin, June 19, 1757 . See the Prince de Ligne's account of it,
Vol. V. of this Historical Series.
292 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vtit.
As for us, as soon as we had crossed the Khine we could
go no farther, for want of waggons and munitions of war.
Mare'chal d'Estre*es, against all my representations had quar-
relled with Paris-Duverney, and he lacked the things he
could have had in abundance if he had been willing to
act in concert with that man of genius. Moreover, the King
of Prussia by the evacuation of Wesel had disconcerted the
first arrangement of our plan of campaign ; we expected to
lay siege to that place, which would have lasted at least six
weeks, during which time means could have been prepared
to march forward. The controller-general, who had begun
the war without securing the necessary funds to carry it on
and pay our subsidies, found himself embarrassed at the out-
set. The war in America was ruinous ; every vessel brought
letters of exchange, to pay which drained the royal treasury.
We admired in France the skill of the King of Prussia in
withdrawing his troops from Wesel to increase his own army,
and in taking his artillery to Holland. It was said that in
that way he secured the fidelity of the King of England,
Elector of Hanover, by leaving that State open to an army of
one hundred thousand Frenchmen and twenty thousand
Germans in our pay; also that the garrison he had in
Wesel would certainly have been made prisoners of war;
and there were other reflections equally specious and frivo-
lous. For my part, I have always considered the evacu-
ation of Wesel as a great blunder on the part of the King of
Prussia, who does not make many, but, on his own showing,
does make some. The siege of Wesel left him at liberty to
fight the army of the empress without the possibility of a
diversion in her favour by us ; in the second place, if the
King of Prussia wanted his national troops in his own army,
he could have put into Wesel six thousand Hessians and as
many Hanoverians and Brunswick men, and still have left
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 293
thirty thousand with the Duke of Cumberland to harass us
in our siege ; in the third place, the King of Prussia could
not have divined that the spring of 1757 would not be rainy
and that the Khine would not overflow ; he ought to have
calculated on all the accidents of season and rivers, and have
counted on our army contracting diseases during the siege
which would reduce it by a third during the campaign ; in
the fourth place, the occupation of Wesel by our troops could
alone prevent Holland from taking sides with our enemies.
Was it wise in the King of Prussia to put, by the evacuation
of that place, that power into the position of forced neutral-
ity ? Moreover, why give us a depot and a base of supplies
like Wesel ? We have seen since how important that place
has been for us and for the safety of our Ehenish allies. It
may be said that Wesel could not be defended for more
than six weeks, or two months at the most. I agree to that ;
but the whole campaign would have been taken up in re-
ducing the fortress and in making preparations to enter the
Electorate of Hanover, and the King of Prussia needed dur-
ing that first campaign to make us lose a great deal of time.
Before the exile of M. d'Argenson, a memorial had been
composed containing a full plan of the war; all blunders
were noted ; all failures of precaution, such as had often made
French enterprises fail outside of our own frontier, were
pointed out ; in this memorial the best principles were laid
down and the wisest precautions were scrupulously detailed.
The king gave to this memorial his approbation and his
authority. It may be said that during the first two campaigns
pains were taken to reverse all the principles of conduct de-
veloped in that memorial. They avoided none of the blun-
ders there foreseen; they employed none of the resources
indicated to repair them. It really seemed in this continental
war that we were corrupted by the money of the King of
294 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. vm.
Prussia to ruin our own affairs and promote his, and that
the English ministers were governing our navy to destroy it.
Nevertheless, the whole nation, which had applauded the
Treaty of Versailles, because it had foolishly thought that
treaty would give us peace, now uttered loud cries against
the war that we were carrying into Germany. The ministry
were accused of madness, of crushing France for the sake of
a Court which had been our enemy for three hundred years.
No one considered what the state of Italy would be on the
death of King Ferdinand of Spain (who did in fact die at
the close of 1758) ; they had forgotten that the Peace of
Aix-la-Chapelle had left defenceless the Infant Don Philip,
whose States of Parma would be divided between the Court
of Vienna and the King of Sardinia ; no one chose to re-
member that the King of Naples had refused to accede to
the Treaty of Vienna, and that, without the alliance of
France and the empress, he could not have disposed tranquilly
and freely, as he did, of the kingdom of the Two Sicilies in
favour of a younger son, against the customs and laws of
that country. All these things were seen to take place
without the public of France deigning to perceive that every
one of these points had been agreed upon in advance by the
Treaty of Versailles.
Men have concealed from themselves the danger that
France would have run, lacking money, generals, and above
all a Council, if the empress, following her former errors, had
made herself the ally of England and of the Empress of
Kussia ; we should have had the King of Prussia on our side
just so long as it suited his interests ; the Queen of Hungary
would have ceded to him some district or some fortress,
and he would have left us a prey to all Europe declared
against us.
We should then have seen whether, as they never ceased
1757] CARDINAL DE BEBNIS. 295
to say, and still continue to say to this day, it would have
been more advantageous for us to lose battles in Flanders
and Italy than in Hanover. I know that less money would
have gone out of our treasury if the war could have been
fought on our frontiers ; but we should have lost provinces ;
beaten by the Hanoverians should we have been less beaten
by the imperial troops ? I know that an army has resources
in its own land and among its own fortresses ; but I also
know that it is far better that the devastations of war should
be beyond the frontiers rather than within them. With
economy, with commerce and good administration one can
always bring back in a short time money spent in foreign
parts; but one cannot rebuild burned villages nor replant
great forests in a day. It is madness to wish to have war in
one's own country when we can, with wise precautions, carry
it usefully into that of our enemies or neighbours. It was
through lack of prudence, foresight, and economy that we
were unable to subsist in foreign lands. If we had secured
our rears in marching, provisioned the rivers behind us, for-
tified our posts, abandoned at the end of each campaign the
territory we could not hold with military force during the
winter, our misfortunes would not have happened, or at least
they could have been prevented ; it really seems as if we had
courted them from sheer heedlessness.
296 MEMOIES AND LETTERS OF [cBiP. ix.
IX.
1767. — The Comte de Stainville and the Embassy at Vienna. — My Ap-
pointment to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. — Intrigues to remove
Marshal d'Estre'es from the command of the army.— Negotiations of
the Duke of Cumberland with Mare'chal de Richelieu; of the King
of Prussia with the same, and the Margravine of Bayreuth with me.
M. KouiLLri, always vehemently opposed from jealousy
to the king's new system, did everything possible to send as
ambassador to Vienna the Comte de Broglie, who, although
he had much intelligence, did not perceive that M. Kouilld
had only the name and title of minister, and that the ap-
pointment to Vienna belonged rather to Mme. de Pom-
padour (with whom M. de Broglie was not on good terms)
than to any one else ; also I was likely to influence it, and
I knew that he was not in favour of the alliance, and that
to please the dauphine, he was flattering her with a chimer-
ical project of making the kingdom of Poland hereditary in
the House of Saxony. Mme. de Pompadour was thinking
only of giving this important embassy to the Comte
de Stainville.
I have mentioned heretofore the obligations that she
thought she was under to him, and the violent passion
which she believed he felt for her, — a powerful agent on the
mind of a woman who pushed the admiration of her own
face to the verge of absurdity. It was very important for
Madame Infanta to have a friend in the ambassador whom
the king would appoint to the Court of Vienna. The Comte
de Stainville (since Due de Choiseul), who has never wanted
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 297
for cleverness and ability, passed through Parma on return-
ing from Kome, and did so well with Madame Infanta that
she asked the king to give him the embassy to Vienna ; she
also asked it, with even more eagerness, of the marquise
and of me. I should therefore have opposed the appoint-
ment in vain; Madame de Pompadour was bent upon it;
Madame Infanta still more so; I should have displeased
both by opposing it, and have done so without success.
Moreover, it would have forced me to declare myself against
M. de Stainville without apparent reasons ; the jealousy he
had slightly shown me when I was appointed to the embassy
in Spam, and the little approbation he had secretly given
to the Treaty of Versailles were certainly not sufficient
reasons to exclude the friend of the marquise and the de-
clared servitor of Madame Infanta. Besides, by putting
aside the Comte de Stainville the appointment of M. de
Broglie, who was urged by the dauphine and was openly
opposed to the alliance with Vienna, would certainly take
place ; the Comte de Broglie in sustaining M. Kouill£ in the
ministry was coveting his office; the embassy to Vienna
was the best ladder to it.
I took the course of letting the appointment be made as
the marquise wished, and of being useful to the Comte de
Stainville so long as he continued to serve the king well.
His enemies hastened to let me know the danger I ran in
associating with public affairs a man of his birth, enter-
prising, bold, ambitious, and adroit. Eesolved as I was to
quit the Court and offices when the king wished, and when-
ever I saw I could no longer play a useful and proper part, I
was not alarmed by the danger they pointed out to me and
on which I had already reflected. The Comte de Stainville
arrived in Paris and soon carried the day over his rival
the Comte de Broglie.
29$ MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
I knew, a few days after his arrival, that the Mare*chal de
Luxembourg, having related to him the confidence that the
marquise had in me and the preference she gave me over
not only the ministers but her own friends, the Comte de
Stainville answered : " Oh ! as for him, he does not trouble
me; I can ruin him with her whenever I choose." All
these germs of ill-will were wrapped in a conduct so frank
with me, so decisive for the political system of the king, that
I had no difficulty in forgiving the secret sentiments I had
reason to suspect in him. I attributed them to the jealousy
I excited almost universally; and as my ambition turned
to the side of acquiring reputation rather than fortune or
place, and as, moreover the Comte de Stainville was all the
more suited to fill the embassy to Vienna because he had in
his character a very necessary decision which would soon
put an end to the formalities and delays of M. de Kaunitz,
I paid less attention to my own interests than to those
of 'the king.
M. de Stainville soon saw, by the confidence with which
the king honoured me and by that which the marquise gave
me, that the safest way for him, and also the most useful,
was not to thwart my good fortune, but to give himself the
merit in my mind of contributing to it. He understood my
character ; he knew with what good faith I would do justice
to his talents and make known his services to the Council
He made his plan to advance his fortunes by raising mine
and in working to secure it ; if circumstances changed he
thought himself in a position to destroy it by the same means
with which he had raised it. It will be seen how faithful
he was to this system, and how much good faith and honour
I put into my conduct towards him.
When I entered the council I had made Mme. de Pom-
padour promise that never should there be any question
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 299
of giving me a department. I feared the dangers ; I knew
that I should be responsible to the public for events as soon
as I had the acknowledged direction of affairs; that the
king could not check the jealousies nor the intrigues of the
other secretaries of State. I knew, moreover, that I risked
quarrels with the marquise as soon as I was charged with
the ministry of Foreign Affairs ; that she would want to
appoint all ambassadors ; that she would write from her
own cabinet directly to them; and that if my opinions on
public affairs became different from hers I was not a man
to sacrifice to her wishes either the good of the State or
my own reputation. I could avoid these dangers only by
keeping the place I now occupied in the Council without a
department ; all I needed was that they should put in
M. EouilM's place a minister more capable and less jealous.
Besides which, my health since the month of March, 1757,
was much shaken; I was not without uneasiness about
poison, for I saw, both without and within, many powerful
reasons for fearing it. It will be seen how it became im-
possible for me to escape the department of Foreign Affairs,
and to whom I owed that fatal obligation.
I was charged with drawing up the instructions for
M. de Stain ville ; I read them to the Council, and the dau-
phin, to whom the king, ever since his entrance to the
Council, had ordered me to explain all that had passed between
our Court and that of Vienna, seemed much struck with
the clearness and propriety of those instructions.
I shall have occasion hereafter to relate by itself all
that concerns the dauphin during the period of my min-
istry. I shall only remark here that I never went to the
prince unless sent by the king, and that his Majesty always
asked me how long a time my conversation with his son
had lasted. The special kindness with which the royal
300 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
family honoured me contributed not a little to increase
the jealousy of the courtiers, and to cause uneasiness to
the marquise ; I shall speak of this more fully in the sequel
The Comte de Stainville had too much intelligence not
to feel the impropriety of his being under the orders of a
minister of ill-intentions towards the success of the affairs
with which he was charged ; he did not wish to run the risk
of compromising himself under the instructions of M. EcuiUe* ;
on the one hand, he believed he did an agreeable thing to
the marquise in forcing M. Eouille' to retire, a useful thing
to the king's new system by putting me at the head of af-
fairs, and a useful thing for himself, by having the air of
doing me a service, — I say having the air, because if I
had desired that place it would have offered itself to me.
The means which he took to carry out his object were
singular, and picture very correctly the character of his mind.
He requested Mme. de Pompadour to entreat the king to
allow him to resign the embassy to Vienna, and grant him
for all favour the right to be employed in the army hi his
rank, which was that of a brigadier. At first Mme. de Pom-
padour thought this a joke, and later, that M. de Stainville
had gone mad ; but when she found that he was serious she
was amazed ; he was actually renouncing fifty thousand
crowns in salaries, a position of the highest honour, and clos-
ing the door to a brilliant and almost certain fortune.
He had no difficulty in making it felt that in renouncing
these advantages he meant to show how dangerous it would
be for him to serve the king at Vienna, in circumstances so
critical and delicate, under an ill-intentioned and absolutely
incapable minister ; he made it understood that his reputa-
tion was dearer to him than all else, and he had no difficulty
hi convincing the marquise of the truth of what he said.
" But," she objected, " M, EouilM is dying ; he sleeps at the
1757] CARDINAL DE BEBN1S. 301
Council and in his own cabinet ; we have only to wait for an
apoplexy ; that will deliver us ; the king does not want to
be the homicide of an incapable but honest man by dis-
placing him. If he would only displace himself the king
would rejoice ; but Mme. Kouille', who loves the Court, like
a bourgeoise who was never made to be in it, will not
allow him to do so — " " Would it please you," interrupted
M. de Stainville, eagerly, " if I should bring you, within an
hour, M. Eouille"s resignation ? Will you have it ? "
The marquise, while regarding the scheme as folly, con-
sented, declaring that she would gladly induce the king to
keep M. EcuiUe* in the Council, and in his office of super-
intendent of posts, by means of which Mme. Eouille* could
still keep her little place at Court.
One sees by this on what ridiculous considerations the
fate of great affairs does sometimes depend. For two years
it had been necessary to displace M. Eouille', and yet, from
fear of vexing his wife, they preferred to compromise the
interests of the greatest powers in Europe !
The Comte de Stainville kept his word. He went to see
Mme. EoniHe*, and made her feel that her present Court
existence depended on the preservation of her husband's
health, and that that precious health depended on his release
from the burden of his ministry. She resisted for some
time; but finally she went down to see her husband with
M. de Stainville, and decided him to send in his resignation ;
which news the comte brought back in triumph to the
marquise, who received it with as much surprise as joy. It
must be owned that nothing could be more unscrupulous
than this action of the Comte de Stainville, nor more
adroit.
I was summoned to Versailles (the derangement of my
health having detained me for several days in Paris), and
302 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
the king forced me by his kindness to violate the oath I
had made to myself, never to take upon my shoulders the
burden of a department. If this was a great mistake on my
part, I can at least say it was not voluntary. Could I resist
the king's wish that I should accept a post, the principal
functions of which I had fulfilled for two years ? My
health would have been a sufficient reason for refusing it, if
I were not as much over-burdened with work in not accept-
ing it. The idea of the greater good to be done determined
me ; and I may say with truth that it was not the first time
in my life that idea has won the day over my repugnances.
The very day that I took my oath of office before the
king, June 29, 1757, I carried to him the news of the
complete victory won by Mare*chal Daun over the King
of Prussia at Kolin, and the deliverance of Prague. After
that period until the battle of Eosbach, November 5, 1757,
I never entered the king's apartments without taking to
him good news ; so that when people saw me coming they
used to cry out : " Tiens I here he comes ; he looks like a
battle won."
Mare*chal d'Estre*es, in command of our armies, had com-
mitted the great mistake of not being willing to take con-
certed action with P§,ris-Duverney, who was the head of
the commissary department, and had always been the right
hand of generals and ministers of war, — a man who, with
some defects, united a great soul to many ideas and much
experience. The mare*chal committed another as great in
showing jealousy of the Prince de Soubise, who commanded
the reserve, which was habitually called the " Soubise army."
The Prince de Soubise was beloved by the king and the
marquise. The plan of the latter, who believed that all her
friends had great talents, was that he should carry off some
signal advantage which would put her in a position to ask
1757] CARDINAL DE BEKNIS. 303
for him with decency the command of our armies, and a
place in the Council as military member of it. The marquise
thought that she herself would find support in a man of the
honour and worth of M. de Soubise, a minister as well as a
general, able and docile, who would follow her views and
carry out her ideas.
Mare'chal d'Estre'es felt the role they wanted this great
seigneur to play, and, as he was neither enduring nor dis-
simulating, M. de Soubise often had to suffer from his
temper. The latter made frequent complaints to the mar-
quise, who did not conceal her displeasure at the conduct
of the mare'chal towards her favourite. This rendered it
easy to make her listen to and welcome the complaints of
the Court of Vienna on the slowness with which Mare'chal
d'Estre'es was proceeding on the Lower Rhine. It is certain
that he lacked many things before starting ; but it was not
understood why, with so large a force under his command,
he did not advance with more vigour on the Duke of Cum-
berland, who commanded an army much inferior to his
own.
Mare'chal de Eichelieu, who had uttered loud cries when
the Comte d'Estre'es was appointed to the command of the
armies, conceived, although he had quarrelled with the
marquise, the bold idea of supplanting him. The Comte de
Maillebois, quartermaster-general of the army in Germany,
entered into his views, as did M. de Cre*milles, lieutenant-
general, a weak, ambitious, and timid m^n, who wanted the
first places, but feared his own power to maintain them.
The mare*chal had always had the confidence of M. d'Argen-
son, and now had that of M. de Paulmy (his uncle's suc-
cessor), and still more that of Paris-Duverney, who, since
the deaths of Mare'chal de Saxe and Mare'chal de Lowendahl,
and the capture of Minorca, had taken it into his head that
304 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. i±.
the Marshal de Eichelieu was as great a warrior as he was
a courtier and man of intrigue. M. Duverney, sensitive to
the affronts put upon him by Mare'chal d'Estre*es, profited by
the complaints of the Court of Vienna, and the vexation
of the marquise at the proceedings of the general towards
M. de Soubise. He wrote a memorial, which was strongly
approved by MM. de Eichelieu, de Maillebois, de Cre'milles,
and de Paulmy. Forty thousand more men were sent to
Germany under Marechal de Eichelieu, who went there
with orders to command the army, and to command Mare'-
chal d'Estre*es, if he were willing to put himself under his
orders. By this new plan, the Prince de Soubise was given
a corps of twenty-five or thirty thousand men, who were
to act immediately in Saxony, keep the King of Prussia
delayed there without risking a battle, and so give time
to the Austrians to seize Silesia, where, in spite of our
desires, they wished to establish the theatre of war, instead
of placing it on the Elbe, where the mass of our forces could
have supported them and rendered possible the siege of
Magdeburg, while the Swedes and Eussians would lay siege
to Stettin-on-the Oder.
I shall say here, in passing, that the Eussians could never
be induced to quit the frontiers of Poland, nor the Austrians
the frontiers of Silesia. The taking of Magdeburg and
Stettin would have taken from the King of Prussia the Elbe
and the Oder, the resources of his hereditary States. Silesia
would have fallen of herself on the day this double object
was obtained; but Providence did not permit the carrying
out of these sound views. It must also be admitted that
our own blunders aided the obstinacy of our allies in making
us all miss the principal aim and purpose of the war.
To return to the new plan of campaign devised by M.
Duverney. It must be allowed that if the Prince de Soubise
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 305
had been the Marechal de Saxe, and if, instead of giving him
an army composed of troops from the Cercles, they had given
him forty thousand men drawn from the grand-army (which
would still have been strong enough with sixty thousand to
defeat the Due of Cumberland and take possession of the
Electorate of Hanover), — we must, I say, allow that if the
troops of the Empire had been kept to guard our communi-
cations, and if our army in Westphalia had been well in con-
cert with the army sent to Saxony, the plan would have been
as fruitful in results as it was judicious. It would not have
resulted, as PSris-Duverney said prophetically, in bringing
the war to an end in one campaign, but it gave reason to
expect (especially after the taking of Chemnitz and the vic-
tory at Breslau by the Austrians, November, 1757) that the
King of Prussia would have lacked resources to continue the
war, and that Magdeburg and Stettin would have fallen into
our hands and those of our allies in the second campaign,
which would have ended the war gloriously and infallibly.
But it was madness to strip the kingdom of our troops, to
expose our coasts to invasion from England and the country
to uprisings of the religionaries ; it was even greater folly to
send the Prince de Soubise, known only as an honest man
full of generosity and nobleness, to measure himself, in his
apprenticeship, against the King of Prussia, and to imagine
that Marshal de Eichelieu would be willing to aid in mak-
ing the military reputation of M. de Soubise, with the cer-
tainty that if it were made by the winning of a battle the
prince would supersede him in the command of the armies
— which was certain through the king's liking for the prince
and the passion of Mme. de Pompadour to see her " dear
Soubise " at the head of the army and the Council.
Paris-Duverney was blinded by the hatred he had to Ma-
re* chal d'Estre*es, by the unreflecting enthusiasm which the
VOL. I. — 20
306 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. IX.
taking of Minorca had inspired in him for Mardchal de Kiche-
lieu, whose bravery and audacity made Duverney conceive
the highest hopes. He knew that the king would never
willingly displace Mare*chal d'Estre*es, whom he liked, to sub-
stitute Marshal de Kichelieu, whom he no longer liked but
feared for his intrigues and his ambition. In consequence
of this, Duverney bethought him of proposing the Prince de
Soubise for the command of the army in Saxony, feeling
well assured that the marquise would sacrifice her hatred to
M. de Kichelieu if, by giving him command of the grand-
army, that of Saxony could be secured for M. de Soubise, and
that with this last expectation she would bring the king to
agree to the displacement of Mare*chal d'Estre*es. All Du-
verney 's conjectures in regard to this proved sound.
The Comte de Maillebois saw in the distance, as if assured
of it, the future disagreement of MM. de Kichelieu and de
Soubise, and, Mare*chal d'Estre*es once dismissed, he reckoned
on M. de Soubise being ruined by his inexperience, M. de
Kichelieu by his eagerness for getting money and conducting
the army as he pleased, but especially on the hatred Mme.
de Pompadour had vowed to the mare*chal since his late in-
trigues at the time of the king's attempted assassination.
All these rivals set aside, the Comte de Maillebois, brother-
in-law of M. de Paulmy, minister of war, and quartermaster-
general of the grand-army, flattered himself, not without
reason, that in spite of Mme. de Pompadour's repugnance to
him, they would be forced to give him the command of the
armies ; he did not foresee then that the Due de Broglie, by
distinguished actions, would snatch it from him, nor that he
himself would alienate his chance by the imprudence of his
conduct.
The above is the mot d'enigme of the campaign of 1757,
and almost that of the whole war, for the same intrigues and
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 307
the same personal aims thwarted all the operations of our
armies.
Piiris-Duverney, having drawn up his plan of campaign,
agreed with the parties interested that I should ask the king
for an audience, at which Duverney should read his memorial
in presence of his Majesty, Mme. de Pompadour, and M. de
Paulmy only ; it was agreed that I should not know its con-
tents for three weeks. They feared that the Mare*chal de
Belleisle, a friend of the Mare*chal d'Estre*es and an old en-
emy of M. de Eichelieu, might fetter the project ; for this
reason it was settled that I should not be informed of it
until the plan had been adopted by the king, and Mare*chal
de Eichelieu had, through a reconciliation with Mme. de
Pompadour, induced her to obtain for him the command of
the grand-army and for M. de Soubise that of the little army
in Saxony.
It is incredible that such an intrigue should have suc-
ceeded as it did, and that the king should have allowed
them to make a mystery to me of an operation which was
to put another face on the affairs of Europe with which I
was charged ; I could not myself believe it if I had not been
an ocular witness of the manoeuvre. The king, to whom I
announced Duverney's memorial, telling him that I was not
to know of its contents for three weeks, joked me about it.
I made him remark that when his Majesty knew the con-
tents himself he would inform me of them if, in his opin-
ion, it was necessary for his affairs that I should know them
earlier.
M. de Paulmy was won to the scheme by his brother-in-
law, M. de Maillebois. It was, therefore, not difficult for
P§ris-Duverney, who has both ardour and eloquence, to make
Mme. de Pompadour admire a plan which gave a fine r61e to
the Prince de Soubise, and got rid of the Mare'chal d'Estrfe,
308 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
whom she now could not endure, although it placed at
the head of the armies M. de Kichelieu, whom she disliked.
But she was so confident that M. de Soubise would beat
the King of Prussia, and that this success would make him
a marshal of France, that she consented to the choice
of M. de Eichelieu in the hope that M. de Soubise would
take his place in the next campaign ; friendship carried the
day over hatred in her heart. Thus was decided the greatest
and then most important affair for France and for Europe.
Mare'chal de Eichelieu pretended at first great reluctance
to make advances to Mme. de Pompadour, but finally con-
sented. All went well at the interview. The mare'chal
justified himself, and the marquise simulated sentiments that
were not in her heart. It was agreed that excellent troops
should be given to M. de Soubise ; but after the mare'chal
was appointed commander-in-chief of the whole army I had
great difficulty in making him cede to M. de Soubise a single
old and tried regiment ; so that before he started for the
army he had already partly quarrelled with the marquise
and shown coldness to M. de Soubise, so little master was he
of concealing his jealousy of that favourite of the king.
After the interview of Mare'chal de Kichelieu with Mme.
de Pompadour, M. Duverney communicated to me his memo-
rial in presence of the Marquis de Paulmy, the mare'chal
de Belleisle, and M. de Cre*milles. It was earlier than at
first proposed. I was not dazzled by what was specious
in the plan. I said that the kingdom would be left a prey
to invasion by England; that the expenditures would be
increased ; and that the success of the plan depended on the
events of the war, the conduct of the generals, and partly on
that of our allies. They were not at all pleased with me, but
the resolutions were already taken and they could do without
my approval. I admit, however, that I had a good opinion
1757] CAKDINAL DE BERNIS. 309
of the courage of the two generals, and that I thought Mare*-
chal de Eichelieu more eager for glory than for money ; my
only fear was for M. de Soubise,_thus imprudently confronted
with the King of Prussia.
Meantime Mare'chal de Belleisle, who had his spies every-
where, knew that something was going on to the disadvantage
of Mare'chal d'Estre*es, and that Mare'chal de Eichelieu was
likely to supplant him. He therefore wrote to d'Estre*es in
these very words : " My dear mare'chal, if you wish to con-
tinue to command the king's army, make haste to cross the
Weser, give battle, and win it." That note drew Mare'chal
d'Estre*es from his lethargy and decided him to fight the
battle of Hastembeck, which proved a victory, though he be-
lieved for some time that he had lost it, as he modestly stated
in a letter he wrote to the king after the affair. This action,
which was no great thing in itself, had great results, and
saved to France the whole country of Hanover.
Mare'chal de Eichelieu, in consequence of delaying his
departure, did not arrive until after the battle and after the
city of Hanover had sent its keys to Mare'chal d'Estre*es. All
Europe was amazed that after so considerable a victory the
command of the army was taken from the general who had
won it ; but Europe was ignorant of the intrigues of Versailles ;
it did not know that six weeks before the battle Mare'chal
de Eichelieu had already been substituted for Mare'chal
d'Estre'es.
It can be said that we have, by our conduct in the last
war, baffled all the reasonings and all the judgments of men
of sense ; this is what intrigue leads to ; this is the effect of
the passions of men and the infatuation of women.
The Mare'chal de Eichelieu had hardly taken command
of the grand-army before the Duke of Cumberland wrote
to him that he had powers from the king, his father, to
310 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
negotiate with him for the peace of Hanover and the
neutrality of that State, or for a suspension of arms. The
mare'chal replied, with much respect and dignity, that
" the king had placed him at the head of his army to fight
the enemies of his allies, and not to negotiate."
This answer conformed to the instructions of the king,
which I had given him. In them he was formally ordered
to send to Versailles all negotiations whatsoever which the
enemy might endeavour to open with him, whether on the
part of the King of England or on that of the King of
Prussia and his allies. The Mare'chal de Kichelieu re-
membered this formal command on this occasion ; he forgot
it at Kloster-Zeven a month or six weeks later. He might
at least have remembered then what the Duke of Cumber-
land had written him on his arrival respecting his powers
when that prince declared to him at Kloster-Zeven that he
had no powers, but would despatch a courier to London to
obtain them. Of two things, one : either the Duke of Cum-
berland did not tell the truth when he first wrote to the
mare'chal, or he deceived him at Kloster-Zeven in declaring
that he had no powers.
A short time after the letter of the Duke of Cumberland,
the King of Prussia wrote one to the mare*chal with his own
hand, very flattering, and proposing with jests what he
called " a trifle," — those were the very words of his Prussian
Majesty, — "a bagatelle," a mere nothing : " that of treating
for peace with the conqueror of Port-Mahon, the conqueror
of Lower Saxony, the liberator of Genoa ; " adding that if this
proposal did not displease him, he would send one of his
confidential advisers to treat with him. The mare'chal sent
us a copy of his answer, together with the original letter of
the King of Prussia. He answered the king, very suitably,
that he could only make wishes for peace, and could not
1757] CARDINAL DE BEENIS. 311
enter into any negotiation for it without the orders of the
king his master.
The letter of the King of Prussia was communicated to
the Court of Vienna, which laughed, with good reason, at
the trap laid for us to suspend the operations of the campaign
in order to give his Prussian Majesty time to recover from
his losses at Kolin, and from various other checks he had
received from time to time.
Marshal de Richelieu has since declared that it depended
on France only to make peace on that occasion ; that is to
say, during the first campaign, and at a time when the
Court of Vienna had just recovered the upper hand, when
Russia had put sixty thousand men in motion, and when all
our allies were making efforts to fulfil the obligations of
then: alliance with the Courts of Vienna and Saxony ! The
beautiful dames of Paris, over whom the marechal, old as
he is, preserves his rights, may believe this, but it is amazing
that historians and men of intelligence have given it a
thought.
Word was sent to Mare'chal de Richelieu to reply to the
King of Prussia that the king would always incline his
allies to make peace when the Empire, Saxony, and the
Court of Vienna were satisfied respecting the invasions
and damages they had suffered.
In spite of this refusal, and some time after the capitula-
tion of Kloster-Zeven, when the mare*chal thought proper
to take the totality of his army to Halberstadt in Lower
Saxony, there to levy contributions and eat up supplies
which were intended to provision our armies for the winter,
the King of Prussia, knowing that Marshal de Richelieu
would be very glad to end the war, and perhaps to weaken
our union with the Court of Vienna, because that union
strengthened the position of Mme. de Pompadour, his enemy.
312 MEMOIES AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. a.
proposed a suspension of arms during the winter, between
the French and Prussian troops. The Duke of Brunswick
asked the mare'chal to treat of this affair; the latter
refused to do so, but permitted the Marquis du Mesnil,
lieutenant-general, to hear what the duke had to say. In
fact, among them they drew up the articles of this extraor-
dinary agreement; the mare*chal had it approved at a
council of war, and all our generals, who were dying of a
desire to get back to Paris for the winter, testified that this
suspension would be very useful in a military point of view,
that they saw nothing in it that was not to our advantage,
but that it was for politics to decide whether such an
agreement could be carried out under the circumstances.
We made no mystery to the Court of Vienna of this last
attempt of the King of Prussia. That Court had not been
pleased, neither had the Swedish Senate, with the convention
of Kloster-Zeven, the coming rupture of which it foresaw ; it
was now indignant that Mare'chal de Eichelieu should again
give ear to such artifices of the common enemy. These were
indeed gross ; for this new convention secured the possession
of Saxony until the spring to the King of Prussia ; he would
then have led all his forces into Silesia to drive out the Aus-
trians ; and we should not have been more tranquil during the
winter, inasmuch as the Hanoverian army was resolved to
break the treaty of Kloster-Zeven — for I can no longer
call it a capitulation. By accepting the proposal of the
King of Prussia, we should do the greatest possible harm
to the empress-queen, in giving that monarch the ability
to assemble all his forces during six months against her;
we ourselves would have remained embarrassed before the
Hanoverian army, unable to draw any profit from the diver-
sion the army of M. de Soubise, combining with that of the
Empire, was to make in Saxony.
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 313
The King of Prussia, as it was, drew great advantages from
these parleys between the Duke of Brunswick and the
Marquis du Mesnil ; he caused to be printed the form of the
agreement drawn up between the two generals, adding
articles which gave great umbrage to several of our allies,
and making it believed for a long time that we had signed
them.
While the King of Prussia was thus setting traps for the
Mare*chal de Kichelieu, the Margravine of Bayreuth, his
much loved sister, was negotiating with me, through the
channel of Cardinal de Tencin, then living in retirement at
Lyon, and not unwilling to play once more a little role in
the world before his death. My answer to the margravine
was so concise and clear that the Court of Vienna spread
copies of it throughout the Empire. That answer calmed
the anxiety of our allies, all the more alarmed by these
Prussian tentatives because France, which a year ago was
enthusiastic over the Treaty of Versailles, had now become
Prussian ; our armies were Prussian, several of our ministers
would have been had they dared to raise the mask, and our
alliance with the Courts of Vienna and Kussia was more
criticised in Paris than in London.
My letter through Cardinal de Tencin dispersed the um-
brages of our allies. The margravine, however, was not re-
pelled ; she sent the Comte de Mirabeau [uncle of the famous
Mirabeau], my relative and her chamberlain, to me with a
letter, which I refused to unseal unless he consented that
after having read it I should place it, the original letter, in
the hands of the Comte de Staremberg, the ambassador of
the empress. M. de Mirabeau took the letter from me as
soon as he knew the use I should make of it.
Nothing is more dangerous in wars of alliance, especially
when they first begin, than to give ear to such overtures ;
314 MEMOIRS AND LETTERS OF [CHAP. ix.
they usually tend only to causing loss of time, to suspending
military operations, to sowing jealousy and distrust among
allies. Mare*chal de Eichelieu had too much intelligence
not to know how common and how easy are all such traps;
he therefore had his reasons for giving in to them ; it was
not because he was an enemy to the Court of Vienna, nor
that he was very enthusiastic over the talents of the King
of Prussia (as the whole French nation now were) ; but the
more our alliance with the empress was successful, the
more the influence of the marquise was strengthened ; he
was her enemy, and she was his enemy. Neither did it
suit him that the Prince de Soubise should play a great part.
Such are the secret motives which explain the conduct of
the marechal at Kloster-Zeven and during the remainder of
the campaign.
To return to the period after the departure of Mare*chal,
d'Estre'es, who left M. de Eichelieu the command of an army
which had just won a battle by which it brought into sub-
jection the Electorate of Hanover. Mare*chal de Kichelieu,
instead of marching directly on the Duke of Cumberland
amused himself by receiving in Hanover the honours of a
triumph that was due to his predecessor ; he gave a detach-
ment to the Due d'Ayen, with orders to levy contributions
in the Duchy of Brunswick, and he thus left time for the
Hanoverian army to reach the camp at Stade. This camp
was well fortified, but it was necessary to either perish or
vanquish if forced into it. The Elbe, very broad at that
point, was at the rear of the Hanoverian army, and there
were no boats to transport it across the river into the duchy
of Saxe-Lauenburg. It was there that Marechal de Riche-
lieu, after having lost his opportunity to vanquish the Hano-
verian army, resolved to force it with an audacity which
came of imprudence and temerity. He engaged the head of
1757] CARDINAL DE BERNIS. 315
his own army in a swampy region where it was impossible,
if it had rained for twenty-four hours only, that provisions
or artillery could reach him. If the Duke of Cumberland
had trusted more than he did to the valour of his troops,
then ill-disciplined and frightened, though two months later
under an able general they forced us to evacuate the whole
region between the principality of Halberstadt and the
Lower Khine, it was very possible, I say, that the head of
Mardchal de Kichelieu's army might have been beaten by
the Hanoverian army issuing from the intrenchments of
Stade; not succeeding, that army could have regained its
fortified camp; having succeeded, it would have discon-
certed all our projects.
We shall presently see how and where this audacious
march of Marshal de Kichelieu ended.
APPENDIX I.
THE EXPEDITION TO MINORCA.
Letter written by Marechal de Richelieu to the Abbe
Comte de Bernis.
HEADQUAKTERS, PORT-MAHON.
May 6, 1756.
I DO not know, monsieur, if you have yet arrived at your
embassy in Madrid, and I fear the illness which kept you in bed
when I left; though my last news, dated April 20, assured me
that you were beginning to go out. I hope that you will give
me news of yourself as soon as you reach Madrid; and that if
you are not yet there the Abbe de Frischmann, who will open
this letter in your absence, will send them to me.
Meantime I must render you an account of all that has hap-
pened to me since my departure from Toulon. I was welcomed
by a storm, April 13th, which scattered many of the vessels which
I had with me, — 198 sail, independently of ships of war.
Several were dismasted, others sprang a-leak and were forced to
return to Toulon, Marseille, and some to Corsica. They have all
rejoined, however, and I am only short of three feluccas laden
with subsistence-supplies, one of which was captured, as you will
see by the copy of my letter to the Marquis de Cayro, herewith
annexed.
I landed on the 18th at Ciutadella, a rather well fortified town
at the other extremity of the island from Port-Mahon, rather re-
markable for the number of its public buildings and edifices. The
English abandoned it on the approach of our fleet and while we
were disembarking. They did the same at Fournel, where there
is a rather considerable harbour, defended by a very well fortified
fort, of which I took possession next morning. Having learned
318 APPENDIX I.
that the enemy on retreating was beginning to do damage, I imme-
diately marched twenty-four companies of grenadiers, supported
by a brigade of infantry, commanded by the Marquis du Mesnil,
lieutenant-general, who drove back the enemy and camped at
Mercadal, which is about the centre of the island. I joined him
the day after with the rest of the army and sent on the Prince
de Beauvau with all the grenadiers to seize this place (Port-
Mahon) and take up a position around the fortress of Saint-Philip,
where I camped myself with the whole army on the following
day.
I have been busy since then in landing the immense quantity
of supplies necessary for the commissariat and the artillery in
taking so considerable a fortress ; and as on this island they never
saw a cart, and the mules are very small and too puny to drag
artillery, I have had to use the oxen I brought with me, and
soldiers, to drag my numerous and weighty baggage ; consequently
it is easy to see the time it has taken me to collect my gabions,
fascines, and all that is needed before beginning so important a
siege; but, finally, with infinite pains and trouble, all is now
ready, and I expect to-morrow, or, at latest, the day after, to open
the trenches.
Our squadron blockades the port, in which 1 have found two
millions worth of French property and vessels, which are now in
my power. If you have any knowledge of the plan of the harbour
you will see that it rises toward the town, so that these vessels
were able to escape at night below the cannon of the fort and
come to the foot of my terrace, where I hold them in safety. I
have seized Fort Phillippet and the whole right bank of the
harbour as you enter it, on which is the signal tower, where I
have posted a battery of mortars and cannon, which defend the
entry of the port to all attempting it, except our own squadron,
which lies at half-range from the shore, to batter all the works on
that side which overlook it.
On arriving at Ciutadella I sent a vessel to Majorca with an
aide of the quartermaster-general of my army to inquire of the
French consul what means he would have to obtain on that island
supplies for the convenience and comfort of our army, which may
be wanting on this island. I learned two days later, by a vessel
APPENDIX I. 319
sent me from Majorca, that the Marquis de Cayro, captain-general
of that island, had sent for our consul as soon as he heard of our
approach, to pay him compliments and assure him that he had
received orders from the Spanish prime-minister to preserve a per-
fect equality between the English and ourselves, which it seems
they mean to pay us in compliments. You will see by the copy
of a letter I have just written to M. de Cayro the subjects on
which I think I have reason to complain, and the representations
which, it seems to me, you ought to make about them to the
Court of Spain.
It is for you, monsieur, who are on the spot, to choose the
means to convey these complaints, and the manner of remedying
the inconveniences to which the army of the king may be put in
consequence of such conduct. It is very fatal that we should
meet with them from Spain in this conjuncture, from which she
might derive an advantage for herself which she may not find
again in a hundred years, for you know it only depends on her to
recover now an important portion of her own domain, which
would make her the arbiter of the commerce of the Mediterranean,
instead of those who have been her veritable enemies ever since
they have had possession of it. I say " her veritable enemies "
because assuredly the English are more the enemies of Spain than
of us; for they have much more to gain, and the parts of her
commerce which they are trying to tear from her in order to
attain to universal despoticity of commerce is greater in proportion
to what they get from us. ... The two kings of France and Spain
ought to be united for the interests of the two nations, being
kings of the same blood; and therefore, as you may say, one;
though by the divisions and intrigues of their Courts they are
perpetually being drawn away from the interests of their nations,
their houses, and their glory, to give profit to their common
enemies.
It is a fatality which true patriots must ever deplore; and if
your talents and your intellect do not succeed in putting things
where they should be, at a moment which seems to have an
eminent interest, so clear and so easy to satisfy, I see with grief
that we may as well renounce it forever. You will give me
great pleasure if you will write me the situation in which you
320 APPENDIX I.
find minds, and also give me news of yourself, which you can
always do by way of Barcelona.
We have heard nothing yet of Admiral Binck [Byng] and his
squadron, with which he was said to he coming. It appears that
ours, which is good and fine and in excellent condition, is de-
termined to fight him unless he arrives with very superior forces.
I scarcely dare flatter myself to reach the end of my siege "before
that event. However, if this should happen I should return to
France immediately; leaving here enough troops and munitions
to prevent the English from attempting, or at any rate succeeding
in, the slightest enterprise against this island ; which will be very
easy to do for I myself only succeeded through their fault and
the bad measures they had taken. . . .
(Added in the Duke de Richelieu's own writing.)
The ideas people had of this fortress were so different from
what it really is that we should have been crazy to undertake the
siege of it with what had been collected for that purpose before
my departure. . . . When I ordered the artillery disembarked
I asked how many days it would take to bring it before the for-
tress. The commandant, a man full of zeal and readiness to serve
us, said six months ; to comprehend the fright this gave me, I must
explain that from Ciutadella to Port-Mahon is only the distance
from Paris to Fontainebleau, and the road infinitely better in
all respects. I had to find means to bring in detail the munitions
of war, . . . and it was the soldiers who dragged the cannon
and the caissons.
APPENDIX II.
TREATY AND CONVENTIONS OF MAY 1, 1756.
Convention of neutrality signed between Her Majesty the
Empress- Queen of Hungary and Bohemia and His Very
Christian Majesty.
THE differences which have arisen between His Very Christian
Majesty and His Britannic Majesty on the subject of the bound-
aries of their respective possessions in America appearing, more
and more, to threaten the public tranquillity, Her Majesty the
Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia and His Very Christian
Majesty, who desire, equally, the unalterable duration of the
friendship and good understanding which happily exists between
them, have judged it proper to take measures for that effect.
Her Majesty the Empress-Queen declares and promises for this
object, in the most solemn and most obligatory manner possible,
that not only she will take no part, directly or indirectly, in the
above-named differences, which do not concern her and about
which she has made no pledges, but she will observe a perfect and
exact neutrality during the whole time that the war between
France and England, occasioned by the said differences, may last.
His Very Christian Majesty, on his side, not wishing to involve
any other power in his private quarrel with England, declares and
reciprocally promises, in the most solemn and most obligatory
manner possible, that he will not attack, nor invade, under any
pretext or for any reason whatsoever, the Low Countries, or other
Kingdoms, States and Provinces under the dominion of Her
Majesty the Empress-Queen; and that he will do her no harm
either directly or indirectly, in her possessions nor in her rights ;
and Her Majesty the Empress-Queen promises reciprocally in
regard to the Kingdoms, States, and Provinces of His Very
Christian Majesty.
VOL. I. — 21
322 APPENDIX II.
This convention or act of neutrality shall be ratified by Her
Majesty the Empress-Queen and His Very Christian Majesty
within the space of six weeks, or sooner, if possible.
In pledge whereof, we, the undersigned, ministers plenipoten-
tiary of Her Majesty the Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia
and of His Very Christian Majesty have signed the present act
and have appended thereto the seal of our arms.
Done at Versailles this first of May, 1756.
G. COMTE DE STAREMBERG.
A. L. EOUILLE.
F. J. DE PIERRE DE BERNIS.
Treaty of defensive union and friendship signed between Her
Majesty the Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia and
His Very Christian Majesty.
In the name of the very holy and indivisible Trinity, Father,
Son, and Holy Ghost. So be it.
Be it known to all those whom it may concern . . .
Her Majesty the Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia has
appointed and authorized the very illustrious and very excellent
seigneur, George, Count of the Holy Eoman Empire Staremberg,
councillor of the supreme aulic council of the Empire, chamberlain
of Their Imperial Majesties, and their plenipotentiary to His Very
Christian Majesty; and His Very Christian Majesty in like
manner appoints and authorizes the very illustrious and very
excellent seigneurs, Antoine-Louis Rouille, Comte de Jouy and
de Fontaine-Gue'rin, councillor in all the councils of his Majesty,
minister and secretary of State of his commandments and finances,
commander and grand-treasurer of his Orders; and Frangois-
Joachim de Pierre de Bernis, Comte de Lyon, Abbe-commanda-
taire of the royal abbey of Saint- Arnould of Metz, one of the
forty of the Academie Franchise, and ambassador extraordinary
from His Majesty to His Catholic Majesty; the which, after duly
communicating to one another their full powers in good form, of
which copies are appended to this treaty, and after duly conferring
together, have agreed upon the following articles : —
Article I. There shall be friendship and sincere and constant
APPENDIX II. 323
union between Her Majesty the Empress-Queen and His Very
Christian Majesty. . . .
Art. II. The Treaty of Westphalia of 1648, and all the
treaties of peace and friendship which since that epoch have been
concluded and now exist between Their said Majesties, and in
particular the convention and act of neutrality signed this day, are
renewed and confirmed by the present treaty in the best form and
as though they were inserted here word for word.
Art. III. Her Majesty the Empress-Queen promises and
pledges herself to guarantee and defend all the kingdoms, states,
provinces, and domains at present possessed by His Very Christian
Majesty in Europe, whether by Herself or by her heirs and suc-
cessors, without exception, against the attacks of any power
whatsoever, and for always ; the case, nevertheless, of the present
war between France and England solely excepted, conformably
with the act of neutrality signed this day.
Art. IV. His Very Christian Majesty pledges himself to Her
Majesty, the Empress-Queen, her heirs and successors, according
to the order of the pragmatic sanction established in Her house,
to guarantee and defend against the attacks of any power what-
soever, and for always, all the kingdoms, states, provinces, and
domains at present possessed by Her Majesty in Europe, without
any exception.
Art. V. In consequence of this reciprocal guarantee, the high
contracting powers will always work in concert for whatever
measures may seem to them most proper for the maintenance of
peace ; and, in the event of the States of either one of them being
threatened with invasion, they will employ their good and most
efficacious offices to prevent it.
Art. VI. But as these good offices which they here promise
to each other may not have the desired effect, Their said Majesties
oblige themselves from the present moment to succour each other
mutually with a body of twenty-four thousand men, in case one
or the other of them be attacked, by whomsoever it be, and under
whatsoever pretext it may be; the present war between France
and England on the subject of America solely excepted, as was said
in Article III of the present treaty.
Art. VII. The said succour shall be composed of eighteen
324 APPENDIX n.
thousand infantry, and six thousand cavalry, and it shall be set
in motion six weeks, or two months at latest after requisition is
made by whichever one of the high contracting parties is attacked,
or threatened with invasion in his or her possessions. This body
of troops shall be maintained at the cost of whichever of the two
high contracting parties is the one who is bound to supply this
succour, and the one who receives it will furnish winter quarters
to the said body of troops ; but the party demanding this succour
shall be free to require, in place of the said effective in men,
the equivalent in money, to be paid in specie every month; but
the said equivalent shall be estimated as a total, and neither party
shall be able under any pretext whatsoever to exact more than
eight thousand florins (money of the Empire), for each thousand
men of the infantry, and twenty-four thousand florins for each
thousand men of the cavalry.
Art. VIII. Her Majesty the Empress-Queen, and His Very
Christian Majesty, reserve to themselves the right to mutually
invite other powers to take part in this purely defensive
treaty.
Art. IX. The present treaty shall be ratified by Her Majesty
the Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia, and by His Very
Christian Majesty, and the ratifications shall be exchanged within
the space of six weeks, counting from day of signature, or earlier
if possible.
In pledge whereof we, the undersigned, ministers plenipotenti-
ary of Her Majesty the Empress-Queen of Hungary and Bohemia
and of His Very Christian Majesty, have signed the present treaty,
and have appended thereto the seal of our arms.
Done at Versailles this first of May, 1756.
G. COMTE DE STAREMBERG.
A. L. ROUILLE.
F. J. DE PIERRE DE BERNIS.
APPENDIX III.
SPEECH PRONOUNCED FOR THE KING BY THE CHAN-
CELLOR TO THE DEPUTIES FROM PARLIAMENT.
SEPTEMBER 1, 1757.
THE sentiments which animated your predecessors would not
have allowed them to take the step which the greater part of the
officers of Parliament have lately been induced to take.
The king orders you to keep always present to your minds the
obligations which your oath imposes on you. No motive can
absolve you from rendering the justice that you owe to the sub-
jects of His Majesty; magistrates appointed to administer the
laws cannot refuse to do so without becoming guilty themselves
of the evils which are the necessary result of that refusal.
On the repeated testimony which has been given to His Majesty
of your submission, and your fidelity, He willingly desires to-
day to question your hearts only, and find in your sentiments
grounds for confidence in the future.
He therefore effaces forever the memory of what has displeased
him in your past conduct, and will regard as non-existing the
resignations which you have sent him.
His Majesty has informed you, by letters which have been
addressed to you, that He is willing to replace in their offices all
those who resigned them.
In regard to those of your colleagues whom He felt himself
obliged, for special reasons, to send away, His Majesty, while
retaining them in their places, has not fixed the time of their
recall; when the king is obeyed, when you have resumed the
full exercise of your usual functions, when His Majesty is satis-
fied with the excellence of your conduct, He will listen favourably
to your appeals in this matter.
As for what concerns the second declaration (that on discipline),
the king desires that the usage may become as useless as he has
326 APPENDIX m.
judged it to be necessary; but His Majesty will not refuse to
listen to whatever his parliament may think its duty to present
to him.
He wills that the suppression ordered by his edict of December
last be executed. He will send to his parliament an inter-
pretative declaration, to the registration of which He orders you
to proceed without delay.
The king orders you to resume your ordinary functions: con-
form yourselves to his intentions.
His Majesty has nothing so much at heart as that the silence
he has prescribed for both sides shall reign throughout his
kingdom, that the peace he has desired so long may be re-estab-
lished. Though His Majesty, from superior reasons, and in view
of the general welfare, thought it his duty to rise above ordinary
rules, his parliament need not apprehend any consequences from
this in the future. The king orders you therefore to see that his
first declaration is executed, comformably to the canons of the
Church received throughout the kingdom, to the laws, and to
the ordinances.
It is by returning to these views that you will remember the
considerations of wisdom and moderation on which you ought to
regulate your conduct; give, yourselves, the example of respect
and submission which His Majesty desires shall be paid to
religion, and its ministers; it is thus that you will make a legiti-
mate use of the authority which the king confides to you.
May these sentiments be always graven on your hearts; and
remember that your sovereign is treating you, at this moment,
as a father.
INDEX TO VOL. I.
AIX-LA-CHAPBLLE (Peace of) 159; 161-
163.
ARGENSON (Marc-Pierre, Comte d'),
refuses to be on good terms with Mme.
de Pompadour, 198 ; jealousy as min-
ister of war against M. de Machault,
minister of the navy, 225, 241 ; re-
fusal of reconciliation with Mme. de
Pompadour, 283-285 ; dismissed and
exiled, 286-288; his dismissal from
ministry of war causes in a great
measure the French disasters in the
"Seven Years' War," 285; takes
his dismissal painfully, his death,
August, 1764, 289.
BAYREUTH (The Margravine of), en-
deavours to negotiate with Bernis,
313,314.
BELLE ISLE (Charles-Louis- Auguste
Fouquet, Due and Marechal de), com-
mands on the western coast of
France, 225, 226 ; enters the Council
of State, 295.
BERNIS (Fra^ois-Joachim de Pierre,
Abbe and Cardinal de), letter to his
niece, 81-84; birth and family re-
lations, 85-87 ; childhood, 88-90 ;
early education, 91-94 ; sent to Jesuit
college in Paris, 94 ; life and studies
there, 95-98; reflections on systems
of education, 98, 99 ; enters seminary
of Saint- Sulpice, life and studies
there, 99-103 ; goes to Languedoc,
104, 105; returns to Paris, Cardinal
de Fleury's prejudice against him,
106; brave struggle with poverty,
early life in the world, takes to
poetry, 107-111; acquaintance and
friendship with Cardinal de Polignac,
126, 128; goes to Auvergne and Lan-
guedoc, kindness of Massillon to him,
131, 132; his celebrated speech to
Cardinal de Fleury, 133, 134 ; is re-
fused a benefice, 135-138 ; his election
to the French Academy, 138, 140;
intercourse with men of letters, 141-
144 ; judgment on women, 144-146 ;
on great seigneurs, 147-149; origin
of his fortune, Mme. de Pompadour,
150-156; his situation in 1751, 157,
158; determines to enter public life,
166 ; appointed ambassador to Venice,
168-171 ; history of his embassy and
acts in Venice, 175-187 ; visit to
Parma, 188; takes Holy Orders in
Venice, 189 ; returns to Versailles,
190; shocked at the state of public
affairs, 195, 202 ; appointed ambas-
sador to Spain, 203 ; suddenly called
on to assist Mme. de Pompadour and
the king in negotiating an alliance
with the Court of Vienna, 204 ; the his-
tory of that negotiation, 204-21 6 ; per-
petually thwarted by the ministers,
especially Rouille', 217-219; proposes
an ultimatum to England, prepares
for the attack on Minorca, 220-228 ;
proposes terms of peace with Eng-
land which the ministry reject, 228 ;
negotiations with Vienna, 229-230;
health breaks down under physical
and mental strain, 231 ; signs Treaty
of Versailles, 232, 233, 321-324;
cabals against him in the ministry;
234-236 ; enters the Council of State,
328
INDEX.
244; his opinion as to the proper
course towards parliament, 249-252 ;
called by the king to take charge of
the affair of parliament, the principles
on which he did so, 258-264 ; success
of his course, 267-270; prediction
made to him by a minister, 271 ; his
honourable reflections on his position
and duty after the attempt on the
king's life, 280-283; induces Mme.
de Pompadour to be reconciled to
Comte d'Argenson, the latter rejects
the proposal, 283-285 ; the sermon to
him of Comte d'Argenson's last days,
289; his kind construction of Stain-
ville's (Choiseul's) sentiments to him,
298 ; made minister of Foreign Affairs
against his will, 299 ; the Margravine
of Bayreuth endeavours to negotiate
with him, 313, 314.
CHATEAUROUX (TheDuchesse de), 139 ;
her death,r!51.
CHOISEUL (Etienne-Francois, Comte de
Stainville and Due de), appointed
ambassador to Vienna, 296, 298;
persuades Rouille to resign, 300-
302.
COURT (The) its manners and morals,
112-115.
DAM i ENS (Robert-Francis), his at-
tempted assassination of Louis XV.,
272-283.
Due (M. le), failure of his ministry,
119, 120.
DUVERNEY (Joseph Paris, called P&ris-),
his advice to M. le Due, 119, makes
preparations for the attack on Mi-
norca and supplies the money to the
treasury, 221-224.
ENGLAND, outbreak of the war with,
ultimatum of France, capture of
Minorca, 220-229, 317-320.
ESTREES (Louis-Ce'sar-Charles le Tel-
lier, Comte and Marechal d'), in com-
mand of the armies, quarrels with
Paris-Duverney, 302 ; intrigues against
him led by Mme. de Pompadour in
favour of the Prince de Soubise; is
goaded to win the victory of Ilastem-
beck, 309; superseded by Marechal
de Richelieu, 309.
FLKURT (Cardinalde), afriend of BermV
father, gives advice as to his educa-
tion, 94 ; his prejudice against Bernis,
106 ; sketch of him and his career,
anecdotes concerning him, 115-125;
Bernis' famous speech to him, 133,
134.
FONTENELLE (Bernard le Bovier de),
141.
FRANCE, condition of, after the Peace
of Aix-la-Chapelle, 161-163; the gov-
ernment and ministers, 164-167 ; state
of Court and government in 1752,
172, 174; alarming condition, 191-
194; naval attack by England before
declaring war, 199 ; quarrels in the
government, 200; her military mis-
fortunes in the Seven Years' War
begin after dismissal of Comte d'Ar-
genson, 289 ; conduct of the con-
tinental war, 290-295.
FREDERICK the Great, King of Prussia,
distrust of him by France, 210, 212,
213, 216-218; on hearing of the
Treaty of Versailles assembles his
army and prepares for war, 237, 238 ;
beginning of the Seven Years' War,
240; his actions during that war,
310-313.
JESUITS (The), their college of Louis-
le-Grand in Paris, its professors and
Bernis' career there, 95-98.
KAUNITZ (Wenceslas, Comte), Austrian
prime-minister, negotiates alliance
with France, 204-216, etc.
Louis XV., beginning of his relations
with Mme. de Pompadour, 150-156 ;
speaks for the first time to Bernis,
157 ; excessive eagerness for alliance
with Austria, 206, 208; his delight
at the signing of the Treaty of Ver-
sailles, threatening letters against
IttDEX.
329
Mm, 272; his attempted assassina-
tion bv Damiens, 272-283.
LOUISE-ELISABETH DE FRANCE (Ma-
dame Infanta and Duchess of Parma),
187, 188, 190.
MACHAULT (Jean-Baptiste de), minister
of the navy, lukewarm conduct as to
the siege of Minorca, jealousy of
Comte d'Argenson, minister of war,
225 ; dismissed and exiled, 285-288 ;
how he took his disgrace, 290.
MARIA THERESA (The Empress-queen),
proposes, through Mme. de Pompa-
dour, an alliance with France, 204 ;
history of that negotiation, 204-216;
in the Seven Years' War, 240, etc.,
310, etc.
MASSILLON (Jean-Baptiste), Bishop of
Clermont, his friendly approval of
Bernis, 131, 132.
MINORCA (Island of), taking of, 224-
228, 317-320.
MiREPOix(Jean-FrancoisBoyer,Bishop
of), his refusal of benefices to Bernis,
134-138.
ORLEANS (Philippe d')/Regent, injury
done by him to religion and morals,
anecdotes relating to, 112-114, 118.
PARLIAMENT (The), sketch of its affairs
and conduct, especially in relation to
the clergy and bull Unigenitus, from
1732 to 1758, 246-271.
POLIGNAC (Melchior, Cardinal de),
sketch of him, anecdotes and poem
relating to him, 126-130.
POMPADOUR (Mme. de), beginning of
her relations to Louis XV. and to
B*ernis, 150-157; her position in
1755, 195-198; chosen by Maria
Theresa to negotiate an alliance
between France and Austria, 204;
history of negotiation, 204-216 ;
threatening letters against her, 272 ;
her perilous position and behaviour
after Damiens' attack on the king's
life, Bernis' faithfulness to her, 274-
276 ; recovers the king, and is more
secure than ever on her throne, 277,
282 ; is willing to be reconciled to
Comte d'Argenson; resolves on his
ruin, 283-285.
RICHELIEU (Due and Marechal de),
chosen by Bernis 'to command the
attack on Minorca, and takes the
island, 224-228; his letter describ-
ing it, 317-320; commands the army
on the Rhine, 309 ; negotiates with
the Duke of Cumberland, and also
with King of Prussia, 310, 311; his
blunders, 314, 315.
ROUILLE (Antoine-Louis, Comte de
Jouy), minister of Foreign Affairs,
his perverse thwarting of Bernis,
217-219; claims the credit of the
Treaty of Versailles, 233, 235, 244 ; is
made to resign by Choiseul, 300-302.
SAINT-SULPICE (Seminary of ),the Abbe
Couturier its superior, Bernis' career
there, 99-103.
SAXE (Maurice, Comte and Marechal
de), remark as to Fontenoy, 154 ; his
character, 155.
SEVEN YEARS' WAR (The) beginning
of 240; continuation, 290-315.
SOUBISE (Charles de Rohan, Prince de),
his part in the Seven Years' War, 302,
etc.
STAREMBERG (George-Adam, Comte
de), negotiates with Bernis the
Treaty of Versailles, 204, etc.
STUART (Prince Charles Edward), his
arrest and treatment, 158.
UNIGENITUS (The Bull), division of the
bishops on the subject; the pope's
action concerning it, 253, 254.
VENICE (Republic of), Bernis' embassy
there, 174-1 87.
VERSAILLES (The Treaty of), signed
May 1, 1756, and what followed, 232
etc.
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY
DC Bernis, Frangois Joachim de
135 Pierre de
B5A2 Memoirs and letters of
1902 Cardinal de Bernis
v.l
• •.:'• '.-.'•:;; ;